ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07837700Updated Sep 23, 2026

Parent Perceptions of OptiPAP Junior

An interventional study of Nasal CPAP interface: OptiPAP Junior and Nasal CPAP interface: FlexiTrunk in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD), Preterm Birth Complication and Pulmonary, sponsored by Sharp HealthCare. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 30 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Sharp HealthCare · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 30 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate how different forms of respiratory support affect parent interaction, how parents feel about different methods of support, and how their child's current respiratory support level is perceived in the setting of long-term outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The information gathered in this study is relevant to all NICU families of children who need respiratory support as the investigators will assess parent perceptions of different devices, namely the OptiPAP Junior, as well as aspects of respiratory support to share with the broader NICU community and change how NICU providers talk about these devices and lung outcomes with parents.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD)
  • Preterm Birth Complication
  • Pulmonary
  • CPAP

Keywords

  • parent perception
  • NICU
  • respiratory support
03

In context

Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

362 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 244 interventional studies indexed under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Browse Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Sharp HealthCare is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (60%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 30 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infants born less than 31 weeks who have been stable for 72 hours on continuous positive pressure level (CPAP) of support via a standard interface.
  • Parents (females or males) must be greater than 18 years of age at the time of the interview after their infant has experienced both respiratory modalities.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants will be excluded if they have suspected or confirmed abnormalities/trauma to the skull or airway involving any abnormal connection that may allow pressure to be transmitted to unintended anatomical structures or tissues.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OptiPAP Junior

    The OptiPAP Junior device (Fisher \& Paykel) is an FDA cleared device interface for the provision of pressure-based respiratory support to be used in accordance with its approved labeling.

    Device: Nasal CPAP interface: OptiPAP Junior

  • Active comparator
    Flexitrunk

    The Flexitrunk (Fisher \& Paykel) is a predominant interface used in neonatal care units. Flexitrunk is an FDA cleared device interface for the provision of pressure-based respiratory support to be used in accordance with its approved labeling.

    Device: Nasal CPAP interface: FlexiTrunk

Interventions

  • DeviceNasal CPAP interface: OptiPAP Junior

    FDA 510(k)-cleared non-invasive nasal interface used to deliver continuous positive airway pressure. Infants receive CPAP via the OptiPAP Junior interface for 5 consecutive days, either as the first or second interface depending on randomized sequence. CPAP level and duration are managed by the clinical team per standard NICU practice; the device is used in accordance with its cleared labeling

  • DeviceNasal CPAP interface: FlexiTrunk

    FDA-cleared Class I, 510(k)-exempt nasal interface that is the standard CPAP interface in many neonatal care units. Infants receive CPAP via the FlexiTrunk interface for 5 consecutive days, either as the first or second interface depending on randomized sequence. CPAP level and duration are managed by the clinical team per standard NICU practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parent perception of different respiratory devices

    To assess parent perception of different respiratory devices, namely the OptiPAP Junior, in comparison to other modalities through semi-structured parent interviews.

    Time frame: From baseline to study completion, an average of 3 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parent perception and recommendations on inpatient pulmonary support and outcome measurements

    To detail family member perception of lung disease and respiratory support, parent recommendations of how to improve NICU bonding in setting of respiratory needs, and parent recommendations on inpatient pulmonary outcome measurements through semi-structured parent interviews.

    Time frame: From baseline to study completion, an average of 3 months.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ando H, Cousins R, Young C. Achieving Saturation in Thematic Analysis: Development and Refinement of a Codebook. Comprehensive Psychology. 2014;3:03.CP.3.4.
  • Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How Many Interviews Are Enough? Field Methods - FIELD METHOD. 2006;18:59-82.
  • Dorner RA, Boss RD, Vazifedan T, Johnson E, Garzon A, Lemmon ME. Life on the Frontlines: Caregiver Experience of Pediatric Cerebrospinal Shunt Malfunction. Pediatr Neurol. 2023 Oct;147:124-129. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.07.021. Epub 2023 Aug 2. PubMed 37611406 ↗
  • Dorner RA, Boss RD, Burton VJ, Raja K, Lemmon ME. Parent preferences for neurodevelopmental screening in the neonatal intensive care unit. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 Apr;62(4):500-505. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14457. Epub 2020 Jan 7. PubMed 31909496 ↗
  • Dorner RA, Boss RD, Burton VJ, Raja K, Robinson S, Lemmon ME. Isolated and On Guard: Preparing Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Families for Life with Hydrocephalus. Am J Perinatol. 2022 Sep;39(12):1341-1347. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722344. Epub 2021 Jan 17. PubMed 33454943 ↗
  • Thivierge E, Luu TM, Bourque CJ, Barrington KJ, Pearce R, Jaworski M, Janvier A. Pulmonary important outcomes after extremely preterm birth: Parental perspectives. Acta Paediatr. 2023 May;112(5):970-976. doi: 10.1111/apa.16723. Epub 2023 Mar 3. PubMed 36815277 ↗
  • Callahan KP, Kielt MJ, Feudtner C, Barkman D, Bamat N, Fierro J, Fiest E, DeMauro SB. Ranking Future Outcomes Most Important to Parents of Children with Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. J Pediatr. 2023 Aug;259:113455. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113455. Epub 2023 May 10. PubMed 37172804 ↗
  • Klingenberg C, Pettersen M, Hansen EA, Gustavsen LJ, Dahl IA, Leknessund A, Kaaresen PI, Nordhov M. Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 Mar;99(2):F134-7. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-304525. Epub 2013 Nov 13. PubMed 24225220 ↗
  • Manley BJ, Owen L, Doyle LW, Davis PG. High-flow nasal cannulae and nasal continuous positive airway pressure use in non-tertiary special care nurseries in Australia and New Zealand. J Paediatr Child Health. 2012 Jan;48(1):16-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02186.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12. PubMed 21988616 ↗
  • Abman SH, Bancalari E, Jobe A. The Evolution of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia after 50 Years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 15;195(4):421-424. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201611-2386ED. No abstract available. PubMed 28199157 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data, particularly data that underlie the results reported in this article after deidentification will be available with other researchers, including data dictionaries for meta-analysis.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 14 months later.

Of 71 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 73 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 63.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2026
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Sep 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07837700
Lead sponsor
Sharp HealthCare
Collaborators
Fisher & Paykel
Responsible party
Rebecca Dorner, MD, MHS (Principal Investigator, Sharp HealthCare) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Rebecca Dorner, MD, MHS
Contact
Rebecca.Dorner@sharp.com
858-939-4391

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion