ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT013272743MPUpdated Nov 8, 2018Results posted

Multicenter Trial of Magnetic Mini-Mover for Pectus Excavatum

An interventional study of Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (Magnimplant) in Pectus Excavatum, sponsored by Michael Harrison. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 8 Years to 14 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-08.

Sponsored by Michael Harrison · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
8 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a Phase 3, multicenter, non-randomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the next-generation outpatient Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (3MP) in 15 patients aged 8-14 years for the correction of pectus excavatum ('sunken chest'). 3MP for pectus excavatum uses a magnetically coupled implant to pull the sternum forward and gradually remodel the deformed costal cartilage. The Funding Source for this trial is the FDA Office of Orphan Products Development (Grant #R01 FD003341).

Read the detailed description

Pectus excavatum is the most common congenital chest wall abnormality in children. The investigators have developed a novel method of achieving gradual deformation/reformation of chest wall cartilage. A magnetic force field is used to apply controlled, sustained force to promote biologic reformation of structural cartilage. A magnet is implanted on the sternum and secured through a 2-inch subxiphoid incision as a one-hour outpatient procedure. The magnet (and sternum) is pulled outward by another magnet suspended in a novel, low-profile, lightweight device previously molded to the patient's anterior chest wall. The low-profile, non-obtrusive anterior chest wall prosthesis is held in place by the force field between the two magnets.

In the single-center, FDA-funded trial (IDE G050196), the investigators tested proof of concept, safety and probable benefit of this procedure in 10. In this Phase III multicenter trial, the investigators will further test the safety and efficacy of the procedure in 15 otherwise healthy patients with moderate-to-severe PE, ages 8 to 14. The investigators will be using the next generation Magnetic Mini-Mover Magnimplant device (IDE G090006), a design the investigators believe is much improved in terms of safety and ease of implantation/explantation. Implantation of the Magnimplant will be accomplished in an outpatient procedure. The investigators will document the rate of correction by comparing chest X-ray measurement of the Pectus Severity Index prior to implantation, to that measured after the magnet is removed. Treatment will last 18-24 months, depending on correction and when the patient has completed his or her pubertal growth spurt, as documented by hand x-ray. Explant of the device will be accomplished in an outpatient procedure. The investigators will document safety with an EKG prior to implantation, one month post-implantation, and finally after the magnet is removed. The investigators will document efficacy by comparing pre- and post-treatment PSI, as well as by evaluating patient satisfaction with a post-procedure Quality of Life-type survey. Long-term follow-up will occur at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after explantation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pectus Excavatum

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Pectus excavatum
  • Chest wall deformity
  • Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure
  • Pectus Severity Index
  • pediatric medical device
  • magnetic alteration
  • sunken chest
03

In context

Funnel Chest

79 studies on the registry are indexed under Funnel Chest; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 40 across 46 interventional studies indexed under Funnel Chest.

Browse Funnel Chest studies →

Lead sponsor

Michael Harrison is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
8 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Otherwise healthy male or female with pectus excavatum deformity
  • Between 8 and 14 years of age (inclusive)
  • Pectus Severity Index > 3.5 (normal 2.56). NOTE: A pectus severity index of 3.5 or greater qualifies as a moderate-to-severe deformity, and justifies operative intervention
  • Ability to read, speak and understand English
  • Onset of rapid growth of puberty documented by hand/wrist x-ray in early to mid-puberty (defined as bone age in females of 7-13 years, and males of 9-14 years)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other congenital anomalies (including significant skeletal anomalies such as scoliosis, bony fusion involving the cervical vertebrae) not directly related to pectus excavatum
  • Bleeding disorders
  • Heart disease (including arrhythmia)
  • Persons with active implantable medical devices (AIMD) such as pacemakers
  • Persons with a relative(s) or close family friend(s) living within their households and having a pacemaker
  • Persons with arteriovenous malformations
  • Chest deformity more complicated than pectus excavatum (e.g., Poland syndrome)
  • Persons for whom a foreign body implant would pose a risk (e.g., immunodeficiency)
  • Persons at increased risk for general anesthesia (e.g., history of malignant hyperthermia)
  • Respiratory conditions that have required treatment (e.g., prednisone) in the last 3 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Inability to understand or follow instructions
  • Refusal to wear the external brace
  • Refusal to undergo monthly chest x-rays
  • Inability or refusal to return to UCSF for biweekly follow-up visits for the first month after surgery, and monthly thereafter until explant.
  • Inability to obtain pre-approval (authorization) from the patient's insurance carrier
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Arm

    This is a non-randomized study in which otherwise healthy patients, ages 8-14, with severe pectus excavatum (PSI \> 3.5) will undergo the interventional treatment arm by having outpatient surgery and the Magnetic MIni-Mover Magnimplant procedure is performed during which the magnetic implant is surgically placed. After 2 years of treatment with the implanted magnet and brace treatment, the Magnetic Mini-Mover Magnimplant will be explanted. After surgery and recovery, all subjects will be fitted for an orthotic brace, which houses the external magnet and records brace-wear compliance. They will undergo 3MP treatment for 18-24 months, enough to attempt to improve their PSI (\< 3.25).

    Device: Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (Magnimplant)

Interventions

  • DeviceMagnetic Mini-Mover Procedure (Magnimplant)

    This is a non-randomized study in which otherwise healthy patients, ages 8-14, with severe pectus excavatum (PSI \> 3.5) will undergo the Magnetic Mini-Mover procedure outpatient surgery. The Magnimplant or Magnetic Mini-Mover device implant will surgically implanted on the sternum. Patients will be required to wear a custom-fitted orthotic brace, which houses the external magnet and records brace-wear compliance. They will undergo brace treatment for 18-24 months, enough to attempt to improve their PSI (\< 3.25). Patients will be seen in clinic at least monthly until treatment is complete and the magnimplant device will be explanted from their sternum.

    Also known as: IDE G090006

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions

    All adverse reactions were recorded and reported, including complications from implantation of the device, complications from application of the external device over time (e.g., changes in skin; infection; changes in cardiac electrical function).

    Time frame: During treatment, 24 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comfort and Brace Wear During Treatment

    Comfort of the external brace directly affects compliance (i.e., bracewear) and compliance were be measured throughout treatment. In addition, the satisfaction of the patient and family will be measured using a standard Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire administered 1 month after implanting the device and 1 month after removing the device.

    Time frame: During treatment, 24 months

  2. Chest Wall Correction, by Pectus Severity Index

    Though not powered to determine efficacy, preliminary efficacy data, as measured by pre and post treatment Pectus Severity Index (Haller Index), was also collected. Pre-treatment Haller Index was assessed based on computed tomography (CT) of the chest. One month after implant removal, patients underwent repeat chest CT to evaluate chest wall correction.

    Time frame: 24 months

  3. Patient Satisfaction During the Treatment

    . Patients were asked to fill out questionnaire at 2 intervals: 1 month after explant and 1 year after explant

    Time frame: One month and one year after explant.

07

Results

Posted May 17, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTreatment Arm
Started15
Completed15
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Adverse Reactions

All adverse reactions were recorded and reported, including complications from implantation of the device, complications from application of the external device over time (e.g., changes in skin; infection; changes in cardiac electrical function).

Time frame:
During treatment, 24 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Reactions
ParticipantsTreatment Arm
Discharge home same day13
Normal EKG after implant of magnet15
Surgical site infection14
Intact cables for implant placement8
SecondaryComfort and Brace Wear During Treatment

Comfort of the external brace directly affects compliance (i.e., bracewear) and compliance were be measured throughout treatment. In addition, the satisfaction of the patient and family will be measured using a standard Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire administered 1 month after implanting the device and 1 month after removing the device.

Time frame:
During treatment, 24 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Comfort and Brace Wear During Treatment
ParticipantsTreatment Arm
Discomfort5
Tolerated Brace wear10
SecondaryChest Wall Correction, by Pectus Severity Index

Though not powered to determine efficacy, preliminary efficacy data, as measured by pre and post treatment Pectus Severity Index (Haller Index), was also collected. Pre-treatment Haller Index was assessed based on computed tomography (CT) of the chest. One month after implant removal, patients underwent repeat chest CT to evaluate chest wall correction.

Time frame:
24 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Chest Wall Correction, by Pectus Severity Index
ParticipantsTreatment Arm
Improved5
No change2
Worsened7
Statistical analysis
  • Treatment Arm · Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney) · p = 0.486
SecondaryPatient Satisfaction During the Treatment

. Patients were asked to fill out questionnaire at 2 intervals: 1 month after explant and 1 year after explant

Time frame:
One month and one year after explant.
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Satisfaction During the Treatment
ParticipantsTreatment Arm
Recommend 3MP after 1 month11
Recommend 3MP after 1 year11
Satisfaction with results at 1 month9
Satisfaction with results after 1 year8

Adverse events

Collected over 2 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Treatment Arm0/15 (0%)2/15 (13.3%)4/15 (26.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventTreatment Arm
Acute cable breakage requiring urgent explantProduct Issues1/15
Nonacute cable breakage requiring explantCardiac disorders1/15
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTreatment Arm
Post-procedure hospitalization for pain controlSurgical and medical procedures1/15
Wound infectionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/15
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/15
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/15

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Treatment Arm
Mean12 (8 to 14)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Treatment Arm
Female2
Male13
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Treatment Arm
Pectus Severity Index (Haller Index)
Pectus Severity Index (Haller Index)(Ratio)Treatment Arm
Mean4.7 (3.6 to 7.4)
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
  • UCSF-Benioff Children's Hospital
    San Francisco, California 94158, United States
  • Children's Mercy Hospitals
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Harrison MR, Curran PF, Jamshidi R, Christensen D, Bratton BJ, Fechter R, Hirose S. Magnetic mini-mover procedure for pectus excavatum II: initial findings of a Food and Drug Administration-sponsored trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Jan;45(1):185-91; discussion 191-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.10.032. PubMed 20105602 ↗
  • Harrison MR, Estefan-Ventura D, Fechter R, Moran AM Jr, Christensen D. Magnetic Mini-Mover Procedure for pectus excavatum: I. Development, design, and simulations for feasibility and safety. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jan;42(1):81-5; discussion 85-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.09.042. PubMed 17208545 ↗
  • Harrison MR, Gonzales KD, Bratton BJ, Christensen D, Curran PF, Fechter R, Hirose S. Magnetic mini-mover procedure for pectus excavatum III: safety and efficacy in a Food and Drug Administration-sponsored clinical trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Jan;47(1):154-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2011.10.039. PubMed 22244409 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The end results will be published in Journal of Pediatric Surgery June 2017

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Dec 2011 to primary completion in Nov 2016, 59 months.

Results were first posted in May 2018, 1 year 6 months after primary completion.

Of 31 interventional studies with no phase under Funnel Chest, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 68. This study's 59 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 30, 2011
First posted
Apr 1, 2011
StartActual
Dec 2011
Primary completionActual
Nov 2016
CompletionActual
May 2018
Results first posted
May 17, 2018
Last update
Nov 8, 2018
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01327274
Lead sponsor
Michael Harrison
Collaborators
Shriners Hospitals for Children, Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Responsible party
Michael Harrison (Professor of Surgery and Pediatrics, Emeritus, University of California, San Francisco) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2011
Start date
Dec 2011
Primary completion
Nov 2016
Completion
May 2018
Results posted
May 17, 2018
Last update
Nov 8, 2018

Study contacts

Michael R Harrison, MD
study director · University of California, San Francisco
Benjamin Padilla, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco
Lan Vu, MD
principal investigator · University of California, San Francisco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion