A Phase 3 interventional study of Budesonide and Placebo in Proctitis and Proctosigmoiditis, sponsored by Bausch Health Americas, Inc.. Completed at 63 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-14.
Sponsored by Bausch Health Americas, Inc. (part of Bausch Health Companies Inc.) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to establish the efficacy profile of rectally administered budesonide foam, as compared to an equivalent volume of rectally administered placebo foam over the same dosing schedule, in participants who present with a diagnosis of active, mild to moderate, ulcerative proctitis (UP) or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis (UPS). During the study, eligible participants will be allowed to maintain previously established oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) treatment at doses up to 4.8 grams/day (g/day).
27 studies on the registry are indexed under Proctitis; 6 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 265 is above the median of 122 across 23 interventional studies indexed under Proctitis.
Browse Proctitis studies →Bausch Health Americas, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 213 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.
Of its 25 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (72%) have results posted.
First submitted before Bausch Health Americas, Inc. became part of Bausch Health Companies Inc..
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.
Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hemoglobin (Hb)
The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Hepatitis B tests
Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.
Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Corticosteroids (steroids)
Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.
Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS, will receive 2 milligrams (mg)/25 milliliter (mL) of budesonide foam, rectally twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by 2 mg/25 mL of budesonide foam, rectally once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
Drug: Budesonide
Participants who were diagnosed with active mild to moderate UP or UPS will receive 25 mL of placebo matching to budesonide foam twice daily for a period of 2 weeks followed by once daily for a period of 4 weeks.
Drug: Placebo
Budesonide will be administered as per the dose and schedule specified in the respective arm.
Placebo matching to budesonide will be administered as per the schedule specified in the respective arm.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission
Remission was a combined assessment of clinical and endoscopic variables, defined as an endoscopy score of less than or equal to (\<=) 1, a rectal bleeding score of 0, and an improvement or no change from baseline in stool frequency subscales of the Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) at the end of 6 weeks of treatment. MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment (PGA) and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Stool frequency MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Endoscopy MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal or inactive disease and 3 indicated severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rectal Bleeding MMDAI Subscale Score of 0 at End of Week 6
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices:stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Number of Scheduled Assessments With Rectal Bleeding Responder Classification
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Percentage of participants who were rectal bleeding responder at scheduled assessments were reported. Rectal bleeding responders were defined as those participants who achieved a rectal bleeding MMDAI subscale score of 0 during the treatment period. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopy MMDAI Subscale Score of 0 or 1 at End of Week 6
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Endoscopy subscale ranged from 0-3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Percentage of participants with normal or mild disease have been presented in this outcome measure. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0 for Rectal Bleeding Subscale and a Combined Score of <=2 for Bowel Frequency and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) in the MMDAI Subscales at End of Week 6
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Bowel frequency (BF) subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal disease and 3 indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MMDAI Total Score of <= 3 With Greater Than or Equal to (>=2) Points of Improvement From Baseline at the End of Week 6
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. Physician global assessment (PGA) subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Endoscopy Subscale Score at End of Week 6
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern), 2 = moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Rectal Bleeding Subscale Score at End of Week 6
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time, and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=3 Point Improvement From Baseline in the MMDAI Total Score Including Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Rectal Bleeding Subscale Score and MMDAI Endoscopy Subscale at End of Week 6
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Week 6
Mean Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MMDAI Total Score and Subscale Scores
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 6
| Milestone | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 133 | 132 |
| Received at least 1 dose of study drug | 133 | 132 |
| Completed | 108 | 116 |
| Not completed | 25 | 16 |
| Withdrew: Adverse event | 13 | 7 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 6 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Noncompliance | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Low cortisol | 2 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Lack of efficacy | 2 | 6 |
| Withdrew: Met exclusion criterion | 0 | 1 |
Remission was a combined assessment of clinical and endoscopic variables, defined as an endoscopy score of less than or equal to (\<=) 1, a rectal bleeding score of 0, and an improvement or no change from baseline in stool frequency subscales of the Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index (MMDAI) at the end of 6 weeks of treatment. MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment (PGA) and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Stool frequency MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Endoscopy MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal or inactive disease and 3 indicated severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration).
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Remission | 38.3 | 25.8 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices:stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Rectal Bleeding MMDAI Subscale Score of 0 at End of Week 6 | 46.6 | 28.0 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Percentage of participants who were rectal bleeding responder at scheduled assessments were reported. Rectal bleeding responders were defined as those participants who achieved a rectal bleeding MMDAI subscale score of 0 during the treatment period. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Responder at 1 Assessment | 12.0 | 13.6 |
| Responder at 2 Assessment | 18.8 | 13.6 |
| Responder at 3 Assessment | 21.1 | 10.6 |
| Responder at 4 Assessment | 6.0 | 1.5 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Endoscopy subscale ranged from 0-3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease, 2 = moderate disease and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Percentage of participants with normal or mild disease have been presented in this outcome measure. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an Endoscopy MMDAI Subscale Score of 0 or 1 at End of Week 6 | 55.6 | 43.2 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Bowel frequency (BF) subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal disease and 3 indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Score of 0 for Rectal Bleeding Subscale and a Combined Score of <=2 for Bowel Frequency and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) in the MMDAI Subscales at End of Week 6 | 41.4 | 25.8 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, physician's global assessment and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. Physician global assessment (PGA) subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an MMDAI Total Score of <= 3 With Greater Than or Equal to (>=2) Points of Improvement From Baseline at the End of Week 6 | 45.9 | 30.3 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 = normal or inactive disease, 1 = mild disease (erythema, decreased vascular pattern), 2 = moderate disease (marked erythema, absent vascular pattern, friability, erosions), and 3 = severe disease (spontaneous bleeding, ulceration). Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Endoscopy Subscale Score at End of Week 6 | 57.1 | 47.7 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding MMDAI subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 = no blood seen, 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time, 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time, and 3 indicated blood alone passed. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Rectal Bleeding Subscale Score at End of Week 6 | 70.7 | 53.0 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| percentage of participants | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants Who Achieved >=3 Point Improvement From Baseline in the MMDAI Total Score Including Improvement of >=1 Point From Baseline in the MMDAI Rectal Bleeding Subscale Score and MMDAI Endoscopy Subscale at End of Week 6 | 52.6 | 37.9 |
The MMDAI was used to assess the overall disease activity for each participant. The MMDAI evaluated 4 indices: stool frequency, rectal bleeding, PGA and endoscopy findings each on a scale of 0 to 3 with a maximum total score of 12. Rectal bleeding subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated no blood seen and 3 indicated blood alone passed. BF subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal number of stools per day and 3 indicated 5 or more stools than normal. PGA subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. Endoscopy subscore ranged from 0-3, where 0 indicated normal and 3 indicated severe disease. MMDAI total score ranged from 0-12, where higher score indicated severe disease. Missing data was imputed using LOCF method.
| unit on a scale | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Bowel frequency score: Baseline | 1.8 ± 0.87 | 1.9 ± 0.93 |
| Bowel frequency score: Change at Week 6 | -0.7 ± 0.98 | -0.5 ± 0.85 |
| Rectal Bleeding score:Baseline | 2.1 ± 0.38 | 2.1 ± 0.36 |
| Rectal Bleeding score: Change at Week 6 | -1.2 ± 0.95 | -0.8 ± 0.93 |
| PGA score:Baseline | 1.8 ± 0.43 | 1.8 ± 0.41 |
| PGA score: Change at Week 6 | -0.8 ± 0.79 | -0.5 ± 0.78 |
| Endoscopy score:Baseline | 2.1 ± 0.30 | 2.1 ± 0.29 |
| Endoscopy score: Change at Week 6 | -0.8 ± 0.76 | -0.5 ± 0.74 |
| Total score:Baseline | 7.8 ± 1.23 | 7.9 ± 1.28 |
| Total score: Change at Week 6 | -3.5 ± 2.80 | -2.4 ± 2.74 |
Collected over From start of study drug up to Week 8. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Budesonide | 0/134 (0%) | 2/134 (1.5%) | 66/134 (49.3%) |
| Placebo | 0/131 (0%) | 3/131 (2.3%) | 47/131 (35.9%) |
| Event | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Ectopic pregnancyPregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | 0/72 | 1/80 |
| AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/134 | 1/131 |
| Colitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders | 0/134 | 1/131 |
| HypersensitivityImmune system disorders | 1/134 | 0/131 |
| Arterial thrombosis limbVascular disorders | 1/134 | 0/131 |
| Event | Budesonide | Placebo |
|---|---|---|
| Blood cortisol decreasedInvestigations | 25/134 | 0/131 |
| Adrenal insufficiencyEndocrine disorders | 7/134 | 2/131 |
| Proctitis ulcerativeGastrointestinal disorders | 0/134 | 4/131 |
| Abdominal pain upperGastrointestinal disorders | 4/134 | 0/131 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 4/134 | 1/131 |
| HeadacheNervous system disorders | 4/134 | 1/131 |
| Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations | 1/134 | 3/131 |
| ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/134 | 3/131 |
| HaemorrhoidsGastrointestinal disorders | 0/134 | 2/131 |
| Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 0/134 | 2/131 |
Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomized participants.
| Age, Continuous(years) | Budesonide | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 43.2 ± 13.94 | 41.4 ± 13.24 | 42.4 ± 13.60 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Budesonide | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 72 | 80 | 152 |
| Male | 61 | 52 | 113 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Budesonide | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hispanic or Latino | 20 | 22 | 42 |
| Not Hispanic or Latino | 113 | 110 | 223 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Budesonide | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Asian | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 15 | 5 | 20 |
| White | 115 | 123 | 238 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ran from Nov 2009 to primary completion in Apr 2013, 41 months.
Results were first posted in Aug 2019, 6 years 3 months after primary completion.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Budesonide
Bausch Health Americas, Inc. →