An interventional study of CBT and Clinical Management in Breast Cancer, Depression and Anxiety, sponsored by Wenzhou Medical University. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to female participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-01.
Sponsored by Wenzhou Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy on depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients.
Comprehensive intervention on depression and anxiety in breast cancer patients is a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, blinded controlled clinical study, which uses cognitive-behavioral therapy. This study tries to evaluate the efficacy of sequential therapy on breast cancer patients' depression and its improvement on breast cancer patients' life quality, pain and sleeping.
12,544 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 2,892 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 392 is above the median of 72 across 9,303 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.
Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →Wenzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 93 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Exit criteria:
The group will receive clinical management treatment only each session.
Behavioral: Clinical Management
The experimental group will receive CBT
Behavioral: CBT
Participants with breast cancer in the control group received standard medical care, but don't receive any other interventions.
The subjects will receive standardized CBT treatment regularly for 9 sessions(once per week in the first month and once half a month in the second and third months), and each session will last for about 60 minutes.The treatment includes three steps:Concept stage (the first and second sessions): establishment of therapeutic relationships with the subjects; Skills acquisition and repeat stage (the third session to the 8th session): clarification of sources of stress, patients' cognitive and behavioral response to stress. Application and complete price segment (the 9th session): return visit to test efficacy of psychological intervention.
Also known as: cognitive-behavioral intervention, psychological intervention
Clinical management is a clear contrast method of psychological therapy, which is a half-structured interview and lasting for 20-25 minutes each session. Clinical management will be assigned to both experimental group and controlled group in the first stage of intervention. Following are major elements: Talk to the subjects to find their main problems; introduce knowledge and medication knowledge about cancer and depression; subjects reporting use of drugs for cancer and depression and a variety of signs and symptoms of the reaction. Encourage patients to adhere to drug treatment and to comply with this research program; The operation of CBT and clinical management should be conducted by the same person as far as possible.
Also known as: Placebo of Cognitive-Behavioral therapy
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17)
1. The scale(HAMD-17) is used to assessed the depression symptoms of patients. 2. The scale range is 0-53.Higher value represents a worse outcome. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,2 week,4 week,8 week,12 week,16 week,24 week
Time frame: baseline,2 w,4 w,8 w,12 w,16 w,24 w
Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA-14)
1. The scale(HAMA-14) is used to assessed the anxiety symptoms of patients. 2. The scale range is 0-56.Higher value represents a worse outcome. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,2 week,4 week,8 week,12 week,16 week,24 week.
Time frame: baseline,2 w,4 w,8 w,12 w,16 w,24 w
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
1. The scale is used to assess the pain intensity of patients. 2. The scale range of VAS is 0-10. Higher score indicates a higher intensity of pain. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,4 week,8 week,12 week,24 week
Time frame: baseline,4 w,8 w,12 w,24 w
Athens Insomnia Scale(AIS)
1. The scale is used to assess the sleep quality of patients. 2. The scale range of AIS is 0-21. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,4 week,8 week,12 week,24 week
Time frame: baseline, 4w,8w,12w,24w
Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment (FACT-B)
1. The scale is used to assess the life quality of patients. 2. The scale includes 5 subscales. The scores of each scale are summed to compute a total score. 3. The scale range is 0-144. Higher score indicates better life quality. 4. The scale was assessed at baseline,4 week,12 week,24 week.
Time frame: baseline, 4w,12w,24w
| Milestone | Stage 1 Clinical Management | Stage 1 CBT | Stage 1 Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 98 | 98 | 196 |
| Completed | 90 | 91 | 175 |
| Not completed | 8 | 7 | 21 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 6 | 4 | 11 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 2 | 3 | 10 |
1. The scale(HAMD-17) is used to assessed the depression symptoms of patients. 2. The scale range is 0-53.Higher value represents a worse outcome. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,2 week,4 week,8 week,12 week,16 week,24 week
| units on a scale | Stage 1 Clinical Management | Stage 1 CBT | Stage 1 Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | 11.52 ± 3.789 | 13.31 ± 5.090 | 11.01 ± 3.844 |
| 2W | 10.23 ± 3.207 | 11.72 ± 4.976 | 10.28 ± 3.462 |
| 4W | 9.80 ± 3.056 | 9.72 ± 4.835 | 10.24 ± 3.688 |
| 8W | 8.71 ± 3.601 | 7.80 ± 4.440 | 9.42 ± 4.175 |
| 12W | 8.01 ± 3.200 | 5.71 ± 3.979 | 8.81 ± 4.198 |
| 16W | 7.42 ± 3.019 | 5.13 ± 4.108 | 8.26 ± 4.338 |
| 24W | 7.01 ± 3.317 | 4.45 ± 3.875 | 7.86 ± 4.410 |
1. The scale is used to assess the pain intensity of patients. 2. The scale range of VAS is 0-10. Higher score indicates a higher intensity of pain. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,4 week,8 week,12 week,24 week
| units on a scale | Stage 1 Clinical Management | stage1 CBT | stage1 Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | 3.23 ± 2.240 | 3.60 ± 2.171 | 3.31 ± 1.956 |
| 4W | 2.39 ± 1.907 | 2.48 ± 2.173 | 2.71 ± 1.806 |
| 8W | 2.11 ± 1.845 | 1.89 ± 1.899 | 2.41 ± 1.882 |
| 12W | 1.92 ± 1.857 | 1.71 ± 1.703 | 2.23 ± 2.025 |
| 24W | 1.71 ± 1.982 | 1.45 ± 1.772 | 2.04 ± 2.094 |
1. The scale(HAMA-14) is used to assessed the anxiety symptoms of patients. 2. The scale range is 0-56.Higher value represents a worse outcome. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,2 week,4 week,8 week,12 week,16 week,24 week.
| units on a scale | Stage 1 Clinical Management | Stage 1 CBT | Stage 1 Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | 12.11 ± 3.188 | 13.38 ± 4.883 | 11.37 ± 2.736 |
| 2W | 10.89 ± 3.401 | 11.34 ± 4.433 | 10.63 ± 3.105 |
| 4W | 10.34 ± 3.505 | 9.82 ± 3.952 | 10.40 ± 3.663 |
| 8W | 9.15 ± 3.709 | 8.26 ± 4.120 | 9.36 ± 3.802 |
| 12W | 8.57 ± 3.364 | 6.30 ± 3.518 | 8.81 ± 4.231 |
| 16W | 7.90 ± 3.263 | 5.42 ± 3.638 | 8.31 ± 4.348 |
| 24W | 7.60 ± 3.305 | 4.99 ± 3.263 | 7.91 ± 4.277 |
1. The scale is used to assess the sleep quality of patients. 2. The scale range of AIS is 0-21. Higher score indicates worse sleep quality. 3. The scale was assessed at baseline,4 week,8 week,12 week,24 week
| units on a scale | Stage 1 Clinical Management | stage1 CBT | stage1 Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | 6.95 ± 4.337 | 8.49 ± 4.341 | 7.14 ± 4.475 |
| 4W | 6.06 ± 3.865 | 5.37 ± 3.268 | 6.19 ± 4.235 |
| 8W | 5.87 ± 4.414 | 4.22 ± 3.236 | 5.99 ± 4.507 |
| 12W | 5.63 ± 4.335 | 2.90 ± 2.242 | 5.85 ± 4.749 |
| 24W | 5.34 ± 4.505 | 2.40 ± 2.054 | 5.63 ± 4.946 |
1. The scale is used to assess the life quality of patients. 2. The scale includes 5 subscales. The scores of each scale are summed to compute a total score. 3. The scale range is 0-144. Higher score indicates better life quality. 4. The scale was assessed at baseline,4 week,12 week,24 week.
| units on a scale | Stage 1 Clinical Management | stage1 CBT | stage1 Control Group |
|---|---|---|---|
| baseline | 78.09 ± 18.86 | 76.78 ± 19.91 | 79.49 ± 21.06 |
| 4W | 80.41 ± 19.14 | 86.67 ± 18.74 | 80.07 ± 22.04 |
| 12W | 89.69 ± 16.22 | 102.94 ± 20.24 | 85.14 ± 24.61 |
| 24W | 95.06 ± 17.54 | 109.21 ± 19.62 | 89.70 ± 25.76 |
Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stage 1 Clinical Management | — | 0/98 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) |
| stage1 CBT | — | 0/98 (0%) | 0/98 (0%) |
| stage1 Control Group | — | 0/196 (0%) | 0/196 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Stage 1 Clinical Management | stage1 CBT | stage1 Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 47.3 ± 8.7 | 46.8 ± 8.9 | 47.1 ± 8.3 | 47.1 ± 8.6 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Stage 1 Clinical Management | stage1 CBT | stage1 Control Group | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 98 | 98 | 196 | 392 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Wenzhou Medical University