ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05514002Updated Jul 30, 2026Results posted

Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Versus Standard Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Adults 18-64 Years

A Phase 4 interventional study of Fluzone Quadrivalent and Flublok Quadrivalent in Influenza, Human, sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
3,988
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized, active comparator trial will compare the clinical efficacy of recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) to standard-dose egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine (SD IIV) among adults aged 18-64 years. The primary study hypothesis is that the clinical efficacy of RIV is superior to that of SD IIV to prevent and attenuate influenza-like illness (ILI)-associated influenza virus infection. Relative efficacy will be assessed by comparing rates of ILI-associated reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed influenza virus infection and measures of infection and illness attenuation among participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV. A secondary hypothesis is that humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to RIV are superior to responses to SD IIV. Relative immunogenicity will be assessed by comparing markers of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses post-vaccination among a subset of participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV.

Read the detailed description

This randomized, active comparator trial will compare the clinical efficacy of recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV) to standard-dose egg-based inactivated influenza vaccine (SD IIV) among adults aged 18-64 years. The primary study hypothesis is that the clinical efficacy of RIV is superior to that of SD IIV to prevent and attenuate influenza-like illness (ILI)-associated influenza virus infection. Relative efficacy will be assessed by comparing rates of ILI-associated reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed influenza virus infection and measures of infection and illness attenuation among participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV. A secondary hypothesis is that humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to RIV are superior to responses to SD IIV. Relative immunogenicity will be assessed by comparing markers of humoral and cell-mediated immune responses post-vaccination among a subset of participants who receive RIV versus SD IIV

The trial will be conducted at up to 6 sites in the United States during at least two influenza seasons (2022-23 and 2023-24). Stratified enrollment procedures will be used to enroll a representative mix of participants based on age (18-49 and 50-64 years). In addition, an enrollment quota will be used to enroll a minimum proportion of trial participants that self-identify as from a racial or ethnic group that has been historically underrepresented in clinical trials to optimize the racial and ethnic representativeness of the trial population compared to the US source population.

Eligible participants at each site will be randomized 1:1 to receive a single dose of RIV (Flublok® Quadrivalent by Sanofi Pasteur, 45µg of HA per strain) versus a single dose of SD IIV (Fluzone® Quadrivalent by Sanofi Pasteur, 15 µg of HA per strain) during approximately September through mid-November of 2022 or 2023. At a subset of sites, approximately 120 participants per trial season will be recruited and enrolled into an immunogenicity substudy with blood collection. All study vaccines are licensed for use in adults aged >18 years in the United States; RIV is licensed for adults aged >=18 years and SD IIV is licensed for persons aged >=6 months. Participants and study investigators will be blinded to study arm assignment. Designated study staff administering vaccines will be aware of study arm assignment and will not be involved with study surveillance to avoid involvement with measurement of study outcomes.

All participants will be followed with surveillance for ILI-associated RT-PCR-confirmed influenza virus infection. ILI will be defined as subjective (i.e., participant-reported) fever, cough, runny nose, or sore throat. Starting at enrollment, participants will respond to weekly text messages or emails asking about new onset of ILI symptoms to familiarize them with the electronic surveillance procedures and keep them engaged in the study prior to circulation of influenza viruses in the community. Once national and/or state influenza surveillance systems indicate that influenza viruses have begun circulating in the United States or no later than the first week of December, participants will also self-collect mid-turbinate nasal swabs (henceforth referred to as 'nasal swabs') with onset of ILI symptoms and self-ship or drop off swabs at designated sites for shipment to a central laboratory. Samples will be tested for influenza viruses by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Samples may also be tested for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and other respiratory viruses. During the influenza virus circulation period or no later than the first week of December, participants who report ILI symptoms during the surveillance contacts will complete follow-up questionnaires to provide detailed information about their illnesses. Electronic surveillance and nasal swab collection will continue until local influenza virus circulation ends with the option to restart surveillance if additional periods of influenza virus circulation occur through May of each trial season.

Participants in the immunogenicity substudy will have blood collected just prior to vaccination and at approximately 7 days, 28 days, and 6 months post-vaccination to evaluate humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to vaccination; these participants will also have two nasal swabs collected prior to vaccination and at approximately 7 and 28 days post-vaccination for human microbiome characterization.

Sites will aim to enroll a combined total of up to 16,247 participants during the 2022-23 and 2023-24 seasons; up to about 7,000 of these will be in the first year. The immunogenicity substudy site(s) will aim to enroll 120 participants each season (60 per vaccine arm) who will contribute blood for serum, plasma, and peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) collection and nasal swabs for human microbiome characterization. A blinded sample size re-estimation will be conducted at the end of the first trial season by an independent designated statistician with experience with adaptive trial approaches. The analysis will follow a pre-specified analysis plan, and the recommended revised sample size will be shared with the trial steering committee for decision-making. Participants from the first trial season may be eligible for the second trial season; all participants will complete eligibility screening and consent processes at the start of each trial season. Participants from the first trial season who consent to participate in the second trial season will be rerandomized.

02

Conditions studied

  • Influenza, Human

Browse trials for

03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,356 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 184 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3,988 is above the median of 227 across 1,957 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 11 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (73%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-64 years
  • Comfortable reading and responding to text messages or emails sent in either English, Spanish, or Chinese
  • Currently enrolled as a student in a college or graduate degree program AND attending in-person classes with other students.

OR Currently employed as a frontline worker defined as an occupation that cannot be done from home or alone AND have direct face-to-face contact, defined as being within 6 feet, or about two arms' lengths, with co-workers, patients or the public as part of full-time (at least 20 hours per week) job responsibilities.

  • Have daily access to the internet and a mobile phone that can send and receive text messages.
  • Plan to continue to live/work in the study area through May 2023 (if trial season 1) or May 2024 (if trial season 2). For students in college or graduate degree programs, this is defined as living/working in the area excluding brief absences during school vacation periods.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lives with another person who is already enrolled in this study as reported by the subject.
  • Previous reaction to the study vaccines as reported by the subject.
  • Has already received current year influenza vaccine on our after July 1, 2022 as reported by the subject.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
3,988 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV)

    recombinant vaccine Flublok® Quadrivalent

    Biological: Flublok Quadrivalent

  • Active comparator
    Standard-Dose Inactivate Influenza Vaccine (SD IIV)

    egg-based vaccines Fluzone® Quadrivalent or Fluarix® Quadrivalent at approximately 28 days after receipt of the 2018-19 and 2019-20 vaccines

    Biological: Fluzone Quadrivalent

Interventions

  • BiologicalFluzone Quadrivalent

    Intramuscular

  • BiologicalFlublok Quadrivalent

    Intramuscular

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. RT-PCR-Confirmed Influenza Infection

    Number of participants with RT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection during the influenza circulation period. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was calculated as (1 - hazard ratio comparing RIV vs SD-IIV) × 100%.

    Time frame: From ≥14 days after vaccination through end of surveillance (up to 16 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to Return to Usual Health Following Influenza Illness

    Number of days from onset of influenza illness until return to usual health, defined as two consecutive days reporting return to usual health on the FLU-PRO Plus instrument.

    Time frame: Up to 14 days after onset of influenza illness

07

Results

Posted Jul 30, 2026
Limitations and caveats
Enrollment was lower than planned because the study ended after a single influenza season due to funding constraints, resulting in approximately 25% of the target sample size and limited statistical power to detect differences in relative vaccine effectiveness. The study was conducted during a single influenza season, which may limit generalizability to other seasons.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneQuadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)
Started19951993
Completed19761976
Not completed1917
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1917

Outcome measures

PrimaryRT-PCR-Confirmed Influenza Infection

Number of participants with RT-PCR-confirmed influenza infection during the influenza circulation period. Relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was calculated as (1 - hazard ratio comparing RIV vs SD-IIV) × 100%.

Time frame:
From ≥14 days after vaccination through end of surveillance (up to 16 weeks)
Reported as:
Number · participants
RT-PCR-Confirmed Influenza Infection
participantsQuadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)
RT-PCR-confirmed influenza2028
No RT-PCR-confirmed influenza19431936
Statistical analysis
  • Quadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4) vs Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4) · Cox proportional hazard: 29 · 95% CI -26 to 60rVE calculated as (1 - hazard ratio) × 100%.
SecondaryTime to Return to Usual Health Following Influenza Illness

Number of days from onset of influenza illness until return to usual health, defined as two consecutive days reporting return to usual health on the FLU-PRO Plus instrument.

Time frame:
Up to 14 days after onset of influenza illness
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to Return to Usual Health Following Influenza Illness
daysQuadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)
Time to Return to Usual Health Following Influenza Illness10.5 ± 3.310.9 ± 2.7

Adverse events

Collected over From vaccination through end of study follow-up (approximately 16 weeks). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Quadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)0/1,995 (0%)0/1,995 (0%)0/1,995 (0%)
Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)0/1,993 (0%)0/1,993 (0%)0/1,993 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Modified intention-to-treat population including randomized participants who received study vaccine and responded to at least one surveillance contact during the influenza circulation period.

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Quadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)Total
18-49 years164516463291
50-64 years331330661
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)Quadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)Total
Female125512212476
Male6847221406
Transgender/Other121224
None of these252146
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Quadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native141529
Asian390392782
Black or African American232228460
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander134
White117311752348
Multiracial7375148
Declined/missing race9388181
Hispanic or Latino/a301299600
Not Hispanic or Latino/a163316413274
Declined/missing ethnicity423678
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Quadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine (RIV4)Quadrivalent Standard-Dose Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (SD-IIV4)Total
United States197619763952
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • University of Arizona
    Tucson, Arizona 85724, United States
  • Florida A&M University
    Tallahassee, Florida 32307, United States
  • Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84119, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Grant L, Whitaker JA, Yoon SK, Lutrick K, Bhargava S, Brown CP, Zaragoza E, Fink RV, Meece J, Wielgosz K, El Sahly H, Hegmann KT, Lowe AA, Southworth A, Tatum T, Ball SW, Levine MZ, Thiese MS, Battan-Wraith S, Barnes J, Phillips AL, Fry AM, Dawood FS; Randomized Assessment of Influenza Vaccine Efficacy Network (RAIVEN). Relative Effectiveness and Immunogenicity of Quadrivalent Recombinant Influenza Vaccine Versus Egg-Based Inactivated Influenza Vaccine Among Adults Aged 18-64 Years: Results and Experience From a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Sep 26;11(10):ofae559. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae559. eCollection 2024 Oct. PubMed 39416990 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Upon the completion of all study deliverables and after a suitable moratorium, external parties may request de-identified study data from the steering committee as specified in U.S. Government Data Sharing guidelines.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: Upon the completion of all study deliverables and dissemination of analyses to meet the protocol objectives.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05514002
Collaborators
Westat, University of Arizona, Florida A&M University, Baylor College of Medicine, University of Utah
Responsible party
Lauren Grant (Principal investigator, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2022
Start date
Sep 13, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2023
Results posted
Jul 30, 2026
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Fatimah S Dawood, MD
principal investigator · Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion