CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT01112852EVLUpdated Apr 28, 2010

EVL (Endoscopic Variceal Ligation) Plus Vasoconstrictor vs.Ligation Plus PPI( Proton Pump Inhibitor) in the Control of Acute Esophageal Variceal Bleeding

A Phase 4 interventional study of pantoloc 40 mg and somatostatin or terlipressin in Esophageal Varices and Bleeding, sponsored by National Science Council, Taiwan. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-04-28.

Sponsored by National Science Council, Taiwan · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
118
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Previous studies showed that combination of endoscopic therapy with vasoconstrictor is better than either vasoconstrictor or endoscopic therapy alone in achieving the successful hemostatsis of acute variceal bleeding. The rationale of using vasoconstrictor is to enhance the efficacy of hemostasis by endoscopic therapy. Nowadays, endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has replaced endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) as the endoscopic treatment of choice in the arresting of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. EVL alone can achieve hemotasis up to 97% even in cases of active variceal hemorrhage. However, early rebleeding due to ligation-induced ulcer may be encountered. It appears that prevention of esophageal ulcers and bleeding by a proton pump inhibitor may be more logical than using a vasoconstrictor after cessation of bleeding by EVL.

Read the detailed description

Previous studies showed that combination of endoscopic therapy with vasoconstrictor is better than either vasoconstrictor or endoscopic therapy alone in achieving the successful hemostatsis of acute variceal bleeding. The rationale of using vasoconstrictor is to enhance the efficacy of hemostasis by endoscopic therapy. Nowadays, endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) has replaced endoscopic injection sclerotherapy (EIS) as the endoscopic treatment of choice in the arresting of acute esophageal variceal hemorrhage. EVL alone can achieve hemotasis up to 97% even in cases of active variceal hemorrhage. However, early rebleeding due to ligation-induced ulcer may be encountered. It appears that prevention of esophageal ulcers and bleeding by a proton pump inhibitor may be more logical than using a vasoconstrictor after cessation of bleeding by EVL.

Thus, we designed a controlled trial to compare the initial hemostasis, early rebleeding rate in cirrhotic patients presenting with acute variceal bleeding receiving either emergency EVL plus somatostatin infusion or losec infusion for 5 days.

AIMS:

To investigate whether the combination of EVL and somatostatin is superior to the combination of EVL and losec in terms of efficacy in the arresting of acute esophageal variceal bleeding and very early rebleeding.

02

Conditions studied

  • Esophageal Varices
  • Bleeding

Keywords

  • control of bleed
03

In context

Esophageal and Gastric Varices

169 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal and Gastric Varices; 41 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 118 is above the median of 104 across 109 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal and Gastric Varices.

Browse Esophageal and Gastric Varices studies →

Lead sponsor

National Science Council, Taiwan is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The etiology of portal hypertension is cirrhosis.
  • Age ranges between 18-80 y/o.
  • Patients presenting with acute esophageal variceal bleeding proven by emergency endoscopy within 12 hours. (Acute esophageal variceal bleeding was defined as: (1) when blood was directly seen by endoscopy to issue from an esophageal varix (active bleeding), or (2) when patients presented with red color signs on their esophageal varices with blood in esophagus or stomach and no other potential site of bleeding identified (inactive bleeding).
  • EVL is performed after confirmation of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. Enrollment time: Immediately after EVL is completed and variceal bleeding is arrested.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Association with severe systemic illness, such as sepsis, COPD, uremia
  • Association with gastric variceal bleeding
  • Failure in the control of bleeding by emergency EVL
  • Moribund patients, died within 12 hours of enrollment
  • Uncooperative
  • Ever received EIS, EVL within one month prior to index bleeding
  • Child-Pugh's scores > 13
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
118 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    EVL + vasoconstrictor

    Somatostatin 6mg in 500 cc 5% dextrose, 250μg slow bolus IV infusion followed by 250μg per hour (6mg/ 24 hours) or Terlipressin 2mg bolus was instituted on enrollment followed by 1mg per 6 hours for 5 days. The use of either somatostatin or glypressin was at the discretion of doctors in charge.

    Drug: somatostatin or terlipressin

  • Experimental
    EVL + PPI

    Pantoloc 40 mg intravenously per day was instituted on enrollment and continued for 5

    Drug: pantoloc 40 mg

Interventions

  • Drugpantoloc 40 mg

    pantoloc iv. infusion per day

    Also known as: pantoloc, a proton pump inhibitor

  • Drugsomatostatin or terlipressin

    Somatostatin 6mg in 500 cc 5% dextrose, 250μg slow bolus IV infusion followed by 250μg per hour (6mg/ 24 hours) or Terlipressin 2mg bolus was instituted on enrollment followed by 1mg per 6 hours for 5 days. The use of either somatostatin or glypressin was at the discretion of doctors in charge.

    Also known as: somatostatin and terlipressin are vasoconstrictors.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success rate of initial hemostasis

    Definition of initial hemostasis Initial hemostasis was defined as achieving a 24h bleeding-free period within the first 48h after treatment together with stable vital signs based on Baveno consensus criteria. Very early rebleeding was defined as: UGI bleeding occurred after initial hemostasis and within 5 days after enrollment. UGI bleeding was proven to be from esophageal varices.

    Time frame: 5 days

  2. very early rebleeding

    Very early rebleeding is defined as episodes of variceal bleeding 48-120 hours after treatment.

    Time frame: 48-120 hours after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. The amount of blood transfusion within 42 days

    The amount of blood transfusion during admission was recorded.

    Time frame: 42 days

  2. Mortality

    Mortality within 42 days was recorded and compared.

    Time frame: within 42 days

  3. The size and number of ulcers on varices

    If p't agrees, a second look endoscopy is performed to detect ulcers.

    Time frame: 2 weeks after treatment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lo GH, Perng DS, Chang CY, Tai CM, Wang HM, Lin HC. Controlled trial of ligation plus vasoconstrictor versus proton pump inhibitor in the control of acute esophageal variceal bleeding. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;28(4):684-9. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12107. PubMed 23278466 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01112852
Lead sponsor
National Science Council, Taiwan
First posted
Apr 28, 2010
Start date
Dec 2006
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Apr 2010
Last update
Apr 28, 2010

Study contacts

Gin-Ho Lo
principal investigator · E-DA Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion