ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06453694PET-AONUpdated Oct 28, 2026

Efgartigimod for the Treatment of Acute Optic Neuritis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Efgartigimod Alfa and Placebo in Optic Neuritis, sponsored by Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Updated Oct 28, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to test efgartigimod alfa against placebo in adults with first-time optic neuritis (optic nerve inflammation). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is it feasible to use efgartigimod alfa for optic neuritis?
  • Is it feasible to run a larger trial testing efgartigimod alfa in optic neuritis?
  • Does efgartigimod alfa work better than placebo in improving how quickly and how much vision returns?

Participants will:

  • have their vision and blood tested
  • be asked questions about their vision
  • will receive standard of care treatment with steroids regardless of whether they are receiving efgartigimod alfa or not
  • will have periodic visits over 6 months
Read the detailed description

This study is designed as a pilot, single-site, randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-arm, parallel-group clinical trial comparing efgartigimod alfa in addition to standard of care (IV steroids with a standardized oral taper) to standard of care with placebo, with an option for rescue therapy with plasma exchange for all participants in the case of poor therapeutic response.

02

Conditions studied

  • Optic Neuritis

Keywords

  • Optic neuritis
  • Inflammatory optic neuropathy
  • Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein Antibody Disease (MOGAD)
  • Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)
  • Multiple Sclerosis
03

In context

Optic Neuritis

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Optic Neuritis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 50 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Optic Neuritis.

Browse Optic Neuritis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Provision of signed and dated form
  2. Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  3. Adults aged 18 years or older
  4. Diagnosed with a first episode of optic neuritis, based on clinical presentation (i.e. typical features such as pain with eye movements, color vision changes, subacute presentation, and visual acuity loss) and confirmed by contrast enhancement or T2 hyperintensity of the optic nerve on MRI brain or orbits using a 1.5T MRI scanner or greater
  5. Onset of optic neuritis-related vision changes (does not include headache, eye pain, or pain with eye movements), as defined by decreased visual acuity, subjectively reported blurred vision, or optic nerve enhancement on MRI brain or orbits, within 10 days (inclusive) of enrollment. If optic neuritis is bilateral, then enrollment must occur within 10 days of vision changes in the first affected eye.
  6. Best-corrected high contrast visual acuity (HCVA) in the worse affected eye on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) eye chart of logMAR 0.48 (20/60) or worse.
  7. For females of : negative urine or serum pregnancy test at screening or use of highly effective for at least 1 month prior to screening and agreement to use such a method during study participation and for an additional 8 weeks after the end of efgartigimod administration
  8. For males of reproductive potential: use of condoms or other methods to ensure effective contraception with partner

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current pregnancy or lactation
  2. Known allergic reactions or intolerance to efgartigimod, methylprednisolone, prednisone, or gadolinium or any of their components
  3. Known diagnosis of optic neuropathy preceding the current episode of optic neuritis
  4. Evidence of a systemic disease other than MS, NMOSD, or MOGAD that might be associated with the optic neuritis
  5. Receiving systemic immunomodulatory or therapy at the time of enrollment or planned receipt within 3 weeks of treatment. Initiation of immunotherapy more than 3 weeks after the second dose of efgartigimod is not an exclusion criterion and is permitted.
  6. Known diagnosis of CNS demyelinating disease (MS, NMOSD, MOGAD) prior to present attack.
  7. Any visually-significant ocular pathology (i.e. retinal problems, cataracts, glaucoma etc.) in the affected eye that led to known best-corrected visual acuity deficits in participants prior to onset of optic neuritis. Congenital color-blindness is not disqualifying.
  8. Alternative explanation for visual changes detected on fundoscopic exam and slit lamp examination.
  9. Enrollment in another clinical study involving an treatment given within 2 months of enrollment in the present study.
  10. to MRI or plasma exchange
  11. Has received >3 days of high-dose (IV or PO) for the treatment of the current episode of acute optic neuritis by the time of randomization. Randomization may occur at the latest on the next day after completion of 3rd dose of steroids.
  12. Known disease or common variable immunodeficiency
  13. History of unless considered cured by adequate treatment with no evidence of recurrence for ≥1 year before the first administration of IMP. Adequately treated participants with the following cancers may be included at any time:

    1. Basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer
    2. Carcinoma in situ of the cervix
    3. Carcinoma in situ of the breast
    4. Incidental histological finding of prostate cancer (TNM stage T1a or T1b)
  14. uncontrolled active or chronic bacterial, viral, or fungal infection
  15. Clinically significant recent major surgery (within 1 month of screening), or intends to have surgery during the study
  16. Any conditions or circumstances that in the opinion of the investigator may put the participant at undue risk, confound the results of the study, or otherwise make the participant unsuitable for the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Reproductive potential

Able to have children. For women this usually means from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery; for men, unless permanently sterile. Read who the line is about — participants, women, men, or their partners.

Criteria about it usually ask for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Efgartigmod alfa

    10 patients will receive efgartigimod alfa All participants will receive standard of care high dose corticosteroids for 3 days with a prednisone taper over 3 weeks.

    Drug: Efgartigimod Alfa

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    10 patients will receive placebo. All participants will receive standard of care high dose corticosteroids for 3 days with a prednisone taper over 3 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • 2,016 mg will be administered subcutaneously by a healthcare provider on Day 0 and Day 3 of the trial. Rescue therapy with therapeutic plasma exchange will be given to any participant based on the results of Day 7 evaluation.

    Also known as: Vyvgart Hytrulo

  • DrugPlacebo

    Subcutaneous injection of placebo will be administered by a healthcare provider on Day 0 and Day 3 of the trial. Rescue therapy with therapeutic plasma exchange will be given to any participant based on the results of Day 7 evaluation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment Rate

    Number of enrolled participants per month

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Study Adherence Rate

    Proportion of randomized participants who receive both doses of assigned study intervention, attend all assigned study visits, and complete at least the high contrast visual acuity, low contrast visual acuity, and Pelli-Robson assessments at all visits

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Change in high contrast visual acuity for effect size and standard deviation estimation

    Difference in change in high-contrast visual acuity from baseline to 1 month between groups

    Time frame: 1 month

  4. Change in low contrast visual acuity for effect size and standard deviation estimation

    Difference in change in low contrast visual acuity (LCVA) (# of letters seen at 2.5% illumination) from baseline to 1 month between groups

    Time frame: 1 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Retention rate

    Percentage of enrolled subjects who remain in the study and do not voluntarily withdraw

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. Screen failure rate

    Percentage of participants who fail screening

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Pre-screen failure rate

    Percentage of participants who fail pre-screening

    Time frame: 2 years

  4. Drug adherence rate

    Percentage of randomized participants who receive 2 full doses of their assigned study intervention

    Time frame: 2 years

  5. Full improvement in visual acuity (high contrast)

    Proportion of participants with full improvement in high contrast visual acuity

    Time frame: 30 days

  6. Full improvement in visual acuity (low contrast)

    Proportion of participants with full improvement in low contrast visual acuity

    Time frame: 30 days

  7. Personal maximal improvement (high contrast)

    Proportion of participants with personal maximal improvement in high contrast visual acuity (defined as individual final visual acuity at 6 months)

    Time frame: 30 days

  8. Personal maximal improvement (low contrast)

    Proportion of participants with personal maximal improvement in high contrast visual acuity (defined as individual final visual acuity at 6 months)

    Time frame: 30 days

  9. Improvement in high contrast visual acuity at 3 months

    Difference in change in high contrast visual acuity from baseline to 3 months between groups

    Time frame: 3 months

  10. Improvement in high contrast visual acuity at 6 months

    Difference in change in high contrast visual acuity from baseline to 6 months between groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  11. Rescue treatment

    Number and proportion of patients in each arm requiring rescue treatment

    Time frame: Day 7

  12. Difference in change in low contrast visual acuity from baseline to 6 months between groups

    Difference in change in low contrast visual acuity (# of letters seen at 2.5% illumination) from baseline to 3 months between groups

    Time frame: 3 months

  13. Difference in change in low contrast visual acuity from baseline to 6 months between groups

    Difference in change in low contrast visual acuity (# of letters seen at 2.5% illumination) from baseline to 6 months between groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  14. The number and proportion of participants with low contrast visual acuity of 0

    The number and proportion of participants with low contrast visual acuity of 0

    Time frame: 30 days

  15. Contrast sensitivity

    Difference in change in Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score (# of letters seen at 2.5% illumination) from baseline to each assessment time point between groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  16. Color Vision

    Difference in change in Hardy-Rand-Rittler color vision score from baseline to each assessment time point between groups. Scores range from 0 (lowest) to 6 (highest).

    Time frame: 6 months

  17. Visual fields

    Difference in change in Humphrey Visual fields score from baseline to each assessment time point between groups. Data derived from automated perimetry are continuous and expressed in decibels. The mean deviation calculated from a Humphrey Visual Field analyzer (24-2 fast paradigm) represents the difference between an individual's test performance and the performance of a normally-sighted control of the same age.

    Time frame: 6 months

  18. Vision Related Quality of Life

    National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VFQ-25) scores at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months in each arm. Scores range from 0 = worst to 100 = best

    Time frame: 6 months

  19. Efgartigimod safety measures

    Frequency and type of overall adverse events, treatment-related adverse events, and serious adverse events

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Number and proportion of patients enrolled within 3, 5, 7, and 10 days of visual symptom onset

    Number and proportion of patients enrolled within 3, 5, 7, and 10 days of visual symptom onset

    Time frame: Day 0

  2. Contrast enhancement

    Number and proportion of patients enrolled with contrast enhancement of the optic nerves on MRI

    Time frame: Day 0

  3. Median duration (in days) from onset of blurry vision or visual acuity change to randomization

    Median duration (in days) from onset of blurry vision or visual acuity change to randomization

    Time frame: Day 0

  4. Median duration (in days) from onset of eye pain or headache to randomization

    Median duration (in days) from onset of eye pain or headache to randomization

    Time frame: Day 0

  5. Number and proportion of overall participants with each diagnosis

    Number and proportion of overall participants with a final diagnosis of AQP4+ NMOSD, seronegative NMOSD, MOGAD, MS-related optic neuritis, idiopathic acute optic neuritis, or other diagnosis

    Time frame: Day 30

  6. Proportion amongst screened and recruited participants with HCVA of each visual acuity severity

    Proportion amongst screened and recruited participants with HCVA worse than logMAR 0.48 (20/60), logMAR 0.7 (20/100), and logMAR 1 (20/200)

    Time frame: Day 0

  7. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 1 month between groups

    Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 1 month between groups

    Time frame: 1 month

  8. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 3 months between groups

    Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 3 months between groups

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 6 months between groups

    Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness at 6 months between groups

    Time frame: 6 months

  10. Ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness at 1 month between groups

    Ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness at 1 month between groups

    Time frame: 1 month

  11. Ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness at 3 months between groups

    Ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness at 3 months between groups

    Time frame: 3 months

  12. Ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness at 6 months between groups

    Ganglion cell layer (GCL) thickness at 6 months between groups

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
    Recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
    Recruiting
    • Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH · Contactavishnevetsky@mgb.org · 617-726-8639
    • Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH · Principal investigator
    • Denis T Balaban, MD · Sub investigator
    • Michael Levy, MD, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Marc Bouffard, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026→Jun 2027
Oct 28, 2026
Study completion
Jul 2027→Jun 2028
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    Primary completion Dec 2026→Jun 2027
    Study completion Jul 2027→Jun 2028
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06453694
Lead sponsor
Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH
Collaborators
argenx
Responsible party
Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH (Attending Physician in Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Jun 12, 2024
Start date
Aug 12, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Anastasia Vishnevetsky, MD, MPH
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Efgartigimod alfa

Start the discussion