ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06438809Updated Jun 21, 2024

Umbilical-Cord-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Injection for Chronic Radiation Proctitis

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) in Chronic Radiation Proctitis, sponsored by Jiangsu Topcel-KH Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-21.

Sponsored by Jiangsu Topcel-KH Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2025, 1 year 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell injection for the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis.

Read the detailed description

Radiation therapy is frequently used to treat pelvic cancers such as anal, cervical, prostate, and rectal cancer. While effective in controlling local tumors, it can also cause collateral damage to the gastrointestinal tract. The rectum is particularly vulnerable to radiation damage due to its fixed position in the pelvis. In the acute phase, radiation can lead to proctitis, an inflammatory condition characterized by mucosal ulceration, edema, and loss of microvilli. Patients typically present within three months of radiation therapy with symptoms like diarrhea, urgency, and tenesmus. Chronic radiation proctitis can either follow the acute phase or appear after a symptom-free period, typically 8 to 12 months post-radiation treatment. This chronic condition results from radiation-induced small-vessel injury, causing ischemia, obliterative endarteritis, fibrosis, and neovascularization. Rectal bleeding is a common symptom of chronic radiation proctitis.

Clinical studies have demonstrated that mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) treatment offers significant benefits, including anti-inflammatory, immune modulation, and tissue repair effects. Recent research indicates that intralesional injection of MSC is effective in treating radiation proctitis, reducing pain and bleeding without causing severe adverse events. This suggests that MSC treatment could be a promising option for radiation proctitis.

This is a phase I/II study designed to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of MSC treatment for radiation proctitis. Patients will be followed up for 24 months after treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Radiation Proctitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Proctitis

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Proctitis; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 122 across 23 interventional studies indexed under Proctitis.

Browse Proctitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Jiangsu Topcel-KH Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Fully understand and sign the form;
  2. Age ≥18 years and \<80 years;
  3. Good physical condition ( score 0-1);
  4. diagnosed with pelvic malignant tumors and received radiotherapy;
  5. Diagnosed with chronic radiation proctitis after at least 6 months of endoscopic examination following the completion of radiotherapy and ineffective conventional treatment;
  6. Screening period LENT-SOMA score ≥1;
  7. Subjects and their spouses or partners have no plans for conception from screening to 6 months after the end of the trial, no plans for sperm or egg donation, and agree to use effective non-pharmacological measures during the trial.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with severe liver or kidney dysfunction during the screening period;
  2. Patients with severe congestive heart failure or coronary artery disease during the screening period;
  3. Patients with allergic constitution or severe systemic immune diseases;
  4. Patients with active gastrointestinal bleeding or acute intestinal obstruction during the screening period;
  5. Pregnant patients;
  6. Patients with rectal stenosis or fistula formation requiring surgical treatment that limits endoscopic therapy;
  7. Patients with a screening period LENT-SOMA score of 4;
  8. Patients with tumor recurrence or ;
  9. Patients currently participating in other clinical trials at the time of screening or who have not been out of another clinical trial for less than 1 month;
  10. Other situations deemed unsuitable for inclusion in this study by the investigator.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Open label single arm study

    All patients will receive a single injection of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (120 million cells), and their therapeutic response will be monitored over a period of 24 months.

    Biological: Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

Interventions

  • BiologicalMesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)

    MSC suspension single does injection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The severity of adverse events after administration as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.

    Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 is a grading scale which can be utilized for adverse event (AE) reporting. It ranges from grade 1 (mild) to grade 5 (death related to AE) , and higher grade means the AE is more severe.

    Time frame: 28 days (1 month)

  2. The incidence of adverse events after administration.

    Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention.

    Time frame: 28 days (1 month)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The severity of adverse events after administration as assessed by CTCAE v5.0.

    Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 is a grading scale which can be utilized for adverse event (AE) reporting. It ranges from grade 1 (mild) to grade 5 (death related to AE) , and higher grade means the AE is more severe.

    Time frame: 112 days (4 month)

  2. The incidence of adverse events after administration.

    Adverse events are any unexpected medical occurrences in a participant that may not be directly caused by the trial intervention.

    Time frame: 112 days (4 month)

  3. The recurrence of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration.

    The recurrence means that subjects who were previously cured or relieved are diagnosed again by the investigator, clinically, as having chronic radiation proctitis.

    Time frame: Day 112 (month 4)

  4. The deterioration of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration.

    The deterioration means that the symptoms of chronic radiation proctitis have worsened compared to baseline.

    Time frame: Day 112 (month 4)

  5. No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by LENT-SOMA score.

    The Late Effects Normal Tissue/Subjective Objective Management Analytic (LENT/SOMA) is used for grading radiation therapy (RT)-induced side effects. It is graded on a 4-point scale ranging from occasional (score of 1) to refractory (score of 4), with a higher score indicating more severe disease. No improvement means no improvement of the score comparing to the baseline level.

    Time frame: Day 112 (month 4)

  6. No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by VRS.

    The Vienna Rectoscopy Score (VRS) is a feasible and effective tool for detecting and classifying pathological changes in the rectal mucosa after radiotherapy (RT). It is graded on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 to 5, with a higher score indicating more severe disease. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level.

    Time frame: Day 112 (month 4)

  7. No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by a semi-quantitative scoring system for radiotherapy-induced rectal pathological damage.

    A specific scoring system that assesses the intensity of morphological features has been developed. The total score ranging from 0 to 10 , and a higher score indicates more severe disease. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level.

    Time frame: Day 112 (month 4)

  8. No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by a RTD grading scale.

    The rectal telangiectasia density (RTD) grading scale ranges from 0 to 3, and a higher score indicates the disease is more severe. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level.

    Time frame: Day 112 (month 4)

  9. No improvement of chronic radiation proctitis symptoms after administration as assessed by VAS score.

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is commonly used to assess the intensity of a patient's pain, ranging from none to extreme. It is graded on an 11-point scale,ranging from 0 to 10,with higher scores indicating more severe pain. No improvement means that the score does not improve compared to the baseline level.

    Time frame: Day 112 (month 4)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started May 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2025, 12 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 23, 2024
First posted
Jun 3, 2024
StartActual
May 24, 2024
Primary completionEst.
May 2025
CompletionEst.
May 2025
Last update
Jun 21, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06438809
Lead sponsor
Jiangsu Topcel-KH Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2024
Start date
May 24, 2024
Primary completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Completion
May 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 21, 2024

Study contacts

Zhaoshen Li, MD
Contact
zhsl@vip.163.com
021-81873241

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion