CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00967005Updated Mar 21, 2023Results posted

N-Acetyl Cysteine Plus Behavioral Therapy for Nicotine Dependent Pathological Gamblers

A Phase 2 interventional study of N Acetyl Cysteine and Sugar Pill in Gambling and Tobacco Use Disorder, sponsored by University of Chicago. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-21.

Sponsored by University of Chicago · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this application is to examine whether, given its mechanism of action, the dietary supplement, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) will reduce both tobacco use and pathological gamblers (PG) symptoms in nicotine dependent pathological gamblers.

Read the detailed description

Among US adults, 12.8% report nicotine dependence, and nicotine dependence is highly associated with a variety of DSM-IV Axis I and II disorders (Grant BF et al., 2004). Pathological gambling (PG), a serious public health problem with detrimental effects on individuals and families, and with an estimated yearly cost to society of 5 billion dollars due to lost jobs, debt, bankruptcy, and incarcerations, is associated with elevated proportions of nicotine dependence (41% - 55%), and tobacco smoking in clinical samples of pathological gamblers has been associated with increased gambling severity and more frequent psychiatric problems (Smart \& Ferris, 1996; Crockfod \& El-Guebaly, 1998; Shaffer et al., 1999; Petry \& Oncken, 2002; Potenza et al., 2004; Grant et al., 2005; Falk et al., 2006; Fagan et al., 2007). In addition, research suggests that continued nicotine use is associated with greater rates of relapse among pathological gamblers who received behavioral therapy. Despite increased awareness of the relationship between nicotine dependence and PG, and the possible effects of nicotine dependence on gambling severity, no previous research has focused on how assessment and treatment of nicotine dependence may aid in the successful treatment of PG or smoking cessation. Preliminary research suggests that behavioral therapy using imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing (IDMI) has shown promise in reducing the symptoms of PG (Grant et al., in press). Despite the efficacy of treatments for PG and nicotine dependence, relapse is common among individuals with nicotine dependence and PG. Preclinical studies have suggested that levels of glutamate within the nucleus accumbens mediate reward-seeking behavior and may underlie relapse seen in addictions. N-acetyl cysteine, a dietary supplement, amino acid and cysteine pro-drug, appears to modulate glutamate within the nucleus accumbens and has shown benefit in reducing the reward-seeking behavior in individuals with cocaine dependence and in pathological gamblers (Baker et al., 2003; LaRowe et al., 2006; Grant et al., 2006). If successful in treating nicotine dependent pathological gamblers, N-acetyl cysteine may serve as a viable, low-cost, and easily available treatment option for nicotine dependent pathological gamblers who receive behavioral therapy.

We therefore propose to examine how a dietary supplement, N-acetyl cysteine, used in combination with behavioral therapy, will affect both the urge to smoke and gamble in nicotine dependent pathological gamblers and smoking and gambling behaviors. We therefore propose a randomized placebo-controlled trial of N-acetyl cysteine or placebo with 80 nicotine dependent pathological gamblers who will all receive brief standardized smoking cessation treatment (Ask, Advise, and Refer model) for nicotine cessation and 6 sessions of IDMI for PG. We hypothesize that N-acetyl cysteine plus behavioral therapy will result in greater reduction in both nicotine dependence and PG symptoms during the acute treatment phase and will enhance greater long-term abstinence. Our research will contribute to an improved understanding of the treatment of nicotine-dependent pathological gamblers as well as a greater understanding of the treatment of co-occurring addictions. If our intervention is successful, it will have the potential to set a new standard of care for a range of psychiatric disorders that co-occur with nicotine dependence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gambling
  • Tobacco Use Disorder

Keywords

  • N acetyl cysteine
  • Pathological gambling
  • Nicotine dependence
03

In context

Tobacco Use Disorder

968 studies on the registry are indexed under Tobacco Use Disorder; 126 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 28 is below the median of 89 across 851 interventional studies indexed under Tobacco Use Disorder.

Browse Tobacco Use Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Chicago is the lead sponsor of 907 studies on the registry; 182 are open to participants now.

Of its 99 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 68 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male and female outpatients, age 18-75 years;
  2. Presence of current DSM-IV nicotine dependence and PG for at least 6 months duration;
  3. Stable psychotropic drug dose for a period of at least 3 months prior to study entry;
  4. Completion of complete blood count, urinalysis, liver function tests, thyroid function tests, and pregnancy test with no evidence of significant lab abnormalities;
  5. Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects who are currently receiving individual or group therapy specifically for nicotine dependence or PG symptoms;
  2. Currently receiving pharmacotherapies for either nicotine dependence or pathological gambling;
  3. Subjects who have started attending Gamblers Anonymous within the 3 months prior to study initiation;
  4. Subjects who have an unstable and significant medical illness;
  5. Current clinically significant suicidality (score or 3 or 4 on item 3 of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale) or any other disorder requiring immediate intervention;
  6. Lifetime history of bipolar disorder type I or II, dementia, or psychotic disorder;
  7. Current (past 12 months) DSM-IV substance abuse or dependence (except nicotine dependence);
  8. Borderline or antisocial personality disorder based on the SCID-II;
  9. Positive urine drug screen at screening;
  10. Asthma (given possible worsening of asthma due to NAC);
  11. Cognitive impairment that interferes with the capacity to understand and self-administer medication or provide written informed consent;
  12. Current pregnancy or lactation, or inadequate contraception in women of childbearing potential; and
  13. Previous treatment with NAC
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    N Acetyl Cysteine

    The objective of this application is to examine whether, given its mechanism of action, the dietary supplement, N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) will reduce both tobacco use and PG symptoms in nicotine dependent pathological gamblers.

    Drug: N Acetyl Cysteine

  • Placebo comparator
    Sugar Pill

    Other: Sugar Pill

Interventions

  • DrugN Acetyl Cysteine

    N-Acetyl Cysteine, 1200mg-3000mg each day for 24-weeks

    Also known as: N-acetylcysteine, Acetylcysteine, NAC

  • OtherSugar Pill

    placebo control

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

    Week 0 corresponds to baseline. Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

    Time frame: Week 0

  2. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

    Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

    Time frame: Week 6

  3. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

    Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

    Time frame: Week 12

  4. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

    Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

    Time frame: Week 24

  5. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

    Week 0 corresponds to baseline. Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

    Time frame: Week 0

  6. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

    Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

    Time frame: Week 6

  7. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

    Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

    Time frame: Week 12

  8. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

    Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

    Time frame: Week 24

  9. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

    Week 0 corresponds to baseline. Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

    Time frame: Week 0

  10. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

    Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. . Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

    Time frame: Week 6

  11. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

    Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

    Time frame: Week 12

  12. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

    Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

    Time frame: Week 24

  13. Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

    Week 0 corresponds to baseline. This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: Week 0

  14. Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

    Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: Week 6

  15. Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

    Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: Week 12

  16. Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

    Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

    Time frame: Week 24

  17. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 0 corresponds to baseline. This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 0

  18. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 6

  19. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 12

  20. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 24

  21. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 0 corresponds to baseline. This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 0

  22. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 6

  23. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 12

  24. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

    Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 24

07

Results

Posted Jul 7, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Started1315
Treatment completion1010
Completed65
Not completed710
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up710

Outcome measures

PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

Week 0 corresponds to baseline. Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

Time frame:
Week 0
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score23.5 ± 6.420.4 ± 5.0
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score17.4 ± 9.116.3 ± 7.4
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score7.5 ± 4.65.5 ± 5.9
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score

Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). Minimum score=0 and maximum score=40, with higher score signifying more severe symptoms. Scale is 10 items scored from 0 to 4. Scores on each item are summed to compute total score. Thoughts/urges (questions 1 to 5) and behavior (questions 6 to 10) are added to get the total score.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Total Score1.0 ± 1.36.4 ± 6.2
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

Week 0 corresponds to baseline. Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

Time frame:
Week 0
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale11.8 ± 3.79.0 ± 3.4
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale8.9 ± 4.27.9 ± 3.8
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale5.5 ± 2.32.7 ± 2.1
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale

Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). Questions 1 through 5 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe thoughts/urges.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Urges/Thoughts Subscale0.8 ± 1.23.6 ± 3.6
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

Week 0 corresponds to baseline. Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

Time frame:
Week 0
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale11.7 ± 3.711.4 ± 2.8
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. . Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale8.5 ± 5.78.3 ± 4.9
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale2.0 ± 3.12.8 ± 4.5
PrimaryYale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale

Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). Questions 6 through 10 are summed to compute the thoughts/urges subscale. Minimum=0 and maximum=20, with higher scores signifying more severe gambling behaviors.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling Behavior Subscale0.2 ± 0.42.8 ± 4.1
PrimaryFagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

Week 0 corresponds to baseline. This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

Time frame:
Week 0
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score6.5 ± 2.06.7 ± 2.1
PrimaryFagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score4.0 ± 1.95.9 ± 2.4
PrimaryFagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score5.3 ± 2.95.0 ± 1.5
PrimaryFagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score

Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). This scale has 6 questions. Questions 1 and 4 are on a scale from 0 to 3 (higher scores being more severe symptoms) and questions 2, 3, 5, and 6 are on a scale from 0 to 1 (1 being more severe symptoms). Scores on all questions are summed to compute total score, with higher total score meaning more severe nicotine dependence. Scores range from 0 to 10.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence Total Score4.6 ± 1.35.3 ± 1.2
PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

Week 0 corresponds to baseline. This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 0
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score9.7 ± 5.77.9 ± 4.8
PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score7.5 ± 4.75.5 ± 3.8
PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score7.0 ± 4.93.7 ± 3.2
PrimaryHamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score

Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). This scale assesses depressed mood, feelings of guilt, difficulty sleeping, somatic symptoms, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores of the 17 items. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 52, with higher scores signifying more severe depressive symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Total Score2.8 ± 2.13.5 ± 1.7
PrimaryHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

Week 0 corresponds to baseline. This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 0
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score11.1 ± 10.89.7 ± 6.6
PrimaryHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

Week 6 corresponds to end of N-acetylcysteine plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy versus placebo plus Ask-Advise-Refer therapy. This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score7.5 ± 4.36.2 ± 4.0
PrimaryHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

Week 12 corresponds to end of 6 sessions of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing versus placebo plus imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing. This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score7.4 ± 3.24.2 ± 3.2
PrimaryHamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score

Week 24 represents the 3-month follow-up period (ie, corresponds to being off N-acetylcysteine or placebo and done with imaginal desensitization and motivational interviewing for 12 weeks). This scale measures anxiety symptoms, tension, somatic symptoms, difficulty concentrating, and others. Total score is computed by summing the scores on the 14 items (each item is scored from 0 to 4). Minimum score= 0 and maximum score= 56, with higher scores signifying more severe anxiety symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score
units on a scaleN Acetyl CysteineSugar Pill
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale Total Score5.0 ± 3.66.5 ± 5.2

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected over the entire 12 weeks each of the subjects were enrolled in the study.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
N Acetyl Cysteine—0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)
Sugar Pill—0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)N Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
Mean47.5 ± 10.147.7 ± 10.647.6 ± 10.9
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)N Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years131528
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)N Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
Female235
Male111223
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)N Acetyl CysteineSugar PillTotal
United States131528
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Yale University School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06519, United States
  • University of Minnesota School of Medicine
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Dowling N, Merkouris S, Lubman D, Thomas S, Bowden-Jones H, Cowlishaw S. Pharmacological interventions for the treatment of disordered and problem gambling. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 22;9(9):CD008936. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008936.pub2. PubMed 36130734 ↗
  • Grant JE, Odlaug BL, Chamberlain SR, Potenza MN, Schreiber LR, Donahue CB, Kim SW. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of N-acetylcysteine plus imaginal desensitization for nicotine-dependent pathological gamblers. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Jan;75(1):39-45. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08411. PubMed 24345329 ↗
  • Potenza MN, Balodis IM, Franco CA, Bullock S, Xu J, Chung T, Grant JE. Neurobiological considerations in understanding behavioral treatments for pathological gambling. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Jun;27(2):380-92. doi: 10.1037/a0032389. Epub 2013 Apr 15. PubMed 23586456 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 21, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00967005
Lead sponsor
University of Chicago
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), University of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2009
Start date
Sep 2009
Primary completion
Sep 2012
Completion
Aug 2014
Results posted
Jul 7, 2017
Last update
Mar 21, 2023

Study contacts

Marc N Potenza, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Yale University
Jon E Grant, MD, JD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion