CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00982397Updated Nov 6, 2017Results posted

Safety and Clinical Performance of the Protecta ICD and CRT-D

An interventional study of Protecta VR-ICD and Protecta DR-ICD or CRT-D in Tachyarrhythmias, Heart Failure and Ventricular Dysfunction, sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure. Completed at 122 sites in 21 countries. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-06.

Sponsored by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,770
Allocation
Non-randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is two-fold. In Phase I (Protecta Clinical Study), system performance will be evaluated. In Phase II (PainFree SST), the inappropriate shock-free rate at one year of subjects implanted with a Medtronic Protecta implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

The PainFree SST study was a prospective, multicenter clinical trial, which was conducted in two consecutive phases. Phase I assessed safety as determined by assessment of delays in ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrhythmia detection time using new algorithms. Phase II assessed the influence of new algorithms on inappropriate and unnecessary shocks at 1 year of follow-up. Subjects enrolled in Phase I continued in Phase II of the study and data from all enrolled subjects contributed to the analysis of Phase II objectives. A sub-study of Phase II randomized secondary prevention subjects to either 18/24 NID or 30/40 NID in order to assess the safety of prolonged detection in these patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tachyarrhythmias
  • Heart Failure
  • Ventricular Dysfunction
03

In context

Ventricular Dysfunction

262 studies on the registry are indexed under Ventricular Dysfunction; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,770 is above the median of 63 across 144 interventional studies indexed under Ventricular Dysfunction.

Browse Ventricular Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure is the lead sponsor of 239 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Of its 19 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 17 (89%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients meeting one of the following criteria can be included in Phase I of the study:

    • Patients indicated (per local indications) for a dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (DR-ICD)/cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D)
    • Patients undergoing a device replacement or upgrade to DR-ICD or CRT-D and with the protocol required leads (patients must be enrolled prior to implant)
  • Patients meeting one of the following criteria can be included in Phase II of the study:

    • Patients indicated for a DR-ICD/VR-ICD/CRT-D device and intended to receive a Protecta device
    • Patients undergoing a DR-ICD/VR-ICD/CRT-D device replacement or an upgrade to a Protecta DR-ICD/VR-ICD or CRT-D
    • Patients indicated for a DR-ICD/VR-ICD/CRT-D already implanted with a Protecta device and the protocol required leads, who have not yet been discharged after implant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a mechanical tricuspid heart valve
  • Patients enrolled or intended to participate in any concurrent drug and/or device study, which would confound the results of this trial as determined by Medtronic, during the course of this clinical study
  • Patients with medical conditions that preclude the testing required for all patients by the study protocol or that otherwise limit study participation required for all patients
  • Patients with exclusion criteria required by local law (e.g. age, pregnancy, breast feeding, etc)
  • Patients anticipated not being able to complete the study
  • Patients unwilling to provide written informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
2,770 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-chamber detetction

    Patients implanted with a Protecta VR-ICD.

    Device: Protecta VR-ICD

  • Experimental
    Dual-chamber detection

    Patients implanted with a Protecta DR-ICD or CRT-D.

    Device: Protecta DR-ICD or CRT-D

Interventions

  • DeviceProtecta VR-ICD

    Protecta single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

  • DeviceProtecta DR-ICD or CRT-D

    Protecta dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Subjects Who Are Inappropriate Shock Free

    Primary objective of Phase II. Subjects implanted with a VR device will be analyzed separately from subjects implanted with a DR / CRT-D device. An inappropriate shock is a shock delivered by the defibrillator when the patient's heart rhythm was not a tachyarrhythmia, as adjudicated by the independent Episode Review Committee .

    Time frame: Implant to one year post-implant

  2. Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Severe Adverse Device Effects (Phase I)

    In Phase I, only DR-ICD/CRT-D devices were implanted, so that for Phase I objectives there is only 1 arm to report results for.

    Time frame: Implant to one month post-implant

  3. Percentage of Phase I Subjects Where the Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) Detection Time With Protecta Features on is no More Than 2 Seconds Longer Than the VF Detection Time With Protecta Features Off

    In Phase I, only DR-ICD/CRT-D devices were implanted, so that for Phase I objectives there is only 1 arm to report results for.

    Time frame: At implant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Secondary Prevention Subjects Who Are Syncopal Event Free

    Time frame: Implant to one year post-implant

07

Results

Posted Nov 6, 2017

Participant flow

Phase I
Participant flow — Phase I
MilestoneDR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICD
Started2360
Completed2360
Not completed00
Phase II/Overall Study
Participant flow — Phase II/Overall Study
MilestoneDR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICD
Started2019751
Secondary prevention randomized 18/24nid231122
Secondary prevention randomized 30/40nid221131
Completed2019751
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Subjects Who Are Inappropriate Shock Free

Primary objective of Phase II. Subjects implanted with a VR device will be analyzed separately from subjects implanted with a DR / CRT-D device. An inappropriate shock is a shock delivered by the defibrillator when the patient's heart rhythm was not a tachyarrhythmia, as adjudicated by the independent Episode Review Committee .

Time frame:
Implant to one year post-implant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Percentage of Subjects Who Are Inappropriate Shock Free
percentage of patientsDR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICD
Percentage of Subjects Who Are Inappropriate Shock Free98.5 (97.9 to 99.0)97.5 (96.1 to 98.5)
Statistical analysis
  • DR-ICD/CRT-D · Percentage of participants: 98.5 · 95% CI 97.9 to 99.0Therapy rates were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis methods, accounting for death as a competing risk.Therapy incidence rates were estimated using cumulative incidence functions and reported with 95% confidence interval.
  • VR-ICD · Percentage of participants: 97.5 · 95% CI 96.1 to 98.5Therapy rates were analyzed using competing risks survival analysis methods, accounting for death as a competing risk.Therapy incidence rates were estimated using cumulative incidence functions and reported with 95% confidence interval.
PrimaryPercentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Severe Adverse Device Effects (Phase I)

In Phase I, only DR-ICD/CRT-D devices were implanted, so that for Phase I objectives there is only 1 arm to report results for.

Time frame:
Implant to one month post-implant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Severe Adverse Device Effects (Phase I)
percentage of patientsPhase I
Percentage of Subjects With Unanticipated Severe Adverse Device Effects (Phase I)0 (NA to 3.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase I · Exact Binomial · p = <0.0001 (P-value is for comparison against a performance criterion of 10%.)
PrimaryPercentage of Phase I Subjects Where the Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) Detection Time With Protecta Features on is no More Than 2 Seconds Longer Than the VF Detection Time With Protecta Features Off

In Phase I, only DR-ICD/CRT-D devices were implanted, so that for Phase I objectives there is only 1 arm to report results for.

Time frame:
At implant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Percentage of Phase I Subjects Where the Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) Detection Time With Protecta Features on is no More Than 2 Seconds Longer Than the VF Detection Time With Protecta Features Off
percentage of patientsPhase I
Percentage of Phase I Subjects Where the Ventricular Fibrillation (VF) Detection Time With Protecta Features on is no More Than 2 Seconds Longer Than the VF Detection Time With Protecta Features Off100 (98.1 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Phase I · Confidence interval and hypothesis test · p = <0.0001 (P-value is for comparison of the observed proportion of successes against a protocol-specified performance criterion of 95%.)
SecondaryPercentage of Secondary Prevention Subjects Who Are Syncopal Event Free
Time frame:
Implant to one year post-implant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of patients
Percentage of Secondary Prevention Subjects Who Are Syncopal Event Free
percentage of patients18/24 NID30/40 NID
Percentage of Secondary Prevention Subjects Who Are Syncopal Event Free9696
Statistical analysis
  • 18/24 NID vs 30/40 NID · Farrington-Manning · p = 0.0013 (P-Value is for non-inferiority) · Risk difference (rd): 0.0 · 90% CI -2.7 to 2.7The 90% Confidence Interval is for the difference (p1-p2), where p1=syncope free rate 30/40 arm and p2=syncope free rate 18/24 arm. Estimated value and confidence interval reflect percentages.

Adverse events

Collected over Reported Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) include events starting on or after the date of consent and through study completion, an average of 22 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
DR-ICD/CRT-D—452/2,019 (22.4%)—
VR-ICD—125/751 (16.6%)—
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 311
Most frequent serious events
EventDR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICD
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders108/201929/751
Ventricular tachycardiaCardiac disorders40/201914/751
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders33/20194/751
Device dislocationGeneral disorders32/20193/751
PneumoniaInfections and infestations21/20196/751
Angina pectorisCardiac disorders19/20194/751
SyncopeNervous system disorders18/20193/751
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders17/20193/751
Chest painGeneral disorders14/20194/751
Medical device changeSurgical and medical procedures11/20190/751

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)DR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICDTotal
Mean65.9 ± 12.161.9 ± 12.164.8 ± 12.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)DR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICDTotal
Female430140570
Male15896112200
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)DR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICDTotal
Austria441458
Canada119145264
Colombia18422
Czech Republic333063
Denmark6042102
Germany24857305
India71825
Israel10458162
Italy611172
Japan14437181
Malaysia17219
Netherlands15486240
Saudi Arabia12143164
Slovenia15015
South Africa707
Spain243054
Sweden17320
Switzerland13013
United Arab Emirates145
United Kingdom10311114
United States709156865
LVEF
LVEF(%)DR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICDTotal
Mean31.8 ± 13.033.3 ± 13.532.2 ± 13.2
QRS
QRS(ms)DR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICDTotal
Mean133.7 ± 33.7107.1 ± 21.9125.9 ± 33.0
Indication
Indication(participants)DR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICDTotal
Secondary Prevention593254847
Primary Prevention14264971923
Heart Failure Status
Heart Failure Status(participants)DR-ICD/CRT-DVR-ICDTotal
NYHA I232187419
NYHA II7583461104
NYHA III75499853
NYHA IV30838
No Heart Failure245109354
Unknown022
08

Study locations

122 sites
  • Birmingham Heart Clinic PC
    Birmingham, Alabama 35235, United States
  • CardioVasular Associates of Mesa
    Mesa, Arizona 85206, United States
  • Mercy Hospital Fort Smith
    Fort Smith, Arkansas 72903, United States
  • LA Cardiology Associates
    Los Angeles, California 90017, United States
  • Cardiology Consultants of Napa Valley
    Napa, California 94558, United States
  • Hartford Hospital
    Hartford, Connecticut 06102, United States
  • University of Florida Health at Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32209, United States
  • Arrhythmia Syncope Consultants LLC
    Miami, Florida 33133, United States
  • Indiana Heart Physicians
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46237, United States
  • Cardiovascular Research of Northwest Indiana
    Munster, Indiana 46321, United States
  • Iowa Heart Center
    West Des Moines, Iowa 50314, United States
  • Delmarva Heart Research Foundation
    Salisbury, Maryland 21804, United States
  • Essentia Institute of Rural Health
    Duluth, Minnesota 55805, United States
  • CentraCare Heart & Vascular Center
    Saint Cloud, Minnesota 56303, United States
  • Saint Louis Heart & Vascular PC
    Saint Louis, Missouri 62040, United States
  • Saint John's Medical Research Inc
    Springfield, Missouri 65804, United States
  • Cardiology PC
    Syracuse, New York 13210, United States
  • Pinehurst Medical Clinic
    Pinehurst, North Carolina 28374, United States
  • Ohio Heart and Vascular
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45219, United States
  • St. Vincent Mercy Medical Center
    Toledo, Ohio 43608, United States
  • Central Bucks Cardiology
    Doylestown, Pennsylvania 18901, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • Pee Dee Cardiology
    Florence, South Carolina 29506, United States
  • Cardiology Consultants PA
    Spartanburg, South Carolina 29303, United States
  • Centennial Heart Cardiovascular Consultants LLC
    Nashville, Tennessee 37203, United States
  • Hall-Garcia Cardiology Associates
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Health System
    Richmond, Virginia 23298, United States
  • Spokane Cardiology
    Spokane, Washington 99204, United States
  • Columbia St. Mary's Hospital
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211, United States
  • LKH - Universitätsklinikum Graz
    Graz, Austria
  • Landesklinikum St. Pölten
    St. Polten, Austria
  • Klinikum Wels-Grieskirchen GmbH
    Wels, Austria
  • Saint Paul's Hospital (Vancouver BC)
    Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  • Royal Jubilee Hospital
    Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
  • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologieet de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ)
    Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
  • Newmarket Electrophysiology Research Group
    Newmarket, Ontario, Canada
  • Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
    Halifax, Canada
  • Kelowna Arrhythmia Research
    Kelowna, Canada
  • Queen's University & Kingston General Hospital
    Kingston, Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre - University Campus
    London, Canada
  • Montreal Heart Institute
    Montreal, Canada
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute
    Ottawa, Canada
  • Fundacion Cardioinfantil
    Bogota, Colombia
  • Hospital Cardiovascular del Nino
    Bogota, Colombia
  • Clinica Cardiovascular Santa Maria
    Medellin, Colombia
  • Krajska nemocnice Liberec a.s. - Kardiocentrum
    Liberec, Czechia
  • Aalborg Sygehus
    Aalborg, Denmark
  • Aarhus Universitetshospital - Skejby
    Aarhus, Denmark
  • Herz- und Gefässzentrum Bad Bevensen
    Bad Bevensen, Germany
  • Herz- und Diabeteszentrum NRW - Ruhr-Universität Bochum
    Bad Oeynhausen, Germany
  • Segeberger Kliniken GmbH
    Bad Segeberg, Germany
  • Berufsgenossenschaftliche Universitätsklinik Bergmannsheil GmbH
    Bochum, Germany
  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn
    Bonn, Germany
  • MVZ am Küchwald GmbH ambulantes Herz Zentrum Chemnitz
    Chemnitz, Germany
  • Klinikum Coburg GmbH
    Coburg, Germany
  • Kardiocentrum Frankfurt an der Klinik Rotes Kreuz
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen Georg-August-Universität
    Gottingen, Germany
  • Ruprecht-Karls-Universität
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH - Standort I Kaiserslautern
    Kaiserslautern, Germany
  • Herz Zentrum Bodensee
    Konstanz, Germany
  • Klinikum Ludwigsburg - Akademisches Lehrkrankenhaus der Universität Heidelberg
    Ludwigsburg, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
    Mainz, Germany
  • Städtische Kliniken München GmbH - Klinikum Bogenhausen
    Munchen, Germany
  • Städtische Kliniken Neuss Lukaskrankenhaus GmbH-Akad.Lehrkrankenhaus d. Heinrich-Heine-Universität
    Neuss, Germany
  • Universitätsmedizin Rostock
    Rostock, Germany
  • Herz- und Kreislaufzentrum Rotenburg a.d. Fulda GmbH
    Rotenburg a.d. Fulda, Germany
  • Asklepios Kliniken Schwalm - Eder GmbH - Klinikum Schwalmstadt
    Schwalmstadt, Germany
  • Heinrich-Braun-Klinikum Zwickau gemeinnützige GmbH
    Zwickau, Germany
  • Care Institute of Medical Sciences
    Ahmedabad, India
  • Medanta-The Medicity
    Gurgaon, India
  • Barzilai Medical Center Ashkelon
    Ashkelon, Israel
  • Soroka University Medical Center
    Be'er Sheba, Israel
  • Carmel Medical Center
    Haifa, Israel
  • Rambam Health Care Campus
    Haifa, Israel
  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
    Jerusalem, Israel
  • Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital
    Petach Tikva, Israel
  • Chaim Sheba Medical Center
    Ramat Gan, Israel
  • Kaplan Medical Center
    Rehovot, Israel
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
    Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Ospedale classificato ed equiparato Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria
    Negrar, Italy
  • Azienda Complesso Ospedaliero San Filippo Neri - Ospedale San Filippo Neri
    Rome, Italy
  • Hirosaki University School of Medicine & Hospital
    Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
  • Kansai Rosai Hospital
    Amagasak, Hyogo, Japan
  • Kobe University Hospital
    Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
  • St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital
    Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Kinki University Hospital
    Osakasaya, Osaka, Japan
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovasuclar Center
    Suita, Osaka, Japan
  • Sapporo Medical Center NTT EC
    Chuo-ku, Sapporo, Japan
  • Akita Medical Center
    Akita, Japan
  • Chiba University Hospital
    Chiba, Japan
  • Kokura Memorial Hospital
    Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Kumamoto University Hospital
    Kumamoto, Japan
  • Kyoto University Hospital
    Kyoto, Japan
  • Niigata University Medical & Dental Hospital
    Niigata, Japan
  • Kitasato University Hospital
    Sagamihara, Japan
  • Institut Jantung Negara - National Heart Institute
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Medisch Centrum Alkmaar
    Alkmaar, Netherlands
  • Academisch Medisch Centrum (AMC)
    Amsterdam, Netherlands
  • Amphia Ziekenhuis - Locatie Molengracht Breda
    Breda, Netherlands
  • Catharina Ziekenhuis
    Eindhoven, Netherlands

Showing the first 100 of 122 sites across 21 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Auricchio A, Meijer A, Kurita T, Schloss E, Brinkman K, Claessens-van Ooijen M, Sterns L. Safety, efficacy, and performance of new discrimination algorithms to reduce inappropriate and unnecessary shocks: the PainFree SST clinical study design. Europace. 2011 Oct;13(10):1484-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur133. Epub 2011 Jun 13. PubMed 21669960 ↗
  • Auricchio A, Schloss EJ, Kurita T, Meijer A, Gerritse B, Zweibel S, AlSmadi FM, Leng CT, Sterns LD; PainFree SST Investigators. Low inappropriate shock rates in patients with single- and dual/triple-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using a novel suite of detection algorithms: PainFree SST trial primary results. Heart Rhythm. 2015 May;12(5):926-36. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.01.017. Epub 2015 Jan 28. PubMed 25637563 ↗
  • Sterns LD, Meine M, Kurita T, Meijer A, Auricchio A, Ando K, Leng CT, Okumura K, Sapp JL, Brown ML, Lexcen DR, Gerritse B, Schloss EJ. Extended detection time to reduce shocks is safe in secondary prevention patients: The secondary prevention substudy of PainFree SST. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jul;13(7):1489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.03.022. Epub 2016 Mar 14. PubMed 26988379 ↗
  • Wollmann CG, Lawo T, Kuhlkamp V, Becker R, Garutti C, Jackson T, Brown ML, Mayr H. Implantable defibrillators with enhanced detection algorithms: detection performance and safety results from the PainFree SST study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014 Sep;37(9):1198-209. doi: 10.1111/pace.12390. Epub 2014 Mar 25. PubMed 24665992 ↗
  • Zweibel S, Cronin EM, Schloss EJ, Auricchio A, Kurita T, Sterns LD, Gerritse B, Lexcen DR, Cheng A. Estimating the incidence of atrial fibrillation in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):132-138. doi: 10.1111/pace.13555. Epub 2018 Dec 13. PubMed 30478983 ↗
  • Kurita T, Ando K, Ueda M, Shizuta S, Okamura H, Matsumoto N, Gerritse B, Fagan DH, Schloss EJ, Meijer A, Auricchio A, Sterns LD, Okumura K; PainFree SST investigators. Comparison of ICD shock rates in Japanese and non-Japanese patients in the PainFree SST study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Sep;41(9):1185-1191. doi: 10.1111/pace.13427. Epub 2018 Aug 13. PubMed 29928759 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00982397
Lead sponsor
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 23, 2009
Start date
Sep 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2013
Completion
Sep 2013
Results posted
Nov 6, 2017
Last update
Nov 6, 2017

Study contacts

A. Meijer, Dr.
principal investigator · Eindhoven, The Netherlands
A. Auricchio, Prof.
principal investigator · Lugano, Switzerland
T. Kurita, Dr.
principal investigator · Higashi-Osaka, Japan
E.J. Schloss, Dr.
principal investigator · Cincinnati Ohio, USA
L. Sterns, Dr.
principal investigator · Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion