CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01220466Updated May 20, 2013Results posted

Performance and Acceptability of iDesign

An interventional study of STAR S4IR LASIK with iDesign Aberrometer in Refractive Error, sponsored by Abbott Medical Optics. Completed at 4 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-05-20.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Optics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
77
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The results of this trial will demonstrate that the iDesign System performs as intended and is acceptable in a clinical setting.

Read the detailed description

LASIK treatment across the range of myopia with or without astigmatism, hyperopia with or without astigmatism, and mixed astigmatism.

02

Conditions studied

  • Refractive Error

Browse trials for

03

In context

Refractive Errors

413 studies on the registry are indexed under Refractive Errors; 62 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 77 is close to the median of 82 across 296 interventional studies indexed under Refractive Errors.

Browse Refractive Errors studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbott Medical Optics is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, of any race, and at least 18 years old at the time the consent form is signed.
  • The refractive error, based on manifest refraction (adjusted for optical infinity), must be MRSE up to -15.00 D with manifest cylinder between 0.00 and -6.00 D; MRSE up to +9.00 D with cylinder between 0.00 and +6.00 D; or manifest cylinder (from 1.00 to 6.00 D) greater than the magnitude of sphere, and the cylinder and sphere have opposite signs.
  • BSCVA of 20/20 or better.
  • UCVA:

    • Myopes must be 20/40 or worse.
    • Subjects with Hyperopia or mixed astigmatism, treatment may be based on difficulty maintaining UCVA of 20/40 evidenced by spectacle/contact lens dependence for distance, as documented by the investigator.
  • Wavefront diameter ≥ 4.0 mm.
  • Sufficient agreement between manifest refraction (adjusted for optical infinity) and iDesign System refraction (sphere, cylinder, and axis) to allow treatment selection and generation of an ablation profile as determined by the investigational iDesign System software.
  • Manifest refraction sphere within ± 0.75 D of cycloplegic refraction sphere.
  • Anticipated post-operative stromal bed thickness of at least 250 microns, based on pre-operative central corneal pachymetry minus the maximum treatment depth to be ablated (as calculated by the iDesign System) and the intended flap thickness.
  • Anticipated post-operative keratometry value (based on pre-operative iDesign System refraction and keratometry) that is appropriate.
  • A stable refractive error (based on a previous exam, medical records, or prescription) as compared to the unadjusted pre-operative manifest refraction.
  • Subjects who currently wear contact lenses must demonstrate refractive stability in the operative eye. Rigid or toric lenses must be removed for at least 2 weeks and SCL for at least 3 days prior to the first refraction used to establish stability. A second refraction with a change of no more than ± 0.50 D MRSE at least 7 days after baseline.
  • Willing and capable of returning for follow-up examinations for the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding, or intend to become pregnant over the course of the study, as determined by verbal inquiry, or another condition associated with the fluctuation of hormones that could lead to refractive changes.
  • Subjects with an ametropic or amblyopic fellow eye not meeting all inclusion criteria that does not fall within the indications for treatment using the VISX® STAR S4 IR™ Excimer Laser.
  • Concurrent use of systemic (including inhaled) medications that may impair healing, including but not limited to: steroids, antimetabolites, isotretinoin (Accutane™) within 6 months of treatment, and amiodarone hydrochloride (Cordarone™) within 12 months of treatment.
  • Acute or chronic disease, illness, or treatment that would increase the operative risk (e.g., immuno-compromised, autoimmune disease, connective tissue disease, clinically significant atopic disease, diabetes, etc.).
  • Subjects with a cardiac pacemaker, implanted defibrillator, implanted neurostimulator, or any active electrical implants.
  • Ocular condition (other than high myopia) that may predispose the subject to future complications, such as history or evidence of active or inactive corneal disease
  • Previous intraocular or corneal surgery that might confound the outcome of the study or increase risk to the subject.
  • Known sensitivity or inappropriate responsiveness to any of the medications used in the post-operative course.
  • Concurrent participation in any other clinical study.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
77 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Refractive Error

    Device: STAR S4IR LASIK with iDesign Aberrometer

Interventions

  • DeviceSTAR S4IR LASIK with iDesign Aberrometer

    CustomVue LASIK targeted for emmetropia

    Also known as: CustomVue

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent Within 1.0 D

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Percentage of Eyes With Loss of More Than 2 Lines Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA)

    Time frame: 6 Months

  3. Percentage of Eyes With Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) Worse Than 20/40

    Time frame: 6 Months

  4. Percentage of Eyes With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 D of Absolute Cylinder as Compared to the Preoperative Refraction

    Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism is an increase of astigmatism (cylinder) postoperatively that could be caused by the refractive treatment. An increase of greater than 2.0 D is considered a safety endpoint per ANSI Z80.11-2007.

    Time frame: 6 Months

07

Results

Posted May 20, 2013

Participant flow

One or both eyes of 77 subjects (143 eyes) were treated. This includes a predominance of Caucasian participants and a mean age of 37.2 years.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHyperopia With or Without AstigmatismMyopia With or Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Started115610
Completed115610
Not completed000

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better.
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better.
percentage of eyesMyopia With and Without AstigmatismHyperopia With and Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Percentage of Eyes With Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or Better.100 (97.3 to 100)100 (85.4 to 100)100 (82.9 to 100)
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent Within 1.0 D
Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent Within 1.0 D
percentage of eyesMyopia With and Without AstigmatismHyperopia With and Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent Within 1.0 D99.1 (94.9 to 100)89.5 (66.9 to 98.7)93.8 (69.8 to 99.8)
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Eyes With Loss of More Than 2 Lines Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA)
Time frame:
6 Months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Loss of More Than 2 Lines Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA)
percentage of eyesMyopia With and Without AstigmatismHyperopia With and Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Percentage of Eyes With Loss of More Than 2 Lines Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA)0 (NA to NA)5.3 (0.1 to 26)0 (NA to NA)
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Eyes With Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) Worse Than 20/40
Time frame:
6 Months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) Worse Than 20/40
percentage of eyesMyopia With and Without AstigmatismHyperopia With and Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Percentage of Eyes With Best Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BSCVA) Worse Than 20/400 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Eyes With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 D of Absolute Cylinder as Compared to the Preoperative Refraction

Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism is an increase of astigmatism (cylinder) postoperatively that could be caused by the refractive treatment. An increase of greater than 2.0 D is considered a safety endpoint per ANSI Z80.11-2007.

Time frame:
6 Months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 D of Absolute Cylinder as Compared to the Preoperative Refraction
percentage of eyesMyopia With and Without AstigmatismHyperopia With and Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Percentage of Eyes With Induced Manifest Refractive Astigmatism Greater Than 2.00 D of Absolute Cylinder as Compared to the Preoperative Refraction0 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)0 (NA to NA)

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Hyperopia With and Without Astigmatism—1/11 (9.1%)2/11 (18.2%)
Myopia With and Without Astigmatism—2/56 (3.6%)4/56 (7.1%)
Mixed Astigmatism—0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventHyperopia With and Without AstigmatismMyopia With and Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Decrease in BSCVA of greater than or equal to two linesEye disorders1/112/560/10
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHyperopia With and Without AstigmatismMyopia With and Without AstigmatismMixed Astigmatism
Corneal epithelial defectEye disorders1/110/560/10
Other - car accidentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/110/560/10
Foreign body in the eyeEye disorders0/111/560/10
Miscreated flapEye disorders0/111/560/10
retinal tear/holeEye disorders0/111/560/10
Other - concussionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/111/560/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Hyperopia With or Without AstigmatismMyopia With or Without AstigmatismMixed AstigmatismTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years11561077
>=65 years0000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Hyperopia With or Without AstigmatismMyopia With or Without AstigmatismMixed AstigmatismTotal
Female628438
Male528639
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Hyperopia With or Without AstigmatismMyopia With or Without AstigmatismMixed AstigmatismTotal
Canada11561077
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Clearly LASIK
    Victoria, British Columbia V8X 1X2, Canada
  • Image Plus Laser Eye Center
    Winnipeg, Manitoba R3C 3J5, Canada
  • University of Ottawa Eye Institute, The Ottawa Hospital
    Ottawa, Ontario K1H 8L6, Canada
  • Yonge-Eglington Laser
    Toronto, Ontario M4P 2E5, Canada
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01220466
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Optics
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 14, 2010
Start date
Oct 2010
Primary completion
Jun 2011
Completion
Dec 2011
Results posted
May 20, 2013
Last update
May 20, 2013

Study contacts

Nicholas Tarantino, OD
study director · Abbott Medical Optics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion