CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00975195Updated Feb 10, 2015Results posted

Inhaled Corticosteroid Withdrawal in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A Phase 4 interventional study of tiotropium inhalation and salmeterol xinafoate in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 222 sites in 23 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-02-10.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,488
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomised study to be conducted in patients with severe to very severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) to establish whether there is a need for these patients to be continuously treated with an inhaled corticosteroid on top of two potent long-acting bronchodilators. The study also aims to identify the type of patients who are likely to benefit from inhaled corticosteroid maintenance therapy.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,488 is above the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female aged 40 years or more
  2. Severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)
  3. Current or ex-smoker with smoking history of at least 10 pack years
  4. At least one documented exacerbation of COPD in previous year

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Significant diseases other than COPD; significant alcohol or drug abuse
  2. Current clinical diagnosis of asthma requiring steroid treatment
  3. History of thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
  4. Regular use of daytime oxygen
  5. Recent history (within 3 months) of myocardial infarction
  6. Recent (within 6 weeks) respiratory infection or COPD exacerbation
  7. Recent (within 6 weeks) treatment with systemic corticosteroids at doses in excess of 5milligram / day
  8. Recent (within 3 months) unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention
  9. Recent (within 1 year) hospitalisation for cardiac failure
  10. Malignancy requiring chemotherapy or radiotherapy
  11. Clinical diagnosis of bronchiectasis
  12. Pregnant or nursing women
  13. Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
  14. Current or recent (within 30 days) participation in another clinical study
  15. Current participation in or recent completion (within 4 weeks) of a pulmonary rehabilitation program
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
2,488 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    fluticasone high dose

    fluticasone priopionate high dose and tiotropium inhalation and salmeterol xinafoate

    Drug: tiotropium inhalation · Drug: salmeterol xinafoate · Drug: fluticasone propionate

  • Experimental
    fluticasone medium & low doses

    fluticasone priopionate medium and high doses; and tiotropium inhalation; and salmeterol xinafoate; and placebo matched to fluticasone priopionate

    Drug: tiotropium inhalation · Drug: salmeterol xinafoate · Drug: fluticasone propionate · Drug: placebo matched for fluticasone propionate

Interventions

  • Drugtiotropium inhalation
  • Drugsalmeterol xinafoate
  • Drugfluticasone propionate
  • Drugplacebo matched for fluticasone propionate
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

    A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of ≥2 lower respiratory symptoms related to COPD, with ≥1 symptom lasting ≥3 days, requiring a change in treatment. Lower respiratory symptoms included shortness of breath, sputum production (volume), sputum purulence, cough, wheezing and chest tightness. A change in treatment included: hospitalisation/treatment in an urgent care unit, prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic steroids or a significant change of prescribed respiratory medication such as theophyllines, long-acting beta-agonists or inhaled corticosteroids. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital.The "measure type" displays the 25th percentile and its 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

    Number of moderate or severe on-treatment COPD exacerbations, based on a 7-day gap rule: exacerbations where the onset date of the second exacerbation event was ≤7 days after the end date of the first exacerbation event were combined and counted as moderate or severe if ≥1 of the contributing exacerbation events was moderate or severe. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. Exacerbations were considered moderate if they required prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic steroids. Measured values show adjusted mean event rate.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  2. Proportion of Patients With ≥1 Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

    Presence (yes vs no) of at least one moderate or severe on-treatment COPD exacerbation, displayed as a percentage. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. Exacerbations were considered moderate if they required prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic steroids.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  3. Time to First Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

    Time to first severe on-treatment COPD exacerbation. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. The "measure type" displays the 25th percentile and its 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  4. Number of Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

    Number of severe on-treatment COPD exacerbations based on a 7-day gap rule: exacerbations where the onset date of the second exacerbation event was ≤7 days after the end date of the first exacerbation event were combined and counted as severe if ≥1 of the contributing exacerbation events was severe. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. Measured values show adjusted event rate.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  5. Proportion of Patients With at Least One Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation.

    Presence (yes vs no) of at least one severe on-treatment COPD exacerbation, displayed as a percentage. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  6. Time to First On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

    Time to first on-treatment COPD exacerbation of any severity. The "measure type" displays the 25th percentile and its 95% confidence interval.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  7. Number of On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

    Number of on-treatment COPD exacerbations of any severity, based on a 7-day gap rule: exacerbations where the onset date of the second exacerbation event was ≤7 days after the end date of the first exacerbation event were combined. Measured values show adjusted event rate.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  8. Proportion of Patients With at Least One On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

    Presence (yes vs no) of at least one on-treatment COPD exacerbation of any severity, displayed as a percentage.

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  9. Severity of On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

    Severity of on-treatment COPD exacerbations: for each patient, the worst applicable category was taken (i.e. none, mild, moderate or severe)

    Time frame: During randomised treatment, up to 488 days

  10. Change in On-treatment Lung Function as Measured by Trough FEV1

    Change from baseline in on-treatment lung function as measured by trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 6, 12, 18 and 52 visits

  11. Changes in On-treatment Dyspnoea as Measured by the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) Dyspnoea Scale

    Change from baseline in on-treatment dyspnoea as measured by the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnoea scale; change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Negative changes from baseline indicate an improvement in health. Scale from 0 to 4: * 0 = not troubled by breathlessness, except during strenuous exercise * 1 = short of breath when hurrying or walking up a slight hill * 2 = walks slower than contemporaries on the same level because of breathlessness, or has to stop for breath when walking at own pace * 3 = stops for breath after approximately 100 yards, or after a few minutes on the level * 4 = too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing or undressing "No breathlessness" was given a score of -1 Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits

  12. Change in On-treatment Physical Health Status as Determined by Body Mass Index (BMI)

    Change from baseline in on-treatment physical health status as determined by body mass index (BMI); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits

  13. Change in On-treatment Exercise Capacity Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6-MWT)

    Change from baseline in on-treatment exercise capacity measured by six-minute walk test (6-MWT); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits

  14. Change in On-treatment BODE Index

    Change from baseline in on-treatment BODE index (Body mass index, airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exercise capacity index), a composite score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits

  15. Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Cough Impact Domain

    Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Cough impact domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "extremely/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less impact due to cough. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits

  16. Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Cough Symptoms Domain

    Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Cough symptoms domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "a lot/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less symptoms due to cough. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits

  17. Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Sputum Impact Domain

    Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Sputum impact domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "a lot/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less impact due to sputum. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits

  18. Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Sputum Symptoms Domain

    Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Sputum symptoms domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "extremely/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less symptoms due to sputum. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits

  19. Change in On-treatment FEV1 as Measured by Home Based Spirometry

    Change from baseline in on-treatment Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) as measured by home based spirometry. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. The weekly mean was defined as the mean of the measurements taken during the last 7 days prior to the visit date, and was calculated if ≥4 of the 7 days had non-missing measurements. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 45 and 52 visits

  20. Change in On-treatment FVC as Measured by Home Based Spirometry

    Change from baseline in on-treatment forced vital capacity (FVC) as measured by home based spirometry. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. The weekly mean was defined as the mean of the measurements taken during the last 7 days prior to the visit date, and was calculated if ≥4 of the 7 days had non-missing measurements. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 45 and 52 visits

  21. Change in On-treatment PEFR as Measured by Home Based Spirometry

    Change from baseline in on-treatment peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) as measured by home based spirometry; change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 45 and 52 visits

  22. Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Activity Domain

    Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Activity domain. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits

  23. Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Impact Domain

    Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Impact Domain. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits

  24. Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Symptoms Domain

    Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Symptoms domain. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits

  25. Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Total Score

    Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Total score. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits

  26. Change in On-treatment Physician Global Evaluation

    Change from baseline in on-treatment physician global evaluation. The evaluation reflected the physician's opinion of the patient's overall condition and was based on the need for concomitant medication, the number and severity of exacerbations, the severity of cough, the ability to exercise, the amount of wheezing and any other relevant clinical observations. Patients were graded on a scale of 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent). Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits

07

Results

Posted Feb 10, 2015
Limitations and caveats
Additional secondary endpoints were listed in the original protocol. Those endpoints are of exploratory nature only and were not considered relevant for trial conclusions. For more information see tab "Full Text Review", section "More Information".

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Started12441244
Completed10161011
Not completed228233
Withdrew: Adverse event108101
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy66
Withdrew: Protocol violation2723
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up97
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4861
Withdrew: Other reason not defined above2933
Withdrew: Not treated12

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to First Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

A Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation was defined as an increase or new onset of ≥2 lower respiratory symptoms related to COPD, with ≥1 symptom lasting ≥3 days, requiring a change in treatment. Lower respiratory symptoms included shortness of breath, sputum production (volume), sputum purulence, cough, wheezing and chest tightness. A change in treatment included: hospitalisation/treatment in an urgent care unit, prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic steroids or a significant change of prescribed respiratory medication such as theophyllines, long-acting beta-agonists or inhaled corticosteroids. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital.The "measure type" displays the 25th percentile and its 95% confidence interval.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Number · days
Time to First Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation
daysFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Time to First Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation107.0 (94.0 to 124.0)110.0 (99.0 to 120.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Chi-squared · p = 0.3497 (Two-sided p-value to test superiority of fluticasone maintenance over fluticasone withdrawal if non-inferiority shown.) · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.058 · 95% CI 0.941 to 1.189Ratio calculated as fluticasone withdrawal divided by fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryNumber of Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

Number of moderate or severe on-treatment COPD exacerbations, based on a 7-day gap rule: exacerbations where the onset date of the second exacerbation event was ≤7 days after the end date of the first exacerbation event were combined and counted as moderate or severe if ≥1 of the contributing exacerbation events was moderate or severe. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. Exacerbations were considered moderate if they required prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic steroids. Measured values show adjusted mean event rate.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Mean · exacerbations per patient-year
Number of Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations
exacerbations per patient-yearFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Number of Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations0.91 (0.83 to 0.99)0.95 (0.87 to 1.04)
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Regression, Negative Binomial · p = 0.4441 · Rate ratio: 1.05 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.18Ratio calculated as fluticasone withdrawal divided by fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryProportion of Patients With ≥1 Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

Presence (yes vs no) of at least one moderate or severe on-treatment COPD exacerbation, displayed as a percentage. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. Exacerbations were considered moderate if they required prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic steroids.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients With ≥1 Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation
percentage of participantsFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Proportion of Patients With ≥1 Moderate or Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation44.246.7
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Fisher Exact · p = 0.2269
SecondaryTime to First Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

Time to first severe on-treatment COPD exacerbation. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. The "measure type" displays the 25th percentile and its 95% confidence interval.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Number · days
Time to First Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation
daysFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Time to First Severe On-treatment COPD ExacerbationNA (NA to NA)419.0 (379.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Chi-squared · p = 0.0849 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.202 · 95% CI 0.975 to 1.481Ratio calculated as fluticasone withdrawal divided by fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryNumber of Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

Number of severe on-treatment COPD exacerbations based on a 7-day gap rule: exacerbations where the onset date of the second exacerbation event was ≤7 days after the end date of the first exacerbation event were combined and counted as severe if ≥1 of the contributing exacerbation events was severe. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital. Measured values show adjusted event rate.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Mean · exacerbations per patient-year
Number of Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations
exacerbations per patient-yearFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Number of Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbations0.20 (0.17 to 0.23)0.23 (0.19 to 0.27)
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Regression, Negative Binomial · p = 0.2291 · Rate ratio: 1.15 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.45Ratio calculated as fluticasone withdrawal divided by fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryProportion of Patients With at Least One Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation.

Presence (yes vs no) of at least one severe on-treatment COPD exacerbation, displayed as a percentage. Exacerbations were considered severe if the patient was held and treated for an acute respiratory condition in an urgent care department or an observation unit for \>6 hours, the patient was treated at home by a mobile urgent care team or the patient was admitted to hospital.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients With at Least One Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation.
percentage of participantsFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Proportion of Patients With at Least One Severe On-treatment COPD Exacerbation.13.415.2
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Fisher Exact · p = 0.2083
SecondaryTime to First On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

Time to first on-treatment COPD exacerbation of any severity. The "measure type" displays the 25th percentile and its 95% confidence interval.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Number · days
Time to First On-treatment COPD Exacerbation
daysFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Time to First On-treatment COPD Exacerbation365.0 (309.0 to NA)346.0 (302.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Chi-squared · p = 0.5562 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.035 · 95% CI 0.923 to 1.160
SecondaryNumber of On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

Number of on-treatment COPD exacerbations of any severity, based on a 7-day gap rule: exacerbations where the onset date of the second exacerbation event was ≤7 days after the end date of the first exacerbation event were combined. Measured values show adjusted event rate.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Mean · exacerbations per patient-year
Number of On-treatment COPD Exacerbations
exacerbations per patient-yearFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Number of On-treatment COPD Exacerbations1.03 (0.95 to 1.12)1.08 (0.99 to 1.17)
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Regression, Negative binomial · p = 0.4342 · Rate ratio: 1.05 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.18Ratio calculated as fluticasone withdrawal divided by fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryProportion of Patients With at Least One On-treatment COPD Exacerbation

Presence (yes vs no) of at least one on-treatment COPD exacerbation of any severity, displayed as a percentage.

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Proportion of Patients With at Least One On-treatment COPD Exacerbation
percentage of participantsFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Proportion of Patients With at Least One On-treatment COPD Exacerbation46.949.0
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Fisher Exact · p = 0.3155
SecondarySeverity of On-treatment COPD Exacerbations

Severity of on-treatment COPD exacerbations: for each patient, the worst applicable category was taken (i.e. none, mild, moderate or severe)

Time frame:
During randomised treatment, up to 488 days
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Severity of On-treatment COPD Exacerbations
percentage of participantsFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
None and patient completed randomised treatment42.941.2
None and patient discontinued randomised treatment10.29.8
Mild2.72.3
Moderate30.831.5
Severe13.415.2
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Lung Function as Measured by Trough FEV1

Change from baseline in on-treatment lung function as measured by trough forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 6, 12, 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litres
Change in On-treatment Lung Function as Measured by Trough FEV1
LitresFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 6 visit (N=1135, 1135)-0.009 ± 0.0062-0.011 ± 0.0062
Week 12 visit (N=1114, 1092)-0.011 ± 0.0062-0.018 ± 0.0063
Week 18 visit (N=1077, 1058)-0.011 ± 0.0064-0.050 ± 0.0064
Week 52 visit (N=970, 935)-0.016 ± 0.0094-0.059 ± 0.0096
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0014 · Mean difference (net): -0.043 · 95% CI -0.069 to -0.017Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChanges in On-treatment Dyspnoea as Measured by the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) Dyspnoea Scale

Change from baseline in on-treatment dyspnoea as measured by the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnoea scale; change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Negative changes from baseline indicate an improvement in health. Scale from 0 to 4: * 0 = not troubled by breathlessness, except during strenuous exercise * 1 = short of breath when hurrying or walking up a slight hill * 2 = walks slower than contemporaries on the same level because of breathlessness, or has to stop for breath when walking at own pace * 3 = stops for breath after approximately 100 yards, or after a few minutes on the level * 4 = too breathless to leave the house, or breathless when dressing or undressing "No breathlessness" was given a score of -1 Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Changes in On-treatment Dyspnoea as Measured by the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) Dyspnoea Scale
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 18 visit (N=1140, 1143)-0.030 ± 0.022-0.001 ± 0.022
Week 52 visit (N=1043, 1019)-0.028 ± 0.0240.035 ± 0.024
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0632 · Mean difference (net): 0.064 · 95% CI -0.004 to 0.131Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Physical Health Status as Determined by Body Mass Index (BMI)

Change from baseline in on-treatment physical health status as determined by body mass index (BMI); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · kg/m2
Change in On-treatment Physical Health Status as Determined by Body Mass Index (BMI)
kg/m2Fluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 18 visit (N=1143, 1146)0.030 ± 0.0280.040 ± 0.028
Week 52 visit (N=1047, 1021)0.004 ± 0.039-0.009 ± 0.039
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.8137 · Mean difference (net): -0.013 · 95% CI -0.122 to 0.096Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Exercise Capacity Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6-MWT)

Change from baseline in on-treatment exercise capacity measured by six-minute walk test (6-MWT); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · meters
Change in On-treatment Exercise Capacity Measured by Six-minute Walk Test (6-MWT)
metersFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 18 visit (N=1111, 1110)3.89 ± 1.9931.94 ± 1.993
Week 52 visit (N=1013, 987)3.94 ± 2.2310.42 ± 2.252
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.2663 · Mean difference (net): -3.53 · 95% CI -9.74 to 2.69Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment BODE Index

Change from baseline in on-treatment BODE index (Body mass index, airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea and Exercise capacity index), a composite score ranging from 0 (best) to 10 (worst); change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment BODE Index
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 18 visit (N=1038, 1024)-0.06 ± 0.030.06 ± 0.03
Week 52 visit (N=931, 907)-0.03 ± 0.040.14 ± 0.04
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0033 · Mean difference (net): 0.16 · 95% CI 0.05 to 0.27Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Cough Impact Domain

Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Cough impact domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "extremely/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less impact due to cough. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Cough Impact Domain
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 12 visit (N=307, 319)-1.65 ± 0.986-1.24 ± 0.968
Week 18 visit (N=302, 312)-2.87 ± 1.035-3.71 ± 1.018
Week 52 visit (N=268, 269)-4.51 ± 1.063-5.54 ± 1.057
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.4914 · Mean difference (net): -1.03 · 95% CI -3.98 to 1.91Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Cough Symptoms Domain

Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Cough symptoms domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "a lot/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less symptoms due to cough. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Cough Symptoms Domain
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 12 visit (N=309, 318)-0.32 ± 1.062-0.85 ± 1.048
Week 18 visit (N=305, 312)-1.47 ± 1.103-3.34 ± 1.091
Week 52 visit (N=270, 268)-1.69 ± 1.180-3.26 ± 1.180
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.3490 · Mean difference (net): -1.56 · 95% CI -4.84 to 1.71Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Sputum Impact Domain

Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Sputum impact domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "a lot/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less impact due to sputum. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Sputum Impact Domain
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 12 visit (N=308, 317)-2.26 ± 0.996-1.63 ± 0.983
Week 18 visit (N=303, 310)-2.38 ± 0.977-3.31 ± 0.967
Week 52 visit (N=267, 267)-4.29 ± 1.047-4.15 ± 1.045
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.9262 · Mean difference (net): 0.14 · 95% CI -2.77 to 3.04Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Sputum Symptoms Domain

Change from baseline in on-treatment cough and expectoration as measured by the cough and sputum assessment questionnaire (CASA-Q) (selected sites only): Sputum symptoms domain. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Response options for the items in this domain range from "not at all/never" to "extremely/always" on a five-point scale. Domain items were reverse scored, summed and transformed to a domain score ranging from 0 to 100 where a higher score is associated with less symptoms due to sputum. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 12, 18 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment Cough and Expectoration as Measured by the CASA-Q: Sputum Symptoms Domain
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 12 visit (N=308, 317)-1.36 ± 1.154-1.24 ± 1.139
Week 18 visit (N=302, 311)-2.71 ± 1.119-1.93 ± 1.105
Week 52 visit (N=269, 268)-5.10 ± 1.212-2.45 ± 1.211
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.1241 · Mean difference (net): 2.64 · 95% CI -0.73 to 6.01Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment FEV1 as Measured by Home Based Spirometry

Change from baseline in on-treatment Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) as measured by home based spirometry. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. The weekly mean was defined as the mean of the measurements taken during the last 7 days prior to the visit date, and was calculated if ≥4 of the 7 days had non-missing measurements. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 45 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litres
Change in On-treatment FEV1 as Measured by Home Based Spirometry
LitresFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 6 visit (N=893, 939)-0.049 ± 0.0066-0.053 ± 0.0065
Week 12 visit (N=910, 930)-0.050 ± 0.0068-0.056 ± 0.0067
Week 18 visit (N=913, 901)-0.051 ± 0.0068-0.093 ± 0.0068
Week 27 visit (N=863, 843)-0.056 ± 0.0071-0.092 ± 0.0072
Week 36 visit (N=854, 845)-0.059 ± 0.0074-0.099 ± 0.0074
Week 45 visit (N=830, 815)-0.061 ± 0.0080-0.103 ± 0.0080
Week 52 visit (N=785, 788)-0.067 ± 0.0087-0.115 ± 0.0087
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (net): -0.048 · 95% CI -0.073 to -0.024Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment FVC as Measured by Home Based Spirometry

Change from baseline in on-treatment forced vital capacity (FVC) as measured by home based spirometry. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. The weekly mean was defined as the mean of the measurements taken during the last 7 days prior to the visit date, and was calculated if ≥4 of the 7 days had non-missing measurements. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 45 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litres
Change in On-treatment FVC as Measured by Home Based Spirometry
LitresFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 6 visit (N=893, 939)-0.116 ± 0.0179-0.089 ± 0.0177
Week 12 visit (N=910, 930)-0.113 ± 0.0168-0.105 ± 0.0167
Week 18 visit (N=913, 901)-0.122 ± 0.0177-0.124 ± 0.0177
Week 27 visit (N=863, 843)-0.123 ± 0.0167-0.147 ± 0.0167
Week 36 visit (N=854, 845)-0.135 ± 0.0170-0.158 ± 0.0171
Week 45 visit (N=830, 815)-0.141 ± 0.0174-0.168 ± 0.0175
Week 52 visit (N=785, 788)-0.157 ± 0.0180-0.201 ± 0.0180
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0855 · Mean difference (net): -0.044 · 95% CI -0.094 to 0.006Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment PEFR as Measured by Home Based Spirometry

Change from baseline in on-treatment peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) as measured by home based spirometry; change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 6, 12, 18, 27, 36, 45 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Litres/sec
Change in On-treatment PEFR as Measured by Home Based Spirometry
Litres/secFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 6 visit (N=893, 939)-0.228 ± 0.0249-0.230 ± 0.0246
Week 12 visit (N=910, 930)-0.266 ± 0.0253-0.290 ± 0.0252
Week 18 visit (N=913, 901)-0.295 ± 0.0253-0.435 ± 0.0254
Week 27 visit (N=863, 843)-0.319 ± 0.0273-0.430 ± 0.0274
Week 36 visit (N=854, 845)-0.352 ± 0.0278-0.473 ± 0.0278
Week 45 visit (N=830, 815)-0.368 ± 0.0297-0.490 ± 0.0298
Week 52 visit (N=785, 788)-0.377 ± 0.0318-0.538 ± 0.0318
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0004 · Mean difference (net): -0.161 · 95% CI -0.249 to -0.073Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Activity Domain

Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Activity domain. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Activity Domain
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 27 visit (N=1002, 988)0.09 ± 0.4920.85 ± 0.496
Week 52 visit (N=942, 916)-0.19 ± 0.5120.78 ± 0.518
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.1838 · Mean difference (net): 0.97 · 95% CI -0.46 to 2.40Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Impact Domain

Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Impact Domain. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Impact Domain
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 27 visit (N=1004, 998)-0.78 ± 0.4560.35 ± 0.457
Week 52 visit (N=946, 921)-0.08 ± 0.4941.27 ± 0.499
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0551 · Mean difference (net): 1.35 · 95% CI -0.03 to 2.72Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Symptoms Domain

Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Symptoms domain. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Symptoms Domain
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 27 visit (N=1010, 998)0.12 ± 0.5830.62 ± 0.586
Week 52 visit (N=955, 921)0.51 ± 0.5931.11 ± 0.602
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.4804 · Mean difference (net): 0.60 · 95% CI -1.06 to 2.25Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Total Score

Change from baseline in on-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores: Total score. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations. Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Scores: Total Score
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 27 visit (N=996, 986)-0.42 ± 0.3980.55 ± 0.401
Week 52 visit (N=939, 913)-0.07 ± 0.4321.15 ± 0.437
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0467 · Mean difference (net): 1.22 · 95% CI 0.02 to 2.43Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance
SecondaryChange in On-treatment Physician Global Evaluation

Change from baseline in on-treatment physician global evaluation. The evaluation reflected the physician's opinion of the patient's overall condition and was based on the need for concomitant medication, the number and severity of exacerbations, the severity of cough, the ability to exercise, the amount of wheezing and any other relevant clinical observations. Patients were graded on a scale of 1 (poor) to 8 (excellent). Change was calculated as week score minus baseline score. Statistical analysis results are presented only for the week 52 visit as this is the primary timepoint of interest.

Time frame:
Baseline and week 27 and 52 visits
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale
Change in On-treatment Physician Global Evaluation
units on a scaleFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Week 27 visit (N=1113, 1093)0.10 ± 0.030.04 ± 0.03
Week 52 visit (N=1041, 1014)0.19 ± 0.030.08 ± 0.03
Statistical analysis
  • Fluticasone Maintenance vs Fluticasone Withdrawal · Restricted maximum likelihood · p = 0.0223 · Mean difference (net): -0.11 · 95% CI -0.21 to -0.02Difference calculated as fluticasone withdrawal minus fluticasone maintenance

Adverse events

Collected over Randomised treatment plus 30 days post-treatment for patients not switching to open-label, up to 518 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Fluticasone Maintenance—292/1,243 (23.5%)464/1,243 (37.3%)
Fluticasone Withdrawal—300/1,242 (24.2%)458/1,242 (36.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 279
Most frequent serious events
EventFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders154/1243180/1242
PneumoniaInfections and infestations34/124338/1242
Lobar pneumoniaInfections and infestations12/12433/1242
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/124310/1242
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders9/12435/1242
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways diseaseInfections and infestations7/12435/1242
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/12435/1242
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders5/12431/1242
Lung neoplasm malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)5/12433/1242
Cardiac arrestCardiac disorders3/12434/1242
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventFluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone Withdrawal
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders410/1243413/1242
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations93/124380/1242

Baseline characteristics

Treated Set (TS) which included all patients who were dispensed study medication and were documented to have taken ≥1 dose of randomised treatment.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Fluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone WithdrawalTotal
Mean63.6 ± 8.664.0 ± 8.463.8 ± 8.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Fluticasone MaintenanceFluticasone WithdrawalTotal
Female230206436
Male101310362049
08

Study locations

222 sites
  • 352.2046.61006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Concord, New South Wales, Australia
  • 352.2046.61001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Glebe, New South Wales, Australia
  • 352.2046.61002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
  • 352.2046.61004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Daw Park, South Australia, Australia
  • 352.2046.61003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Toorak Gardens, South Australia, Australia
  • 352.2046.61005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Woodville, South Australia, Australia
  • 352.2046.32002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bruxelles, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bruxelles, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Eupen, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32017 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Gilly, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Herentals, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Jambes, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Lebbeke, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Leuven, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Middelheim, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32010 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Montigny-le-Tilleul, Belgium
  • 352.2046.32013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Turnhout, Belgium
  • 352.2046.55005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Goiania, Brazil
  • 352.2046.55002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Goiânia, Brazil
  • 352.2046.55001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • 352.2046.55006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Porto Alegre, Brazil
  • 352.2046.55003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 352.2046.35905 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bourgas, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.35902 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Rousse, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.35904 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.35906 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.35907 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.35908 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sofia, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.35903 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.35909 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria
  • 352.2046.86002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Beijing, China
  • 352.2046.86003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Beijing, China
  • 352.2046.86006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Beijing, China
  • 352.2046.86008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chongqing, China
  • 352.2046.86001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Guangzhou, China
  • 352.2046.86004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Shanghai, China
  • 352.2046.86005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Shanghai, China
  • 352.2046.86007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Wuhan, China
  • 352.2046.45001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Aarhus C, Denmark
  • 352.2046.45003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    København NV, Denmark
  • 352.2046.45002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Odense C, Denmark
  • 352.2046.3317A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Brest, France
  • 352.2046.3317B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Brest, France
  • 352.2046.3317C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Brest, France
  • 352.2046.3320A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Castelnau le Lez, France
  • 352.2046.3320B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Castelnau le Lez, France
  • 352.2046.3320C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Castelnau le Lez, France
  • 352.2046.3335A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Clermont Ferrand cedex 1, France
  • 352.2046.3314A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Forbach, France
  • 352.2046.3301A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Marseille cedex 20, France
  • 352.2046.3333A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Marseille, France
  • 352.2046.3326A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Montpellier, France
  • 352.2046.3326C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Montpellier, France
  • 352.2046.3325A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nantes Cedex 1, France
  • 352.2046.3325C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nantes Cedex 1, France
  • 352.2046.3325D Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nantes Cedex 1, France
  • 352.2046.3334A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nantes, France
  • 352.2046.3324A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nîmes, France
  • 352.2046.3332A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nîmes, France
  • 352.2046.3332B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nîmes, France
  • 352.2046.3332C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Nîmes, France
  • 352.2046.3331A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Perpignan, France
  • 352.2046.3331B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Perpignan, France
  • 352.2046.3331C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Perpignan, France
  • 352.2046.3329A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saint Laurent du Var, France
  • 352.2046.3329B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saint Laurent du Var, France
  • 352.2046.3302A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saint-Pierre cedex, France
  • 352.2046.3302B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saint-Pierre cedex, France
  • 352.2046.3302C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saint-Pierre cedex, France
  • 352.2046.3302D Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saint-Pierre cedex, France
  • 352.2046.3336A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Toulouse cedex 9, France
  • 352.2046.3336B Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Toulouse cedex 9, France
  • 352.2046.3336C Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Toulouse cedex 9, France
  • 352.2046.3337A Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Toulouse, France
  • 352.2046.49012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Berlin, Germany
  • 352.2046.49020 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Berlin, Germany
  • 352.2046.49021 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Berlin, Germany
  • 352.2046.49008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bochum, Germany
  • 352.2046.49019 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Cottbus, Germany
  • 352.2046.49002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Donaustauf, Germany
  • 352.2046.49023 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Frankfurt/Main, Germany
  • 352.2046.49013 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • 352.2046.49025 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Frankfurt, Germany
  • 352.2046.49024 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Geesthacht, Germany
  • 352.2046.49022 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Gelnhausen, Germany
  • 352.2046.49001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Großhansdorf, Germany
  • 352.2046.49006 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Heidelberg, Germany
  • 352.2046.49014 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Immenhausen, Germany
  • 352.2046.49016 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kiel, Germany
  • 352.2046.49003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Köln, Germany
  • 352.2046.49004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Mainz, Germany
  • 352.2046.49005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Marburg, Germany
  • 352.2046.49015 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    München, Germany
  • 352.2046.30003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Athens, Greece
  • 352.2046.30004 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Athens, Greece
  • 352.2046.30005 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Athens, Greece
  • 352.2046.30007 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Athens, Greece
  • 352.2046.30008 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Athens, Greece
  • 352.2046.30011 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Athens, Greece
  • 352.2046.30012 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Athens, Greece

Showing the first 100 of 222 sites across 23 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1. PubMed 32943047 ↗
  • Watz H, Tetzlaff K, Magnussen H, Mueller A, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Wouters EFM, Vogelmeier C, Calverley PMA. Spirometric changes during exacerbations of COPD: a post hoc analysis of the WISDOM trial. Respir Res. 2018 Dec 13;19(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0944-3. PubMed 30545350 ↗
  • Watz H, Tetzlaff K, Wouters EF, Kirsten A, Magnussen H, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Vogelmeier C, Fabbri LM, Chanez P, Dahl R, Disse B, Finnigan H, Calverley PM. Blood eosinophil count and exacerbations in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids: a post-hoc analysis of the WISDOM trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2016 May;4(5):390-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(16)00100-4. Epub 2016 Apr 7. PubMed 27066739 ↗
  • Magnussen H, Disse B, Rodriguez-Roisin R, Kirsten A, Watz H, Tetzlaff K, Towse L, Finnigan H, Dahl R, Decramer M, Chanez P, Wouters EF, Calverley PM; WISDOM Investigators. Withdrawal of inhaled glucocorticoids and exacerbations of COPD. N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 2;371(14):1285-94. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407154. Epub 2014 Sep 8. PubMed 25196117 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00975195
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2009
Start date
Feb 2009
Primary completion
Jul 2013
Completion
Jul 2013
Results posted
Feb 10, 2015
Last update
Feb 10, 2015

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion