CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00905424Updated Jun 14, 2021Results posted

Exploratory Study of SPD489 in Adults With Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) as Augmentation Therapy to an Antidepressant

A Phase 2 interventional study of Antidepressant + SPD489 (lisdexamfetamine dimesylate) and Antidepressant + placebo in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Shire. Completed at 15 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 55 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-06-14.

Sponsored by Shire · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
246
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 55 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the efficacy of SPD489 when used as augmentation to an antidepressant in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) as measured by mean change in total Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 246 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Shire is the lead sponsor of 346 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 47 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 47 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 55 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-55 with a primary diagnosis of nonpsychotic MDD

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of non-response to multiple antidepressants
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
246 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active

    Antidepressant + SPD489

    Drug: Antidepressant + SPD489 (lisdexamfetamine dimesylate)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Antidepressant + placebo

    Drug: Antidepressant + placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAntidepressant + SPD489 (lisdexamfetamine dimesylate)

    Escitalopram oxalate (antidepressant) 20 mg/day oral + 20, 30, or 50 mg SPD489 oral once daily for 6 weeks

    Also known as: LDX, Vyvanse

  • DrugAntidepressant + placebo

    Escitalopram oxalate (antidepressant) 20 mg/day oral + placebo oral once daily for 6 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

    MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

    The HAM-D is a validated rating scale which consists of 17 items. Nine of the items are scored on a scale of 0-4 and 8 items are scored on a scale of 0-2 for a total scoring range of 0-52. A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates increased severity of depression. In general, the lower the total score the less severe the depression.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks

  2. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6

    Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks

  3. Percentage of Non-Remitters With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6 - LOCF

    Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Augmentation Baseline

    CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

    Time frame: Augmentation baseline

  5. Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Week 6

    CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  6. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Scale Total Score at Week 6

    BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three scales (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to develop interpretive reports. Lower scores reflect better functioning.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

  7. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale Total Score at Week 6

    MAF contains 16 items scored on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Answers are converted to a Global Fatigue Index with total scores ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Lower scores indicate less fatigue.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

  8. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR) Scale Total Score at Week 6

    QIDS-SR is a validated, self-reported rating scale that contains 16 items scored on a scale from 0-3 with total scores ranging from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Lower scores indicate less depression.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

  9. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in MADRS Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

    MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

  10. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the HAM-D Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

    The HAM-D is a validated rating scale which consists of 17 items. Nine of the items are scored on a scale of 0-4 and 8 items are scored on a scale of 0-2 for a total scoring range of 0-52. A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates increased severity of depression. In general, the lower the total score the less severe the depression.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

  11. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the SDS Total Score at Week 6

    Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment.

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks

  12. Percentage of Remitters With Improvement on CGI-I at Week 6 - LOCF

    Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  13. Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Augmentation Baseline

    CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

    Time frame: Augmentation Baseline

  14. Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Week 6

    CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  15. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the BRIEF-A Scale Total Score at Week 6

    BRIEF-A is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of three scales (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Lower scores reflect better functioning.

    Time frame: Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks

  16. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the MAF Scale Total Score at Week 6

    MAF contains 16 items scored on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Answers are converted to a Global Fatigue Index with total scores ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Lower scores indicate less fatigue.

    Time frame: Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks

  17. Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the QIDS-SR Scale Total Score at Week 6

    QIDS-SR is a validated, self-reported rating scale that contains 16 items scored on a scale from 0-3 with total scores ranging from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Lower scores indicate less depression.

    Time frame: Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jul 14, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAntidepressant + SPD489Antidepressant + Placebo .
Started8988
Completed7879
Not completed119
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up33
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject12
Withdrew: Adverse event42
Withdrew: Non-compliance with study medication20
Withdrew: Sponsor decision10
Withdrew: Positive urine drug screen01
Withdrew: Non-adherence to visit schedule01

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in Montgomery-Ǻsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 6 - Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)-7.1 ± 0.93-4.9 ± 0.94
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0902 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -2.3 · 90% CI -4.5 to -0.1
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

The HAM-D is a validated rating scale which consists of 17 items. Nine of the items are scored on a scale of 0-4 and 8 items are scored on a scale of 0-2 for a total scoring range of 0-52. A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates increased severity of depression. In general, the lower the total score the less severe the depression.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF-4.9 ± 0.64-4.0 ± 0.65
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.3091 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -0.9 · 90% CI -2.4 to 0.6
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6

Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline, 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score at Week 6-3.7 ± 0.73-1.7 ± 0.74
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0573 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -2.0 · 90% CI -3.7 to -0.3
SecondaryPercentage of Non-Remitters With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6 - LOCF

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percent of Participants
Percentage of Non-Remitters With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6 - LOCF
Percent of ParticipantsAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Percentage of Non-Remitters With Improvement on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) at Week 6 - LOCF60.045.3
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.2368
SecondaryAssessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Augmentation Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

Time frame:
Augmentation baseline
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Augmentation Baseline
Percent of participantsAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Normal, not at all ill1.51.6
Borderline mentally ill20.012.5
Mildly ill40.034.4
Moderately ill32.348.4
Markedly ill6.23.1
Severely ill00
Among the most extremely ill00
SecondaryAssessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Week 6

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Assessment in Non-Remitters of Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) at Week 6
Percent of participantsAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Normal, not at all ill27.014.5
Borderline mentally ill31.724.2
Mildly ill30.222.6
Moderately ill9.529.0
Markedly ill1.69.7
Severely ill00
Among the most extremely ill00
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Scale Total Score at Week 6

BRIEF-A is a validated 75-item questionnaire composed of three scales (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). There is no range for a total score. Raw scale scores are used to develop interpretive reports. Lower scores reflect better functioning.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A) Scale Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Global Executive Composite-4.7 ± 1.03-1.7 ± 1.04
Behavioral Regulation Index-3.7 ± 0.97-1.7 ± 0.99
Metacognition Index-4.8 ± 1.04-1.5 ± 1.06
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0463 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -3.0 · 90% CI -5.4 to -0.5
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.1431 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -2.0 · 90% CI -4.3 to 0.3
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0281 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -3.3 · 90% CI -5.8 to -0.8
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale Total Score at Week 6

MAF contains 16 items scored on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Answers are converted to a Global Fatigue Index with total scores ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Lower scores indicate less fatigue.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) Scale Total Score at Week 6-5.3 ± 1.25-2.3 ± 1.26
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0920 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -3.0 · 90% CI -6.0 to -0.1
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR) Scale Total Score at Week 6

QIDS-SR is a validated, self-reported rating scale that contains 16 items scored on a scale from 0-3 with total scores ranging from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Lower scores indicate less depression.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR) Scale Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Non-Remitters in the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR) Scale Total Score at Week 6-2.4 ± 0.45-1.2 ± 0.46
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Non-remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Non-remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0774 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -1.2 · 90% CI -2.2 to -0.1
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in MADRS Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

MADRS is a validated, 10-item rating scale with each item being scored on a scale from 0-6 with a total score ranging from 0-60. Lower scores indicate a decreased severity of depression.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in MADRS Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in MADRS Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF0.1 ± 1.13-1.1 ± 1.18
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.4726 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): 1.2 · 90% CI -1.6 to 4.0
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the HAM-D Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF

The HAM-D is a validated rating scale which consists of 17 items. Nine of the items are scored on a scale of 0-4 and 8 items are scored on a scale of 0-2 for a total scoring range of 0-52. A score of 0-7 is generally accepted to be within the normal range (or in clinical remission), while a score of 20 or higher indicates increased severity of depression. In general, the lower the total score the less severe the depression.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the HAM-D Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the HAM-D Total Score at Week 6 - LOCF-0.8 ± 0.92-1.6 ± 0.96
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.5182 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): 0.9 · 90% CI -1.4 to 3.1
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the SDS Total Score at Week 6

Designed to evaluate the extent to which illness symptoms impact a subject's life in 3 areas: work/school, social, and family/home. Each area is scored on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 10 (highly impaired) with a total score ranging from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). Lower scores translate into less impairment.

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the SDS Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the SDS Total Score at Week 6-1.6 ± 0.89-0.6 ± 0.91
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.4630 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -0.9 · 90% CI -3.1 to 1.2
SecondaryPercentage of Remitters With Improvement on CGI-I at Week 6 - LOCF

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) consists of a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the scale.

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Percentage of Remitters With Improvement on CGI-I at Week 6 - LOCF
Percent of participantsAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Percentage of Remitters With Improvement on CGI-I at Week 6 - LOCF65.252.4
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.5230
SecondaryAssessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Augmentation Baseline

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

Time frame:
Augmentation Baseline
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Augmentation Baseline
Percent of participantsAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Normal, not at all ill26.123.8
Borderline mentally ill47.871.4
Mildly ill21.74.8
Moderately ill4.30
Markedly ill00
Severely ill00
Among the most extremely ill00
SecondaryAssessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Week 6

CGI-S assesses the severity of the subject's condition on a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill)

Time frame:
6 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percent of participants
Assessment in Remitters of CGI-S at Week 6
Percent of participantsAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Normal, not at all ill50.061.9
Borderline mentally ill36.423.8
Mildly ill13.69.5
Moderately ill04.8
Markedly ill00
Severely ill00
Among the most extremely ill00
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the BRIEF-A Scale Total Score at Week 6

BRIEF-A is a validated 86-item questionnaire composed of three scales (Global Executive Composite, Behavioral Recognition Index, and Metacognition Index). Items are rated 1 (never), 2 (sometimes), and 3 (often). Lower scores reflect better functioning.

Time frame:
Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the BRIEF-A Scale Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Global Executive Composite-0.9 ± 1.21-2.7 ± 1.21
Behavioral Regulation Index-0.4 ± 1.37-1.5 ± 1.37
Metacognition Index-1.1 ± 1.24-3.4 ± 1.24
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.2876 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): 1.8 · 90% CI -1.0 to 4.7
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.5590 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): 1.1 · 90% CI -2.1 to 4.4
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.2079 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): 2.3 · 90% CI -0.7 to 5.2
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the MAF Scale Total Score at Week 6

MAF contains 16 items scored on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Answers are converted to a Global Fatigue Index with total scores ranging from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). Lower scores indicate less fatigue.

Time frame:
Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the MAF Scale Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the MAF Scale Total Score at Week 6-4.0 ± 1.77-0.2 ± 1.81
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.1489 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -3.7 · 90% CI -8.0 to 0.5
SecondaryChange From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the QIDS-SR Scale Total Score at Week 6

QIDS-SR is a validated, self-reported rating scale that contains 16 items scored on a scale from 0-3 with total scores ranging from 0 (no depression) to 27 (very severe depression). Lower scores indicate less depression.

Time frame:
Augmentation baseline and 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Units on a scale
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the QIDS-SR Scale Total Score at Week 6
Units on a scaleAntidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters)Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters)
Change From Augmentation Baseline for Remitters in the QIDS-SR Scale Total Score at Week 6-1.9 ± 0.57-0.4 ± 0.58
Statistical analysis
  • Antidepressant + SPD489 (Remitters) vs Antidepressant + Placebo (Remitters) · ANCOVA · p = 0.0852 (The test was performed a priori at the significance level of 0.10) · Mean difference (final values): -1.4 · 90% CI -2.8 to -0.1

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Antidepressant + SPD489—0/88 (0%)35/88 (39.8%)
Antidepressant + Placebo .—1/85 (1.2%)15/85 (17.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventAntidepressant + SPD489Antidepressant + Placebo .
RhabdomyolysisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/881/85
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAntidepressant + SPD489Antidepressant + Placebo .
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders10/880/85
HeadacheNervous system disorders10/884/85
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders4/886/85
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders6/882/85
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/883/85

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Antidepressant + SPD489Antidepressant + Placebo .Total
Mean39.4 ± 9.6538.6 ± 10.3839.0 ± 9.99
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Antidepressant + SPD489Antidepressant + Placebo .Total
18-40 years444993
41-55 years443680
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Antidepressant + SPD489Antidepressant + Placebo .Total
Female5354107
Male353166
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Antidepressant + SPD489Antidepressant + Placebo .Total
United States8885173
08

Study locations

15 sites
  • Pharmacology Research Institute (PRI)
    Newport Beach, California 92660, United States
  • Affiliated Research Institute
    San Diego, California 92108, United States
  • Florida Clinical Research Center, LLC
    Bradenton, Florida 34208, United States
  • Gulfcoast Clinical Research Center
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912, United States
  • Clinical Neuroscience Solutions, Inc.
    Orlando, Florida 32809, United States
  • Atlanta Institute of Medicine & Research
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Carman Research
    Smyrna, Georgia 30080, United States
  • Vince & Associates Clinical Research
    Overland Park, Kansas 66212, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • North Star Medical Research, LLC
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130, United States
  • IPS Research Company
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103, United States
  • Summit Research Network
    Portland, Oregon 97210, United States
  • FutureSearch Clinical Trials, LP
    Austin, Texas 78756, United States
  • Northwest Clinical Research Center
    Bellevue, Washington 98007, United States
  • Summit Research Network (Seattle), LLC
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Trivedi MH, Cutler AJ, Richards C, Lasser R, Geibel BB, Gao J, Sambunaris A, Patkar AA. A randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate as augmentation therapy in adults with residual symptoms of major depressive disorder after treatment with escitalopram. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Aug;74(8):802-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08360. PubMed 24021497 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00905424
Lead sponsor
Shire
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 20, 2009
Start date
Jul 30, 2009
Primary completion
Aug 4, 2010
Completion
Aug 4, 2010
Results posted
Jul 14, 2011
Last update
Jun 14, 2021

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Takeda

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion