A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Local intercostal nerve block and Cryo-analgesia and intercostal nerve block in Postoperative Pain, Acute and Postoperative Complications, sponsored by Swedish Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-23.
Sponsored by Swedish Medical Center · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
A pilot randomized controlled trial comparing intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-ablation plus intercostal nerve blocks, and serratus plane catheter plus intercostal nerve blocks in patients undergoing esophagectomies with minimally invasive thoracic approaches.
Pilot study planned to consent 30 patients in total with a projected study timeline of 2-3 years for completion. Participants will be enrolled in the study and randomized in their preoperative clinic visit. On the day of surgery, they will receive the intervention they were randomized to. 10 patients will be randomized to the intercostal block group, 10 patients will be randomized to the cryo-ablation plus intercostal block group, and 10 patients will be randomized to the serratus plane catheter plus intercostal block group. They will be followed throughout their hospital stay until discharge for data collection purposes. Once the patient is discharged from the hospital, post-operative follow-up in the Swedish Thoracic Surgery Clinic will be collected up to 1 year post-operatively.
5,089 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,137 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 75 across 4,341 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.
Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →Swedish Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
All adult individuals who undergo an esophagectomy with an intended minimally invasive approach of the chest at Swedish Medical Center-First Hill. These approaches include:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients receiving intercostal blocks will receive a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.
Procedure: Local intercostal nerve block · Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter
Patients receiving cryo-analgesia and intercostal blocks, the patient will receive cryo-ablation prior to the intercostal block. The cryo-ablation will occur 2 cm from the sympathetic chain 2 intercostal spaces above and 2 intercostal spaces below the access incision. The patient will also receive a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.
Procedure: Cryo-analgesia and intercostal nerve block · Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter
Patients receiving serratus plane catheter blocks and intercostal nerve blocks, a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine will be administered. A total of 20 cc of the weight-based calculation will be reserved for the serratus plane catheter. The remaining local anesthetic will be divided into two-thirds for the chest and one-third for the abdomen. Patients with serratus plane catheters will have an ongoing infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 ml per hour. The serratus plane catheters will also receive a bolus of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine on Post Operative Day (POD) #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 by the pain service.
Procedure: Serratus plane catheter blocks and intercostal nerve blocks · Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter
Patients receiving intercostal blocks will receive a total of 1.0 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.
The cryo-ablation will occur 2 cm from the sympathetic chain 2 intercostal spaces above and 2 intercostal spaces below the access incision. The patient will also receive a total of 1.2 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine. This will be divided into two-thirds allocated for use in the chest/intercostal block and one-third allocated for use in the abdomen.
Also known as: Cryo-ablation
A total of 1.2 cc/kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine + epinephrine will be administered. A total of 20 cc of the weight-based calculation will be reserved for the serratus plane catheter. The remaining local anesthetic will be divided into two-thirds for the chest and one-third for the abdomen. Patients with serratus plane catheters will have an ongoing infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 8 ml per hour. The serratus plane catheters will also receive a bolus of 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with epinephrine on POD #1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 by the pain service.
The pain service and thoracic surgery attending physician will assess if the patient's pain is not well-controlled using the pain modality they are randomized to. If additional pain control is needed, this will likely consist of a thoracic epidural catheter. Any additional pain control will be added as an adjunct to the study arm and will be noted in the data set.
Post Operative Pain Change Over Time
Compare post-operative pain score changes over time between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Baseline (prior to OR) to every 12 hours postoperatively thru Post Operative Day 4.
Post Operative Pain
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Baseline (Prior to OR)
Post Operative Pain
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post-Op Time 0
Post Operative Pain Day 1 (AM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 1 (AM)
Post Operative Pain Day 1 (PM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 1 (PM)
Post Operative Pain Day 2 (AM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 2 (AM)
Post Operative Pain Day 2 (PM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 2 (PM)
Post Operative Pain Day 3 (AM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 3 (AM)
Post Operative Pain Day 3 (PM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 3 (PM)
Post Operative Pain Day 4 (AM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 4 (AM)
Post Operative Pain Day 4 (PM)
Compare single timepoint post-operative pain scores between intercostal nerve blocks, cryo-analgesia, and serratus plane catheters in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy. Patients will be asked specifically about thoracic/chest pain and asked to rate this pain on a Likert pain scale of 0-10, 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst pain they can imagine.
Time frame: Post Operative Day 4 (PM)
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Swedish Medical Center