CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01251367Updated Sep 28, 2022Results posted

Dysport® Adult Lower Limb Spasticity Follow-on Study

A Phase 3 interventional study of Botulinum toxin type A in Post-stroke Spasticity and Spasticity Post-Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by Ipsen. Completed at 50 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-28.

Sponsored by Ipsen · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
352
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to assess the long term safety of Dysport® in hemiparetic subjects with lower limb spasticity due to stroke or traumatic brain injury over repeated treatment cycles.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post-stroke Spasticity
  • Spasticity Post-Traumatic Brain Injury
03

In context

Muscle Spasticity

704 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscle Spasticity; 149 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 352 is above the median of 36 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Muscle Spasticity.

Browse Muscle Spasticity studies →

Lead sponsor

Ipsen is the lead sponsor of 282 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Completion of Dysport® Adult Lower Limb Spasticity Double Blind study Y-55-52120-140 (NCT01249404)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fixed contractures in lower limb
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
352 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Dysport®

    Dysport® is injected into lower limbs across 4 cycles of treatment, a minimum of 12 weeks between 2 injections. Doses vary from 1000 U to 1500 U.

    Biological: Botulinum toxin type A

Interventions

  • BiologicalBotulinum toxin type A

    I.M. (intramuscular) injection on day 1 of each treatment cycle.

    Also known as: AbobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time that the subject gave informed consent to the end of the study/early withdrawal (EOS/EW). An AE was reported as a TEAE if it was not present prior to study treatment administration in Study 140, or if it was present prior to study treatment in Study 140 but the intensity increased during the treatment phase of this study. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any AE that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, treatment related TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs leading to death, TEAEs leading to withdrawal, treatment emergent AESIs, and serious adverse events (SAEs) are summarised by treatment cycle.

    Time frame: Up to EOS (maximum duration of 52 weeks).

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)

    Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. BP was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in BP from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  3. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)

    HR was recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. HR was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in HR from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  4. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

    Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  5. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

    Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  6. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit

    Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  7. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)

    Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  8. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)

    Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  9. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets

    Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  10. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)

    Blood samples were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  11. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine

    Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  12. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose

    Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  13. Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®

    Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 and at EOS/EW to test for the presence of BTX-A antibodies. The number of subjects who were either NAb positive at baseline or negative at baseline but then positive following injection of Dysport® were reported.

    Time frame: At Week 4

  14. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

    12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, at Week 4 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 millimetres/second (mm/s), recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters; QT Duration, QT interval corrected with Fridericia's method (QTcF), QT interval corrected with Bazett's method (QTcB), QRS duration and PR duration were recorded and outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)

    Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM)), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  2. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

    Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  3. Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4

    Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.

    Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

  4. Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4

    Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.

    Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

  5. Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4

    An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The mean PGA scores per cycle at Week 4 were reported.

    Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

  6. Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4

    An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The percentage of responders with a PGA score of +1 or greater are reported at Week 4.

    Time frame: Week 4 of each cycle

  7. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended

    Range of active dorsiflexion of the ankle joint of the treated limb, measured using a goniometre, both with the knee flexed (90°) and extended, was used to assess treatment response. The measurements were obtained at the end of baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  8. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain

    The intensity of lower limb pain in the treated limb was evaluated by the subject using the Scale of Pain Intensity (SPIN) which provided a pictorial representation of pain in a 6-point graphic scale with the degree of red shading inside a circle representing the intensity of pain. The bottom and top of the scale are anchored by two extremes: 'no pain' (circle with no red shading and scored as 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (circle completely red and scored as 5), marked with either verbal or visual cues. The intervening points are represented by red circles increasing proportionally in size. The subject marks the circle that best indicates their pain intensity. The SPIN assessments were obtained at baseline, Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW. The mean changes from baseline in subjects with a baseline SPIN Score \>0 at Week 4 was reported per cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  9. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)

    Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 health surveys prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW visit. The SF-36 is a generic non preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. The mean change in the PCS and MCS from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL

    Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaire prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at EOS/EW visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems, rated from 1 to 5 (best to worst). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean change in pain and discomfort and VAS scores from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  11. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)

    All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of WS were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  12. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length

    All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of step length were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  13. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence

    All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of cadence were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  14. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)

    Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the Tardieu Scale (TS) for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  15. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)

    Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  16. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

    Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  17. Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

    Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

  18. Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4

    Subjects were assessed on their use of walking aids and orthoses at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW visit. Outcome measure is reported per cycle at baseline and Week 4. Number of subjects with no walking aid/orthoses were included in the 'No Walking Aid' category and number of subjects with any kind of walking aid/orthosis (including single point cane, tripod cane, ankle foot orthosis or other type of walking aid/orthosis) were combined into the 'Walking Aid' category.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle

07

Results

Posted Nov 9, 2017
Limitations and caveats
Data is summarised according to total dose received at each corresponding cycle (i.e. including 1000 U and 1500 U Dysport® in lower limb during all cycles, as well as 1000 U in lower limb + 500 U Dysport® in upper limb during Cycles 3 and 4).

Participant flow

The study was designed as a multicentre study and included 51 sites in Australia, Belgium, the Czech Republic, France, Hungary, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia and the United States of America that included at least one subject. The current study (Study 142) was an open label extension to the double blind Study 140 (Y-55-52120-140).

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTotal Dysport®
Started345
Cycle 1345
Cycle 2297
Cycle 3224
Cycle 4139
Completed269
Not completed76
Withdrew: Protocol violation1
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy2
Withdrew: Adverse event19
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject36
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up5
Withdrew: Subject required alternative treatment7
Withdrew: No study drug available1
Withdrew: Subject had personal or medical issues4
Withdrew: End of study visit performed in error1

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Adverse events (AEs) were monitored from the time that the subject gave informed consent to the end of the study/early withdrawal (EOS/EW). An AE was reported as a TEAE if it was not present prior to study treatment administration in Study 140, or if it was present prior to study treatment in Study 140 but the intensity increased during the treatment phase of this study. Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) were identified as those assessed as being due to remote spread of effect of Dysport®, or any AE that was assessed as a hypersensitivity reaction. TEAEs, treatment related TEAEs, severe TEAEs, TEAEs leading to death, TEAEs leading to withdrawal, treatment emergent AESIs, and serious adverse events (SAEs) are summarised by treatment cycle.

Time frame:
Up to EOS (maximum duration of 52 weeks).
Reported as:
Number · participants
Assessment of the Long-Term Safety of Dysport® Through the Collection of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
participantsTotal Dysport®
TEAE - Cycle 1140
TEAE - Cycle 297
TEAE - Cycle 347
TEAE - Cycle 421
Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 143
Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 223
Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 37
Treatment Related TEAE - Cycle 45
Severe TEAE - Cycle 113
Severe TEAE - Cycle 29
Severe TEAE - Cycle 34
Severe TEAE - Cycle 42
TEAE leading to death - Cycle 10
TEAE leading to death - Cycle 21
TEAE leading to death - Cycle 31
TEAE leading to death - Cycle 40
TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 18
TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 210
TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 31
TEAE leading to withdrawal - Cycle 40
AESI - Cycle 131
AESI - Cycle 224
AESI - Cycle 310
AESI - Cycle 45
SAE - Cycle 123
SAE - Cycle 214
SAE - Cycle 37
SAE - Cycle 42
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)

Systolic and diastolic BP were recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. BP was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in BP from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP)
Millimetres Mercury (mmHg)Total Dysport®
Systolic BP - Cycle 1-0.7 (-67 to 37)
Systolic BP - Cycle 2-1.9 (-69 to 37)
Systolic BP - Cycle 3-2.4 (-58 to 79)
Systolic BP - Cycle 4-5.1 (-73 to 25)
Diastolic BP - Cycle 10.3 (-34 to 37)
Diastolic BP - Cycle 2-0.2 (-38 to 30)
Diastolic BP - Cycle 3-0.3 (-32 to 28)
Diastolic BP - Cycle 4-1.1 (-35 to 32)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)

HR was recorded at baseline and at each subsequent study visit. HR was measured with the subject in a sitting position after resting for 3 minutes. Mean change in HR from baseline at Week 4 is reported per cycle.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Beats per minute (bpm)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Heart Rate (HR)
Beats per minute (bpm)Total Dysport®
Cycle 13.7 (-28 to 39)
Cycle 24.9 (-27 to 41)
Cycle 33.9 (-25 to 52)
Cycle 44.5 (-16 to 33)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count

Blood samples for RBC count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Tera cells/Litre (L)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count
Tera cells/Litre (L)Total Dysport®
Cycle 10.049 (-0.51 to 0.66)
Cycle 20.074 (-0.59 to 0.68)
Cycle 30.046 (-0.59 to 0.66)
Cycle 40.028 (-1.24 to 0.61)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)

Blood samples for haemoglobin and MCHC were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · grams (g)/L
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haemoglobin and Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
grams (g)/LTotal Dysport®
Haemoglobin - Cycle 11.2 (-17 to 32)
Haemoglobin - Cycle 21.5 (-46 to 25)
Haemoglobin - Cycle 31.5 (-22 to 26)
Haemoglobin - Cycle 41.2 (-39 to 17)
MCHC - Cycle 11.9 (-29 to 34)
MCHC - Cycle 21.3 (-33 to 41)
MCHC - Cycle 33.4 (-23 to 33)
MCHC - Cycle 48.9 (-14 to 37)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit

Blood samples for haematocrit were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · percentage of RBC in blood
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Haematocrit
percentage of RBC in bloodTotal Dysport®
Cycle 10.001 (-0.057 to 0.081)
Cycle 20.003 (-0.107 to 0.098)
Cycle 3-0.001 (-0.066 to 0.086)
Cycle 4-0.009 (-0.12 to 0.047)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)

Blood samples for MCH were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · picograms (pg)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Haemoglobin (MCH)
picograms (pg)Total Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.06 (-4.7 to 6.3)
Cycle 2-0.17 (-9.3 to 4.6)
Cycle 30.00 (-2.8 to 5.3)
Cycle 40.05 (-1.8 to 2)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)

Blood samples for MCV were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Femtolitres (fL)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
Femtolitres (fL)Total Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.74 (-10.3 to 14.8)
Cycle 2-0.9 (-21.2 to 12.5)
Cycle 3-1.02 (-8.5 to 13.7)
Cycle 4-2.44 (-9.1 to 3.7)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets

Blood samples for WBC count with differentials (neutrophils, lymphocytes) and platelet count were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Giga cells/L
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count, Neutrophils, Lymphocytes and Platelets
Giga cells/LTotal Dysport®
WBC count - Cycle 1-0.21 (-8.7 to 5.3)
WBC count - Cycle 2-0.32 (-5.7 to 4.9)
WBC count - Cycle 3-0.26 (-5.2 to 5.1)
WBC count - Cycle 4-0.02 (-4.3 to 5.2)
Neutrophils - Cycle 1-0.17 (-7.5 to 4.5)
Neutrophils - Cycle 2-0.27 (-5.3 to 4.2)
Neutrophils - Cycle 3-0.28 (-5.6 to 4.8)
Neutrophils - Cycle 4-0.06 (-4.4 to 5.5)
Lymphocytes - Cycle 1-0.05 (-1.3 to 1.4)
Lymphocytes - Cycle 2-0.05 (-1.3 to 1.4)
Lymphocytes - Cycle 30.03 (-1.2 to 2.5)
Lymphocytes - Cycle 4-0.01 (-0.9 to 2)
Platelets - Cycle 1-0.1 (-193 to 192)
Platelets - Cycle 20.0 (-133 to 276)
Platelets - Cycle 30.1 (-139 to 152)
Platelets - Cycle 44.6 (-67 to 167)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)

Blood samples were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW for analysis of the following clinical chemistry parameters: ALP, GGT, SGOT and SGPT. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · IU/L
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT), Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT)
IU/LTotal Dysport®
ALP - Cycle 1-1.2 (-60 to 110)
ALP - Cycle 2-2.9 (-141 to 57)
ALP - Cycle 3-5.2 (-238 to 33)
ALP - Cycle 4-3.2 (-45 to 39)
SGOT - Cycle 12.7 (-47 to 35)
SGOT - Cycle 23 (-27 to 144)
SGOT - Cycle 31.3 (-109 to 34)
SGOT - Cycle 41.8 (-12 to 19)
SGPT - Cycle 11.2 (-60 to 45)
SGPT - Cycle 22.4 (-53 to 302)
SGPT - Cycle 31.7 (-444 to 69)
SGPT - Cycle 40.8 (-28 to 25)
GGT - Cycle 11 (-122 to 614)
GGT - Cycle 2-1.9 (-145 to 121)
GGT - Cycle 3-3 (-254 to 107)
GGT - Cycle 4-0.4 (-61 to 70)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine

Blood samples for clinical chemistry analysis of total bilirubin and creatinine were taken at baseline, at Week 4, and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Micromole/L (μmol/L)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Total Bilirubin and Creatinine
Micromole/L (μmol/L)Total Dysport®
Total bilirubin - Cycle 10.13 (-13.7 to 12.8)
Total bilirubin - Cycle 20.14 (-10.6 to 15.2)
Total bilirubin - Cycle 30.03 (-10.4 to 7)
Total bilirubin - Cycle 4-0.05 (-9.1 to 16.1)
Creatinine - Cycle 1-2 (-36 to 27)
Creatinine - Cycle 2-5.3 (-36 to 35)
Creatinine - Cycle 3-7.9 (-53 to 35)
Creatinine - Cycle 4-14.2 (-62 to 9)
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose

Blood samples for analysis of BUN and fasting blood glucose levels were taken at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · millimole/L (mmol/L)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) and Fasting Blood Glucose
millimole/L (mmol/L)Total Dysport®
BUN - Cycle 10.14 (-3.93 to 5)
BUN - Cycle 2-0.05 (-3.57 to 5.72)
BUN - Cycle 3-0.19 (-11.06 to 4.29)
BUN - Cycle 4-0.37 (-4.64 to 3.57)
Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 1-0.046 (-6.16 to 6.38)
Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 20.009 (-4.17 to 9.44)
Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 30.015 (-5.66 to 7)
Fasting blood glucose - Cycle 40.231 (-3.44 to 8.61)
PrimaryPresence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®

Blood samples were collected at baseline, Week 4 and at EOS/EW to test for the presence of BTX-A antibodies. The number of subjects who were either NAb positive at baseline or negative at baseline but then positive following injection of Dysport® were reported.

Time frame:
At Week 4
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Presence of Botulinum Toxin Type A (BTX-A) Neutralising Putative Antibodies (NAbs) Following Injection of Dysport®
ParticipantsTotal Dysport®
Positive at baseline3
Negative at baseline & positive post baseline0
PrimaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)

12-lead ECG tracing was performed at baseline, at Week 4 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The 12-lead ECG recordings were performed at a paper speed of 25 millimetres/second (mm/s), recorded with the subject in a supine position after 5 minutes rest. The ECG parameters; QT Duration, QT interval corrected with Fridericia's method (QTcF), QT interval corrected with Bazett's method (QTcB), QRS duration and PR duration were recorded and outcome measure is reported per cycle as change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Milliseconds (ms)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Milliseconds (ms)Total Dysport®
QT Duration - Cycle 1-10.1 ± 24.9
QT Duration - Cycle 2-12.2 ± 22.9
QT Duration - Cycle 3-13.6 ± 26.5
QT Duration - Cycle 4-16.5 ± 23.5
QTcF - Cycle 1-0.6 ± 16.9
QTcF - Cycle 2-1.9 ± 14.8
QTcF - Cycle 3-3.8 ± 16.2
QTcF - Cycle 4-1.8 ± 16.1
QTcB - Cycle 14.5 ± 20.2
QTcB - Cycle 23.5 ± 18.4
QTcB - Cycle 31.5 ± 19.5
QTcB - Cycle 46.1 ± 21.3
QRS Duration - Cycle 1-0.6 ± 6.3
QRS Duration - Cycle 2-0.7 ± 5.8
QRS Duration - Cycle 3-0.8 ± 6.2
QRS Duration - Cycle 4-0.9 ± 6.7
PR Duration - Cycle 1-2.2 ± 14.5
PR Duration - Cycle 2-1.7 ± 15.2
PR Duration - Cycle 3-0.5 ± 14.4
PR Duration - Cycle 4-0.6 ± 13.4
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM)), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Measured in the Gastrocnemius-soleus Complex (GSC) (Knee Extended)
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.8 ± 0.9
Cycle 2-0.9 ± 1
Cycle 3-1 ± 1
Cycle 4-1 ± 0.9
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-1 ± 1.2
Cycle 2-1.1 ± 1
Cycle 3-1.2 ± 1
Cycle 4-1.1 ± 1.1
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the GSC (with the knee extended) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.

Time frame:
Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the GSC (Knee Extended) at Week 4
percentage of participantsTotal Dysport®
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 156.2
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 257.6
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 360.7
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 466.9
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 118.3
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 223.2
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 323.2
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 422.3
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4

Muscle tone in the treated limb was assessed by MAS in the soleus muscle (with the knee flexed) at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. The MAS consists of 6 grades: 0 (no increase in muscle tone), 1 (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the ROM), 1+ (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM), 2 (more marked increase in muscle tone), 3 (considerable increase in muscle tone) or 4 (affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension), and can be applied to muscles of both the upper and lower limbs. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as the percentage of subjects with at least a 1 grade reduction or 2 grades reduction in MAS score at Week 4.

Time frame:
Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With At Least a 1 or 2 Grade Reduction in the MAS Measured in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed) at Week 4
percentage of participantsTotal Dysport®
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 161.4
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 268.4
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 372.3
At least 1 grade reduction - Cycle 471.9
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 128.4
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 230.6
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 330.4
At least 2 grades reduction - Cycle 428.8
SecondaryPhysician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4

An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine-point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The mean PGA scores per cycle at Week 4 were reported.

Time frame:
Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of Treatment Response at Week 4
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 11.4 ± 1.1
Cycle 21.6 ± 1
Cycle 31.8 ± 1
Cycle 41.9 ± 1
SecondaryPercentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4

An assessment of overall treatment response was conducted by the investigator at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The investigator rated the response to treatment in the subject's lower limb after injection of Dysport® relative to the status at the baseline. Answers were made on a nine point rating scale: -4=markedly worse, -3=much worse, -2=worse, -1=slightly worse, 0=no change, +1=slightly improved, +2=improved, +3=much improved, +4=markedly improved. The percentage of responders with a PGA score of +1 or greater are reported at Week 4.

Time frame:
Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Subjects With a Score of at Least +1 on the PGA Scale at Week 4
percentage of participantsTotal Dysport®
Cycle 183.8
Cycle 286.2
Cycle 389.3
Cycle 489.9
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended

Range of active dorsiflexion of the ankle joint of the treated limb, measured using a goniometre, both with the knee flexed (90°) and extended, was used to assess treatment response. The measurements were obtained at the end of baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in the Range of Active Ankle Dorsiflexion Both With the Knee Flexed and With the Knee Extended
DegreesTotal Dysport®
Knee Extended - Cycle 14.1 ± 10.6
Knee Extended - Cycle 24.4 ± 10.6
Knee Extended - Cycle 36 ± 11.4
Knee Extended - Cycle 46.5 ± 10.9
Knee Flexed - Cycle 14.1 ± 10.7
Knee Flexed - Cycle 25 ± 10.3
Knee Flexed - Cycle 35.2 ± 10.9
Knee Flexed - Cycle 43.8 ± 9.8
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain

The intensity of lower limb pain in the treated limb was evaluated by the subject using the Scale of Pain Intensity (SPIN) which provided a pictorial representation of pain in a 6-point graphic scale with the degree of red shading inside a circle representing the intensity of pain. The bottom and top of the scale are anchored by two extremes: 'no pain' (circle with no red shading and scored as 0) and 'pain as bad as it could be' (circle completely red and scored as 5), marked with either verbal or visual cues. The intervening points are represented by red circles increasing proportionally in size. The subject marks the circle that best indicates their pain intensity. The SPIN assessments were obtained at baseline, Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW. The mean changes from baseline in subjects with a baseline SPIN Score \>0 at Week 4 was reported per cycle.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Lower Limb Pain
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.7 ± 1.2
Cycle 2-0.8 ± 1.2
Cycle 3-0.9 ± 1.2
Cycle 4-0.9 ± 1.2
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)

Subjects were asked to complete the SF-36 health surveys prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at the EOS/EW visit. The SF-36 is a generic non preference based health status measure. This instrument assessed subject health across 8 variable dimensions, which are specific health domains such as physical functioning, social functioning and vitality. Each variable item score is coded and turned into a 0-100 scale where 0 indicates the worst and 100 indicates the best possible health state for both the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) of the questionnaire. The mean change in the PCS and MCS from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) Quality of Life (QoL)
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
PCS - Cycle 11.05 ± 7.5
PCS - Cycle 21.43 ± 7.67
PCS - Cycle 31.85 ± 7.01
PCS - Cycle 42.8 ± 6.65
MCS - Cycle 1-1.13 ± 11.27
MCS - Cycle 2-0.82 ± 12.7
MCS - Cycle 30.56 ± 12.24
MCS - Cycle 40.14 ± 13.23
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL

Subjects were asked to complete the EQ-5D-5L QoL questionnaire prior to the study treatment at baseline, at Week 4 and at EOS/EW visit. The EQ-5D-5L index is a generic preference based measure of health related QoL producing utility scores that represent subject preferences for particular health states. This instrument rated subject health state looking at 5 specific dimensions such as mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort and anxiety/ depression and scored their general health state. Each dimension has 5 levels of severity: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems, rated from 1 to 5 (best to worst). In addition, a visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100 was also included for the patients to summarize their overall health status, where 0 is the worst and 100 the best possible health state. The mean change in pain and discomfort and VAS scores from baseline to Week 4 are reported.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions, 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) QoL
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Pain/discomfort - Cycle 1-0.1 ± 1.0
Pain/discomfort - Cycle 2-0.2 ± 1.0
Pain/discomfort - Cycle 3-0.2 ± 1.0
Pain/discomfort - Cycle 4-0.4 ± 1.2
VAS - Cycle 12.8 ± 18.3
VAS - Cycle 23.8 ± 17.7
VAS - Cycle 34.4 ± 19.9
VAS - Cycle 45.5 ± 21.0
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)

All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of WS were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · metres/second (m/s)
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Walking Speed (WS)
metres/second (m/s)Total Dysport®
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.07 ± 0.12
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 ± 0.13
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.08 ± 0.13
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.09 ± 0.14
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.06 ± 0.13
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.07 ± 0.14
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.08 ± 0.13
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.08 ± 0.14
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.07 ± 0.16
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 ± 0.18
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.09 ± 0.18
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.1 ± 0.18
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.07 ± 0.17
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.09 ± 0.19
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.09 ± 0.19
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.1 ± 0.21
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length

All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of step length were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · m/step
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Step Length
m/stepTotal Dysport®
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.03 ± 0.06
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.03 ± 0.09
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.03 ± 0.08
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.05 ± 0.09
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.03 ± 0.07
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.03 ± 0.08
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.03 ± 0.08
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.04 ± 0.09
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.03 ± 0.08
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.03 ± 0.09
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.03 ± 0.09
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.04 ± 0.09
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.02 ± 0.08
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.03 ± 0.09
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.03 ± 0.09
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.04 ± 0.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence

All WS tests were conducted without walking aids over a distance of 10 metres at both a comfortable WS and at maximal WS. Evaluations of cadence were made barefoot and with shoes on, at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle, and at EOS/EW. Outcome measure is reported per cycle as mean change from baseline at Week 4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · steps/s
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Cadence
steps/sTotal Dysport®
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.08 ± 0.21
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 ± 0.23
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.08 ± 0.21
Comfortable WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.07 ± 0.21
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.07 ± 0.21
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.08 ± 0.22
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.08 ± 0.22
Comfortable WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.07 ± 0.21
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 10.07 ± 0.26
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 20.08 ± 0.28
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 30.09 ± 0.26
Maximal WS, barefoot - Cycle 40.11 ± 0.25
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 10.07 ± 0.23
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 20.09 ± 0.27
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 30.09 ± 0.27
Maximal WS, with shoes - Cycle 40.09 ± 0.27
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the Tardieu Scale (TS) for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the GSC (Knee Extended)
DegreesTotal Dysport®
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 12.7 ± 7.9
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 22.4 ± 7.8
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 32.6 ± 8.9
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 42.7 ± 8.4
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 17.1 ± 10.6
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 27.3 ± 11.1
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 37.9 ± 12.2
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 49.5 ± 12.4
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 1-4.4 ± 8.6
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 2-4.9 ± 9.2
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 3-5.4 ± 9.3
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 4-6.8 ± 9.2
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the GSC (knee extended). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the GSC (Knee Extended)
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.5 ± 0.8
Cycle 2-0.5 ± 0.7
Cycle 3-0.5 ± 0.7
Cycle 4-0.5 ± 0.8
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group at two velocities. Slow speed of muscle stretch measures the range of passive motion. During a slow stretching movement, the examiner determines the angle of movement arrest, either due to subject discomfort or a mechanical resistance. The same movement is repeated at high velocity (as fast as possible) to determine the angle of catch and release. The angle of movement arrest at slow velocity (XV1) and the angle of catch at fast speed (XV3) were recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. The spasticity angle (X) was calculated as the difference between XV1 and XV3. Mean changes in Angles XV1, XV3 and X from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · Degrees
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Angle of Arrest (XV1), Angle of Catch (XV3) and Spasticity Angle (X) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)
DegreesTotal Dysport®
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 11.9 ± 8.0
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 22.8 ± 8.1
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 32.6 ± 8.5
Angle of arrest (XV1) - Cycle 42.4 ± 8.6
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 16.9 ± 10.3
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 27.5 ± 10.8
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 37.8 ± 11.2
Angle of catch (XV3) - Cycle 48.8 ± 11.4
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 1-5.0 ± 10.0
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 2-4.7 ± 9.8
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 3-5.2 ± 9.6
Spasticity angle (X) - Cycle 4-6.4 ± 11.1
SecondaryMean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)

Spasticity in the treated limb was assessed using the TS for the soleus muscle (knee flexed). The TS is administered by applying passive stretch to a muscle group. The spasticity grade (Y) assesses quality of muscle reaction on a 5-point scale (measured at fast speed): 0 =No resistance throughout passive movement, 1=slight resistance throughout passive movement, 2=clear catch at precise angle, interrupting passive movement, followed by release, 3=fatigable clonus (less than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at a precise angle, followed by release. 4=unfatigable clonus (more than 10 seconds when maintaining pressure) occurring at precise angle. Spasticity grade (Y) was recorded at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at EOS/EW. Mean changes in spasticity grade (Y) from baseline to Week 4 are reported per cycle.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 4 in Spasticity Grade (Y) in the Soleus Muscle (Knee Flexed)
units on a scaleTotal Dysport®
Cycle 1-0.6 ± 0.8
Cycle 2-0.6 ± 0.7
Cycle 3-0.7 ± 0.8
Cycle 4-0.7 ± 0.7
SecondaryUse of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4

Subjects were assessed on their use of walking aids and orthoses at baseline, at Weeks 4 and 12 after each Dysport® injection, at discretionary visits at Weeks 16, 20 and 24 of each cycle and at the EOS/EW visit. Outcome measure is reported per cycle at baseline and Week 4. Number of subjects with no walking aid/orthoses were included in the 'No Walking Aid' category and number of subjects with any kind of walking aid/orthosis (including single point cane, tripod cane, ankle foot orthosis or other type of walking aid/orthosis) were combined into the 'Walking Aid' category.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 4 of each cycle
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Use of Walking Aids/Orthoses at Baseline and Week 4
ParticipantsTotal Dysport®
No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 1101
Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 1244
No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 199
Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 1242
No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 284
Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 2213
No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 280
Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 2212
No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 356
Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 3168
No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 359
Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 3147
No Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 440
Walking Aid at Baseline - Cycle 499
No Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 433
Walking Aid at Week 4 - Cycle 464

Adverse events

Collected over From baseline to EOS (maximum duration of 52 weeks).. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Total Dysport®—43/345 (12.5%)69/345 (20%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 44
Most frequent serious events
EventTotal Dysport®
EpilepsyNervous system disorders5/345
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/345
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/345
Cerebral haemorrhageNervous system disorders2/345
SyncopeNervous system disorders2/345
Gait disturbanceGeneral disorders2/345
DysphagiaGastrointestinal disorders2/345
Venous thrombosisVascular disorders1/345
HaematomaVascular disorders1/345
Subdural haemorrhageInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/345
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTotal Dysport®
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications42/345
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders36/345

Baseline characteristics

The summary of baseline characteristics presented are from subjects completing Study 140 who were selected by the investigator for entry into Study 142 and received at least one injection of study treatment in this open label extension study.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Total Dysport®
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years280
>=65 years65
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Total Dysport®
Mean53.1 ± 12.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Total Dysport®
Female110
Male235
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Dysport®
Hispanic or Latino34
Not Hispanic or Latino311
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Total Dysport®
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian7
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Black or African American21
White313
More than one race3
Unknown or Not Reported0
08

Study locations

50 sites
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    Scottsdale, Arizona 85259, United States
  • Rancho Los Amigos
    Downey, California 90242, United States
  • Pacific Neuroscience Medical Group
    Oxnard, California 93030, United States
  • Associated Neurologist of Southern CT, PC
    Fairfield, Connecticut 06824, United States
  • Design Neuroscience Center
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Island Neurological Associates
    Plainview, New York 11803, United States
  • University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7200, United States
  • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Moss Rehab & Albert Einstein
    Elkins Park, Pennsylvania 19027, United States
  • Vanderbilt University
    Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dalla
    Dallas, Texas 75390-9016, United States
  • University of North Texas HSC at Ben Hogan Center
    Fort Worth, Texas 76104, United States
  • University of Texas - Houston
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
  • St George Hospital
    Kogarah, Australia
  • Epworth Rehabilitation
    Melbourne, Australia
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital
    Melbourne, Australia
  • St Vincent's Hospital
    Melbourne, Australia
  • St Vincent's Hospital
    Sydney, Australia
  • Westmead Hospital
    Sydney, Australia
  • Université catholique de Louvain av Hippocrate 10
    Bruxelles, Belgium
  • Clinique Universitaire
    Yvoir, Belgium
  • Charles University in Prague
    Praha 2, Czechia
  • CHU Jean MINJOZ
    Besançon, France
  • Centre de Réadaptation de Coubert
    Coubert, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Albert Chenevier-Hopital Henri Mondor
    Créteil, France
  • Hopital Raymond Poincarré
    Garches, France
  • Hôpital de L'Archet I
    Nice, France
  • Hôpital Sébastopol
    Reims, France
  • Hôpital Civil
    Strasbourg, France
  • Hopital Rangueil
    Toulouse, France
  • National Institute for Medical Rehabilitation
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Uno Medical Trials
    Budapest, Hungary
  • Petz Aladar Country Hospital
    Gyor, Hungary
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria "Policlinico Vittorio Emanuele"
    Catania, Italy
  • Specjalistyczna Praktyka Lekarska
    Katowice, Poland
  • Centrum Medyczne Plejady
    Krakow, Poland
  • Krakowska Akademia Neurologii Sp. z o.o.
    Krakow, Poland
  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne
    Krakow, Poland
  • Nzoz Neuro - Card
    Poznan, Poland
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Kliniczny
    Warszawa, Poland
  • Serviço de Reabilitação
    Alcabideche, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte
    Lisbon, Portugal
  • Centro Hospitalar São João
    Porto, Portugal
  • Medical Rehabilitation Center
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • Scientific Research Institute of Neurology
    Moscow, Russian Federation
  • State University
    St Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Derer's Hospital
    Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Univerzitna nemocnica Bratislava
    Bratislava, Slovakia
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Esquenazi A, Brashear A, Deltombe T, Rudzinska-Bar M, Krawczyk M, Skoromets A, O'Dell MW, Grandoulier AS, Vilain C, Picaut P, Gracies JM. The Effect of Repeated abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport(R)) Injections on Walking Velocity in Persons with Spastic Hemiparesis Caused by Stroke or Traumatic Brain Injury. PM R. 2021 May;13(5):488-495. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12459. Epub 2020 Sep 11. PubMed 32741133 ↗
  • Esquenazi A, Stoquart G, Hedera P, Jacinto LJ, Dimanico U, Constant-Boyer F, Brashear A, Grandoulier AS, Vilain C, Picaut P, Gracies JM. Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA for the Treatment of Hemiparesis in Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity Previously Treated With Other Botulinum Toxins: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. PM R. 2020 Sep;12(9):853-860. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.12348. Epub 2020 Mar 27. PubMed 32108436 ↗
  • McAllister PJ, Khatkova SE, Faux SG, Picaut P, Raymond R, Gracies JM. Effects on walking of simultaneous upper/lower limb abobotulinumtoxina injections in patients with stroke or brain injury with spastic hemiparesis. J Rehabil Med. 2019 Oct 29;51(10):813-816. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2604. PubMed 31529136 ↗
  • Gracies JM, Esquenazi A, Brashear A, Banach M, Kocer S, Jech R, Khatkova S, Benetin J, Vecchio M, McAllister P, Ilkowski J, Ochudlo S, Catus F, Grandoulier AS, Vilain C, Picaut P; International AbobotulinumtoxinA Adult Lower Limb Spasticity Study Group. Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA in spastic lower limb: Randomized trial and extension. Neurology. 2017 Nov 28;89(22):2245-2253. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004687. Epub 2017 Nov 1. PubMed 29093068 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized, and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of study participants. Any requests should be submitted to www.vivli.org for assessment by an independent scientific review board.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 28, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01251367
Lead sponsor
Ipsen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 1, 2010
Start date
Jun 2011
Primary completion
Apr 2015
Completion
Apr 2015
Results posted
Nov 9, 2017
Last update
Sep 28, 2022

Study contacts

Ipsen Study Director
study director · Ipsen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion