CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT01034371Updated Dec 21, 2009

Comparison of One-stop Hybrid Revascularization Versus Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass for the Treatment of Multi-vessel Disease

An interventional study of Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and PCI-Drug eluting stents in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases. Status unknown at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-12-21.

Sponsored by China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Dec 2009), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The "one-stop" hybrid coronary revascularization combines minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) and PCI to be performed in the hybrid operating suite, an enhanced operating room equipped with radiographic capability. This study is to compare 1-year clinical outcomes of "one-stop" hybrid coronary revascularization with off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) in selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

Read the detailed description
  • With the development of specialized devices and experience, off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) has been a well-established less invasive technique for coronary revascularization. Compared with conventional on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), OPCAB avoids the use of cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest, and is associated with decreased morbidity, shorter length of stay in ICU and hospital, and less perioperative complications, especially in elderly patients with severe comorbidities. "One-stop" (also named simultaneous) hybrid coronary revascularization is also a novel, safe and feasible minimally invasive approach in selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). It allows surgical and interventional procedures to be performed consecutively in the "one-stop" hybrid operating suite, an enhanced operating room equipped with radiographic capability, wherein the left intramammary artery (LIMA) is placed on the left anterior descending artery (LAD) by minimally invasive procedure, immediately followed by percutaneous coronary intervention/stenting on the non-LAD lesions. However, few studies are now available on the outcomes of coronary revascularization between the new hybrid strategy with conventional OPCAB. This study is a single center randomized clinical trial to compare 1-year clinical outcomes of "one-stop" hybrid coronary revascularization with OPCAB in selected patients with multivessel CAD with suitable coronary anatomy.

Sample size:

  • We examined the results of SYNTAX trial and of our institution published previously. The 1-year MACCE rate (the primary endpoint) is estimated as being 13% for OPCAB. The sample calculated for this trial is 400 patients.

Design/Methodology:

  • Trial design: A single center randomized clinical trial comparing "one-stop" hybrid procedure versus conventional OPCAB in 400 patients with suitable anatomy who need revascularization.

Intervention: Patients will be randomized to undergo either "one-stop" hybrid procedure or conventional OPCAB.

  • Randomization: Patients will be evaluated by both a cardiac surgeon and an interventional cardiologist. After obtaining informed written consent, patients will be randomized to receive "one-stop" hybrid procedure or conventional OPCAB. An expertise-based randomization will be used.

The data adjudicators will be blinded to the study. Due to the nature of this study, the operating surgeons, cardiologists, anesthetists, other operative room staff, and ICU staff will not be blind in this study.

Study intervention:

  • Candidates will be randomized to receive "one-stop" hybrid procedure or conventional OPCAB.
02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • Coronary Artery Disease; Hybrid Revascularization;
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Coronary Artery Bypass
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,596 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 955 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 123 across 3,435 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases is the lead sponsor of 256 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Two- or three-vessel disease, left main disease, or LM equivalent with 2 or 3-vessel disease (left anterior descending [LAD], left circumflex [LCX], right coronary artery [RCA] territory);
  • LAD diseases not suitable for PCI [i.e. chronic totally occlusion (CTO), severe calcification or/and angulated lesions, bifurcation or trifurcation lesions];
  • Angiographic characteristics of non-LAD lesion(s) amiable to PCI;
  • Chronic stable or unstable angina pectoris of CCS 2 or greater (symptoms of angina and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia);
  • Evaluated by both cardiac surgeon and cardiologist together.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Need for emergent CABG;
  • Prior CABG;
  • Prior PCI with stenting within 6 months of study entry;
  • Stroke with 6 months of study entry;
  • Overt congestive heart failure;
  • Need for a concomitant operation (i.e. valve repair or replacement, Maze surgery);
  • Hemodynamic instability;
  • Situations in which complete revascularization is not possible served;
  • Allergy to radiographic contrast, aspirin or clopidogrel.
  • Contradictions to PCI: Occluded coronary vessels, PVD, Unable to achieve access, Fresh thrombus, Vessels \<1.5mm; Intolerance to aspirin or both clopidogrel and ticlopidine;
  • Cannot undergo either CABG or PCI/DES because of a coexisting medical condition
  • History of significant bleeding; Significant leukopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, or known bleeding diathesis.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    One-stop hybrid revasularization

    Procedure: Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass · Procedure: PCI-Drug eluting stents

  • Active comparator
    Off-pump coronary artery bypass

    Procedure: Off-pump coronary artery bypass

Interventions

  • ProcedureMinimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass

    MIDCAB with no associated or concomitant surgical procedures, using partial ministernotomy, without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegia.

    Also known as: MIDCAB

  • ProcedurePCI-Drug eluting stents

    PCI with drug eluting stents (DES) performed by cardiologists on the non-LAD lesions in the same operating suite immediately following MIDCAB. Device: Polymer-based Sirolimus-Eluting Stents (SES).

    Also known as: PCI

  • ProcedureOff-pump coronary artery bypass

    Procedure: coronary artery bypass without cardiopulmonary Coronary artery bypass surgery with no associated or concomitant surgical procedures, using full median sternotomy, without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cardioplegia.

    Also known as: OPCAB

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including death, myocardial infarction, stroke and/or repeat revascularization.

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall MACCE rate.

    Time frame: 30 days after procedure and 2 years after enrollment

  2. Cardiac death.

    Time frame: 30 days after procedure, 1 and 2 years after enrollment

  3. Documented myocardial infarction.

    Time frame: 30 days after procedure, 1 and 2 years after enrollment

  4. Target lesion revascularization.

    Time frame: 30 days after procedure, 1 and 2 years after enrollment

  5. Recurrence of Angina.

    Time frame: 1 and 2 years after enrollment

  6. Cost-effectiveness analysis.

    Time frame: 1 and 2 years after enrollment

  7. Quality of life.

    Time frame: 6 months, 1 and 2 years after enrollment

  8. Rehospitalization.

    Time frame: 6 months, 1 and 2 years after enrollment

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular Institute & Fuwai Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100037, China
    • Shengshou Hu, M.D. · Contact · shengshouhu@yahoo.com · 0086-010-8839-8359
    • Zhe Zheng, M.D. · Contact · zhengzhefuwai@tom.com · 0086-010-8839-8359
    • Shengshou Hu, M.D. · Principal investigator
    • Yuejin Yang, M.D. · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Institute of cardiovascular diseases & Fuwai hospital
    Beijing, Beijing 100037, China
    • Shengshou Hu, M.D. · Contact · shengshouhu@yahoo.com · 0086-10-8839-8359
    • Zhe Zheng, M.D. · Contact · zhengzhefuwai@tom.com · 0086-10-8839-8359
    • Shengshou Hu, M.D. · Principal investigator
    • Yuejin Yang, M.D. · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 21, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT01034371
Lead sponsor
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases
First posted
Dec 17, 2009
Start date
Dec 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2012 (estimated)
Last update
Dec 21, 2009

Study contacts

Shengshou Hu, M.D.
Contact
shengshouhu@yahoo.com
0086-10-8839-8359
Zhe Zheng, M.D.
Contact
zhengzhefuwai@tom.com
0086-10-8839-8359
Shengshou Hu, M.D.
study director · China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion