CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00904462Updated Feb 10, 2010

Pilot Study of Lidocaine 5% Patch Versus Placebo in Patients With Osteoarthritis Pain of the Knee

A Phase 2 interventional study of Lidoderm and Placebo patch in Osteoarthritis, Knee, sponsored by Endo Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 24 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-02-10.

Sponsored by Endo Pharmaceuticals · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
224
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with unilateral or bilateral osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee participated in a Phase II clinical trial to assess the efficacy of lidocaine 5% patch compared with placebo in the treatment of pain from OA of the knee.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 224 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Endo Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 100 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Had unilateral or bilateral OA of the knee diagnosed according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria based on clinical and radiographic evidence (presence of osteophytes on x-ray and written evaluation) of OA
  2. Had functional capacity class rating of I, II, or III according to ACR classification
  3. Had normal 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) without any clinically significant abnormalities in heart rate, rhythm, or conduction
  4. Had discontinued use of all analgesic medications (including over-the-counter [OTC] analgesics) prior to randomization (patients were allowed limited use of analgesic medications for non study pain
  5. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had an average pain intensity rating for the index joint of 6 or greater (on a 0 to 10 scale) for at least 3 days out of the 5 consecutive days immediately prior to the baseline visit; 0 is defined as "no pain" and 10 is defined as "pain as bad as ever imagined" as measured by Question 5 of the BPI and recorded in a diary
  6. At baseline visit, patients were randomized to double-blind treatment if they had, at the baseline visit, an OA severity score for the index joint of 7 or greater on a composite scale of 0 to 24 as measured by the Index of Severity for Osteoarthrosis of the Knee

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Had been diagnosed with inflammatory arthritis, gout, pseudo-gout or Paget's disease that in the investigator's opinion would have interfered with the assessment of pain and other symptoms of OA
  2. Had serious medical conditions requiring daily medications, such as anticonvulsants and tricyclic antidepressants, that could have confounded study results
  3. Had any other clinically significant joint disease or prior joint replacement surgery at the index joint
  4. Had severe renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance of \<30 mL/min)
  5. Had moderate or greater hepatic impairment
  6. Were taking analgesic medications, glucosamine, or chondroitin that could not be discontinued during the study. Patients taking these medications prior to the study were required to discontinue use for the duration of the study. Patients using opioid analgesics at study entry were required to taper off these medications.
  7. Were taking long-acting opioids or opioids that could not be discontinued over the first 5 days of the placebo run-in period.
  8. Were using lidocaine-containing product that could not be discontinued during the study
  9. Had previously failed treatment with Lidoderm analgesic patch for OA
  10. Had recently received either a corticosteroid injection (within 8 weeks) or hyaluronic acid (within 6 months) of study entry
  11. Were unable to discontinue use of topical drugs applied to the knee
  12. Were taking class I anti-arrhythmic drugs (e.g. mexiletine, tocainide)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
224 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine 5% patch

    Lidocaine 5% patch (Lidoderm®, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.), 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours

    Drug: Lidoderm

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo patch

    Matching placebo patch, 1⅓ patches applied on each affected knee once every 24 hours

    Drug: Placebo patch

Interventions

  • DrugLidoderm

    Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

    Also known as: Lidocaine 5% patch

  • DrugPlacebo patch

    Eligible patients were randomly allocated to receive one of two treatments for 12 weeks: lidocaine 5% patch or matching placebo patch.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) OA Index

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

  2. Pain intensity and pain relief (BPI Questions 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8)

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

  3. Pain Quality Assessment Scale (PQAS)

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

  4. Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Impression of Change in OA pain (categorical scale)

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

  5. Patient-rated and Investigator-rated Global Assessment of Treatment Satisfaction (categorical scale)

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

Secondary outcomes

  1. QoL: Pain interference on activities of daily living using Question 9 of the BPI

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

  2. QoL: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

  3. Quality of Sleep (QOS)

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

  4. Safety assessments included AEs, dermal assessments, clinical laboratory tests (including urinalysis), vital sign measurements, physical examination results, and plasma lidocaine concentrations

    Time frame: Visit: V2(Day 0), V3(Day 14), V4(Day 28), V5(Day 42), V6(Day 56), V7/EOS(Day 84)

07

Study locations

24 sites
  • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Hueytown, Alabama, United States
  • Tallassee, Alabama, United States
  • Phoenix, Arizona, United States
  • Boulder, Colorado, United States
  • Deland, Florida, United States
  • Largo, Florida, United States
  • Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
  • St. Petersburg, Florida, United States
  • Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Springfield, Illinois, United States
  • Wheaton, Maryland, United States
  • Peabody, Massachusetts, United States
  • Bingham Farms, Michigan, United States
  • Reno, Nevada, United States
  • Berlin, New Jersey, United States
  • Dayton, Ohio, United States
  • Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
  • Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Charleston, South Carolina, United States
  • Bartlett, Tennessee, United States
  • Cordova, Tennessee, United States
  • Memphis, Tennessee, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00904462
Lead sponsor
Endo Pharmaceuticals
First posted
May 19, 2009
Start date
Aug 2004
Primary completion
Sep 2005
Last update
Feb 10, 2010

Study contacts

Study Director
study director · Endo Pharmaceuticals
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2010. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion