CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01112956Updated Mar 23, 2011

Serologic Assays for the Diagnosis of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2

An observational study in Genital Herpes, sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 55 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-03-23.

Sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,500
Ages
16 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purposes of this study are:

  • To determine the accuracy of commercially available serologic assays in diagnosing patients with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2);
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the commerical assays using HSV-2 western blot as the "gold standard" in a diverse patient population;
  • To develop testing strategies and recommendations for screening asymptomatic populations for HSV-2.
Read the detailed description

The purposes of this study are:

  • To determine the accuracy of commercially available serologic assays in diagnosing patients with herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2);
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the commerical assays using HSV-2 western blot as the "gold standard" in a diverse patient population;
  • To develop testing strategies and recommendations for screening asymptomatic populations for HSV-2.

We will evaluate the assays in diverse populations:

  1. STD clinic population
  2. Men who have sex with men, with high prevalence of HIV infection
  3. Pregnant women

The study will inform the development of testing strategies:

  1. Combine commercial tests to optimize positive predict value (PPV) and negative predict value (NPV)
  2. Increase cutoff values to increase PPV
  3. Understand factors associated with false positive results that may include HSV-1 infection, pregnancy status, HIV infection, and age/race etc.
02

Conditions studied

  • Genital Herpes

Keywords

  • HSV-2
  • HSV-1
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Testing algorithm
  • Test evaluation
03

In context

Herpes Simplex

305 studies on the registry are indexed under Herpes Simplex; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,500 is above the median of 180 across 55 observational studies indexed under Herpes Simplex.

Browse Herpes Simplex studies →

Lead sponsor

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the lead sponsor of 273 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will comprise of diverse ethnic and racial populations derived from 3 Health and Human Services Regions and recruited from different type of clinics: 1) STD clinics 2) Prenatal clinic 3) Health clinic for gay men

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women 16-55 years of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those who refuse to get tested for HIV
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,500 participants (actual)
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • STD clinic patients

    Patients attending sexually transmitted Disease clinics. If the initial testing result reported to the patient is confirmed by the Western Blot test, no follow-up specimens will be collected. If the initial testing result reported to the patient is different from the result by the Western Blot test, patients will be asked to provide a follow-up specimen 3-4 months after initial testing.

  • Pregnant women

    Women recruited from prenatal clinic. A follow-up visit may or may not needed depending on results from the initial test and Western blot test.

  • Men who have Sex with men (MSM)

    Men recruited from a clinic for MSM with high risk for HIV infection. A follow-up visit may or may not needed depending on results from the initial test and Western blot test.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and Specificity using Western Blot as the Gold Standard test

    Time frame: Up to 4 months after initial testing

Secondary outcomes

  1. In population with relative low prevalence of HSV-2 infection (e.g. persons <=25 years), whether a combination of tests (i.e. testing algorithm(s)) can increase the positive predictive value to the level of >= 95%

    Time frame: Up to 4 months after initial testing

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • John Hopkins University
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • New York University School of Medicine
    New York, New York 10016, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 23, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01112956
Lead sponsor
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Collaborators
Massachusetts General Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, NYU Langone Health
First posted
Apr 29, 2010
Start date
Jul 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Completion
Feb 2011
Last update
Mar 23, 2011

Study contacts

Donna Felsenstein, MD
principal investigator · Massachusetts General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion