An interventional study of Manipulation of Positive Airway Pressure (PAP) in Sleep Apnea Central, Cheyne-Stokes Respiration and Obstructive Sleep Apnea, sponsored by Philips Respironics. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-10-31.
Sponsored by Philips Respironics · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate diagnostic agreement and determine the accuracy of the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device compared to simultaneous, attended clinical polysomnography (PSG) in identifying breathing events in participants previously diagnosed with complex sleep apnea (CompSAS), complex sleep apnea with Cheyne-Stokes respiration (CSR), or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Study Objectives: To compare a positive airway pressure (PAP) device's detection of respiratory events and airway status during device detected apneas with events scored on simultaneous polysomnography (PSG).
Design: Prospective PSGs of patients with sleep apnea using a new-generation PAP device.
Settings: Four clinical and academic sleep centers.
Patients: Forty-five patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and complex sleep apnea (Comp SA) performed a PSG on PAP levels adjusted to induce respiratory events.
Interventions: None.
1,422 studies on the registry are indexed under Apnea; 159 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 45 is close to the median of 50 across 965 interventional studies indexed under Apnea.
Browse Apnea studies →Philips Respironics is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Manipulation of positive airway pressure (PAP) will occur throughout the night to induce breaking events. PAP will be set to the participant's prescribed pressure, increased until breathing events are induced, and then returned to the prescribed pressure. This cyclic pattern will continue throughout the night. Events will be measured with REMstar Auto with A-Flex.
Other: Manipulation of Positive Airway Pressure (PAP)
Manipulation of positive airway pressure (PAP) will occur throughout the night to induce breaking events. PAP will be set to the participant's prescribed pressure, increased until breathing events are induced, and then returned to the prescribed pressure. This cyclic pattern will continue throughout the night. Events will be Manually Scored Polysomnography (PSG).
Other: Manipulation of Positive Airway Pressure (PAP)
Positive airway pressure (PAP) will be manipulated throughout the night to induce breathing events. PAP will be set to the participant's prescribed pressure, increased until breathing events are induced , and then returned to the prescribed pressure. This cyclic pattern will continue throughout the night.
Number of Breathing Events Identified by the Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Device Compared to a Simultaneous Polysomnography
The following breathing events: RERAs, central apneas, periodic breathing, obstructive apneas, and hypopneas in patients previously diagnosed with CompSAS or OSA detected by simultaneous Polysomnography and REMstar Auto with A-Flex were compared.
Time frame: During a single night of polysomnography lasting an average of 8 hours
Device Detected Apneas as Detected by Philips Respironics (PR) System One
All device-detected apneas were tabulated. Then they were broken down into obstructed airway apneas and clear airway apneas. The results are recorded below as apneas with obstructed airway and apneas with clear airway.
Time frame: During a single night of polysomnography lasting an average of 8 hours
Device-Detected Obstructed Airway Apnea Agreement
Device-Detected Apneas were broken down and then reviewed with the manually scored apneas. Of the Obstructed Airway apneas they were broken down into a few different categories: Manually Scored Obstructive Apneas, Manually Scored Central Apneas, Manually Scored Hypopneas and Manually Scored RERAs.
Time frame: During a single night of polysomnography lasting an average of 8 hours
Device-Detected Clear Airway Apnea Agreement
Device Detected Clear Airways events were counted by the device. These events were then compared to manual PSG scoring. The manual PSG scoring determined that these were apnea events. However, the manual scoring allows for more channels to be reviewed and manual scoring was able to classify them into 4 different categories: Manually Scored Obstructive Apneas, Manually Scored Central Apneas, Manually scored hypopneas and manually scored RERAs.
Time frame: During a single night of polysomnography lasting an average of 8 hours
| Milestone | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| Started | 45 |
| Completed | 45 |
| Not completed | 0 |
The following breathing events: RERAs, central apneas, periodic breathing, obstructive apneas, and hypopneas in patients previously diagnosed with CompSAS or OSA detected by simultaneous Polysomnography and REMstar Auto with A-Flex were compared.
| events/hour | REMstar Auto With A-Flex | Manually Scored Polysomnography (PSG) |
|---|---|---|
| Apnea-hyopnea index | 16.5 ± 13.5 | 18.1 ± 18.6 |
| Apnea index | 11.4 ± 9.9 | 11.5 ± 16.0 |
| Hypopnea index | 5.1 ± 5.0 | 6.6 ± 7.5 |
| Respiratory effort-related arousal (RERA) index | 2.8 ± 2.0 | 6.3 ± 7.4 |
All device-detected apneas were tabulated. Then they were broken down into obstructed airway apneas and clear airway apneas. The results are recorded below as apneas with obstructed airway and apneas with clear airway.
| events | Device-Detected Apneas |
|---|---|
| Apnea with obstructed Airway | 762 |
| Apnea with clear airway | 335 |
Device-Detected Apneas were broken down and then reviewed with the manually scored apneas. Of the Obstructed Airway apneas they were broken down into a few different categories: Manually Scored Obstructive Apneas, Manually Scored Central Apneas, Manually Scored Hypopneas and Manually Scored RERAs.
| events | Device-Detected Obstructive Airway Apneas |
|---|---|
| Manually Scored Obstructive Apnea | 367 |
| Manually Scored Central Apnea | 159 |
| Manually Scored Hypopnea | 180 |
| Manually Scored RERA | 56 |
Device Detected Clear Airways events were counted by the device. These events were then compared to manual PSG scoring. The manual PSG scoring determined that these were apnea events. However, the manual scoring allows for more channels to be reviewed and manual scoring was able to classify them into 4 different categories: Manually Scored Obstructive Apneas, Manually Scored Central Apneas, Manually scored hypopneas and manually scored RERAs.
| events | Device-Detected Clear Airway Apneas |
|---|---|
| Manually Scored Obstructive Apnea | 53 |
| Manually Scored Central Apnea | 209 |
| Manually Scored Hypopnea | 49 |
| Manually Scored RERA | 24 |
Collected over Adverse events were collected from screening until visit 2, these two visits were up to 7 days apart.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects With Sleep Apnea | — | 0/45 (0%) | 0/45 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| Mean | 53.2 ± 13.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| Female | 16 |
| Male | 29 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants) | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| Caucasian | 32 |
| African American | 8 |
| Hispanic/Latino | 2 |
| Others | 3 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| United States | 45 |
| Body mass index(kg/m^2) | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| Mean | 53.2 ± 13.9 |
| Diagnostic Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI)(events/hour) | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| Mean | 39.3 ± 26.0 |
| Diagnosis(participants) | Sleep Apnea |
|---|---|
| Obstructive Sleep apnea | 32 |
| Complex Sleep Apnea | 13 |
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Philips Respironics