ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07699354CoAGS-GVUpdated Jul 13, 2026

Cyanoacrylate Glue Versus Absorbable Gelatin Sponge for Gastric Varices

An interventional study of EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Cyanoacrylate Glue and Lipiodol and EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Absorbable Gelatin Sponge in Gastric Varices Bleeding, Gastric Varices and Portal Hypertension, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-13.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study compares two endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatments for gastric varices, which are enlarged veins in the stomach that can bleed. Both treatments use small coils placed into the varix. One group will receive coils with cyanoacrylate medical glue, and the other group will receive coils with absorbable gelatin sponge.

The purpose of the study is to determine whether absorbable gelatin sponge with coils is not worse than cyanoacrylate glue with coils for closing off gastric varices, and to compare safety outcomes. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Participants and outcome assessors will not know which treatment was used, but the doctor performing the procedure will know.

After the procedure, participants will be followed for up to 12 months. Follow-up may include clinical assessments, questionnaires about health and quality of life, CT imaging shortly after the procedure, and repeat endoscopic ultrasound assessments to evaluate whether the gastric varix has been successfully treated.

Read the detailed description

Gastric varices are enlarged veins in the stomach that occur in patients with portal hypertension and can cause serious bleeding. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy allows direct visualization of the target varix, placement of embolization coils, delivery of an embolic material, and Doppler assessment of blood flow after treatment.

Cyanoacrylate glue combined with coils is an established treatment approach for gastric varices. However, glue injection can be technically challenging and may be associated with complications such as embolization or equipment-related issues. Absorbable gelatin sponge, delivered as a slurry with coils, is an alternative approach that is used in clinical care and may avoid some of the practical limitations of glue. Comparative randomized data between these approaches are limited.

This is a randomized, patient- and assessor-blinded, non-inferiority trial comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil embolization with cyanoacrylate glue versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil embolization with absorbable gelatin sponge for the treatment of gastric varices. Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio after confirmation of eligibility and informed consent. Randomization will occur intra-procedurally before treatment.

Participants assigned to the cyanoacrylate group will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol. Participants assigned to the absorbable gelatin sponge group will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry. In both groups, Doppler assessment will be used to evaluate blood flow in the target varix after treatment. Repeat coil and/or embolic material injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist.

Participants will be monitored after the procedure for complications, including bleeding and embolization. Follow-up includes CT imaging approximately 48 hours after the procedure, clinical and questionnaire-based follow-up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and repeat endoscopic assessment with endoscopic ultrasound at approximately 3 months and 12 months. The primary endpoint is complete obliteration of the target gastric varix, assessed by absence of Doppler flow on follow-up endoscopic ultrasound at 3 months. Secondary and tertiary outcomes include immediate technical success, clinical success, rebleeding, adverse events, hospital admission, ICU admission, transfusion requirements, reintervention, length of stay, procedural technical difficulty, costs, and health-related quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastric Varices Bleeding
  • Gastric Varices
  • Portal Hypertension

Keywords

  • Endoscopic ultrasound
  • EUS-guided therapy
  • Portal hypertension
  • Cyanoacrylate glue
  • Absorbable gelatin sponge
  • Gelfoam
  • Coil embolization
  • Variceal obliteration
  • Secondary prophylaxis
03

In context

Esophageal and Gastric Varices

150 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal and Gastric Varices; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is below the median of 110 across 96 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal and Gastric Varices.

Browse Esophageal and Gastric Varices studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Gastric varices deemed suitable for EUS-guided endoscopic treatment.
  • History of suspected gastric variceal bleeding or active gastric variceal bleeding, with treatment intended for secondary prophylaxis.
  • Ability to provide directly or through a substitute decision maker.
  • Willingness and ability to undergo clinical follow-up, EUS assessment, and CT imaging.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability or unwillingness to provide directly or through a substitute decision maker.
  • No gastric varix present, or gastric varix too small or not amenable to combination therapy.
  • to therapeutic EUS or endoscopy.
  • Contraindication to any study material used in the assigned treatment arm.
  • Contraindication to contrast-enhanced CT, if not clinically manageable.
  • Inability to complete planned follow-up.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Any clinical situation in which the treating endoscopist determines that randomization would be unsafe or inappropriate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Cyanoacrylate Glue + Lipiodol + Coil

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of the target gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol. Repeat coil and/or glue injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment will be performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.

    Procedure: EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Cyanoacrylate Glue and Lipiodol

  • Experimental
    Absorbable Gelatin Sponge + Coil

    Participants randomized to this arm will undergo endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of the target gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry. Repeat coil and/or absorbable gelatin sponge injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment will be performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.

    Procedure: EUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Absorbable Gelatin Sponge

Interventions

  • ProcedureEUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Cyanoacrylate Glue and Lipiodol

    Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of a gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of cyanoacrylate glue mixed with Lipiodol under direct visualization. The injection is flushed with sterile water. Repeat coil and/or glue injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment is performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.

    Also known as: Glue + Lipiodol + Coil; Cyanoacrylate Glue; Glubran2

  • ProcedureEUS-Guided Coil Embolization With Absorbable Gelatin Sponge

    Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of a gastric varix using coil deployment followed by injection of absorbable gelatin sponge slurry under direct visualization. The slurry is flushed with sterile water. Repeat coil and/or absorbable gelatin sponge injection may be performed at the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Doppler assessment is performed to assess eradication of flow in the treated gastric varix.

    Also known as: Gelfoam + Coil; Absorbable Gelatin Sponge; Gelfoam Slurry

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Complete Obliteration of the Target Gastric Varix on EUS

    Proportion of participants with complete obliteration of the target gastric varix, defined as cessation or absence of Doppler flow within the target varix on follow-up endoscopic ultrasound.

    Time frame: 3 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Immediate Technical Success

    Successful EUS-guided deployment of coil and assigned embolic material into the gastric varix with cessation of Doppler flow at the end of the procedure.

    Time frame: During index procedure

  2. Short-Term Clinical Success

    Cessation of bleeding if present at baseline and/or absence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding after the intervention.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months post-intervention

  3. Procedure-Related Adverse Events

    Rate and severity of procedure-related adverse events, categorized according to the ASGE Lexicon for endoscopic adverse events.

    Time frame: From index procedure through 12 months

  4. Long-Term Technical Success

    Complete obliteration of the treated gastric varix on repeat EUS, defined as absence of Doppler flow in the treated target varix.

    Time frame: 12 months post-intervention

  5. Long-Term Clinical Success

    Absence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding and assessment of clinical durability after the intervention.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months post-intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Transfusion Requirements

    Number of blood product transfusions required after the intervention.

    Time frame: From index procedure through 12 months

  2. Rebleeding

    Occurrence of recurrent gastric variceal bleeding after the index intervention.

    Time frame: From index procedure through 12 months

  3. Hospital Length of Stay

    Length of hospital stay associated with the index presentation and intervention.

    Time frame: From index admission up to 30 days

  4. ICU Admission

    Occurrence of ICU admission after the intervention.

    Time frame: From index procedure through 12 months

  5. Hospital Readmission

    Occurrence of hospital readmission after the index intervention.

    Time frame: From index procedure through 12 months

  6. Reintervention for Gastric Varices

    Need for additional endoscopic, interventional radiology, surgical, or other therapy for gastric varices after the index intervention.

    Time frame: From index procedure through 12 months

  7. Procedural Technical Difficulty

    Operator-assessed technical difficulty, including procedure time, device use, and challenges encountered during the intervention.

    Time frame: During index procedure

  8. Intervention Cost

    Cost of the intervention, including use of coils and assigned embolic material.

    Time frame: During index procedure

  9. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Saracco G, Giordanino C, Roberto N, Ezio D, Luca T, Caronna S, Carucci P, De Bernardi Venon W, Barletti C, Bruno M, De Angelis C, Musso A, Repici A, Suriani R, Rizzetto M. Fatal multiple systemic embolisms after injection of cyanoacrylate in bleeding gastric varices of a patient who was noncirrhotic but with idiopathic portal hypertension. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 Feb;65(2):345-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.07.009. Epub 2006 Dec 1. No abstract available. PubMed 17141231 ↗
  • McCarty TR, Bazarbashi AN, Hathorn KE, Thompson CC, Ryou M. Combination therapy versus monotherapy for EUS-guided management of gastric varices: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Ultrasound. 2020 Jan-Feb;9(1):6-15. doi: 10.4103/eus.eus_37_19. PubMed 31417066 ↗
  • Bazarbashi AN, Wang TJ, Thompson CC, Ryou M. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of gastric varices with coil embolization and absorbable hemostatic gelatin sponge: a novel alternative to cyanoacrylate. Endosc Int Open. 2020 Feb;8(2):E221-E227. doi: 10.1055/a-1027-6708. Epub 2020 Jan 28. PubMed 32010757 ↗
  • Bazarbashi AN, Wang TJ, Jirapinyo P, Thompson CC, Ryou M. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Coil Embolization With Absorbable Gelatin Sponge Appears Superior to Traditional Cyanoacrylate Injection for the Treatment of Gastric Varices. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2020 May;11(5):e00175. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000175. PubMed 32677809 ↗
  • Florencio de Mesquita C, Antunes VLJ, Milioli NJ, Fernandes MV, Correa TL, Martins OC, Chavan R, Baraldo S. EUS-guided coiling plus glue injection compared with endoscopic glue injection alone in endoscopic treatment for gastric varices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Feb;101(2):331-340.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.005. Epub 2024 Oct 9. PubMed 39389435 ↗
  • Bhat YM, Weilert F, Fredrick RT, Kane SD, Shah JN, Hamerski CM, Binmoeller KF. EUS-guided treatment of gastric fundal varices with combined injection of coils and cyanoacrylate glue: a large U.S. experience over 6 years (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Jun;83(6):1164-72. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.09.040. Epub 2015 Oct 9. PubMed 26452992 ↗
  • Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, Fortune BE, Simonetto DA, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J. AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2024 May 1;79(5):1180-1211. doi: 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000647. Epub 2023 Oct 23. No abstract available. PubMed 37870298 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications may be shared with qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to review and approval by the study investigators, Unity Health Toronto institutional requirements, applicable privacy legislation, and any required data sharing agreement. No information that directly identifies participants will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Beginning after publication of the main study results and available for up to 5 years after publication.

Access criteria: Requests will be considered from qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal for purposes consistent with the informed consent and applicable ethics and privacy requirements. Access may require approval from the study investigators and/or institution and completion of a data sharing agreement.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07699354
Responsible party
Sunil Gupta (Assistant Professor, Unity Health Toronto) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 13, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 13, 2026

Study contacts

Kareem Khalaf, MD
Contact
kareem.khalaf@unityhealth.to
+1-416-360-4000 ext. 77537
Katina Zheng, MD
Contact
Katina.Zheng2@unityhealth.to
+1-416-360-4000 ext. 77537
Sunil Gupta, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Division of Gastroenterology, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion