CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01313312Updated Sep 28, 2022Results posted

Dysport® Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Extension Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of Botulinum toxin type A in Nervous System Disorders, sponsored by Ipsen. Completed at 34 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-28.

Sponsored by Ipsen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
258
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles.

Read the detailed description

This was a phase III, multicentre, prospective, open label, repeat treatment cycles, extension to the double study Y-52-52120-145 (Study 145) . The study included both rollover subjects from Study 145 and de novo subjects. The primary study objective was to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with upper limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles. The secondary study objective was to assess the long term efficacy of repeated treatment with Dysport®.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nervous System Disorders
03

In context

Nervous System Diseases

974 studies on the registry are indexed under Nervous System Diseases; 252 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 258 is above the median of 48 across 623 interventional studies indexed under Nervous System Diseases.

Browse Nervous System Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Ipsen is the lead sponsor of 282 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Completion of the double blind study, Y-52-52120-145

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major limitation in the passive range of motion in upper limb
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
258 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Total Dysport®

    A total of 254 subjects in the open label study received between 1 and 5 intramuscular (i.m) injections of Dysport® according to their individual needs, for a period of up to 12 months. All subjects were administered an appropriate dosage of Dysport® (1000 Units \[U\] or 500 U) on Day 1 of treatment Cycle 1. At each study visit from Week 12 onwards, subjects were assessed to determine whether a subsequent treatment cycle was required and treatment cycles were administered at intervals of a minimum of 12 weeks apart depending on the subject's safety and efficacy response. From Cycle 2 onwards, a total dose of 1500 U could be administered in subjects requiring treatment with Dysport® in their shoulder and other upper limb muscles. Subjects who showed improvement in their upper limb during the first two treatment cycles were able to receive concomitant injections of Dysport® 500 U into at least one calf muscle, from Cycle 3 onwards as long as the total dose did not exceed 1500 U.

    Biological: Botulinum toxin type A

Interventions

  • BiologicalBotulinum toxin type A

    Dysport® was supplied to the study centres in vials containing 500 U of botulinum toxin type A (BTX-A). Depending on the dose administered up to 3 vials were required for the injection. Each vial was reconstituted with sodium chloride for injection (0.9%). A total volume of 5.0 mL of the reconstituted product was injected for Dysport® 500 U and 1000 U, and 7.5 mL was injected for Dysport® 1500 U.

    Also known as: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    A TEAE was reported as emergent if it arose (i.e. started or worsened in severity) in the treatment phase after the subject received study medication. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any adverse event (AE) that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, AESIs, severe TEAEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to withdrawal and fatal SAEs are summarised by treatment cycle.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)

    Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  3. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)

    HR was recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  4. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

    Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  5. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

    Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  6. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit

    Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  7. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)

    Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  8. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)

    Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  9. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets

    Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study or early withdrawal.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  10. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, post treatment at Week 4 and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters reported were QRS duration, PR duration, QT duration, QTcB (QT interval corrected for HR according to Bazett), and QTcF (QT interval corrected for HR according to Fridericia) at baseline and the change to end of study/early withdrawal visit (EOS).

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  11. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)

    Blood samples for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  12. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine

    Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  13. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose

    Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  14. Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR

    HR was measured by 12-lead ECG tracing, performed at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study or early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  15. Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies

    Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 of each cycle, and at the end of study/early withdrawal to test for the presence of Botulinum Toxin A Binding antibodies. Samples positive for the presence of binding antibodies were then analysed for the presence of neutralising putative antibodies. The number of subjects who were either positive (+ve) or negative (-ve) at baseline and then positive post baseline for binding or neutralising antibodies were reported.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4

    The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the overall PTMG (finger, wrist or elbow flexors) are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  2. Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG

    The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the overall PTMG at Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  3. Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4

    The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  4. Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4

    The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors at Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  5. Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4

    The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the wrist flexors are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  6. Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4

    The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction in mean MAS in the wrist flexors at Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  7. Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4

    The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the elbow flexors are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  8. Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4

    The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the elbow flexors at Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  9. Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4

    The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the shoulder extensors are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  10. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4

    The PGA is a 9-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator and the mean PGA scores during long-term open label treatment with Dysport were reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4

    At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The mean changes in DAS at Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  12. Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4

    At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least 1 grade reduction from baseline in DAS for PTT at Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  13. Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4

    The DAS is a 4-point scale. The extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least one grade reduction in DAS for each of the individual domains at Week 4 is reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  14. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG

    The Tardieu Scale (TS) was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  15. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG

    The TS was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  16. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG

    The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  17. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG

    The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors.The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  18. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG

    The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  19. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG

    The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  20. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors

    The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  21. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors

    The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  22. Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs

    The AROM was assessed by the range of extension achieved by the subject moving each joint in the PTMGs (extrinsic finger flexors, elbow flexors and wrist flexors) without assistance. A goniometer was used for measurements in the elbow and wrist flexors but not for measurements in the extrinsic finger flexors. Mean changes in AROM in the 3 possible PTMGs from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  23. Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint

    The ease of applying a splint was evaluated on a 6-point scale (0= no splint needed, -1= splint needed and applied with no difficulty, -2= splint needed and applied with mild difficulty, -3= splint needed and applied with moderate difficulty, -4= splint needed and applied with severe difficulty, -5= splint needed,but unable to apply). Mean change in ease of applying a splint from baseline to Week 4 was reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  24. Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4

    The MFS was used to measure upper limb active function. Each subject was video taped while performing specific tasks. The videos were sent to a central provider and were read and scored by two independent readers blinded to the timing of the video and to treatment. These central assessments were used for the analysis of efficacy endpoints. The MFS consists of 10 tasks asking the subject to reach, grasp, carry and release different objects of different sizes which subjects are likely to use in their daily life. Each of these tasks was rated on a 10 point scale ranging from no movement to normal movement; for each task, the score 5 is used to rate a task barely accomplished. Mean change in MFS from baseline to Week 4 was reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  25. Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit

    Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The SF-36 is a generic non-preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. Baseline results and the change from baseline to end of study/early withdrawal for the PCS and MCS are reported.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

  26. Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit

    Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems,moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean values for each dimension and the VAS scores at baseline and at the end of-study /early withdrawal are reported.

    Time frame: Up to Week 52

07

Results

Posted Jun 7, 2017

Participant flow

The study was designed as a multicentre study and included a total of 34 investigational sites in Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Russia, Slovakia and the United States of America (US) that included at least one subject. This study was an open label extension to the double blind Study 145 (Y-52-52120-145).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTotal Dysport®
Started258
Cycle 1254
Cycle 2229
Cycle 3175
Cycle 481
Cycle 511
Completed222
Not completed36
Withdrew: Adverse event5
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject18
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy3
Withdrew: Investigator decision1
Withdrew: Observational phase1
Withdrew: Subject withdrawn early in error4
Withdrew: Did not receive treatment with dysport®4

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was reported as emergent if it arose (i.e. started or worsened in severity) in the treatment phase after the subject received study medication. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any adverse event (AE) that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, AESIs, severe TEAEs, serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment related TEAEs, TEAEs leading to withdrawal and fatal SAEs are summarised by treatment cycle.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Assessment of the Long-term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsTotal Dysport®
TEAEs: Cycle 1102
TEAEs: Cycle 262
TEAEs: Cycle 347
TEAEs: Cycle 411
TEAEs: Cycle 52
Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 118
Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 28
Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 35
Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 42
Treatment related TEAE: Cycle 50
Severe TEAEs: Cycle 114
Severe TEAEs: Cycle 28
Severe TEAEs: Cycle 34
Severe TEAEs: Cycle 41
Severe TEAEs: Cycle 50
TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 12
TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 21
TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 32
TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 40
TEAEs Leading to Withdrawal: Cycle 50
AESIs: Cycle 12
AESIs: Cycle 20
AESIs: Cycle 30
AESIs: Cycle 40
AESIs: Cycle 50
SAEs: Cycle 110
SAEs: Cycle 26
SAEs: Cycle 36
SAEs: Cycle 41
SAEs: Cycle 50
Fatal SAEs: Cycle 11
Fatal SAEs: Cycle 21
Fatal SAEs: Cycle 31
Fatal SAEs: Cycle 40
Fatal SAEs: Cycle 50
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)

Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Millimeters of Mercury (mm Hg)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Millimeters of Mercury (mm Hg)Total Dysport®
Diastolic BP0 (-29 to 34)
Systolic BP-2.8 (-63 to 41)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)

HR was recorded at screening, baseline and at each post baseline visit. Vital signs were measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minute (bpm)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)
Beats per minute (bpm)Total Dysport®
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Heart Rate (HR)2.5 (-28 to 30)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Tera cells/Litre (L)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count
Tera cells/Litre (L)Total Dysport®
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count0.03 (-1.15 to 1.06)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · grams(g)/L
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
grams(g)/LTotal Dysport®
Haemoglobin-0.7 (-33 to 37)
MCHC-0.8 (-26 to 34)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit

Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of RBC in blood
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit
percentage of RBC in bloodTotal Dysport®
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Haematocrit-0.0011 (-0.104 to 0.087)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · picograms (pg)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)
picograms (pg)Total Dysport®
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)-0.33 (-5 to 4.9)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)

Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · femtoliters (fL)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
femtoliters (fL)Total Dysport®
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)-0.77 (-9.9 to 8.2)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets

Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study or early withdrawal.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Giga cells/L
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets
Giga cells/LTotal Dysport®
WBC count0.04 (-6.5 to 5.2)
Neutrophils0 (-6.8 to 5.6)
Lymphocytes0.01 (-1.9 to 1.2)
Platelets3.2 (-142 to 249)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, post treatment at Week 4 and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters reported were QRS duration, PR duration, QT duration, QTcB (QT interval corrected for HR according to Bazett), and QTcF (QT interval corrected for HR according to Fridericia) at baseline and the change to end of study/early withdrawal visit (EOS).

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds (ms)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
milliseconds (ms)Total Dysport®
QT Duration - Baseline403.6 ± 31.9
QT Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS-6.3 ± 22.1
QTcF - Baseline417.8 ± 22.9
QTcF - Change from Baseline to EOS-1 ± 15.5
QTcB - Baseline425.6 ± 25.5
QTcB - Change from Baseline to EOS1.9 ± 20.2
QRS Duration - Baseline94.9 ± 15.3
QRS Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS-0.4 ± 6.4
PR Duration - Baseline165.6 ± 25.4
PR Duration - Change from Baseline to EOS-0.3 ± 13.2
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)

Blood samples for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · International Unit/L (IU/L)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)
International Unit/L (IU/L)Total Dysport®
ALP-0.6 (-39 to 83)
SGOT1.4 (-32 to 45)
SGPT1.2 (-81 to 57)
GGT1.5 (-105 to 195)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal. Outcome measure is reported for number of subjects with data available for analysis.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine
Micromole/L (μmol/L)Total Dysport®
Total Bilirubin-0.27 (-18.7 to 12.2)
Creatinine-3.7 (-115 to 35)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose

Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at end of study/early withdrawal.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · millimoles(mmol)/L
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose
millimoles(mmol)/LTotal Dysport®
BUN-0.033 (-12.85 to 8.93)
Fasting Blood Glucose0.132 (-3.66 to 7.94)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR

HR was measured by 12-lead ECG tracing, performed at baseline, at post treatment follow up visit Week 4, and at the end of study or early withdrawal visit. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 mm/s, recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · bpm
Mean Change From Baseline to End of Study/Early Withdrawal in 12 Lead ECG - HR
bpmTotal Dysport®
Baseline68.2 ± 11.3
Change from Baseline to EOS2.7 ± 10.5
PrimaryNumber of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies

Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 of each cycle, and at the end of study/early withdrawal to test for the presence of Botulinum Toxin A Binding antibodies. Samples positive for the presence of binding antibodies were then analysed for the presence of neutralising putative antibodies. The number of subjects who were either positive (+ve) or negative (-ve) at baseline and then positive post baseline for binding or neutralising antibodies were reported.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Subjects With Botulinum Toxin A Binding and Neutralising Putative Antibodies
ParticipantsTotal Dysport®
Binding +ve at baseline5
Binding -ve at baseline & +ve post baseline20
Neutralising +ve at baseline4
Neutralising -ve at baseline & +ve post baseline11
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the overall PTMG (finger, wrist or elbow flexors) are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) in the Overall Primary Targeted Muscle Group (PTMG) for Upper Limb at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-1.4 ± 1.1
Cycle 2-1.6 ± 1.2
Cycle 3-1.5 ± 1.1
Cycle 4-1.4 ± 1.1
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the overall PTMG at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Overall PTMG
percentage of participantsTotal Dysport®
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 177.6
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 279.5
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 377.1
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 475.3
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 142.1
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 248.0
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 344.6
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 437.0
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-1.3 ± 1.1
Cycle 2-1.5 ± 1.2
Cycle 3-1.5 ± 1.3
Cycle 4-1.3 ± 1.2
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the extrinsic finger flexors at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Extrinsic Finger Flexors at Week 4
percentage of subjectsTotal Dysport®
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 178.6
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 281.3
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 380
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 480.4
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 144.1
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 249.3
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 349.5
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 437.5
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the wrist flexors are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Wrist Flexors at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-1.5 ± 1.2
Cycle 2-1.6 ± 1.3
Cycle 3-1.6 ± 1.3
Cycle 4-1.5 ± 1.2
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction in mean MAS in the wrist flexors at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Wrist Flexors at Week 4
percentage of subjectsTotal Dysport®
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 162.5
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 274.3
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 373.9
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 450
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 147.5
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 254.3
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 347.8
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 430.0
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the elbow flexors are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Elbow Flexors at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-1.0 ± 1.0
Cycle 2-1.1 ± 1.1
Cycle 3-1.1 ± 1.1
Cycle 4-0.8 ± 1.0
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4

The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The percentage of subjects at least a 1 grade reduction and at least a 2 grades reduction from baseline in mean MAS in the elbow flexors at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in MAS for Elbow Flexors at Week 4
percentage of subjectsTotal Dysport®
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 184.1
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 278.3
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 375.6
At least 1 Grade Reduction -Cycle 473.3
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 134.8
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 241.7
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 333.3
At least 2 Grades Reduction -Cycle 440.0
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4

The clinical assessment of muscle tone was performed using the MAS. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, or 4 that can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. The MAS was applied by the rater by stretching the joint through its full available range over 1 second. The mean changes from baseline to Week 4 in MAS in the shoulder extensors are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline MAS in the Shoulder Extensors at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.9 ± 1.1
Cycle 2-0.7 ± 0.9
Cycle 3-0.6 ± 1.0
Cycle 4-0.6 ± 0.8
SecondaryPhysician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4

The PGA is a 9-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator and the mean PGA scores during long-term open label treatment with Dysport were reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 11.7 ± 1
Cycle 21.9 ± 1
Cycle 31.9 ± 1
Cycle 42 ± 0.9
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4

At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The mean changes in DAS at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score for the Principal Target of Treatment (PTT) at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.9 ± 0.8
Cycle 2-1.1 ± 0.8
Cycle 3-1.1 ± 0.8
Cycle 4-1.1 ± 0.8
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4

At baseline the subject and investigator together selected one of the four DAS domains as the PTT. The selected domain was required to have a rating of moderate or severe (≥2) at baseline. The DAS is a 4-point scale, the extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least 1 grade reduction from baseline in DAS for PTT at Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Subjects
Percentage of Subjects With at Least 1 Grade Reduction in DAS for PTT at Week 4
Percentage of SubjectsTotal Dysport®
Cycle 168.5
Cycle 275.1
Cycle 373.7
Cycle 474.1
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4

The DAS is a 4-point scale. The extent of functional impairment in 4 functional domains (dressing, hygiene, limb position and pain) was rated as follows: 0=no disability, 1=mild disability (noticeable but does not interfere significantly with normal activities), 2=moderate disability (normal activities require increased effort and/or assistance) and 3=severe disability (normal activities limited). The percentage of subjects with at least one grade reduction in DAS for each of the individual domains at Week 4 is reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Number · percentage of subjects
Percentage of Subjects With at Least One Grade Reduction in DAS for Individual Domains at Week 4
percentage of subjectsTotal Dysport®
Hygiene - Cycle 140.9
Hygiene - Cycle 245.4
Hygiene - Cycle 344.6
Hygiene - Cycle 446.9
Dressing - Cycle 140.9
Dressing - Cycle 247.2
Dressing - Cycle 346.9
Dressing - Cycle 453.1
Limb Position - Cycle 155.5
Limb Position - Cycle 259.4
Limb Position - Cycle 360.6
Limb Position - Cycle 453.1
Pain - Cycle 133.1
Pain - Cycle 236.7
Pain - Cycle 342.3
Pain - Cycle 448.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG

The Tardieu Scale (TS) was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG
DegreesTotal Dysport®
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-33.5 ± 54
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2-33.9 ± 55.9
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3-43.3 ± 57.8
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4-35.9 ± 48
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 124.3 ± 36.1
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 225.9 ± 36.5
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 324.9 ± 38.7
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 421.8 ± 39.6
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 157.8 ± 55.1
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 259.8 ± 57.8
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 368.2 ± 55.6
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 457.7 ± 52.6
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in extrinsic finger flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Extrinsic Finger Flexors as PTMG
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.6 ± 0.7
Cycle 2-0.6 ± 0.8
Cycle 3-0.6 ± 0.8
Cycle 4-0.5 ± 0.7
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG
DegreesTotal Dysport®
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-26.4 ± 24.9
Angle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 2-31 ± 27.7
Angle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 3-33.3 ± 26
Angle of Spasticity (X) -Cycle 4-46.4 ± 17.3
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 1-0.4 ± 14.9
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 21.3 ± 13.3
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 32.2 ± 10.6
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 4-2.5 ± 9.4
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 126.0 ± 26.1
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 232.3 ± 28.8
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 335.5 ± 27.3
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 443.9 ± 23.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in elbow flexors.The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Elbow Flexors as PTMG
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.3 ± 0.5
Cycle 2-0.4 ± 0.7
Cycle 3-0.5 ± 0.7
Cycle 4-0.6 ± 0.5
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG
DegreesTotal Dysport®
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-23.3 ± 32.5
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2-28.8 ± 37.1
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3-21.7 ± 35.2
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4-13.5 ± 29.3
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 112.6 ± 21.3
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 216.4 ± 23.9
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 318.6 ± 30.6
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 419.0 ± 24.8
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 135.9 ± 35.0
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 245.2 ± 37.7
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 340.3 ± 33.3
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 432.5 ± 28.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG

The TS was used to measure spasticity in wrist flexors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Wrist Flexors as PTMG
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.7 ± 1.1
Cycle 2-0.9 ± 1.0
Cycle 3-0.6 ± 0.9
Cycle 4-0.3 ± 0.7
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors

The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Angle of Spasticity (X) in Shoulder Extensors
DegreesTotal Dysport®
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 1-13.3 ± 24.6
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 2-10.8 ± 30.1
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 3-6.4 ± 23.5
Angle of Spasticity (X) - Cycle 4-7.2 ± 27.4
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 17.2 ± 16.0
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 26.4 ± 23.0
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 310.7 ± 23.8
Angle of Arrest (XV1) - Cycle 410.8 ± 26.1
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 120.5 ± 22.7
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 217.2 ± 26.9
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 317.1 ± 24.5
Angle of Catch (XV3) - Cycle 418.0 ± 19.6
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors

The TS was used to measure spasticity in shoulder extensors. The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 for Spasticity Grade (Y) in Shoulder Extensors
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.1 ± 0.4
Cycle 2-0.1 ± 0.6
Cycle 3-0.2 ± 0.7
Cycle 4-0.2 ± 0.5
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs

The AROM was assessed by the range of extension achieved by the subject moving each joint in the PTMGs (extrinsic finger flexors, elbow flexors and wrist flexors) without assistance. A goniometer was used for measurements in the elbow and wrist flexors but not for measurements in the extrinsic finger flexors. Mean changes in AROM in the 3 possible PTMGs from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Active Range of Motion (AROM) at Week 4 in the 3 Possible PTMGs
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 131.3 ± 40.9
Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 234.4 ± 45
Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 333.5 ± 47.1
Extrinsic Finger Flexors: Cycle 438 ± 53.4
Elbow Flexors: Cycle 110.7 ± 25.5
Elbow Flexors: Cycle 217.6 ± 23.3
Elbow Flexors: Cycle 314.5 ± 24.1
Elbow Flexors: Cycle 413.6 ± 20.6
Wrist Flexors: Cycle 117.3 ± 28.6
Wrist Flexors: Cycle 223 ± 32.7
Wrist Flexors: Cycle 322 ± 30.9
Wrist Flexors: Cycle 43 ± 25.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint

The ease of applying a splint was evaluated on a 6-point scale (0= no splint needed, -1= splint needed and applied with no difficulty, -2= splint needed and applied with mild difficulty, -3= splint needed and applied with moderate difficulty, -4= splint needed and applied with severe difficulty, -5= splint needed,but unable to apply). Mean change in ease of applying a splint from baseline to Week 4 was reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline at Week 4 in Ease of Applying a Splint
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.4 ± 1.1
Cycle 2-0.4 ± 1.3
Cycle 3-0.4 ± 1.4
Cycle 4-0.4 ± 1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4

The MFS was used to measure upper limb active function. Each subject was video taped while performing specific tasks. The videos were sent to a central provider and were read and scored by two independent readers blinded to the timing of the video and to treatment. These central assessments were used for the analysis of efficacy endpoints. The MFS consists of 10 tasks asking the subject to reach, grasp, carry and release different objects of different sizes which subjects are likely to use in their daily life. Each of these tasks was rated on a 10 point scale ranging from no movement to normal movement; for each task, the score 5 is used to rate a task barely accomplished. Mean change in MFS from baseline to Week 4 was reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Modified Frenchay Scale (MFS) at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 10.4 ± 0.77
Cycle 20.51 ± 0.8
Cycle 30.44 ± 0.82
Cycle 40.4 ± 0.75
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit

Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The SF-36 is a generic non-preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. Baseline results and the change from baseline to end of study/early withdrawal for the PCS and MCS are reported.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL) at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
PCS Baseline37.49 ± 8.94
PCS Change1.07 ± 6.76
MCS Baseline46.88 ± 13.09
MCS Change0.96 ± 11.11
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit

Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaires prior to the study treatment at baseline and at the end of study/early withdrawal visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity (no problems, slight problems,moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean values for each dimension and the VAS scores at baseline and at the end of-study /early withdrawal are reported.

Time frame:
Up to Week 52
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in European 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL at End of Study/Early Withdrawal Visit
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Anxiety/Depression Baseline1.9 ± 0.9
Anxiety/Depression Change-0.1 ± 0.9
Mobility Baseline2.8 ± 0.9
Mobility Change0 ± 0.8
Pain/Discomfort Baseline2.1 ± 1
Pain/Discomfort Change-0.2 ± 0.9
Self-Care Baseline2.4 ± 1
Self-Care Change0 ± 0.8
Usual Activities Baseline2.8 ± 1
Usual Activities Change-0.2 ± 1
VAS Baseline63.6 ± 19.7
VAS Change2.8 ± 19

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 52. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Total Dysport®—21/254 (8.3%)142/254 (55.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 34
Most frequent serious events
EventTotal Dysport®
EpilepsyNervous system disorders2/254
Urinary retentionRenal and urinary disorders2/254
HaematomaVascular disorders1/254
Adenocarcinoma pancreasNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/254
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/254
Device malfunctionGeneral disorders1/254
Oedema peripheralGeneral disorders1/254
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/254
Affect labilityPsychiatric disorders1/254
Affective disorderPsychiatric disorders1/254
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 40
Most frequent other events
EventTotal Dysport®
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications20/254
Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders14/254
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders13/254
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/254
FatigueGeneral disorders7/254
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/254
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations6/254
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations6/254
AstheniaGeneral disorders5/254
AnxietyPsychiatric disorders5/254

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics are reported for the 254 Subjects who entered this open label study (223 from Study 145 and 31 de novo subjects) and received at least one open label injection of Dysport®.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Total Dysport®
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years201
>=65 years53
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Total Dysport®
Mean52.4 ± 14
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Total Dysport®
Female91
Male163
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Dysport®
Hispanic or Latino16
Not Hispanic or Latino238
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Dysport®
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian7
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American27
White218
More than one race2
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

34 sites
  • Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center
    Downey, California 90242, United States
  • Associated Neurologist of Southern CT, PT
    Fairfield, Connecticut 06824, United States
  • Parkinson's Disease & Movement Disorders Center of Boca Raton
    Boca Raton, Florida 33488, United States
  • Design Neuroscience Miami
    South Miami, Florida 33143, United States
  • The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    Chicago, Illinois 60611, United States
  • Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10029-6574, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Univ of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
  • Wake Forest Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Vanderbilt University
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas University of Texas
    Dallas, Texas 75390, United States
  • University of North Texas HSC at Ben Hogan Center
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
  • Université catholique de Louvain av Hippocrate 10
    Bruxelles, Belgium
  • Clinique Universitaire
    Yvoir, Belgium
  • Charles University in Prague
    Praha 2, Czechia
  • CHU Brest
    Brest, France
  • Centre de Réadaptation de Coubert
    Coubert, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Hopital Henri Mondor
    Créteil, France
  • Hopital Raymond Poincarré
    Garches, France
  • Hôpital Sébastopol
    Reims, France
  • CHU Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, France
  • Hopital Rangueil
    Toulouse, France
  • Petz Aladar County Hospital
    Gyor, Budapest, Hungary
  • National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Azienda Hospedaliero
    Catania, Italy
  • Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli
    Roma, Italy
  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne
    Krakow, Poland
  • Krakowska Akademia Neurologii
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Medical Rehabilitation Center
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Scientific Center of Neurology of RAMS
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • State University
    St Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Derer's Hospital
    Bratislava, Slovakia
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Delafont B, Carroll K, Vilain C, Pham E. Investigation of mixed model repeated measures analyses and non-linear random coefficient models in the context of long-term efficacy data. Pharm Stat. 2018 Sep;17(5):515-526. doi: 10.1002/pst.1868. Epub 2018 May 20. PubMed 29781237 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01313312
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 11, 2011
Start date
Nov 2011
Primary completion
Dec 2014
Completion
Dec 2014
Results posted
Jun 7, 2017
Last update
Sep 28, 2022

Study contacts

Ipsen Study Director
study director · Ipsen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion