A Phase 1/2 interventional study of PVS-10200 in Peripheral Artery Disease, sponsored by Shire. Completed at 3 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-28.
Sponsored by Shire · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of two doses of PVS-10200, an allogeneic cellular therapy, delivered as a single injection following percutaneous transluminal ("balloon") angioplasty and stent placement for the treatment of peripheral artery disease (PAD).
This is an open-label dose escalation safety study of PVS-10200 in 30 subjects with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requiring balloon angioplasty and stent placement in the superficial femoral artery (SFA). The study will be completed sequentially in two dose cohorts of 10 subjects (low dose group, Cohort A) and 20 subjects (high dose group, Cohort B). A Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will conduct regular safety reviews.
Each subject will receive one treatment of PVS-10200 delivered by ultrasound guided injection to the perivascular region (external to the vessel) of the stented target lesion. The treatment will be administered within 24 hours after balloon angioplasty/stent placement.
1,542 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 282 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 74 across 1,066 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.
Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →Shire is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Of its 47 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Meets anatomic requirements based on biplane digital subtraction angiography performed at the time of intervention including:
Exclusion Criteria:
Each subject will receive one treatment of PVS-10200 delivered by ultrasound guided injection perivascular to the region of the target lesion within 24 hours of the completed angioplasty and stent placement.
Biological: PVS-10200
PVS-10200 is composed of allogeneic human aortic endothelial cells cultured in a gelatin matrix.
Incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Major Adverse Events are: - Death - Major amputation - Procedural related serious adverse events - Investigational product related serious adverse events
Time frame: within 4 weeks after study procedure
Incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Major Adverse Events are: - Death - Major amputation - Procedural related serious adverse events - Investigational product related serious adverse events
Time frame: within 24 and 48 weeks from study procedure
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks from study procedure
Incidence of Adverse Events, Laboratory Abnormalities
Time frame: Up to 48 weeks from study procedure
Maintenance of Primary Patency of Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA)
Primary patency was defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4.Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
Time frame: within 4 weeks from study procedure
Maintenance of Primary Patency of Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA)
Primary patency was defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4.Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
Time frame: within 24 weeks from study procedure
Maintenance of Primary Patency of Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA)
Primary patency was defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4.Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
Time frame: within 48 weeks from study procedure
Rate of Binary In-stent Restenosis
Binary restenosis relied on duplex ultrasound data with a Yes/No assessment with 0-49% being No (peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4) and Yes being 50-99% (PSV ratio \>2.4), with the PSV ratio calculated as PSV from stenosis divided by the PSV from a normal segment of artery proximal to the stenosis. Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
Time frame: within 4 weeks from study procedure
Rate of Binary In-stent Restenosis
Binary restenosis relied on duplex ultrasound data with a Yes/No assessment with 0-49% being No (peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4) and Yes being 50-99% (PSV ratio \>2.4), with the PSV ratio calculated as PSV from stenosis divided by the PSV from a normal segment of artery proximal to the stenosis. Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
Time frame: within 24 weeks from study procedure
Rate of Binary In-stent Restenosis
Binary restenosis relied on duplex ultrasound data with a Yes/No assessment with 0-49% being No (peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4) and Yes being 50-99% (PSV ratio \>2.4), with the PSV ratio calculated as PSV from stenosis divided by the PSV from a normal segment of artery proximal to the stenosis. Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
Time frame: within 48 weeks from study procedure
Number of Patients Requiring Reintervention of Target Lesion / Target Vessel
Survival analysis - outcome reported as patients requiring reintervention of the target lesion / vessel
Time frame: up to 48 Weeks from study procedure
Resting Ankle-brachial Index
ABI was calculated by dividing the systolic blood pressure at the ankle by the systolic blood pressures in the arm. This test is used to predict the severity of PAD.
Time frame: within 4, 24 and 48 weeks from study procedure
Changes in Physical Exam
Changes in physical examination were compared to baseline: numbers of subjects presenting any new finding or worsening of abnormal findings compared to the screening examination are reported
Time frame: within 4, 24 and 48 weeks from baseline
The Fontaine Class of Peripheral Artery Disease
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL ATERIAL DISEASE ACCORDING TO FONTAINE Stage Clinical description I Asymptomatic IIA Mild claudication IIB Moderate -severe claudication III Ischemic rest pain IV Ulceration or gangrene
Time frame: change from baseline to 4 weeks
The Fontaine Class of Peripheral Artery Disease
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL ATERIAL DISEASE ACCORDING TO FONTAINE Stage Clinical description I Asymptomatic IIA Mild claudication IIB Moderate -severe claudication III Ischemic rest pain IV Ulceration or gangrene
Time frame: change from baseline to 24 weeks
The Fontaine Class of Peripheral Artery Disease
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL ATERIAL DISEASE ACCORDING TO FONTAINE Stage Clinical description I Asymptomatic IIA Mild claudication IIB Moderate -severe claudication III Ischemic rest pain IV Ulceration or gangrene
Time frame: change from baseline to 48 weeks
The study period was from 30 March 2010 (first patient's screening visit) to 19 June 2012 (last patient's Week 48 visit). A total of 30 subjects were screened for study eligibility, of whom a total of 21 subjects were registered (i.e., enrolled) and treated with PVS-10200. The study was conducted at 3 study centers in France
| Milestone | Low Dose PVS-10200 (Cohort A) | High Dose PVS-10200 (Cohort B) |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 11 | 10 |
| Completed | 10 | 9 |
| Not completed | 1 | 1 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 0 | 1 |
Major Adverse Events are: - Death - Major amputation - Procedural related serious adverse events - Investigational product related serious adverse events
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Major Adverse Events (MAEs) | 0 | 0 |
Major Adverse Events are: - Death - Major amputation - Procedural related serious adverse events - Investigational product related serious adverse events
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Week 24 | 0 | 0 |
| Week 48 | 0 | 1 |
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Serious Adverse Events | 7 | 7 |
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Emergent Adverse Events | 11 | 10 |
| Clinically Significant Laboratory | 1 | 5 |
Primary patency was defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4.Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| NO | 0 | 0 |
| YES | 9 | 9 |
Primary patency was defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4.Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| NO | 4 | 4 |
| YES | 5 | 4 |
Primary patency was defined as duplex ultrasound peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4.Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| NO | 3 | 3 |
| YES | 4 | 3 |
Binary restenosis relied on duplex ultrasound data with a Yes/No assessment with 0-49% being No (peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4) and Yes being 50-99% (PSV ratio \>2.4), with the PSV ratio calculated as PSV from stenosis divided by the PSV from a normal segment of artery proximal to the stenosis. Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| NO | 9 | 9 |
| YES | 0 | 0 |
Binary restenosis relied on duplex ultrasound data with a Yes/No assessment with 0-49% being No (peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4) and Yes being 50-99% (PSV ratio \>2.4), with the PSV ratio calculated as PSV from stenosis divided by the PSV from a normal segment of artery proximal to the stenosis. Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| NO | 9 | 8 |
| YES | 0 | 0 |
Binary restenosis relied on duplex ultrasound data with a Yes/No assessment with 0-49% being No (peak systolic velocity \[PSV\] ratio ≤2.4) and Yes being 50-99% (PSV ratio \>2.4), with the PSV ratio calculated as PSV from stenosis divided by the PSV from a normal segment of artery proximal to the stenosis. Ultrasound data was obtained for each patient at each time point and had to be considered diagnostic and evaluable by the core lab; if it was not, then this analysis could not be done for that particular subject.
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| NO | 8 | 7 |
| YES | 0 | 0 |
Survival analysis - outcome reported as patients requiring reintervention of the target lesion / vessel
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients Requiring Reintervention of Target Lesion / Target Vessel | 4 ± 15.4% | 2 ± 12.6% |
ABI was calculated by dividing the systolic blood pressure at the ankle by the systolic blood pressures in the arm. This test is used to predict the severity of PAD.
| ratio | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Week 4 | 0.984 ± 0.128 | 0.887 ± 0.237 |
| Week 24 | 0.948 ± 0.172 | 0.842 ± 0.204 |
| Week 48 | 0.931 ± 0.193 | 0.857 ± 0.226 |
Changes in physical examination were compared to baseline: numbers of subjects presenting any new finding or worsening of abnormal findings compared to the screening examination are reported
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Week 4 | 0 | 3 |
| Week 24 | 5 | 1 |
| Week 48 | 3 | 3 |
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL ATERIAL DISEASE ACCORDING TO FONTAINE Stage Clinical description I Asymptomatic IIA Mild claudication IIB Moderate -severe claudication III Ischemic rest pain IV Ulceration or gangrene
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE I (Week 4) | 9 | 5 |
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE IIA (Week 4) | 1 | 1 |
| STAGE IV (Baseline) to STAGE I (Week 4) | 1 | 0 |
| STAGE IV (Baseline) to STAGE IV (Week 4) | 0 | 4 |
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL ATERIAL DISEASE ACCORDING TO FONTAINE Stage Clinical description I Asymptomatic IIA Mild claudication IIB Moderate -severe claudication III Ischemic rest pain IV Ulceration or gangrene
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE I (Week 24) | 4 | 3 |
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE IIA (Week 24) | 4 | 1 |
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE IIB (Week 24) | 2 | 1 |
| STAGE IV (Baseline) to STAGE I (Week 24) | 0 | 1 |
| STAGE IV (Baseline) to STAGE IV (Week 24) | 0 | 2 |
| Missing | 1 | 2 |
CLASSIFICATION OF PERIPHERAL ATERIAL DISEASE ACCORDING TO FONTAINE Stage Clinical description I Asymptomatic IIA Mild claudication IIB Moderate -severe claudication III Ischemic rest pain IV Ulceration or gangrene
| participants | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE I (Week 48) | 6 | 4 |
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE IIA (Week 48) | 1 | 1 |
| STAGE IIB (Baseline) to STAGE IIB (Week 48) | 3 | 1 |
| STAGE IV (Baseline) to STAGE I (Week 48) | 0 | 1 |
| STAGE IV (Baseline) to STAGE IIB (Week 48) | 0 | 1 |
| STAGE IV (Baseline) to STAGE IV (Week 48) | 0 | 1 |
| Missing | 1 | 1 |
Collected over 30 March 2010 (first patient's screening visit) to 19 June 2012 (last patient's Week 48 visit). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort A | — | 7/11 (63.6%) | 11/11 (100%) |
| Cohort B | — | 7/10 (70%) | 10/10 (100%) |
| Event | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| INTERMITTENT CLAUDICATIONVascular disorders | 6/11 | 2/10 |
| IN-STENT ARTERIAL RESTENOSISInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 3/11 | 3/10 |
| TOE AMPUTATIONSurgical and medical procedures | 0/11 | 2/10 |
| ARTERIAL RESTENOSISInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 2/11 | 0/10 |
| ERYSIPELASInfections and infestations | 0/11 | 1/10 |
| FEMORAL ARTERY OCCLUSIONVascular disorders | 0/11 | 1/10 |
| LEG AMPUTATIONSurgical and medical procedures | 0/11 | 1/10 |
| PYELONEPHRITISInfections and infestations | 0/11 | 1/10 |
| WOUND NECROSISGeneral disorders | 0/11 | 1/10 |
| ANGIOPLASTYSurgical and medical procedures | 1/11 | 0/10 |
| Event | Cohort A | Cohort B |
|---|---|---|
| Intermittent ClaudicationVascular disorders | 6/11 | 2/10 |
| HypertensionVascular disorders | 4/11 | 0/10 |
| EcchymosisSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | 1/11 | 3/10 |
| In-Stent Arterial RestenosisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 3/11 | 3/10 |
| Toe AmputationSurgical and medical procedures | 0/11 | 2/10 |
| Arterial RestenosisInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 2/11 | 0/10 |
| Injection Site HaemorrhageGeneral disorders | 2/11 | 0/10 |
| Age, Continuous(Years) | Cohort A | Cohort B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 61.6 ± 10.11 | 70.7 ± 7.67 | 66.0 ± 9.96 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Cohort A | Cohort B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Male | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| Region of Enrollment(Participants) | Cohort A | Cohort B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| France | 11 | 10 | 21 |
| Resting Ankle Brachial Index, Leg with Target Lesion(ratio) | Cohort A | Cohort B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 0.954 ± 0.164 | 0.851 ± 0.258 | 0.902 ± 0.217 |
| Fontaine Classification(Participants) | Cohort A | Cohort B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| STAGE IIB-MODERATE TO SEVERE CLAUDICATION(<200M) | 10 | 6 | 16 |
| STAGE IV - ULCERATION OR GANGRENE | 1 | 4 | 5 |
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Shire