ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00907153Updated Dec 19, 2017Results posted

Vitamin D for the Treatment of Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Vitamin D and Placebo in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-12-19.

Sponsored by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if vitamin D will improve insulin resistance, inflammation, and overall well-being in women with PCOS.

Read the detailed description

As many cells throughout the body possess the vitamin D receptor, adequate vitamin D levels may be essential for multiple physiologic functions. In recent years, vitamin D insufficiency has been linked to insulin resistance, inflammation, poor psychological health, obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease - these are also commonly found in women with Polycystic Ovary syndrome (PCOS). We believe that vitamin D insufficiency contributes to insulin resistance, inflammation, and psychological distress in women with PCOS. These adverse effects may ultimately increase the risk for serious long-term complications in PCOS, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The key objectives of this research study are to determine the effects of vitamin D supplementation on insulin resistance, inflammation, mood and overall well-being in women with PCOS.

The protocol has been modified by adding the following specific aim: To compare vascular function in healthy age and BMI similar matched women to PCOS women pre-treatment. Our hypothesis is that PCOS women will have greater attenuations in retinal vascular reactivity compared to healthy control women, demonstrating poorer endothelial function. We are currently recruiting healthy women who are age and BMI similar to the PCOS women and measure their retinal vascular reactivity for comparisons to the PCOS women's pre-treatment vascular reactivity. These healthy women will only have a baseline visit in which retinal vascular reactivity will be measured. They will not be enrolled in the placebo or Vitamin D randomization process as described above.

02

Conditions studied

  • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Keywords

  • Polycystic Ovary Syndrome
  • Vitamin D
  • Insulin resistance
  • Inflammation
03

In context

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

975 studies on the registry are indexed under Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 70 across 710 interventional studies indexed under Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Browse Polycystic Ovary Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Milton S. Hershey Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 491 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Of its 58 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 44 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of PCOS based on:

    • Eight or fewer menstrual periods per year or spontaneous intermenstrual periods of greater than or equal to 45 days, and
    • Elevated testosterone levels

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current Pregnancy or Nursing
  • Elevated calcium
  • Kidney Stones or kidney disease
  • Current use of vitamin D (other than a multivitamin)
  • Use of metformin or other insulin sensitizing drugs in the last 3 months
  • Elevated prolactin or untreated thyroid disease
  • Diabetes, Liver disease, Heart disease, or other serious medical condition
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vitamin D

    Dietary Supplement: Vitamin D

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementVitamin D

    Vitamin D 300 mcg by mouth once daily for 12 weeks

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo by mouth once daily for 12 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)

    Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) is a validated measure of insulin sensitivity based on fasting insulin and glucose. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) = 1/\[log(I(0)) + log(G(0))\]).

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

    High sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was assessed as a measure of inflammation.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure was measured in the right arm in the sitting position after a 15-minute rest.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure was measured in the right arm in the sitting position after a 15-minute rest.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  4. Change From Baseline in Mean Fasting Glucose

    Glucose was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  5. Change From Baseline in Mean Fasting Insulin

    Insulin was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  6. Change From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Glucose

    Participants underwent a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test, in which blood samples for glucose and insulin were obtained at 0 and 2 hours and used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index (ISI 0,120).

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  7. Change From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Insulin

    Participants underwent a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test, in which blood samples for glucose and insulin were obtained at 0 and 2 hours and used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index (ISI 0,120).

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  8. Change From Baseline in Mean Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI 0,120)

    Participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, in which blood samples for glucose and insulin were obtained at 0 and 120 minutes and used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index (ISI0,120). The ISI 0,120 = the glucose uptake rate divided by the mean plasma glucose divided by the log(mean serum insulin).

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  9. Change From Baseline in Mean Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

    Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is a validated measure of insulin resistance based on fasting insulin and glucose. HOMA-IR is calculated as the product of fasting glucose and insulin divided by 22.5.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  10. Change From Baseline in Mean Total Cholesterol

    Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  11. Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Cholesterol

    Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  12. Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Cholesterol

    Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  13. Change From Baseline in Mean Triglycerides

    Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  14. Change From Baseline in Mean Total Testosterone

    Total and free testosterone levels were assessed from blood samples to evaluate effects on hyperandrogenemia in PCOS.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  15. Change From Baseline in Mean Free Testosterone

    Total and free testosterone levels were assessed from blood samples to evaluate effects on hyperandrogenemia in PCOS.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D

    Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D was assayed by the Immunodiagnostic Systems radioimmunoassay.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean Vitamin D Binding Protein

    Vitamin D binding protein levels were assessed as it has been linked with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  3. Change From Baseline in Mean Intact Parathyroid Hormone (i-PTH)

    Intact parathyroid hormone levels were assessed as they have been linked with obesity and insulin resistance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Dec 19, 2017

Participant flow

36 patients were screened for eligibility between July 2009 and November 2010 at Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology clinics at an academic medical center in Hershey, PA.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVitamin DPlacebo
Started1315
Completed1111
Not completed24
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up11
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject13

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Mean Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)

Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) is a validated measure of insulin sensitivity based on fasting insulin and glucose. Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) = 1/\[log(I(0)) + log(G(0))\]).

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)
units on a scaleVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI)-0.008 (-0.020 to 0.004)0.009 (-0.003 to 0.021)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.05 · Mean difference (net): -0.017 · 95% CI -0.034 to -0.000Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

High sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was assessed as a measure of inflammation.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/L
Change From Baseline in Mean High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
mg/LVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)0.90 (-2.46 to 4.27)2.04 (-1.37 to 5.45)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.62 · Mean difference (net): -1.14 · 95% CI -5.89 to 3.62Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was measured in the right arm in the sitting position after a 15-minute rest.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg
Change From Baseline in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
mm HgVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Systolic Blood Pressure0.64 (-7.13 to 8.42)4.29 (-3.15 to 11.74)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.48 · Mean difference (net): -3.65 · 95% CI -14.32 to 7.02Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure

Blood pressure was measured in the right arm in the sitting position after a 15-minute rest.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg
Change From Baseline in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
mm HgVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure-0.91 (-4.96 to 3.14)5.60 (1.69 to 9.52)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.02 · Mean difference (net): -6.51 · 95% CI -12.07 to -0.96Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Fasting Glucose

Glucose was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Fasting Glucose
mg/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Fasting Glucose-0.70 (-7.96 to 6.56)-6.98 (-14.31 to 0.34)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.22 · Mean difference (net): 6.28 · 95% CI -3.97 to 16.54Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Fasting Insulin

Insulin was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · uU/mL
Change From Baseline in Mean Fasting Insulin
uU/mLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Fasting Insulin13.04 (-3.96 to 30.05)-0.80 (-18.03 to 16.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.33 · Mean difference (net): 13.84 · 95% CI -210.29 to 37.98Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Glucose

Participants underwent a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test, in which blood samples for glucose and insulin were obtained at 0 and 2 hours and used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index (ISI 0,120).

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Glucose
mg/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Glucose-11.66 (-33.22 to 9.89)1.14 (-20.10 to 22.38)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.39 · Mean difference (net): -12.80 · 95% CI -42.94 to 17.34Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Insulin

Participants underwent a 75-gram oral glucose tolerance test, in which blood samples for glucose and insulin were obtained at 0 and 2 hours and used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index (ISI 0,120).

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · uU/mL
Change From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Insulin
uU/mLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean 2-hour Insulin-62.02 (-124.5 to 0.49)13.06 (-47.94 to 74.06)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.09 · Mean difference (net): -75.08 · 95% CI -161.9 to 11.78Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI 0,120)

Participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, in which blood samples for glucose and insulin were obtained at 0 and 120 minutes and used to calculate the insulin sensitivity index (ISI0,120). The ISI 0,120 = the glucose uptake rate divided by the mean plasma glucose divided by the log(mean serum insulin).

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg·l^2/mmol·mU·min
Change From Baseline in Mean Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI 0,120)
mg·l^2/mmol·mU·minVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI 0,120)6.67 (-16.87 to 30.21)5.94 (-17.77 to 29.65)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.96 · Mean difference (net): 0.73 · 95% CI -32.59 to 34.06Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)

Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) is a validated measure of insulin resistance based on fasting insulin and glucose. HOMA-IR is calculated as the product of fasting glucose and insulin divided by 22.5.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
units on a scaleVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)2.57 (-0.90 to 6.03)-0.51 (-4.01 to 2.99)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.21 · Mean difference (net): 3.08 · 95% CI -1.84 to 7.99Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Total Cholesterol

Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Cholesterol
mg/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Cholesterol-1.69 (-19.04 to 15.66)-1.80 (-19.55 to 15.95)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.99 · Mean difference (net): 0.11 · 95% CI -24.43 to 24.64Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean HDL Cholesterol

Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Cholesterol
mg/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean HDL Cholesterol-0.70 (-6.52 to 5.12)1.23 (-4.68 to 7.14)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.62 · Median difference (net): -1.93 · 95% CI -10.12 to 6.26Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean LDL Cholesterol

Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Cholesterol
mg/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean LDL Cholesterol-0.12 (-14.70 to 14.46)-0.40 (-15.24 to 14.45)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.98 · Mean difference (net): 0.28 · 95% CI -20.29 to 20.85Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Triglycerides

Lipid profile was assessed after 12 hours of fasting.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Triglycerides
mg/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Triglycerides-2.21 (-34.11 to 29.69)-12.44 (-44.68 to 19.80)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.64 · Mean difference (net): 10.24 · 95% CI -34.61 to 55.08Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Total Testosterone

Total and free testosterone levels were assessed from blood samples to evaluate effects on hyperandrogenemia in PCOS.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ng/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Testosterone
ng/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Total Testosterone3.01 (-8.05 to 14.06)10.16 (-1.16 to 21.47)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.88 · Mean difference (net): 0.88 · 95% CI -22.81 to 8.51Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean Free Testosterone

Total and free testosterone levels were assessed from blood samples to evaluate effects on hyperandrogenemia in PCOS.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ng/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Free Testosterone
ng/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Free Testosterone2.67 (-1.29 to 6.63)5.82 (1.82 to 9.82)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.25 · Mean difference (net): -3.15 · 95% CI -8.70 to 2.41Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in Mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D

Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D was assayed by the Immunodiagnostic Systems radioimmunoassay.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Change From Baseline in Mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D
ng/mLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean 25-hydroxyvitamin D45.63 (33.50 to 57.76)1.32 (-10.93 to 13.58)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = <0.001 · Mean difference (net): 44.31 · 95% CI 27.13 to 61.48Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in Mean Vitamin D Binding Protein

Vitamin D binding protein levels were assessed as it has been linked with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change From Baseline in Mean Vitamin D Binding Protein
mg/dLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Vitamin D Binding Protein1.01 (-1.60 to 3.62)-0.55 (-3.14 to 2.04)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.38 · Mean difference (net): 1.56 · 95% CI -2.08 to 5.20Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in Mean Intact Parathyroid Hormone (i-PTH)

Intact parathyroid hormone levels were assessed as they have been linked with obesity and insulin resistance.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Change From Baseline in Mean Intact Parathyroid Hormone (i-PTH)
pg/mLVitamin DPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Mean Intact Parathyroid Hormone (i-PTH)-24.28 (-39.80 to -8.76)-16.45 (-31.40 to -1.49)
Statistical analysis
  • Vitamin D vs Placebo · Regression, Linear · p = 0.46 · Mean difference (net): -7.84 · 95% CI -29.34 to 13.67Model-based differences adjusted for oral contraceptive use and season.

Adverse events

Collected over Twelve weeks.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Vitamin D—0/13 (0%)0/13 (0%)
Placebo—0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
Mean28.2 ± 5.228.7 ± 5.628.5 ± 5.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
Female131528
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American101
White101424
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported112
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
United States131528
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Body Mass Index (BMI)(kg/m2)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
Mean37.20 ± 4.5335.09 ± 9.8136.1 ± 7.8
Systolic blood pressure
Systolic blood pressure(mm Hg)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
Mean117.46 ± 10.00113.91 ± 10.21115.56 ± 10.11
Diastolic blood pressure
Diastolic blood pressure(mm hg)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
Mean79.08 ± 8.2874.88 ± 7.7276.83 ± 7.98
25-hydroxyvitamin D
25-hydroxyvitamin D(ng/mL)Vitamin DPlaceboTotal
Mean19.95 ± 9.4722.20 ± 6.8621.15 ± 8.10

16 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
    Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Raja-Khan N, Shah J, Stetter CM, Lott ME, Kunselman AR, Dodson WC, Legro RS. High-dose vitamin D supplementation and measures of insulin sensitivity in polycystic ovary syndrome: a randomized, controlled pilot trial. Fertil Steril. 2014 Jun;101(6):1740-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Mar 14. PubMed 24636395 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 19, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00907153
Responsible party
Nazia Raja-Khan (M.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 22, 2009
Start date
May 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Sep 2014
Results posted
Dec 19, 2017
Last update
Dec 19, 2017

Study contacts

Nazia Raja-Khan, M.D.
principal investigator · Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Vitamin D

Start the discussion