An interventional study of STAR S4IR LASIK with iDesign Aberrometer in Refractive Error, sponsored by Abbott Medical Optics. Completed at 4 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-05-20.
Sponsored by Abbott Medical Optics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The results of this trial will demonstrate that the iDesign System performs as intended and is acceptable in a clinical setting.
LASIK treatment across the range of myopia with or without astigmatism, hyperopia with or without astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism.
413 studies on the registry are indexed under Refractive Errors; 62 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 77 is close to the median of 82 across 296 interventional studies indexed under Refractive Errors.
Browse Refractive Errors studies →Abbott Medical Optics is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
UCVA:
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: STAR S4IR LASIK with iDesign Aberrometer
CustomVue LASIK targeted for emmetropia
Also known as: CustomVue
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better.
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent Within 1.0 D
Time frame: 6 months
Percentage of Eyes With Loss of More Than 2 Lines Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA)
Time frame: 6 Months
Percentage of Eyes With Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) Worse Than 20/40
Time frame: 6 Months
Percentage of Eyes With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 D of Absolute Cylinder as Compared to the Preoperative Refraction
Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism is an increase of astigmatism (cylinder) postoperatively that could be caused by the refractive treatment. An increase of greater than 2.0 D is considered a safety endpoint per ANSI Z80.11-2007.
Time frame: 6 Months
One or both eyes of 77 subjects (143 eyes) were treated. This includes a predominance of Caucasian participants and a mean age of 37.2 years.
| Milestone | Hyperopia With or Without Astigmatism | Myopia With or Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 11 | 56 | 10 |
| Completed | 11 | 56 | 10 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| percentage of eyes | Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better. | 100 (97.3 to 100) | 100 (85.4 to 100) | 100 (82.9 to 100) |
| percentage of eyes | Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent Within 1.0 D | 99.1 (94.9 to 100) | 89.5 (66.9 to 98.7) | 93.8 (69.8 to 99.8) |
| percentage of eyes | Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Eyes With Loss of More Than 2 Lines Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) | 0 (NA to NA) | 5.3 (0.1 to 26) | 0 (NA to NA) |
| percentage of eyes | Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Eyes With Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) Worse Than 20/40 | 0 (NA to NA) | 0 (NA to NA) | 0 (NA to NA) |
Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism is an increase of astigmatism (cylinder) postoperatively that could be caused by the refractive treatment. An increase of greater than 2.0 D is considered a safety endpoint per ANSI Z80.11-2007.
| percentage of eyes | Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Eyes With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 D of Absolute Cylinder as Compared to the Preoperative Refraction | 0 (NA to NA) | 0 (NA to NA) | 0 (NA to NA) |
Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | — | 1/11 (9.1%) | 2/11 (18.2%) |
| Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | — | 2/56 (3.6%) | 4/56 (7.1%) |
| Mixed Astigmatism | — | 0/10 (0%) | 0/10 (0%) |
| Event | Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decrease in BSCVA of greater than or equal to two linesEye disorders | 1/11 | 2/56 | 0/10 |
| Event | Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism | Myopia With and Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corneal epithelial defectEye disorders | 1/11 | 0/56 | 0/10 |
| Other - car accidentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 1/11 | 0/56 | 0/10 |
| Foreign body in the eyeEye disorders | 0/11 | 1/56 | 0/10 |
| Miscreated flapEye disorders | 0/11 | 1/56 | 0/10 |
| retinal tear/holeEye disorders | 0/11 | 1/56 | 0/10 |
| Other - concussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/11 | 1/56 | 0/10 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Hyperopia With or Without Astigmatism | Myopia With or Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 11 | 56 | 10 | 77 |
| >=65 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Hyperopia With or Without Astigmatism | Myopia With or Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 6 | 28 | 4 | 38 |
| Male | 5 | 28 | 6 | 39 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Hyperopia With or Without Astigmatism | Myopia With or Without Astigmatism | Mixed Astigmatism | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Canada | 11 | 56 | 10 | 77 |
This study is completed, as verified in May 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Abbott Medical Optics