CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT00920972Updated Sep 16, 2026

Campath/Fludarabine/Melphalan Transplant Conditioning for Non-Malignant Diseases

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Treatment Plan 1: Stratum 1 and Treatment Plan 2: Strata 2, 3, or 4 in Metabolic Disorders, Hematologic, Immune, or Bone Marrow Disorders and Hemoglobinopathies, sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine. Recruiting at 28 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 20 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-16.

Sponsored by Washington University School of Medicine · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
220
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
Up to 20 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The hypothesis for this study is that a preparative regimen that maximizes host immunosuppression without myeloablation will be well tolerated and sufficient for engraftment of donor hematopoietic cells. It is also to determine major toxicities from these conditioning regimens, within the first 100 days after transplantation.

Read the detailed description

The study uses reduced intensity conditioning that is immune suppressive to achieve donor cell engraftment without exposure to radiation or high dose chemotherapy in children with non-malignant disorders. The intent is to minimize early and late regimen related toxicities in the context of a reduced intensity regimen.

In addition to maximizing opportunity for donor cell engraftment, the trial seeks to minimize toxicities associated with transplant such as graft versus host disease and employs GVHD prophylaxis that seeks to decrease rates of acute and chronic GVHD in the setting of matched and mismatched donor stem cell transplants from marrow and cord blood sources.

02

Conditions studied

  • Metabolic Disorders
  • Hematologic, Immune, or Bone Marrow Disorders
  • Hemoglobinopathies
  • Non-malignant Disorders

Keywords

  • Bone marrow
  • Transplant
  • Transplantation
  • Hematopoietic
  • Umbilical cord
  • Related
  • Unrelated
  • Reduced
  • Non-myeloablative
  • Nonmyeloablative
  • Non-malignant
  • Nonmalignant
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Stratum 1: Patient must have non-malignant disorder, excluding thalassemia. Must be receiving a 8/8 HLA-matched bone marrow, related or unrelated Stratum 2: Patient must have thalassemia receiving 8/8 HLA-matched bone marrow or 5-8/8 HLA-matched UCB. Related or unrelated.

Stratum 3: Patient must have a hemoglobinopathy receiving 7/8 HLA-matched bone marrow or 5-8/8 HLA-matched UCB. Related or unrelated.

Stratum 4: Patient must have a non-malignant disorder (excluding hemoglobinopathy) receiving 7/8 HLA-matched bone marrow or 5-8/8 HLA-matched UCB. Related or unrelated.

All strata:

  • Recipient age \< 21 years
  • Lansky/Karnofsky >/= 40
  • Adequate pulmonary, renal, liver, and other organ function as defined in protocol
  • Negative pregnancy test
  • Adequate total nucleated cell or CD34+ dose of product as defined in protocol
  • If sickle cell, Hemoglobin S \<30%

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HIV positive
  • Invasive infection
  • Pregnancy/lactating
04

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
220 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stratum 1

    Recipients with non-malignant disorders, excluding thalassemia. Related or unrelated 8/8 HLA-matched bone marrow

    Drug: Treatment Plan 1: Stratum 1 · Drug: GVHD Regimen B: BM Recipients

  • Experimental
    Stratum 2

    Recipient with transfusion dependent thalassemia. Related or unrelated. 8/8 HLA-matched bone marrow or 5-8/8 HLA-matched UCB

    Drug: Treatment Plan 2: Strata 2, 3, or 4 · Drug: GVHD Regimen A: UCB Recipients · Drug: GVHD Regimen B: BM Recipients

  • Experimental
    Stratum 3

    Recipient with hemoglobinopathy Related or unrelated. 7/8 HLA-matched bone marrow or 5-8/8 HLA-matched UCB

    Drug: Treatment Plan 2: Strata 2, 3, or 4 · Drug: GVHD Regimen A: UCB Recipients · Drug: GVHD Regimen B: BM Recipients

  • Experimental
    Stratum 4

    Recipient with non-malignant disorder, excluding hemoglobinopathy Related or unrelated. 7/8 HLA-matched bone marrow or 5-8/8 HLA-matched UCB

    Drug: Treatment Plan 2: Strata 2, 3, or 4 · Drug: GVHD Regimen A: UCB Recipients · Drug: GVHD Regimen B: BM Recipients

Interventions

  • DrugTreatment Plan 1: Stratum 1

    Day -50 to -21: Hydroxyurea 30mg/kg PO q day Day -22: Campath-1H 3 mg IV or SQ... Day -21: Campath-1H 10 mg IV or SQ... Day -20: Campath-1H 15 mg IV or SQ... Day -19: Campath-1H 20 mg IV or SQ... Day -8: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -7: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -6: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -5: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -4: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -3: Melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV... (dose modifications for patients \<10 kgs) Procedure/Surgery: Hematopoietic stem cell infusion on Day 0...

  • DrugTreatment Plan 2: Strata 2, 3, or 4

    Day -50 to -21: Hydroxyurea 30mg/kg PO q day… Day -22: Campath-1H 3 mg IV or SQ... Day -21: Campath-1H 10 mg IV or SQ... Day -20: Campath-1H 15 mg IV or SQ... Day -19: Campath-1H 20 mg IV or SQ... Day -8: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -7: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -6: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -5: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -4: Fludarabine 30mg/m2 IV... Day -4: Thiotepa 8mg/kg IV… Day -3: Melphalan 140 mg/m2 IV... (dose modifications for patients \<10 kgs) Procedure/Surgery: Hematopoietic stem cell infusion on day 0...

  • DrugGVHD Regimen A: UCB Recipients

    Day -3: Begin Tacrolimus or cyclosporine Begin MMF Day -1: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +5: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +14: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +28: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +60: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +100: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV

  • DrugGVHD Regimen B: BM Recipients

    Day -3: Begin Tacrolimus or cyclosporine Begin MMF Day -1: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +1: Methotrexate 7.5mg/m2 IV Day +3: Methotrexate 7.5mg/m2 IV Day +5: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +6: Methotrexate 7.5mg/m2 IV Day +14: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +28: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +60: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +100: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +180: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +270: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV Day +365: Abatacept 10mg/kg IV

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Donor engraftment as measured by chimerism

    Engraftment is measured in myeloid and lymphoid lineage cells

    Time frame: 100 days post-transplant

  2. Major toxicities as graded by the CTC v4

    Toxicity monitoring includes unanticipated side effects (new) and all severe irreversible toxicities Grade 3 and above unexpected Grade 4 and above - all toxicities that are possibly, probably or definitely related to protocol therapy All deaths irrespective of attribution

    Time frame: 100 days post-transplant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment as measured by complete blood counts

    Defined as an ANC \>500/microliter and platelets \>20,000 or 50,000/microliter depending on disorder

    Time frame: Post transplant

  2. Incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease as measured by protocol grading scale

    aGVHD - involving the skin, gut and liver. Classified according to grading described by Thomas et al. NEJM 1975; 292:895-902

    Time frame: 100 days post-transplant

  3. Incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease as measured by protocol grading scale

    cGVHD classified per Schulman et al. Am J Med 69: 204-17, 1980.

    Time frame: 2 years post-transplant

  4. Long-term donor engraftment by donor chimerism

    Donor chimerism is determined by PCR analysis after cell separation into lymphoid and myeloid lineage cells using antibodies. Can also be detected by FISH analysis in the event of donor and recipient sex discrepancy.

    Time frame: 2 years post-transplant

  5. Immune reconstitution by laboratory evaluations

    Immune reconstitution detected by absolute numbers of T cell phenotypes, B cells and NK cells. T cell function determined by proliferative response to mitogens. B cell function determined by evaluating anti-tetanus antibody titers.

    Time frame: 1 year post-transplant

  6. Overall and disease free survival

    Overall survival is defined as survival with or without disease Event free survival is defined as disease free, severe GVHD free survival, monitoring quality of life and relevant parameters.

    Time frame: 2 years post-transplant

06

Study locations

1 of 28 sites recruiting
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital
    Phoenix, Arizona 85016, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of Orange County
    Orange, California 92868, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • University of California
    San Diego, California 92123, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Yale School of Medicine
    New Haven, Connecticut 06510, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • George Washington University School of Medicine
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Nemours Children's Health
    Jacksonville, Florida 32207, United States
    Completed
  • University of Miami
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Miami Children's Hospital
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
    Completed
  • All Children's Hospital
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33701, United States
    Completed
  • Children's Memorial Hospital
    Chicago, Illinois 60614, United States
    Completed
  • Indiana University School of Medicine
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Children's Hospital of New Orleans
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, United States
    Completed
  • Children's Mercy
    Kansas City, Missouri 64108, United States
    Completed
  • St. Louis University
    St Louis, Missouri 63104, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Washington University School of Medicine (in St. Louis)
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
    Recruiting
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
    Hackensack, New Jersey 07601, United States
    Completed
  • Columbia University Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • University of North Carolina
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Carolinas Medical Center
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28232, United States
    Completed
  • Duke Children's Hospital
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
    Completed
  • The University of Oklahoma
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
    Completed
  • University of Pittsburg
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224, United States
    Completed
  • Cook Children's Hospital
    Forth Worth, Texas 76104, United States
    Completed
  • Texas Transplant Institute
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
    Completed
  • University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • BC Children's Hospital
    Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3N1, Canada
    Completed
  • University of Manitoba
    Winnipeg, Manitoba MB R3E 0T4, Canada
    Completed
  • University of Calgary
    Calgary, Canada
    Completed
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Bhatla D, Davies SM, Shenoy S, Harris RE, Crockett M, Shoultz L, Smolarek T, Bleesing J, Hansen M, Jodele S, Jordan M, Filipovich AH, Mehta PA. Reduced-intensity conditioning is effective and safe for transplantation of patients with Shwachman-Diamond syndrome. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Aug;42(3):159-65. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.151. Epub 2008 May 26. PubMed 18500373 ↗
  • Hansen MD, Filipovich AH, Davies SM, Mehta P, Bleesing J, Jodele S, Hayashi R, Barnes Y, Shenoy S. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in Hurler's syndrome using a reduced intensity preparative regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Feb;41(4):349-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705926. Epub 2007 Nov 19. PubMed 18026148 ↗
  • Rao A, Kamani N, Filipovich A, Lee SM, Davies SM, Dalal J, Shenoy S. Successful bone marrow transplantation for IPEX syndrome after reduced-intensity conditioning. Blood. 2007 Jan 1;109(1):383-5. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-05-025072. Epub 2006 Sep 21. PubMed 16990602 ↗
  • Shenoy S, Grossman WJ, DiPersio J, Yu LC, Wilson D, Barnes YJ, Mohanakumar T, Rao A, Hayashi RJ. A novel reduced-intensity stem cell transplant regimen for nonmalignant disorders. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2005 Feb;35(4):345-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704795. PubMed 15592491 ↗
  • King AA, Kamani N, Bunin N, Sahdev I, Brochstein J, Hayashi RJ, Grimley M, Abraham A, Dioguardi J, Chan KW, Douglas D, Adams R, Andreansky M, Anderson E, Gilman A, Chaudhury S, Yu L, Dalal J, Hale G, Cuvelier G, Jain A, Krajewski J, Gillio A, Kasow KA, Delgado D, Hanson E, Murray L, Shenoy S. Successful matched sibling donor marrow transplantation following reduced intensity conditioning in children with hemoglobinopathies. Am J Hematol. 2015 Dec;90(12):1093-8. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24183. Epub 2015 Oct 6. PubMed 26348869 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00920972
Lead sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
St. Louis Children's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 16, 2009
Start date
Dec 2001
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 16, 2026

Study contacts

Lissy Keller, CCRP
Contact
kellerl@wustl.edu
3142861168
Ian Snyder, CCRP
Contact
ian.s@wustl.edu
3142735953
Shalini Shenoy, MD
principal investigator · Washington University School of Medicine (in St. Louis)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion