CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00903955Updated Feb 7, 2013

Mucus Dehydration and Evolution of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Lung Disease

An observational study in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Chronic Bronchitis, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 82 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-02-07.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years to 82 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to understand the properties of mucus in persons with COPD, specifically Chronic Bronchitis. We hypothesize that those with Chronic Bronchitis have dehydrated mucus, and thus have a harder time coughing it out of their lungs. This leads to a greater vulnerability for lung infection, inflammation and airflow obstruction. Ultimately, our goal is to understand how mucus dehydration contributes to the progression of COPD/Chronic Bronchitis so that better therapies and interventions can be developed for future generations.

Read the detailed description

Specific Aim I directly tests the hypothesis that mucus clearance is impaired due to mucus dehydration. It measures 1) COPD Mucociliary and Cough Clearance 2) mucus hydration 3) the concentrations of the dominant regulators of airway hydration and 4) the consequences of mucus dehydration on mucus biophysical properties and bacterial infection.

Specific Aim II tests the hypothesis that COPD acute exacerbations are associated with failures of mucus clearance. Measurements will be similar to that of Specific Aim I, but conducted during periods of baseline health, acute exacerbation and recovery.

Specific Aim III tests whether airway surface hydration with 7% Hypertonic Saline will restore clearance in the basal state and during a COPD acute exacerbation. COPD subjects will be exposed to inhaled Hypertonic Saline during periods of baseline health and acute exacerbation. Acute efficacy via measures of mucus clearance and spirometry will studied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
  • Chronic Bronchitis

Keywords

  • Mucus
  • COPD
  • Chronic Bronchitis
03

In context

Bronchitis

268 studies on the registry are indexed under Bronchitis; 26 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is below the median of 446 across 70 observational studies indexed under Bronchitis.

Browse Bronchitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,340 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 155 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 82 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Community members with a history of cigarette smoking and COPD/chronic bronchitis.

Inclusion criteria

  • history of COPD/chronic bronchitis defined as having a productive cough for three months of the year for at least two successive years
  • greater than or equal to a 10 pack year cigarette smoking history
  • ability to perform spirometry

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unstable lung disease
  • allergy to study medications
  • radiation exposure within past year exceeding Federal Regulation Limits
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

    Subjects diagnosed with COPD are classified according to standards set forth by the Global Initiative on Obstructive Lung Disease. This study recruits subjects in each of three GOLD categories.

    Other: 7% hypertonic saline

Interventions

  • Other7% hypertonic saline

    Administered via jet nebulizer to subjects in specific aim 3

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mucociliary clearance of inhaled tc99m

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Identification of bacterial and viral communities in mucus samples; analysis of biochemical and biophysical properties of mucus

    Time frame: March 2012

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2013, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00903955
Lead sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Richard C Boucher, MD (Director of Cystic Fibrosis Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2009
Start date
Sep 2006
Primary completion
Mar 2012
Completion
Mar 2012
Last update
Feb 7, 2013

Study contacts

Richard Boucher, MD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion