CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01124331NeOProMUpdated Mar 13, 2019

Appropriate Oxygen Levels for Extremely Preterm Infants: a Prospective Meta-analysis

An interventional study of Higher oxygen saturation target range (91%-95%) and Lower oxygen saturation (85%-89%) in Infant, Premature, Diseases, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia and Retinopathy of Prematurity, sponsored by University of Sydney. Completed at 9 sites in Australia. Open to participants aged Up to 24 Hours. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-03-13.

Sponsored by University of Sydney · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
4,965
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 24 Hours
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary question to be addressed by this study is: compared with a functional oxygen saturation level (SpO2) of 91-95%, does targeting SpO2 85-89% in extremely preterm infants from birth or soon after, result in a difference in mortality or major disability in survivors by 2 years corrected age (defined as gestational age plus chronological age)?

Read the detailed description

Oxygen has been used in the care of small and sick newborn babies for over 60 years. However, to date there has been no reliable evidence to guide clinicians regarding what is the best level to target oxygen saturation in preterm infants to balance the four competing risks of mortality, lung disease, eye damage and developmental disability.

Five high quality randomised controlled trials are now underway assessing two different levels of oxygen saturation targeting (USA - SUPPORT; Australia - BOOST II; New Zealand - BOOST NZ; UK - BOOST II UK; Canada - COT). The value of these gold-standard trials can be further enhanced when, with careful planning, they are synthesised into a prospective meta-analysis (PMA). A PMA is one where trials are identified for inclusion in the analysis before any of the individual results are known.

We have established the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) Collaboration, comprising the investigators of these five trials and a methodology team. The trials are sufficiently similar with respect to design, participants and intervention and, with planning, will have enough common outcome measures to enable their results to be prospectively meta-analysed. Together they have a combined sample size of almost 5000 enrolled infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Premature, Diseases
  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
  • Retinopathy of Prematurity
  • Infant, Newborn, Diseases
  • Infant, Very Low Birth Weight

Keywords

  • prospective meta-analysis
  • preterm infant
  • pulse oximetry
  • oxygen saturation
03

In context

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; 80 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 4,965 is above the median of 70 across 228 interventional studies indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Browse Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Sydney is the lead sponsor of 91 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 24 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants \< 28wks gestation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants > 28wks gestation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
4,965 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    High Oxygen saturation

    Higher (SpO2 91-95%) functional oxygen saturation target range from birth, or soon thereafter, for durations as specified in each trial protocol.

    Procedure: Higher oxygen saturation target range (91%-95%)

  • Active comparator
    Lower oxygen saturation

    Lower (SpO2 85-89%) functional oxygen saturation target range from birth, or soon thereafter, for durations as specified in each trial protocol.

    Procedure: Lower oxygen saturation (85%-89%)

Interventions

  • ProcedureHigher oxygen saturation target range (91%-95%)

    higher (SpO2 91-95%) functional oxygen saturation target range from birth, or soon thereafter

  • ProcedureLower oxygen saturation (85%-89%)

    Lower (SpO2 85%-89%)functional oxygen saturation target range from birth, or soon thereafter

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. composite outcome of death or major disability by 18-24 months corrected age

    Major disability is defined as any of the following: * Bayley-III Developmental Assessment cognitive score \<85 and/or language score \<85 * Severe visual loss * Cerebral palsy with Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) level 2 or higher or Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) level 2 or higher at 18-24 months postmenstrual age * Deafness requiring hearing aids

    Time frame: by 18-24 months corrected age (gestational age plus chronological age)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) treatment by laser photocoagulation or cryotherapy or anti-VEGF injection

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

  2. measures of respiratory support

    • Measures of respiratory support, including the following separate outcomes a. supplemental oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age, b. postmenstrual age ceased endotracheal intubation, c. postmenstrual age ceased continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), d. postmenstrual age ceased supplemental oxygen, e. postmenstrual age ceased home oxygen (if received).

    Time frame: 36 weeks postmenstrual age

  3. Patent ductus arteriosus diagnosed by ultrasound and receiving medical treatment

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

  4. Patent ductus arteriosus receiving surgical treatment

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

  5. Weight z-score based on WHO percentile charts (WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group, 2006)

    Time frame: 18-24 months corrected age

  6. Weight z-score based on WHO percentile charts (WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group, 2006)

    Time frame: at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and discharge home

  7. Re-admissions to hospital

    Time frame: up to 18-24 months postmenstrual age

  8. Cerebral palsy with GMFCS level 2 or higher or MACS level 2 or higher at 18-24 months corrected age

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

  9. Severe visual impairment (cannot fixate or is legally blind:<6/60 vision , 1.3 logMAR in both eyes or equivalent as defined by trial)

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

  10. deafness requiring hearing aids

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

  11. Bayley-III Developmental Assessment cognitive score <85 and/or language score <85

    Time frame: 2 years corrected age

  12. death

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

Other outcomes

  1. Subgroup analyses will be undertaken on all pre-specified primary and secondary outcomes.

    Subgroups: * Gestational age * less than 26 weeks * greater than or equal to 26 weeks * Inborn or outborn * Use of any antenatal corticosteroids = yes if any of the following * incomplete, less than 24 hours before birth * complete * more than 7 days before birth * started less than 24h before birth * started 24h or more before birth * Male or female gender * Small for gestation age * birth weight below trialist defined cut-point * birth weight less than 10th percentile using WHO centile charts * Multiple or singleton birth * Mode of delivery * Vaginal if any of the following: vaginal, vaginal-cephalic, vaginal-breech * Caesarean if any of the following: caesarean, caesarean section before onset of labour, caesarean section after onset of labour, caesarean section * Time of intervention commencement * less than 6 hours after birth * 6 hours or more after birth * Oximeter calibration software * original * revised

    Time frame: at 18-24 months corrected age

07

Study locations

9 sites
  • Canberra Hospital
    Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Women and Babies
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Liverpool Hospital
    Liverpool, New South Wales 2170, Australia
  • John Hunter Hospital
    New Lambton, New South Wales 2310, Australia
  • Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW
    St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
  • Westmead Hospital,
    Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia
  • Royal Brisbane Women's Hospital
    Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia
  • Royal Women's Hospital
    Melbourne, Victoria 3052, Australia
  • Monash Medical Centre
    Melbourne, Victoria 3800, Australia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Askie LM, Brocklehurst P, Darlow BA, Finer N, Schmidt B, Tarnow-Mordi W; NeOProM Collaborative Group. NeOProM: Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration study protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2011 Jan 17;11:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-6. PubMed 21235822 ↗
  • Askie LM, Darlow BA, Finer N, Schmidt B, Stenson B, Tarnow-Mordi W, Davis PG, Carlo WA, Brocklehurst P, Davies LC, Das A, Rich W, Gantz MG, Roberts RS, Whyte RK, Costantini L, Poets C, Asztalos E, Battin M, Halliday HL, Marlow N, Tin W, King A, Juszczak E, Morley CJ, Doyle LW, Gebski V, Hunter KE, Simes RJ; Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis (NeOProM) Collaboration. Association Between Oxygen Saturation Targeting and Death or Disability in Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Oxygenation Prospective Meta-analysis Collaboration. JAMA. 2018 Jun 5;319(21):2190-2201. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5725. Erratum In: JAMA. 2018 Jul 17;320(3):308. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.9635. PubMed 29872859 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01124331
Lead sponsor
University of Sydney
Collaborators
University of Otago, University of Oxford, University of Pennsylvania, University of California, San Diego
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 17, 2010
Start date
Mar 2005
Primary completion
Aug 2014
Completion
Aug 2014
Last update
Mar 13, 2019

Study contacts

Lisa Askie
principal investigator · National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion