ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01274702VISIONUpdated Jul 29, 2021

Visual Reconstitution Therapy After Optic Neuritis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Visual Reconstitutions Therapy and Saccadic Eye Movement Training in Optic Neuritis and Multiple Sclerosis, sponsored by Friedemann Paul. Completed at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-07-29.

Sponsored by Friedemann Paul · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Incomplete remission after an optic neuritis attack is not uncommon. Visual reconstitution therapy is a software-based approach that has been shown to substantially improve residual visual field deficits in patients with pre- and postchiasmatic lesions.

The primary hypothesis of this randomized, controlled clinical trial is, that visual reconstitution therapy is superior to active comparator treatment in improving the visual field after optic neuritis.

Read the detailed description

Patients with an acute optic neuritis (between 60 and 180 days before screening) or with residual visual deficits after a past optic neuritis are randomized in two treatment groups. Group A is instructed to perform software-based visual reconstitution therapy on a home PC daily and regularly for 30 minutes over a period of six month. Group B will perform a similarly, also software-based training program, developed to improve saccadic eye movements rather than visual fields. Patients are blinded to the respective treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Optic Neuritis
  • Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

  • History of
  • Patients
  • acute
03

In context

Optic Neuritis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Optic Neuritis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 50 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Optic Neuritis.

Browse Optic Neuritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Friedemann Paul is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Definite Optic Neuritis within 60-180 Days or \< 12 months before Screening
  • Visus > 0.05
  • Visus \< 0.7 or confirmed visual field deficit
  • Ability to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Systemic Treatment with Glucocorticosteroids within 30 days prior to Screening
  • Additional significant ophthalmological disease
  • Pregnancy
  • History of Epilepsy
  • Significant arterial Hypertension
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Visual Reconstitution Therapy

    Other: Visual Reconstitutions Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Saccadic Eye Movement Training

    Other: Saccadic Eye Movement Training

Interventions

  • OtherVisual Reconstitutions Therapy
  • OtherSaccadic Eye Movement Training
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Visual field

    visual field perimetry and kampimetry at baseline and after 3 and 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. structural retinal changes

    Optical coherence Tomography is performe at baselline and after 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Quality of Life

    Quality of life is determined by questionaires at baseline and after 6 months

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • NeuroCure Clinical Reserach Center, Charité Universitaetsmedizin
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schinzel J, Schwarzlose L, Dietze H, Bartusch K, Weiss S, Ohlraun S, Paul F, Dorr J. Efficacy of vision restoration therapy after optic neuritis (VISION study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Jun 28;13:94. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-94. PubMed 22742888 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 29, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01274702
Lead sponsor
Friedemann Paul
Collaborators
Beuth Hochschule für Technik Berlin, NovaVision AG, Zentrum für Sehtherapie
Responsible party
Friedemann Paul (Prof. Dr., Charite University, Berlin, Germany) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jan 11, 2011
Start date
May 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2013
Completion
Mar 2013
Last update
Jul 29, 2021

Study contacts

Friedemann Paul, MD
principal investigator · NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité Universitaetsmedizin Berlin

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion