ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01289626Updated May 20, 2014

Efficacy of Lanthanum Carbonate in Calciphylaxis

A Phase 1 interventional study of lanthanum carbonate and Lanthanum for calciphylaxis in Calciphylaxis, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-20.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The research question and primary aim is to determine if lanthanum carbonate is effective in treating calciphylaxis by measurement of complete or partial remission of skin lesions. Secondary endpoints will be measured to determine if lanthanum carbonate can lower calcium-phosphorus product levels, intact PTH and mortality. Albumin levels will be measured as a marker of nutritional status and inflammation.

Read the detailed description

Calciphylaxis or calcific uremic arteriolopathy is an infrequently occurring although debilitating vasculopathy seen primarily in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD) which almost always affects the skin. It has a prevalence rate \~4 % in long term hemodialysis patients, with 1-year survival of 45% and an 8-fold risk of death as compared to the general dialysis population. (Surgery 1997;122:1083-1089, Kidney Int 2001;60:324-332). Despite being described in the literature for over 100 years, there has been no proven effective therapy. Lanthanum carbonate (FOSRENOL®) is a potent non-aluminum, non-calcium phosphate binder that was approved for use to reduce serum phosphate levels in patients with end stage renal disease. Since the proposed etiologic mechanism of injury and vascular calcification of calciphylaxis is predominantly hyperphosphatemia, elevated serum PTH, and hypercalcemia, FOSRENOL® would be an ideal pharmacologic agent to utilize in this extremely enigmatic disease (Dermatol Clin. 2008 Oct;26(4):557-68). Furthermore, a recent case report demonstrated a significant improvement in laboratory parameters and calciphylaxis skin lesions with the use of FOSRENOL® (WMJ. 2008 Nov;107(7):335-8). The primary hypothesis is that since calciphylaxis represents the ultimate sequelae of metastatic vascular calcification predominantly involving hyperphosphatemia, elevated serum PTH, and hypercalcemia, FOSRENOL® will be efficacious in its treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Calciphylaxis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Calciphylaxis, dialysis
03

In context

Calciphylaxis

23 studies on the registry are indexed under Calciphylaxis; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 28 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Calciphylaxis.

Browse Calciphylaxis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,188 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Of its 157 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • i Participants will have signed a witnessed . ii Participants will be greater than or equal to 18 years of age iii Chronic renal failure receiving hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis iv A diagnosis of calciphylaxis proven by skin or initial dermatology visit within the previous 5 year v Serum phosphorus > 4.5 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • i Participants are not able to understand or provide written ii The research team deems that the participant may not be able to follow the study protocol.

iii Non-dependent HD patients receiving dialysis while in acute kidney injury; iv Pregnant dialysis patient v Active gastrointestinal obstruction or bleed vi Active inflammatory bowel disease vii Acute arteriovenous graft occlusion viii Known to FOSRENOL®

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • FOSRENOL® will be administered orally in a dose of 1500- 3750 mg daily in divided doses with meals. Dose escalation will be utilized to a target dose of 3750 mg daily or as designated by clinician over a 4-week period from start of study. The drug will be administered for 12 weeks.

  • DrugLanthanum for calciphylaxis

    Lanthanum use in calciphylaxis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Remission of calciphylaxis skin lesions

    The primary aim of this study will be the complete or partial remission of calciphylaxis skin lesions after 12 weeks of therapy as defined by the clinician.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measurement of phosphorus

    Improvement in phosphorous control (target concentrations of 3.5 - 5.5 mg/dL) will also be monitored to correlate the relationship between phosphorous levels and calciphylaxis.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Intact PTH

    Secondary aim will be the control of laboratory parameters of intact PTH

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Albumin

    Secondary aim will be the control of laboratory parameters of albumin

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Quality of life

    Demonstration of improved DLQI (Dermatology Life Quality Index, http://www.dermatology.org.uk/quality/quality-dlqi-questionnaire.html) scores

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Wisconsin Hospitals
    Madison, Wisconsin 53705, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2011, a primary completion of Mar 2013 and a completion of May 2013. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2011
First posted
Feb 4, 2011
Start
Feb 2011
Primary completionActual
Mar 2013
CompletionActual
May 2013
Last update
May 20, 2014
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01289626
Collaborators
Shire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 4, 2011
Start date
Feb 2011
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
May 2013
Last update
May 20, 2014

Study contacts

Micah Chan, MD MPH
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Lanthanum carbonate

Start the discussion