ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01247545ERICCAUpdated May 29, 2015

Effect of Remote Ischaemic Preconditioning on Clinical Outcomes in CABG Surgery

A Phase 3 interventional study of Remote ischaemic preconditioning and Control in Coronary Heart Disease, sponsored by University College, London. Completed at 28 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-05-29.

Sponsored by University College, London · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,612
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the leading cause of death in the UK, accounting for 124,000 deaths (2006) and costing the UK economy over £7.9 billion a year. Patients with severe CHD are usually treated by coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, the risks of which are increasing due to older and sicker patients being operated on. New treatment strategies are therefore required to improve health outcomes in these high-risk patients undergoing CABG with or without valve (CABG±valve) surgery.

The hypothesis tested in this research proposal is that remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIC), a virtually cost-free, non-pharmacological and simple non-invasive strategy for reducing the damage to the heart muscle at the time of surgery, improves health outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing CABG±valve surgery.

In this research project, 1610 high-risk patients undergoing CABG±valve surgery will be recruited via 28 UK hospitals performing heart surgery. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive either RIC or control. For RIC, a blood pressure cuff will be placed on the upper arm to temporarily deprive it of oxygen and nutrients, an intervention which has been shown in the investigators pilot studies to reduce damage to the heart muscle by up to 40% during CABG±valve surgery. The investigators will determine whether RIC can improve health outcomes in terms of better patient survival, less heart attacks and strokes, shorter hospital stay; less damage to the heart, kidney and brain during surgery; better heart function post-surgery and less chance of developing heart failure; better exercise tolerance and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Heart Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Remote ischemic preconditioning
  • Coronary artery bypass graft surgery
  • Cardioprotection
  • Clinical Outcomes
03

In context

Coronary Disease

2,867 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Disease; 309 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 1,612 is above the median of 124 across 1,601 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Disease.

Browse Coronary Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University College, London is the lead sponsor of 647 studies on the registry; 145 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients undergoing CABG with or without valve surgery using blood cardioplegia
  2. Patients aged 18 years and above
  3. Patients with an additive Euroscore greater than or equal to 5

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cardiogenic shock
  2. Cardiac arrest on current admission
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Significant peripheral arterial disease affecting the upper limbs
  5. Patients with significant hepatic dysfunction (Prothrombin>2.0 ratio)
  6. Patients with significant pulmonary disease (FEV1\<40% predicted)
  7. Patients with known renal failure with a GFR\<30 mL/min/1.73 m2
  8. Patients on glibenclamide or nicorandil, as these medications may interfere with RIC
  9. Patients recruited into another study which may impact on the ERICCA study
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,612 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    Control treatment (sham RIC) will consist of four 5-minute simulated inflations of a blood pressure cuff placed on the upper arm. The inflations will be separated by 5-minute periods when the blood pressure cuff will be deflated.

    Procedure: Control

  • Active comparator
    Remote ischaemic conditioning

    Blood pressure cuff placed on upper arm and inflated to 200mmHg for 5 minutes then deflated for 5 minutes - this cycle is repeated a total of 4 times.

    Procedure: Remote ischaemic preconditioning

Interventions

  • ProcedureRemote ischaemic preconditioning

    Blood pressure cuff placed on upper arm and inflated to 200mmHg for 5 minutes then deflated for 5 minutes - this cycle is repeated a total of 4 times.

  • ProcedureControl

    Control treatment (sham RIC) will consist of four 5-minute simulated inflations of a blood pressure cuff placed on the upper arm. The inflations will be separated by 5-minute periods when the blood pressure cuff will be deflated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events

    Combined endpoint of Cardiovascular death, MI, Revascularisation and Stroke.

    Time frame: One year post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peri-operative myocardial injury

    72 hours area under curve serum troponin-T

    Time frame: 72 hours peri-operative period

  2. LV ejection fraction

    Echo determined LV ejection fraction

    Time frame: At one year

  3. Acute kidney injury

    Acute kidney injury score and 24 hour area under curve serum NGAL

    Time frame: Peri-operative

  4. 30 day MACCE

    Major adverse cardiac and cerebral events 30 days post surgery

    Time frame: 30 days post surgery

  5. All cause death

    Time frame: 1 year post surgery

  6. Length of ITU stay

    Time frame: ITU stay

  7. Length of hospital stay

    Time frame: Until hospital discharge

  8. Inotrope score

    Inotrope score after 72 hours

    Time frame: 72 hours post surgery

  9. 6 minute Walk Test

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 12 months post surgery

  10. Quality of Life

    Quality of Life assessed using the EQ-5D measurement

    Time frame: 6 weeks, 3/6/9 and 12 months post surgery

07

Study locations

28 sites
  • Essex Cardiothoracic Centre
    Basildon, Essex, United Kingdom
  • Royal Sussex County Hospital
    Brighton, Sussex, United Kingdom
  • Blackpool Victoria Hospital
    Blackpool, United Kingdom
  • Papworth Hospital
    Cambridge, United Kingdom
  • Cardiff & Vale University Health Board
    Cardiff, United Kingdom
  • Edinburgh Royal Infirmary
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • Golden Jubilee Hospital
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • Harefield Hospital
    Harefield, United Kingdom
  • Castle Hill Hospital
    Hull, United Kingdom
  • Glenfield Hospital
    Leicester, United Kingdom
  • Hammersmith Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Kings College London Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • London Chest Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Royal Brompton Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • St George's Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • St Thomas Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • UCLH Heart Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • John Radcliffe Hospital
    Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary
    Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Wythenshawe Hospital
    Manchester, United Kingdom
  • Freeman Hospital
    Newcastle, United Kingdom
  • Trent Cardiac Centre
    Nottingham, United Kingdom
  • Derriford Hospital
    Plymouth, United Kingdom
  • Northern General Hospital
    Sheffield, United Kingdom
  • Southampton General Hospital
    Southampton, United Kingdom
  • Swansea Hospital
    Swansea, United Kingdom
  • Wolverhampton Hospital
    Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hausenloy DJ, Mwamure PK, Venugopal V, Harris J, Barnard M, Grundy E, Ashley E, Vichare S, Di Salvo C, Kolvekar S, Hayward M, Keogh B, MacAllister RJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2007 Aug 18;370(9587):575-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61296-3. PubMed 17707752 ↗
  • Venugopal V, Hausenloy DJ, Ludman A, Di Salvo C, Kolvekar S, Yap J, Lawrence D, Bognolo J, Yellon DM. Remote ischaemic preconditioning reduces myocardial injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cold-blood cardioplegia: a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2009 Oct;95(19):1567-71. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2008.155770. Epub 2009 Jun 8. PubMed 19508973 ↗
  • Venugopal V, Laing CM, Ludman A, Yellon DM, Hausenloy D. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on acute kidney injury in nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a secondary analysis of 2 small randomized trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Dec;56(6):1043-9. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.014. Epub 2010 Oct 25. PubMed 20974511 ↗
  • Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application. Cardiovasc Res. 2008 Aug 1;79(3):377-86. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvn114. Epub 2008 May 2. PubMed 18456674 ↗
  • Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Evans R, Ariti C, Jenkins DP, Kolvekar S, Knight R, Kunst G, Laing C, Nicholas J, Pepper J, Robertson S, Xenou M, Clayton T, Yellon DM; ERICCA Trial Investigators. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 8;373(15):1408-17. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1413534. Epub 2015 Oct 5. PubMed 26436207 ↗
  • Candilio L, Malik A, Ariti C, Barnard M, Di Salvo C, Lawrence D, Hayward M, Yap J, Roberts N, Sheikh A, Kolvekar S, Hausenloy DJ, Yellon DM. Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Heart. 2015 Feb;101(3):185-92. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306178. Epub 2014 Sep 24. PubMed 25252696 ↗
  • Hausenloy DJ, Candilio L, Laing C, Kunst G, Pepper J, Kolvekar S, Evans R, Robertson S, Knight R, Ariti C, Clayton T, Yellon DM; ERICCA Trial Investigators. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (ERICCA): rationale and study design of a multi-centre randomized double-blinded controlled clinical trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2012 May;101(5):339-48. doi: 10.1007/s00392-011-0397-x. Epub 2011 Dec 21. PubMed 22186969 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2010, a primary completion of Mar 2015 and a completion of Mar 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 22, 2010
First posted
Nov 24, 2010
Start
Nov 2010
Primary completionActual
Mar 2015
CompletionActual
Mar 2015
Last update
May 29, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 29, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01247545
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 24, 2010
Start date
Nov 2010
Primary completion
Mar 2015
Completion
Mar 2015
Last update
May 29, 2015

Study contacts

Derek J Hausenloy, MD PhD
principal investigator · University College, London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion