An interventional study of Slow breathing in Heart Failure, sponsored by Albert Einstein Healthcare Network. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-05-10.
Sponsored by Albert Einstein Healthcare Network · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Heart failure is associated with faster breathing, which has a negative impact on the functioning of the heart. This leads to fatigue, shortness of breath, and exercise intolerance. It has been shown that when slow breathing technique was taught to patients with heart failure, they had a reduction in their sensation of shortness of breath and an improvement in their exercise performance.
The study will compare the short-term effects of controlled slow breathing with biofeedback in normal healthy subjects, acute heart failure, and chronic stable heart failure. The purpose is to see if there is any change in the objective measurements of heart function while breathing at normal rates compared to a controlled slower rate.
Heart Failure (HF) is a growing and challenging public health concern in the United States. Current data suggest that there are about 5 million heart failure patients in this country with an additional 550,000 patients being diagnosed with this syndrome each year for the first time. Despite the significant advances in the management strategy of heart failure patients in the last 1-2 decades, there are about 1 million hospital admissions each year for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF), almost double the number seen 15 years ago. The readmission rate for these patients at 6-month following discharge approaches about 50% with estimated 5-year mortality of 50%. Approximately, $23 billion are spent for the inpatient management of HF patients with another $40 billion for outpatient care. This prevailing situation mandates further exploration of novel therapeutic targets to treat this complex disease.
Chronic HF is accompanied by a sustained elevation in sympathetic nervous system activity, which is thought to be an important component in the pathophysiology and progression of the disease. HF patients also show abnormal breathing pattern with an increased respiratory rate and a lower tidal volume. Faster respiratory rate is associated with higher levels of sympathetic activity and potentiation of the chemoreflex response to hypoxia and hypercapnia. The relationship between sympathetic activity and spontaneous breathing rate is independent of age, body mass index, physical activity levels, percentage of body fat, or blood pressure. The arterial baroreflex sensitivity is also reduced in patients with heart failure. All these factors contribute to the distressing symptoms of fatigue, dyspnea and exercise intolerance in these patients.
Yoga trainees learn to breathe slowly, at a rate of about six breaths per minute, mobilizing in sequence the diaphragm and the upper and the lower chest. A handful of studies in normal subjects undergoing intensive training in yogic breathing techniques have demonstrated a marked improvement in cardiac hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, cardiac index, stroke volume etc.), but such studies have not been conducted in patients with heart failure.
The purpose of our study is to evaluate the changes in cardiac hemodynamic parameters (cardiac output, cardiac index and thoracic fluid content) in patients with acute heart failure, chronic ambulatory heart failure and normal healthy subjects after a trial of controlled slow breathing. Subjects would undergo non-invasive measurement of cardiac hemodynamics while spontaneously breathing. They would then be given instructions in slow breathing at a rate of 6 to 10 breaths per minute and asked to practice it for some time using heart rate variability as biofeedback mechanism. Hemodynamic measurements would be repeated during and after the trial of slow breathing. The difference between these measurements would then be statistically analyzed. We hypothesize that even a short trial of controlled slow breathing using a biofeedback mechanism in patients with HF would produce significant favorable improvement in cardiac hemodynamics.
161 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoventilation; 28 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 40 across 99 interventional studies indexed under Hypoventilation.
Browse Hypoventilation studies →Albert Einstein Healthcare Network is the lead sponsor of 63 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (50%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria: NORMAL SUBJECTS
Exclusion Criteria: NORMAL SUBJECTS
Inclusion Criteria: CHRONIC AMBULATORY HEART FAILURE
Exclusion Criteria: CHRONIC AMBULATORY HEART FAILURE
Inclusion Criteria: ACUTE HEART FAILURE
Exclusion Criteria: ACUTE HEART FAILURE
Normal healthy subjects without history, signs-symptoms or diagnosis of heart failure
Behavioral: Slow breathing
Diagnosis of Chronic Heart Failure and currently on optimal medical therapy
Behavioral: Slow breathing
Patients admitted to the hospital with acute congestive heart failure.
Behavioral: Slow breathing
The subjects will be given instructions in slow breathing at a rate of 6 to 10 breaths per minute and asked to practice it for some time. Hemodynamic measurements would be repeated before, during and after the trial of slow breathing. A Noninvasive Cardiac Output Monitor will be used. It uses a technology called impedance to measure cardiac output and other hemodynamic parameters by the passage of electric currents through the thorax. This device uses four electrode stickers applied to the thorax and the neck.
Evaluate the changes in cardiac hemodynamic parameters (Cardiac output, cardiac index, and thoracic fluid content) between normal, acute HF and chronic HF subjects with a trial of controlled slow breathing with biofeedback.
Time frame: Half hour
This study is completed, as verified in May 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network