ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00728689Updated Oct 1, 2026Results posted

Phase I Trial of an Investigational Small Pox Medication

A Phase 1 interventional study of ST-246 Days 1 - 3 and ST-246 Days 11 - 13 in Orthopoxviral Disease, Smallpox and Monkey Pox, sponsored by SIGA Technologies. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by SIGA Technologies · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 1, 2026Posted results revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 49 studies in Smallpox with a site in United States — none open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Smallpox · United States.

Enrollment
40th of 43
12 · median 110
Started
2008
with 4 others
Phase 1
13 of 49
none open now
Registered
28th of 49
by date
Lead sponsor
8 of 49
SIGA Technologies

Among the 49 studies in Smallpox with a site in United States, this one is the 40th largest by enrollment of the 43 interventional ones, is one of 5 that started in 2008, is one of 13 in phase 1, and was the 28th registered.

By phase

49 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Phase 217 · 0 open
Phase 1this study13 · 0 open
Phase 36 · 0 open
Observational5 · 0 open
Phase 1/25 · 0 open
Phase 42 · 0 open
No phase1 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2002; this study’s year is marked. 5 started in 2008.

Size and results

Median enrollment 110 across the 43 interventional studies, 5,001 across the 5 observational. Of the 44 that completed or were terminated, 21 (48%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Download CSVWith an account: the 49 studies in Smallpox with a site in United States as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic parameters and safety of a single dose of ST-246 400mg Form I versus ST-246 400mg Form V capsules in fed normal healthy volunteers.

Read the detailed description

This was a Phase I, double-blind, cross-over, single-dose study of the orally administered anti-orthopoxvirus compound, ST-246, to 12 healthy, fed volunteers between the ages of 18 and 50 years. Subjects were randomized such that 6 subjects received either ST-246 Form I (monohydrate) followed 10 days later after a wash-out period by Form V (hemihydrate), and 6 subjects received ST-246 Form V followed by Form I, as for the previous group.

Both forms of ST-246 were similar in the way they were manufactured. The only difference between Form I and Form V may be related to how it dissolves, and this may affect the way that it is absorbed in the human body. Information about any side-effects that may occur will also be collected in this study.

03

Conditions studied

  • Orthopoxviral Disease
  • Smallpox
  • Monkey Pox

Keywords

  • Orthopoxviral
  • Smallpox
  • Monkey pox
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. 18 to 50 years
  2. Available for clinical follow-up duration of study.
  3. Able/willing to give written consent.
  4. Good general health; no medical history.
  5. Refrain from taking any medications from screening through 72 hours after last dose.
  6. Adequate venous access.
  7. PE and lab results without clinically significant findings within 28 days prior to receipt of drug.
  8. Meet Lab Criteria within 28 days prior to receipt of drug.
  9. Negative pregnancy test
  10. Non smokers
  11. No alcohol or caffeine
  12. Participant or partner has undergone surgical sterilization, or the participant agrees either to be abstinent or use two non-hormonal methods of for duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Marked baseline prolongation of /corrected QT interval (QTc) interval (
  2. History of additional risk factors for Torsade de Pointes
  3. abnormal
  4. Personal history of cardiac disease, symptomatic or asymptomatic arrhythmias, syncopal episodes, or prolongation of the PR interval
  5. Family history of Sudden Cardiac Death not clearly due to acute myocardial infarction.
  6. History of any clinically significant conditions including:

    • Asthma
    • Diabetes mellitus
    • History of thyroidectomy or thyroid disease
    • Serious angioedema episodes
    • Head trauma resulting in a diagnosis of TBI other than concussion
    • Seizure or history of seizure
    • Bleeding disorder diagnosed by a doctor or significant bruising or bleeding difficulties with intramuscular injections or blood draws
  7. Family history of idiopathic seizures
  8. History or presence of neutropenia or other blood dyscrasia
  9. Known or infection
  10. Known (HIV) or acquired immunodeficiency syndrome illness.
  11. Current or recent history of a clinically significant bacterial, fungal, or mycobacterial infection.
  12. Known clinically significant chronic viral infection (or current clinically significant viral infection
  13. History of frequent or severe headaches or migraines
  14. Known chronic bacterial, mycobacterial, fungal, parasitic, or protozoal infection
  15. Woman who is pregnant or is breast-feeding or planning to become pregnant
  16. On any concomitant medications
  17. History of drug allergy that, in the opinion of the PI, contraindicates participation in the trial.
  18. Inability to swallow medication
  19. above 35 or below 18,
  20. Current drug abuse or alcohol abuse.
  21. Inability to refrain from physical exercise for a period of 24 hr before and after a PK day or refrain from consuming xanthines, grapefruit or grapefruit juice
  22. Clinically significant lactose intolerance
  23. Received experimental drug within 30 days
  24. Vaccination within 30 days
  25. Total of more than 350 milliliters (mL) of blood drawn in 2 months
  26. Treatment with any or immunomodulatory medication in 3 months
  27. Any condition occupational reason or other responsibility that, in the judgment of the PI, would jeopardize the safety or rights of a subject participating in the trial or would render the subject unable to comply with the protocol
  28. History or diagnosis that would affect absorption of study medication
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group ST-246 Form I (followed by Form V)

    Each of six subjects receive a single oral 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form I (monohydrate) in the first intervention period, followed 10 days later (3 days post-treatment monitoring and 7 days wash-out period) in the second intervention period by a single oral 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form V (hemihydrate). Both forms of drug are orally administered within 30 minutes after a standard light meal consisting of 400-450 calories and approximately 25% fat.

    Drug: ST-246 Days 1 - 3 · Drug: ST-246 Days 11 - 13

  • Active comparator
    Group ST-246 Form V (followed by Form I)

    Each of six subjects receive a single oral 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form V (hemihydrate) in the first intervention period, followed 10 days later (3 days post-treatment monitoring and 7 days wash-out period) in the second intervention period by a single oral 400 mg dose (2×200 mg) of ST-246 Form I (monohydrate). Both forms of drug are orally administered within 30 minutes after a standard light meal consisting of 400-450 calories and approximately 25% fat.

    Drug: ST-246 Days 1 - 3 · Drug: ST-246 Days 11 - 13

Interventions

  • First Intervention is on Days 1 - 3, and includes 6 patients dosed once orally with ST-246 Form I (Arm 1), and 6 patients dosed once orally with ST-246 Form V (Arm 2).

    Also known as: Tecovirimat

  • Second Intervention is on Days 11 - 13 (after a 3 day post-treatment monitoring and 7 day wash-out period) where the 6 patients previously given ST-246 Form I (Arm 1) are now dosed once orally with ST-246 Form V, and the 6 patients previously given ST-246 Form V (Arm 2) are now dosed once orally with ST-246 Form I.

    Also known as: Tecovirimat

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½

    Mean terminal half-life (t½; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.

    Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

  2. Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τ

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, where t is the last timepoint with a drug concentration ≥ lowest obtainable quantification (AUC0-τ; ng\*hr/mL).

    Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

  3. Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞

    Area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞; ng\*hr/mL).

    Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

  4. Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Cmax

    Maximum drug concentration in plasma, determined directly from individual concentration-time data (Cmax)

    Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

  5. Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Tmax

    Time to maximum plasma concentration(Tmax; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.

    Time frame: Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters

    Evaluated safety parameters included: 1. physical examination/vital signs 2. electrocardiograms (heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTc Bazett) 3. laboratory safety tests (hematology, chemistry, urinalysis) 4. adverse events For a), b) and c), summary statistics (mean,SD, median, minm, maxm)for values, and changes from baseline(Day 1 pre-dose) to each timepoint, were measured and compared to laboratory normal reference ranges. Values for a)- d) were assigned grades according to DAIDS AE Grading Table. Any Grade of 3 or higher was considered severe and significant.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Results

Posted Feb 9, 2010

Participant flow

Study period was approximately 2 weeks (from August 26, 2008 to September 8, 2008), plus a 30-day post-treatment follow up. The study was conducted at a Phase I Study Unit of a Clinical Research Center in Orlando, FL.

First Intervention (Days 1 - 3)
Participant flow — First Intervention (Days 1 - 3)
MilestoneST-246 Form I Followed by Form VST-246 Form V Followed by Form I
Started66
Completed66
Not completed00
Washout period (Days 4 - 10)
Participant flow — Washout period (Days 4 - 10)
MilestoneST-246 Form I Followed by Form VST-246 Form V Followed by Form I
Started66
Completed56
Not completed10
Withdrew: Death in family10
Second Intervention (Days 11 - 13)
Participant flow — Second Intervention (Days 11 - 13)
MilestoneST-246 Form I Followed by Form VST-246 Form V Followed by Form I
Started56
Completed56
Not completed00

Outcome measures

SecondaryNumber of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters

Evaluated safety parameters included: 1. physical examination/vital signs 2. electrocardiograms (heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTc Bazett) 3. laboratory safety tests (hematology, chemistry, urinalysis) 4. adverse events For a), b) and c), summary statistics (mean,SD, median, minm, maxm)for values, and changes from baseline(Day 1 pre-dose) to each timepoint, were measured and compared to laboratory normal reference ranges. Values for a)- d) were assigned grades according to DAIDS AE Grading Table. Any Grade of 3 or higher was considered severe and significant.

Time frame:
4 weeks
Reported as:
Number · participants
Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters
participantsST-246 Form IST-246 Form V
Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V as Determined by No Clinically Significant Changes in Safety Parameters1211
PrimaryPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½

Mean terminal half-life (t½; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.

Time frame:
Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½
hoursST-246 Form IST-246 Form V
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: t½27.446 ± 13.10928.180 ± 21.992
Statistical analysis
  • ST-246 Form I vs ST-246 Form V · ANOVA · p = 0.4591
PrimaryPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τ

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to time t, where t is the last timepoint with a drug concentration ≥ lowest obtainable quantification (AUC0-τ; ng\*hr/mL).

Time frame:
Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs
Reported as:
Mean · ng*hr/mL
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τ
ng*hr/mLST-246 Form IST-246 Form V
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-τ15624.495 ± 5449.18820065.316 ± 6744.974
Statistical analysis
  • ST-246 Form I vs ST-246 Form V · ANOVA · p = 0.0048
PrimaryPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞

Area under the drug concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-∞; ng\*hr/mL).

Time frame:
Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs
Reported as:
Mean · ng*hr/mL
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞
ng*hr/mLST-246 Form IST-246 Form V
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: AUC0-∞19922.017 ± 6543.56321982.709 ± 9330.953
Statistical analysis
  • ST-246 Form I vs ST-246 Form V · ANOVA · p = 0.0997
PrimaryPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Cmax

Maximum drug concentration in plasma, determined directly from individual concentration-time data (Cmax)

Time frame:
Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Cmax
ng/mLST-246 Form IST-246 Form V
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Cmax1068.9 ± 294.31230.2 ± 348.6
Statistical analysis
  • ST-246 Form I vs ST-246 Form V · ANOVA · p = 0.0422
PrimaryPharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Tmax

Time to maximum plasma concentration(Tmax; hrs) for Forms I and V were calculated from \[plasma\] vs time profiles.

Time frame:
Post-dose samples at 0.5,1,2,3,4,8,12,24,36,48,72 hrs
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Tmax
hoursST-246 Form IST-246 Form V
Pharmacokinetic Parameters for a Single Dose of ST-246 Form I vs. Form V: Tmax3.8 ± 1.53.8 ± 1.6
Statistical analysis
  • ST-246 Form I vs ST-246 Form V · ANOVA · p = 0.8581

Adverse events

Collected over 4 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
ST-246 Form I—0/12 (0%)1/12 (8.3%)
ST-246 Form V—0/11 (0%)2/11 (18.2%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventST-246 Form IST-246 Form V
HeadacheNervous system disorders0/121/11
Neck painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/121/11
Underarm tendernessGeneral disorders and administration site conditions1/120/11

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)ST-246 Form I Followed by Form VST-246 Form V Followed by Form ITotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years6612
>=65 years000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)ST-246 Form I Followed by Form VST-246 Form V Followed by Form ITotal
Mean34.7 ± 834.8 ± 9.434.8 ± 8.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)ST-246 Form I Followed by Form VST-246 Form V Followed by Form ITotal
Female4610
Male202
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)ST-246 Form I Followed by Form VST-246 Form V Followed by Form ITotal
United States6612
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Orlando Clinical Research Center
    Orlando, Florida 32809, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hatmal MM, Al-Hatamleh MAI, Olaimat AN, Ahmad S, Hasan H, Ahmad Suhaimi NA, Albakri KA, Abedalbaset Alzyoud A, Kadir R, Mohamud R. Comprehensive literature review of monkeypox. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022 Dec;11(1):2600-2631. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2022.2132882. PubMed 36263798 ↗
10

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Aug 2008, a primary completion of Oct 2008 and a completion of Oct 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Feb 2010, 1 year 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 1, 2008
First posted
Aug 6, 2008
Start
Aug 2008
Primary completionActual
Oct 2008
CompletionActual
Oct 2008
Results first posted
Feb 9, 2010
Last update
Oct 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Results
Posted results revised
revised Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Posted results revised
    + 2 other changes: identifiers and index terms

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00728689
Lead sponsor
SIGA Technologies
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 6, 2008
Start date
Aug 2008
Primary completion
Oct 2008
Completion
Oct 2008
Results posted
Feb 9, 2010
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Thomas C Marbury, MD
principal investigator · Orlando Clinical Research Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tecovirimat

Start the discussion