CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT01200069Updated Mar 29, 2017Results posted

IV Ibuprofen for Post-Electroconvulsive Therapy Myalgia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Placebo infusion and ibuprofen intravenous in Depression, Myalgia, sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-29.

Sponsored by Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
unable to increase to target enrollment
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Post-procedure myalgia (muscle ache) is a well-known and common complication of Electro-convulsive Treatment (ECT). Myalgias are a serious concern of patients and occur in approximately 50% of these cases. The pain is usually described as muscle soreness, similar to that resulting from strenuous exercise. The myalgias typically begin shortly after the procedure, lasting approximately 2-7 days in total. A recent study reported that 89% of patients considered prevention significant and would be willing to pay a median of $33 out of pocket to avoid this side effect. In addition to patient discomfort, myalgias can have a further financial burden if these patients are unable to return to work or resume previous daily activities in the days following the procedure. An agent that could treat and possibly even prevent these myalgias has the potential to be very beneficial to these patients. IV ibuprofen (trade name Caldolor) is a novel therapeutic modality approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2009 for the treatment of mild to moderate pain, as an adjunct to opioid analgesics, and for the reduction of fever.

Read the detailed description

IV ibuprofen (trade name Caldolor) is a novel therapeutic modality approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2009 for the treatment of mild to moderate pain, as an adjunct to opioid analgesics, and for the reduction of fever. Ibuprofen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), which produces its effect through inhibition of the enzyme cyclooxygenase (COX). There are at least 2 variations of cyclooxygenase (COX-1 and COX-2) and ibuprofen non-selectively inhibits both, thus decreasing prostaglandin synthesis. This action gives ibuprofen its analgesic, anti-pyretic, and anti-inflammatory properties. NSAIDs have an established history of efficacy in the treatment of both acute and chronic somatic pain. Caldolor, being an intravenous formulation, offers a distinct advantage in patients who either are unable to take medications orally or are fasting preoperatively.

Post-procedure myalgia is a well-known and common complication of ECT. Although the exact etiology is unknown, the myalgias are believed to result from a combination of succinylcholine administration and the seizure activity induced by the ECT procedure itself. Succinylcholine-induced postoperative myalgias are a well-known phenomenon, initially described in the early 1950's. The exact pathogenesis is unknown, with muscle damage from succinylcholine-induced fasciculations or calcium-mediated phospholipase A2 activation and prostaglandin production being proposed as possible etiologies. The latter mechanism provides the rationale for using NSAID therapy. However, succinylcholine is unlikely to be the only factor involved in the development of myalgias following ECT, as a recent study showed that dose adjustments to succinylcholine did not affect rates of myalgia in these patients. Furthermore, seizures can also cause direct muscle injury and there have been reports of muscle pain after ECT both with and without succinylcholine.

A thorough literature search using Medline, Ovid, and scholar.google failed to find any research articles evaluating pretreatment therapy for myalgias in post-ECT patients. The current practice for the treatment of myalgias following ECT has been extrapolated from research on succinylcholine-induced myalgia in post-surgical patients. Previous studies have shown at least partial efficacy with pretreatment of nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents, benzodiazepines, sodium channel blockers (predominantly lidocaine), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The nature of the ECT procedure itself makes several of these modalities undesirable. Both Lidocaine and benzodiazepines can alter the seizure threshold and the short duration of the procedure possibly increases the risks associated with longer acting nondepolarizing muscle relaxants (ie. blurred vision, diplopia, difficulty breathing and swallowing). Therefore, the options for pretreatment are limited. In addition, a recent meta-analysis of randomized trials determined NSAIDs to cumulatively have the best efficacy of any pretreatment therapy in the prevention of post-procedural myalgias. Due to its intravenous formulation, some practitioners have administered ketorolac to ECT patients before the procedure. However, despite a proven efficacy in myalgia prevention shown by NSAIDs as a class, a study specifically examining the use of ketorolac in this regard failed to show any benefit. The use of Ibuprofen has yet to be examined.

Myalgias are a serious concern of patients and occur in approximately 50% of these cases. The pain is usually described as muscle soreness, similar to that resulting from strenuous exercise. The myalgias typically begin shortly after the procedure, lasting approximately 2-7 days in total. A recent study reported that 89% of patients considered prevention significant and would be willing to pay a median of $33 out of pocket to avoid this side effect. In addition to patient discomfort, myalgias can have a further financial burden if these patients are unable to return to work or resume previous daily activities in the days following the procedure. An agent that could treat and possibly even prevent these myalgias has the potential to be very beneficial to these patients.

Experimental Plan:

The study will be a prospective, randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled clinical trial. The subject population will consist of patients undergoing first time electroconvulsive therapy, ranging in age from 18 to 80 years. Subjects will be given a Mini-Mental State Examination at the time of their presentation for ECT to assess their cognitive ability. If the patient consents and fits the inclusion criteria, patients will be randomized to one treatment modality, which they will receive for the first three treatment sessions. The subject and the person collecting the data will both be blinded as to what treatment modality the subject belongs to. The patients will be divided into two groups, Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 will be treated with IV ibuprofen 800mg/8ml given over 30 minutes, prior to induction for ECT; while Group 2 will receive an identically appearing placebo dose, also administered IV, over that same time period. Both groups will receive a standardized anesthetic consisting of methohexital at 1 mg/kg IV for induction and succinylcholine 1 mg/kg IV for muscle paralysis. Other medications (eg. anticholinergic or antihypertensive drugs) will be administered at the discretion of the anesthesiologist. ECT will be administered by the psychiatrist in order to achieve a seizure with a motor component of > 15 second duration. Patients will be transported to the recovery room for post-anesthesia care. Rescue analgesics (Tylenol 500mg PO, Tylenol with codeine 300/30mg PO, Fentanyl 25 mcg IV) will be available to any patient with complaints of myalgia or headache pain of VAS >4.

Measurement Tools:

Severity of myalgias will be assessed based on a self-reported assessment utilizing a numerical rating scale (NRS). The scale will be rated as 0 meaning no pain at all and 10 meaning that pain is so severe as to interfere with daily activities.

Questionnaire:

Do you have any muscle aches or pain right now? If yes, how would you rate that muscle ache/pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain that is the worst imaginable?

Example:

0 = No pain 1-3 = Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, little interference with everyday activities) 4-6 = Moderate Pain (interferes significantly with everyday activities) 7-10 = Severe Pain (unable to perform everyday activities) Have you had to take any medications to treat your muscle aches? If yes, what medication did you take? How many pills? What was the strength of the medication? Do you have a headache right now? If yes, how would you rate that headache on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being pain that is the worst imaginable?

Measurements:

Each patient will have a self-reported numerical pain score assessed at baseline before therapy, 1 hour post-ECT, 6 hours post-ECT, 24 hours post-ECT, and finally at 48 hours post-ECT. The 6, 24 and 48 hour post-ECT assessments will be conducted via a telephone conversation. The use of rescue analgesics during recovery will also be documented as well as time from the end of procedure to discharge. The presence of headache will also be documented in each patient.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression, Myalgia

Keywords

  • depression,myalgia
03

In context

Myalgia

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Myalgia; 43 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 44 across 241 interventional studies indexed under Myalgia.

Browse Myalgia studies →

Lead sponsor

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey is the lead sponsor of 496 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Capable of providing informed consent
  • American Society Anesthesiologists (ASA) rating I-III
  • Subjects age 18-80 capable of providing consent.
  • Subjects undergoing electroconvulsive therapy using succinylcholine as the sole neuromuscular blocking agent.
  • Subjects who have scored ≥23 on the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects who have had a recent thrombotic event, myocardial infarction or stroke or episode of Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) within less than 3 months.
  • Subjects who have had a recent cardiovascular surgery within the last 3 months.
  • Subjects with active Gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Subjects who have asthma, itching or allergic type reaction following aspirin or other NSAID administration
  • Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to ibuprofen
  • Subjects with heart failure, bleeding disorders or kidney failure
  • Subjects taking aspirin, Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or anticoagulants within one month.
  • Subjects with any devices used to treat pain (intrathecal pumps, spinal cord stimulators etc)
  • Subjects with a history of fibromyalgia or chronic myositis
  • Subjects who are pregnant
  • Subjects who do not have a phone
  • Subjects who have had previous ECT
  • Subjects receiving toradol (Ketorolac)
  • Subjects with reported renal disease within less than 3 months.
  • Subjects who have had previous electroconvulsive therapy within the last 3 months
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar water

    500 milliliters of intravenous ringers lactate administered over 30 minutes prior to ECT for treatments 1,2 and 3

    Drug: Placebo infusion

  • Active comparator
    Ibuprofen

    300mg/8milliliters of intravenous ibuprofen/caldolor over 30 min in 500mL of ringers lactate to be administered prior to ECT for treatments # 1, 2 and 3

    Drug: ibuprofen intravenous

Interventions

  • DrugPlacebo infusion

    Identically appearing placebo dose administered IV prior to ECT and subsequently on ECT treatments 2 and 3

    Also known as: lactated ringers

  • Drugibuprofen intravenous

    IV ibuprofen 800mg/8ml given over 30 minutes prior to ECT and subsequently on ECT treatments 2 and 3

    Also known as: Caldolor

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Subject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post-Electroconvulsive Therapy Myalgias After Treatment 1

    subject self reporting rating scale for severity of myalgias utilizing numeric rating scale 0= no pain, 1-3= mild pain, annoyance with little interference with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 4-6= moderate (interferes significantly with ADL, 7-10 = severe pain unable to perform ADL

    Time frame: Treatment day 1 at 1hour, 6 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours

  2. Myalgia Reported on Treatment Day 2

    Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of post ECT Myalgia after treatment day 2 0=no pain, 1-3=mild pain (annoying, little interference with ADL), 4-6= moderate,( interferes significantly with ADL) 7-10 severe pain (unable to perform everyday activities)

    Time frame: 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours & 48 hours following procedure

  3. Myalgia Reported After Treatment #3

    Subject self reported severity of myalgia based on a self reported assessment utilizing numeric rating scale 0=no myalgia, 1-3=mild myalgia (annoying, little interference with ADL);4-6=moderate (interferes significantly with ADL); 7-10 severe myalgia(unable to perform every day activities)

    Time frame: 1 hour, 6 hour, 24 hour, 48 hour after 3rd ECT treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Subject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post Electroconvulsive Therapy Headache After Treatment Day 1

    Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of Post ECT pain score for headache at 1, 6, 24 and 48 hours post procedure. Pain Rating 0= no pain, 2-4=moderate pain, 5-7=distressing severe pain, 8-9=intense very severe pain, 10=unbearable pain

    Time frame: 1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours & 48 hours following procedure

  2. Incidence and Severity of Headache After ECT Treatment 2

    Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of post ECT headache 0=no pain, 2-4=moderate pain, 5-7= distressing severe pain, 8-9= very severe pain, 10=unbearable pain.

    Time frame: 1 hour, 6 hour, 24 hour and 48 hours

  3. Incidence of Headache & Severity Headache After ECT Treatment #3

    Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of post ECT headache after treatment #3, 0=no pain, 2-4=moderate pain, 5-7=distressing severe pain, 8-9 very serious pain, 10=unbearable pain.

    Time frame: 1 hour after treatment, 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours

07

Results

Posted Nov 18, 2016

Participant flow

recruited following assigned schedule date and time for first ECT treatment, Procedure took place in Medical Special procedure unit (same day service)

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSugar WaterIbuprofen
Started86
Completed85
Not completed01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimarySubject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post-Electroconvulsive Therapy Myalgias After Treatment 1

subject self reporting rating scale for severity of myalgias utilizing numeric rating scale 0= no pain, 1-3= mild pain, annoyance with little interference with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 4-6= moderate (interferes significantly with ADL, 7-10 = severe pain unable to perform ADL

Time frame:
Treatment day 1 at 1hour, 6 hour, 24 hours, 48 hours
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Subject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post-Electroconvulsive Therapy Myalgias After Treatment 1
units on a scaleSugar Water-one Hour After Treatment #1Ibuprofen One Hour After Treatment #1Sugar Water 6 Hours After Procedure #1Ibuprofen 6 Hours After Treatment #1Sugar Water 24 Hours After Treatment #1Ibuprofen 24 Hours After Treatment 1Sugar Water 48 Hours After Procedure 1Ibuprofen 48 Hours After Treatment 1
Subject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post-Electroconvulsive Therapy Myalgias After Treatment 12 (0 to 4)0 (0 to 0)7.5 (5 to 10)1.5 (0 to 3)2.5 (2 to 5).5 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
PrimaryMyalgia Reported on Treatment Day 2

Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of post ECT Myalgia after treatment day 2 0=no pain, 1-3=mild pain (annoying, little interference with ADL), 4-6= moderate,( interferes significantly with ADL) 7-10 severe pain (unable to perform everyday activities)

Time frame:
1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours & 48 hours following procedure
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Myalgia Reported on Treatment Day 2
units on a scaleSugar Water-one Hour After Treatment 2Ibuprofen One Hour After Treatment #2Sugar Water 6 Hours After Procedure #2Ibuprofen 6 Hours After Treatment #2Sugar Water 24 Hours After Treatment #2Ibuprofen 24 Hours After Treatment #2Sugar Water 48 Hours After Treatment 2Ibuprofen 48 Hours After Treatment 2
Myalgia Reported on Treatment Day 21.5 (0 to 3)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)1.5 (0 to 3)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
PrimaryMyalgia Reported After Treatment #3

Subject self reported severity of myalgia based on a self reported assessment utilizing numeric rating scale 0=no myalgia, 1-3=mild myalgia (annoying, little interference with ADL);4-6=moderate (interferes significantly with ADL); 7-10 severe myalgia(unable to perform every day activities)

Time frame:
1 hour, 6 hour, 24 hour, 48 hour after 3rd ECT treatment
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Myalgia Reported After Treatment #3
units on a scaleSugar Water-one Hour After Treatment 3Ibuprofen One Hour After Treatment #3Sugar Water 6 Hours After Procedure #3Ibuprofen 6 Hours After Treatment #3Sugar Water 24 Hours After Treatment #3Ibuprofen 24 Hours After Treatment #3Sugar Water 48 Hours After Treatment 3Ibuprofen 48 Hours After Treatment 3
Myalgia Reported After Treatment #30 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
SecondarySubject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post Electroconvulsive Therapy Headache After Treatment Day 1

Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of Post ECT pain score for headache at 1, 6, 24 and 48 hours post procedure. Pain Rating 0= no pain, 2-4=moderate pain, 5-7=distressing severe pain, 8-9=intense very severe pain, 10=unbearable pain

Time frame:
1 hour, 6 hours, 24 hours & 48 hours following procedure
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Subject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post Electroconvulsive Therapy Headache After Treatment Day 1
units on a scalePain Score Sugar Water-one Hour After Treatment 1Pain Score Ibuprofen One Hour After Treatment #1Pain Score After Sugar Water 6 Hours After Treatment #1Pain Score Ibuprofen 6 Hours After Treatment #1Pain Score Sugar Water 24 Hours After Treatment #1Pain Score Ibuprofen 24 Hours After Treatment #1Pain Score Sugar Water 48 Hours After Treatment 1Pain Score Ibuprofen 48 Hours After Treatment 1
Subject Self Reported Numerical Rating of Incidence and Severity of Post Electroconvulsive Therapy Headache After Treatment Day 12.6 (0 to 6)1.5 (0 to 5)3.1 (3 to 10)1.3 (0 to 4)3.6 (0 to 5).16 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
SecondaryIncidence and Severity of Headache After ECT Treatment 2

Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of post ECT headache 0=no pain, 2-4=moderate pain, 5-7= distressing severe pain, 8-9= very severe pain, 10=unbearable pain.

Time frame:
1 hour, 6 hour, 24 hour and 48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Incidence and Severity of Headache After ECT Treatment 2
units on a scaleSugar Water-one Hour After Treatment 2Ibuprofen One Hour After Treatment #2Sugar Water 6 Hours After Procedure #2Ibuprofen 6 Hours After Treatment #2Sugar Water 24 Hours After Treatment #2Ibuprofen 24 Hours After Treatment #2Sugar Water 48 Hours After Treatment #2Ibuprofen 48 Hours After Treatment #2
Incidence and Severity of Headache After ECT Treatment 21.4 (0 to 5)1.1 (0 to 4)1.55 (0 to 5)1 (0 to 5).18 (0 to 2).14 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 0).14 (0 to 1)
SecondaryIncidence of Headache & Severity Headache After ECT Treatment #3

Subject self reported numerical rating of incidence and severity of post ECT headache after treatment #3, 0=no pain, 2-4=moderate pain, 5-7=distressing severe pain, 8-9 very serious pain, 10=unbearable pain.

Time frame:
1 hour after treatment, 6 hours, 24 hours and 48 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Incidence of Headache & Severity Headache After ECT Treatment #3
units on a scaleSugar Water-one Hour After Treatment 3Ibuprofen One Hour After Treatment #3Sugar Water 6 Hours After Procedure #3Ibuprofen 6 Hours After Treatment #3Sugar Water 24 Hours After Treatment #3Ibuprofen 24 Hours After Treatment #3Sugar Water 48 Hours After Treatment 3Ibuprofen 48 Hours After Treatment 3
Incidence of Headache & Severity Headache After ECT Treatment #30 (0 to 0).64 (0 to 4).28 (0 to 2)1 (0 to 6)0 (0 to 0).16 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)

Adverse events

Collected over 0-72 hours after each of the 3 treatments. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sugar Water—0/8 (0%)2/8 (25%)
Ibuprofen—0/6 (0%)1/6 (16.7%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventSugar WaterIbuprofen
dizzynessNervous system disorders2/80/6
vomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/81/6

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sugar WaterIbuprofenTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years8513
>=65 years011
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sugar WaterIbuprofenTotal
Female549
Male325
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sugar WaterIbuprofenTotal
United States8614
Mini Mental State Examination >23
Mini Mental State Examination >23(participants)Sugar WaterIbuprofenTotal
Number8614
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospital
    Newark, New Jersey 07101, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 29, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01200069
Lead sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 13, 2010
Start date
Jul 2010
Primary completion
Sep 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Results posted
Nov 18, 2016
Last update
Mar 29, 2017

Study contacts

Vasanti Tilak, MD
principal investigator · UMDNJ-NJMS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Mar 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion