CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01260935Updated Jan 18, 2012

Comparison of Laparoscopic Hill and Laparoscopic Nissen Anti-Reflux Procedures

An interventional study of Laparoscopic Hill Repair and Laparoscopic Nissen Repair in Gastroesophageal Reflux, Esophageal Reflux and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, sponsored by Swedish Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-01-18.

Sponsored by Swedish Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
121
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects (good and bad) of the Laparoscopic Hill anti-reflux procedure with the Laparoscopic Nissen anti-reflux surgical procedure to see whether one is better than the other.

Read the detailed description

The design is a two-armed prospective single-blinded comparison between the two procedures, performed and randomized independently at the Swedish Medical Center Cancer Institute in Seattle, WA, and at Legacy Health Systems in Portland, OR, in adult patients with uncomplicated gastroesophageal reflux failing medical management. A standardized operative technique for each procedures will be utilized at both institutions, and will include intraoperative manometrics and intraoperative photographic documentation of the gastroesophageal valve, as well as placement of clips at the GE junction to accurately identify its location post-operatively. To eliminate "expertise" bias, the investigator from each institution will participate in up to 50 of the first of each of the two procedures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroesophageal Reflux
  • Esophageal Reflux
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
  • GERD

Keywords

  • GERD
  • laparoscopic surgery
  • gastroesophageal
  • reflux
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 121 is above the median of 72 across 712 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

Swedish Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • abnormal levels of gastroesophageal reflux documented by pH monitoring who are failing medical management or are requiring maximal medical therapy for control
  • > 18 years of age and \< 75 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • hiatal hernias measuring > 7 cm
  • esophageal body amplitude \< 30 or in two or more segments
  • \< 40% propagated peristaltic waves
  • GE junction > 5 cm above the esophageal hiatus
  • dense fibrotic esophageal strictures which do not markedly improve with pre-operative medical therapy
  • body mass index > 40
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
121 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A

    Laparoscopic Hill

    Procedure: Laparoscopic Hill Repair

  • Active comparator
    Arm B

    Laparoscopic Nissen

    Procedure: Laparoscopic Nissen Repair

Interventions

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic Hill Repair

    With the Hill repair, stitches are placed right where the esophagus and stomach meet and attached to muscle tissue that is fixed to the spine.

  • ProcedureLaparoscopic Nissen Repair

    With the Nissen repair, the upper part of the stomach is wrapped around the esophagus, with some anchoring of the wrap at several locations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Determine whether Laparoscopic Hill repair is as effective as Nissen fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

    Comparison of these two surgical procedures will be based on pre- and post-surgery quality of life questionnaires, manometry (test that measures muscle pressures in the lower esophagus), pH testing, operative time, early complication rates, and length of hospital stay.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Swedish Medical Center Cancer Institute
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01260935
Lead sponsor
Swedish Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 15, 2010
Start date
Nov 2002
Primary completion
Nov 2010
Completion
Nov 2010
Last update
Jan 18, 2012

Study contacts

Ralph Aye, MD
principal investigator · Swedish Medical Center Cancer Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion