CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01146743Updated Mar 17, 2011

Prospective Trial for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gallbladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis in High Risk Patients

An interventional study of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in Cholecystitis, sponsored by Asan Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-03-17.

Sponsored by Asan Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
59
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators would like to conduct a prospective, randomized non-inferiority study to compare clinical outcome between endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided gallbladder drainage and percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) in high risk acute cholecystitis patients.

Read the detailed description

The primary outcome is to compare clinical resolution rate of EUS-guided gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis patients with high risk.

The secondary outcome is to compare complications, conversion rate to open cholecystectomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholecystitis

Keywords

  • EUS-guided transmural cholecystostomy
03

In context

Cholecystitis

266 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholecystitis; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 59 is below the median of 86 across 167 interventional studies indexed under Cholecystitis.

Browse Cholecystitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Asan Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 562 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • high risk for general anesthesia and emergency operation (American Society of Anesthesiologists, ASA grade III or IV)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • When the risks of endoscopy to patient are judged to outweigh the most favorable benefits of the procedure.
  • Unstable or unwilling to comply with follow-up
  • When a perforated viscus is known or suspected
  • Simultaneously participating in another investigational drug or device study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
59 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    EUS-guided

    EUS-guided gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis with high risk patients

    Procedure: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage

  • Active comparator
    percutaneous transhepatic

    percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage in acute cholecystitis with high risk patients

    Procedure: percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage

Interventions

  • ProcedureEUS-guided gallbladder drainage

    EUS-guided gallbladder drainage was performed with a linear-array echoendoscope. The initial puncture was performed at the antrum of the stomach or bulb of the duodenum and was chosen to access the gallbladder body or neck and avoid visible vessels. After removal of the needle, a 6F or 7F bougie were inserted and then removed to dilate the tract. Afterward, nasobiliary drainage tube or stent was placed.

    Also known as: EUS-guided transmural drainage

  • Procedurepercutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage

    Under ultrasound guidance, needle punctured to gallbladder via percutaneous transhepatic route.

    Also known as: percutaneous cholecystostomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical response rate

    Definition of clinical response rate within 72 hours from procedure was improvement of local signs and systemic signs of inflammation.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours from procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Complication rate

    Complication was defined as any procedure-related complications during the procedure or within 1 week, including bile leakage, pneumoperitoneum, bleeding, and etc.

    Time frame: Complications during the procedure or within 1 weeks

  2. Conversion rate

    Conversion was defined as conversion to open cholecystectomy during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Time frame: During laparoscopic cholectstectomy

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Asan Medical Center
    Seoul, 138-736, Korea, Republic of
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lee SS, Park DH, Hwang CY, Ahn CS, Lee TY, Seo DW, Lee SK, Kim MW. EUS-guided transmural cholecystostomy as rescue management for acute cholecystitis in elderly or high-risk patients: a prospective feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Nov;66(5):1008-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.03.1080. Epub 2007 Sep 4. PubMed 17767933 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 17, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01146743
Lead sponsor
Asan Medical Center
First posted
Jun 22, 2010
Start date
Jun 2010
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Mar 2011
Last update
Mar 17, 2011

Study contacts

SangSoo Lee, M.D.
study director · Asan Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion