ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00907803246-SafetyUpdated Sep 11, 2026Results posted

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics (PK) of the Anti-Orthopox Drug, ST-246

A Phase 2 interventional study of ST-246 400 mg and ST-246 600 mg in Orthopoxviral Disease, sponsored by SIGA Technologies. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by SIGA Technologies · Phase 2, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
107
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of two clinical doses of the anti-orthopoxvirus drug, ST-246, administered as a single daily oral dose for 14 days to healthy, fed volunteers. The results of this trial determine which dose will be used in expanded pivotal safety trials.

Read the detailed description

This study is a Phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center (3 sites) trial to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of 400 mg and 600 mg Form I ST-246 when administered as a single daily oral dose for 14 days to 107 healthy, fed volunteers between 18 and 74 years of age. Safety parameters included adverse events, vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis) and electrocardiograms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Orthopoxviral Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Orthopoxvirus
  • Smallpox
  • This is a safety study only
  • ST-246 is being studied for treatment of Orthopoxviruses
03

In context

Smallpox

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Smallpox; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 107 is below the median of 150 across 61 interventional studies indexed under Smallpox.

Browse Smallpox studies →

Lead sponsor

SIGA Technologies is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 - 75 yrs
  2. Healthy volunteer
  3. Ability to consent
  4. Available for clinical follow-up for study
  5. Not taking other medications
  6. Adequate venous access
  7. Using adequate ; negative pregnancy test
  8. Able and willing to avoid alcohol for screening and study duration

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to swallow study medication
  2. Pregnant or breast-feeding
  3. Medical condition, e.g., asthma, hypertension, angioedema, traumatic brain injury other than concussion, bleeding disorder, blood dyscrasia, idiopathic seizures, cardiac disease that limits activity, diabetes, active , or C, or AIDS, chronic microbial infection,
  4. History of drug allergy that contraindicates study participation
  5. Medical, psychiatric, social, occupational or other reason that jeopardizes the safety/rights of participant or renders he/she unable to comply with the protocol (including drug or alcohol abuse, or homelessness)
  6. Clinically abnormal
  7. Has or will participate in a clinical trial or experimental treatment within 30 days of, or during, the study
  8. Cannot or will not do physical exercise 24 hrs before and after PK days
  9. Will not consume grapefruit/grapefruit juice during study
  10. Vaccination within 2 wks of screening, or planned before Day 42 of study
  11. Treatment with prednisone or equivalent /modulatory drug \<3 mths before screening
  12. physical exam and lab results \<2weeks from 1st study drug dose
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
107 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ST-246 400 mg

    ST-246 400mg (2 x 200 mg Capsules) Orally Once Daily for 14 days

    Drug: ST-246 400 mg

  • Experimental
    ST-246 600 mg

    ST-246 600 mg (3 x 200 mg Capsules) Orally Once Daily for 14 days

    Drug: ST-246 600 mg

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Matching Placebo capsules, Orally Once Daily for 14 days

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Capsules, 400 mg daily for 14 days

    Also known as: Tecovirimat

  • Capsules, 600 mg daily for 14 days

    Also known as: Tecovirimat

  • DrugPlacebo

    Capsules, once daily for 14 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Daily Oral ST-246 Dose as Determined by Safety Parameter Changes According to the DAIDS (Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) Adverse Events (AE) Grading Table.

    Subjects were administered a single, daily oral dose of ST-246 (400 or 600 mg)and changes in safety parameteres were monitored. Safety parameters included adverse events, vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis) and electrocardiograms. The DAIDS AE grading table is a list of common terms and severity (intensity) of parameters used to describe adverse events occurring in NIAID-sponsored clinical studies/trials.

    Time frame: Days 1 to 14; then 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours and 4 weeks after final dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax

    Cmax: Maximum drug concentration in plasma determined directly from individual concentration-time data

    Time frame: Day 1 post-dose

  2. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax

    Cmax: Maximum drug concentration in plasma determined directly from individual concentration-time data

    Time frame: Day 14 post-dose

  3. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax

    Tmax: Time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma calculated from \[plasma\] versus time profiles

    Time frame: Day 1 post-dose

  4. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax

    Tmax: Time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma calculated from \[plasma\] versus time profiles

    Time frame: Day 14 post-dose

  5. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau

    AUCtau: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval (from time 0 to 24 hours sample) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule

    Time frame: Day 1 post-dose

  6. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau

    AUCtau: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval (from time 0 to 24 hours sample) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule

    Time frame: Day 14 post-dose

  7. Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: t½

    t½: Observed terminal elimination half-life determined after the last dose on Day 14

    Time frame: Day 14 post-dose

07

Results

Posted Aug 27, 2010

Participant flow

This study was conducted at three sites: Apex Research Institute, Santa Ana, CA, Hawaii Clinical Research Center, Honolulu, HI, and Orlando Clinical Research Center, Orlando, FL. The study was conducted in male and female volunteers ages 18 - 75 years inclusive from the sites' databases.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Started454616
Completed424316
Not completed330
Withdrew: Withdrawal of consent - long commute100
Withdrew: Adverse event200
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject010
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up010
Withdrew: Protocol violation010

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Daily Oral ST-246 Dose as Determined by Safety Parameter Changes According to the DAIDS (Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) Adverse Events (AE) Grading Table.

Subjects were administered a single, daily oral dose of ST-246 (400 or 600 mg)and changes in safety parameteres were monitored. Safety parameters included adverse events, vital signs, physical examinations, laboratory tests (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis) and electrocardiograms. The DAIDS AE grading table is a list of common terms and severity (intensity) of parameters used to describe adverse events occurring in NIAID-sponsored clinical studies/trials.

Time frame:
Days 1 to 14; then 24, 48, 72, 96 and 120 hours and 4 weeks after final dose
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Daily Oral ST-246 Dose as Determined by Safety Parameter Changes According to the DAIDS (Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) Adverse Events (AE) Grading Table.
ParticipantsST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Daily Oral ST-246 Dose as Determined by Safety Parameter Changes According to the DAIDS (Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome) Adverse Events (AE) Grading Table.343815
SecondaryEvaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax

Cmax: Maximum drug concentration in plasma determined directly from individual concentration-time data

Time frame:
Day 1 post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax
ng/mLST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax1170 ± 4291467 ± 626—
SecondaryEvaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax

Cmax: Maximum drug concentration in plasma determined directly from individual concentration-time data

Time frame:
Day 14 post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax
ng/mLST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax1286 ± 4491523 ± 607—
SecondaryEvaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax

Tmax: Time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma calculated from \[plasma\] versus time profiles

Time frame:
Day 1 post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax
hoursST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax4 ± 14 ± 1—
SecondaryEvaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax

Tmax: Time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma calculated from \[plasma\] versus time profiles

Time frame:
Day 14 post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax
hoursST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax4 ± 13 ± 1—
SecondaryEvaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau

AUCtau: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval (from time 0 to 24 hours sample) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule

Time frame:
Day 1 post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng*hr/mL
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau
ng*hr/mLST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau11329 ± 494513895 ± 5702—
SecondaryEvaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau

AUCtau: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval (from time 0 to 24 hours sample) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule

Time frame:
Day 14 post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · ng*hr/mL
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau
ng*hr/mLST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau12026 ± 425514791 ± 5712—
SecondaryEvaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: t½

t½: Observed terminal elimination half-life determined after the last dose on Day 14

Time frame:
Day 14 post-dose
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: t½
hoursST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: t½26 ± 1124 ± 15—

Adverse events

Collected over 6 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ST-246 400 mg—0/45 (0%)11/45 (24.4%)
ST-246 600 mg—0/46 (0%)8/46 (17.4%)
Placebo—0/16 (0%)1/16 (6.3%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 24
Most frequent other events
EventST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlacebo
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/455/461/16
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/452/461/16
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders0/451/461/16
PalpitationsCardiac disorders0/450/461/16
FatigueGeneral disorders and administration site conditions1/452/460/16
Abdominal distensionGastrointestinal disorders1/450/460/16
Axillary painGeneral disorders and administration site conditions1/450/460/16
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/450/460/16
DizzinessNervous system disorders1/451/460/16
Dry throatRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/450/460/16

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlaceboTotal
<=18 years2002
Between 18 and 65 years41401394
>=65 years26311
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlaceboTotal
Mean41.3 ± 15.2243.7 ± 15.8142.5 ± 17.0342.5 ± 15.64
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlaceboTotal
Female2722958
Male1824749
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ST-246 400 mgST-246 600 mgPlaceboTotal
United States454616107
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Apex Research Institute
    Santa Ana, California 92705, United States
  • Orlando Clinical Research Center
    Orlando, Florida 32809, United States
  • Hawaii Clinical Research Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96813, United States
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00907803
Lead sponsor
SIGA Technologies
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2009
Start date
Jun 2009
Primary completion
Jan 2010
Completion
Jan 2010
Results posted
Aug 27, 2010
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Thomas Marbury, MD
principal investigator · Orlando Clinical Research Center
Erik Ross, MD
principal investigator · Apex Research Institute
Jon Ruckle, MD
principal investigator · Hawaii Clinical Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tecovirimat

Start the discussion