ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01115400QOLUpdated Apr 20, 2022

Quality of Life Evaluations in Patients With Abdominal Wall Hernias

An observational study in Hernia, sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-04-20.

Primary conditionHernia, AbdominalRegistry: HerniaReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Hernia — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Hernia, Abdominal
Why
  1. The study's title name Hernia, Abdominal, a narrower term within Hernia.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of life in patients with abdominal wall hernias using a user-friendly survey that is designed specifically for this population of patients. The investigators would like to use this survey to elucidate how quality of life of the patient is changed with the presence of an abdominal wall hernia.

Read the detailed description

Abdominal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgery procedures performed in the United States. Hernia occurrences after prior abdominal surgeries can range anywhere from 20-50%. Small abdominal defects (\<3cm) can generally be repaired primarily, however, anything larger usually requires placement of mesh. If the defects are massive and complicated from prior repairs; they often require prolonged operating time, and sometimes even multiple-staged procedures to complete repair. In patients with co-morbidities and needing abdominal hernia repair, the surgeons are generally cautious in recommending surgical treatments as long as no acute emergency exists due to the hernia. Due to the high post-operative complications in these patients, the risks of the surgery may outweigh the benefit of the repair. As a result, many patients with large, complicated hernias are delegated to medical management including the use of abdominal binders, conservative treatments of enterocutaneous fistula and chronic infections. However, these decisions are frequently made from the point of the view of the surgeons, and not the patients.

The investigators would like to evaluate how the patients perceive living with abdominal hernias, and how they view the effect of their quality of life affected by hernias. If the quality of life in these patients is severely affected, the investigators may be able to use that information to stratify these patients and to gauge the necessity of future repairs.

Currently, there is no quality of life survey target specifically for patients with abdominal hernia. Most institutions use the SF36 or a shortened SF36 form to evaluate quality of life. However, the SF36 is generic and cumbersome. It was originally designed for renal failure patients and is not entirely appropriate for hernia patients. This protocol will be the first one to use factors that are specific to hernia patients to accurately describe the patient's quality of life. Also, by generating a quality of life score for patients with different degrees of hernias, the investigators will be able to better stratify patients who may benefit from the hernia repair more than what the surgeons perceive because of the patients' other co-morbidities. And furthermore, the investigators would also like to show the improvement in quality of life in these patients after their successful repairs.

The Hernia QOL survey will be compared with the SF12 (a shortened version of the SF36).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hernia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Abdominal Wall Hernia
  • quality of life
03

In context

Hernia, Abdominal Reclassified

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Abdominal; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 90 is below the median of 115 across 29 observational studies indexed under Hernia, Abdominal.

Browse Hernia, Abdominal studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 295 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 30 (83%) have results posted.

Compared within Hernia, Abdominal, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Hernia. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This protocol will involve patients presenting to University Hospitals Case Medical Center for evaluation of abdominal hernias.

The study population will include all adult patients with the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias, without incarceration or strangulation of bowels. The investigators will need about 90 subjects to participate in this study.

The survey will be entirely anonymous; no patient information will be given out in any part of the survey.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects who are 18 years of age and older
  • Subjects of either sex
  • Subjects with the diagnosis of abdominal wall hernias
  • Subjects who agree to participate in the study program

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subjects who present to clinic with acute incarceration or strangulation of bowel
  • Subjects who are unable to read or write to complete the survey
  • Pregnant women, minors, psychiatric patients and prisoners
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (actual)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of life perception

    The investigators would like to evaluate how the patients perceive living with abdominal hernias, and how they view the changes from their baseline in their quality of life since their hernia. If the quality of life in these patients is severely affected,the investigators may be able to use that information to stratify these patients and to gauge the necessity of future repairs

    Time frame: up to 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Hospitals Case Medical Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2007 to primary completion in Jul 2012, 60 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 12, 2010
First posted
May 4, 2010
StartActual
Jul 2007
Primary completionActual
Jul 2012
CompletionActual
Aug 2012
Last update
Apr 20, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 20, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01115400
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2010
Start date
Jul 2007
Primary completion
Jul 2012
Completion
Aug 2012
Last update
Apr 20, 2022

Study contacts

Michael J Rosen, MD
principal investigator · Univesity Hospitals Case Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion