CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00943787BPK003Updated Sep 8, 2014Results posted

Counter-Regulatory Impairment and the Effect of Microvascular Insulin Transfer in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

An interventional study of Hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic and hypoglycemic clamp in Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, sponsored by University of Virginia. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-09-08.

Sponsored by University of Virginia · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
41
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The researchers plan to test the following hypothesis:

A good level of glucose control in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) is dependent on two levels of feedback from the body:

  1. the transport of insulin through small blood vessels: suggesting that hypoglycemia leads to increased insulin sensitivity which then causes recurrent hypoglycemia;
  2. the endocrine level, defined as insulin-glucose interaction and hormonal counter-regulation.

The researchers plan to investigate the relationships between hypoglycemia, insulin transport, and counter-regulation. This study will ultimately lead to a better understanding of risk for recurrent hypoglycemia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 41 is below the median of 80 across 8,367 interventional studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Virginia is the lead sponsor of 653 studies on the registry; 134 are open to participants now.

Of its 60 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 41 (68%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participated in and satisfied all of the inclusion criteria of NCT00315939
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Have Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus defined by American Diabetes Association criteria or judgment of physician
  • Since our major goal is the investigation of hypoglycemia, we will preferentially recruit patients with a history of severe hypoglycemia/moderate hypoglycemia anticipating that approximately (\~) half of the recruited subjects will have had two or more severe or moderate hypoglycemia episodes in the past 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18
  • Pregnancy
  • Use of oral steroids
  • Hematocrit \< 36% (females); \< 38% (males)
  • Symptomatic heart disease (e.g., history of myocardial infarction, history of coronary bypass or stenting procedure, angina, episode of chest pain of cardiac etiology with documented EKG changes, positive stress test or catheterization with coronary blockages > 50%)
  • History of an ischemic cerebrovascular event
  • Active substance abuse
  • Psychosis
  • Mental retardation
  • Severe depression
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
41 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    SMBG followed by clamp

    One month of self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) field data was used to calculate measures of glucose variability and risk of hypoglycemia, while the hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic and hypoglycemic clamp procedure was used to evaluate insulin sensitivity and epinephrine response during induced hypoglycemia.

    Procedure: Hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic and hypoglycemic clamp

Interventions

  • ProcedureHyperinsulinemic, euglycemic and hypoglycemic clamp

    At 21:30h, an overnight insulin infusion was titrated to control the subjects' BG overnight between 100 and 150mg/dL by blood sampling for plasma glucose via a YSI analyzer every 30min and adjusting the rate of insulin infusion as needed. At the beginning of the clamp, the overnight insulin was replaced by an insulin infusion via a Harvard pump given as a 20mU/kg priming over a 10-min period, followed by a constant rate delivery of 1mU/kg/min until the end of the clamp. Blood was sampled for plasma glucose, and glucose was clamped at basal levels for the euglycemic control period of 150min via a variable-rate infusion of 20% dextrose. Then the glucose concentration was lowered at a rate of 1mg/dL/min to a minimum of 50mg/dL, where it was held constant for 30min. Finally, the glucose concentration was increased at a rate of 1mg/dL/min to 90mg/dL, where it was held for an additional 30min. Blood was sampled for epinephrine during euglycemia, hypoglycemia, and recovery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maximum Epinephrine Response (LBGI Groups)

    Mean maximum epinephrine response during induced hypoglycemia is the average of subjects' maximum concentration of all epinephrine measurements taken at plasma glucose level lower than 70mg/dL. Low blood glucose index (LBGI) is a metric to calculate the risk for hypoglycemia based on frequency and extent of past events based on SMBG readings. In studies, the LBGI typically accounted for 40-55% of the variance of future significant hypoglycemia in the subsequent 3-6 months. The LBGI has established risk categories: Low Risk, LBGI \< 2.5; Moderate Risk, 2.5 \< LBGI \< 5; and High Risk, LBGI \> 5, indicating an over 10-fold increase in future severe hypoglycemia from the lowest to the highest risk category.

    Time frame: 285 min (time of clamp)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum Epinephrine Response (ADRR Groups)

    Mean maximum epinephrine response during induced hypoglycemia is the average of subjects' maximum concentration of all epinephrine measurements taken at plasma glucose level lower than 70mg/dL. Average Daily Risk Range (ADRR) is associated with glycemic variability and risk of both hyper- and hypoglycemia. Low Risk, ADRR \< 20; Moderate Risk, 20 \< ADRR \< 40; and High Risk,ADRR \> 40.

    Time frame: 285 min (time of clamp)

07

Results

Posted Sep 8, 2014

Participant flow

Recruitment period: 2/2006-5/2009. Recruitment included outpatients at UVA clinics, former research subjects, and local advertising. All subjects ≥18 years of age and had type 1 diabetes defined by American Diabetes Association criteria or judgment of the study endocrinologist after review of the clinical history.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAdults With T1DM From Subjects
Started41
Completed34
Not completed7
Withdrew: Physician decision4
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3

Outcome measures

PrimaryMaximum Epinephrine Response (LBGI Groups)

Mean maximum epinephrine response during induced hypoglycemia is the average of subjects' maximum concentration of all epinephrine measurements taken at plasma glucose level lower than 70mg/dL. Low blood glucose index (LBGI) is a metric to calculate the risk for hypoglycemia based on frequency and extent of past events based on SMBG readings. In studies, the LBGI typically accounted for 40-55% of the variance of future significant hypoglycemia in the subsequent 3-6 months. The LBGI has established risk categories: Low Risk, LBGI \< 2.5; Moderate Risk, 2.5 \< LBGI \< 5; and High Risk, LBGI \> 5, indicating an over 10-fold increase in future severe hypoglycemia from the lowest to the highest risk category.

Time frame:
285 min (time of clamp)
Reported as:
Mean · pg/ml
Maximum Epinephrine Response (LBGI Groups)
pg/mlAdults With T1DM From Subjects
LBGI < 2.5495 ± 60
LBGI >= 2.5217 ± 40
SecondaryMaximum Epinephrine Response (ADRR Groups)

Mean maximum epinephrine response during induced hypoglycemia is the average of subjects' maximum concentration of all epinephrine measurements taken at plasma glucose level lower than 70mg/dL. Average Daily Risk Range (ADRR) is associated with glycemic variability and risk of both hyper- and hypoglycemia. Low Risk, ADRR \< 20; Moderate Risk, 20 \< ADRR \< 40; and High Risk,ADRR \> 40.

Time frame:
285 min (time of clamp)
Reported as:
Mean · pg/ml
Maximum Epinephrine Response (ADRR Groups)
pg/mlAdults With T1DM From Subjects
ADRR < 40417 ± 45
ADRR >= 40167 ± 45

Adverse events

Collected over 3 years. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Adults With T1DM From Subjects—3/34 (8.8%)8/34 (23.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAdults With T1DM From Subjects
Orthostatic HypotensionVascular disorders2/34
Vasovagal HypotensionVascular disorders1/34
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAdults With T1DM From Subjects
HyperglycemiaEndocrine disorders2/34
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/34
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/34
Lower Back PainGeneral disorders1/34
Abdomen ecchymosis near Guardian siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/34
Chest PainGeneral disorders1/34

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Adults With T1DM From Subjects
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years34
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Adults With T1DM From Subjects
Mean37 ± 2.1
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Adults With T1DM From Subjects
Female14
Male20
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Adults With T1DM From Subjects
United States34
Glycosylated hembglobin (HbA1c)
Glycosylated hembglobin (HbA1c)(percent)Adults With T1DM From Subjects
Mean7.6 ± 0.21
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Virginia Health System - Behavioral Medicine Center
    Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Pitsillides AN, Anderson SM, Kovatchev B. Hypoglycemia risk and glucose variability indices derived from routine self-monitoring of blood glucose are related to laboratory measures of insulin sensitivity and epinephrine counterregulation. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Jan;13(1):11-7. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0103. PubMed 21175266 ↗
  • Chan A, Barrett EJ, Anderson SM, Kovatchev BP, Breton MD. Muscle microvascular recruitment predicts insulin sensitivity in middle-aged patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 2012 Mar;55(3):729-36. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2402-3. Epub 2011 Dec 14. PubMed 22167126 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00943787
Lead sponsor
University of Virginia
Responsible party
Boris Kovatchev, PhD (Professor, University of Virginia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2009
Start date
Jan 2006
Primary completion
May 2009
Completion
May 2009
Results posted
Sep 8, 2014
Last update
Sep 8, 2014

Study contacts

Boris Kovatchev, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of Virginia Health Systems - Behavioral Medicine Center
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion