ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00902577Updated Apr 8, 2019Results posted

MRI and PET/FMISO In Assessing Tumor Hypoxia in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme

A Phase 2 interventional study of FMISO and MRI in Adult Giant Cell Glioblastoma, Adult Glioblastoma and Adult Gliosarcoma, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-08.

Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This phase II trial is studying how well positron emission tomography (PET) scan using 18F-fluoromisonidazole works when given together with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ) in assessing tumor hypoxia in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Diagnostic procedures, such as MRI and PET scan using 18F-fluoromisonidazole (FMISO), may help predict the response of the tumor to the treatment and allow doctors to plan better treatment.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the association of baseline FMISO PET uptake (hypoxic volume [HV]), highest tumor:blood ratio [T/Bmax]) and MRI parameters (Ktrans, CBV) with overall survival (OS) in participants with newly diagnosed GBM.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the association of baseline FMISO PET uptake (HV, T/Bmax) and MRI parameters (Ktrans, CBV) with time to progression (TTP) and 6-month progression free survival (PFS-6) in participants with newly diagnosed GBM.

II. To assess the reproducibility of the baseline FMISO PET uptake parameters by implementing baseline "test" and "retest" PET scans (performed within 1 to 7 days of each other).

III. To assess the correlation between highest tissue:cerebellum ratio [T/Cmax] and T/Bmax at baseline.

IV. To assess the correlation between other MRI parameters (for example Gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted (T1Gd), vessel caliber index (VCI), , CBV-S, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) , N-acetylaspartate (NAA) to choline (Cho) ratio, blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD), T2) and OS, TTP, and PFS-6.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study.

Two weeks before initiation of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide, patients undergo MRI and PET scan using FMISO. A subset of 15 patients undergo FMISO PET scans approximately 1 week before chemoradiotherapy. Blood samples are collected at baseline and periodically during study to compare image measures of tissue uptake of FMISO to blood concentrations. Tumor samples are collected from diagnostic biopsy or surgery for analysis of tumor hypoxic markers and methylguanine methyl transferase by immunohistochemical and Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays.

After completion of study therapy, patients are followed up every 3 months for up to 5 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • Adult Giant Cell Glioblastoma
  • Adult Glioblastoma
  • Adult Gliosarcoma
03

In context

Glioblastoma

1,951 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 457 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 50 is above the median of 36 across 1,645 interventional studies indexed under Glioblastoma.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,554 studies on the registry; 334 are open to participants now.

Of its 407 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 370 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be able to provide a written informed consent
  • Newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV based on pathology confirmation
  • Residual tumor after surgery (amount of residual tumor will not impact patient eligibility and visible residual disease can include T2/FLAIR hyperintensity)

    • Note: If patient had a biopsy only, postoperative MRI is not needed to assess residual tumor prior to enrollment
  • Scheduled to receive standard fractionated radiation therapy
  • Scheduled to receive Temozolomide (TMZ) in addition to radiation therapy
  • Karnofsky Performance Score > 60

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding (if a female is of child-bearing potential, and unsure of pregnancy status, a standard urine pregnancy test should be done)
  • Scheduled to receive chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or investigational agents in trials unwilling to share data with ACRIN (i.e., additional therapy added to radiation and TMZ is allowed if ACRIN is able to obtain treatment information)
  • Not suitable to undergo MRI or use the contrast agent Gd because of:
  • Claustrophobia
  • Presence of metallic objects or implanted medical devices in body (i.e., cardiac pacemaker, aneurysm clips, surgical clips, prostheses, artificial hearts, valves with steel parts, metal fragments, shrapnel, tattoos near the eye, or steel implants)
  • Sickle cell disease
  • Renal failure
  • Reduced renal function, as determined by Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 based on a serum creatinine level obtained within 28 days prior to registration
  • Presence of any other co-existing condition which, in the judgment of the investigator, might increase the risk to the subject
  • Presence of serious systemic illness, including: uncontrolled intercurrent infection, uncontrolled malignancy, significant renal disease, or psychiatric/social situations which might impact the survival endpoint of the study or limit compliance with study requirements
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to FMISO; an allergic reaction to nitroimidazoles is highly unlikely
  • Not suitable to undergo PET or MRI, including weight greater than 350 lbs (the weight limit for the MRI and PET table)
  • Prior treatment with implanted radiotherapy or chemotherapy sources such as wafers of polifeprosan 20 with carmustine
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diagnostic (MRI and PET using FMISO)

    Two weeks before initiation of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide, patients undergo MRI (DSC, DCE,DWI and MRS) and PET scan using FMISO. A subset of 15 patients undergo FMISO PET scans approximately 1 week before chemoradiotherapy.

    Drug: FMISO · Other: MRI · Other: PET · Other: MRS

Interventions

  • DrugFMISO

    FMISO PET scans

    Also known as: 18F-fluoromisonidazole, 18F-MISO, 18F-Misonidazole

  • OtherMRI

    Undergo MRI

    Also known as: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan, Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance, MRI Scan, NMR Imaging, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging (NMRI), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Medical Imaging, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Magnetic Resonance (MR)

  • OtherPET

    Undergo FMISO PET scan

    Also known as: Medical Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography, PET Scan, Positron Emission Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography Scan, Positron-Emission Tomography, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging

  • OtherMRS

    Also known as: Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS), Magnetic Resonance Imaging Spectroscopy (MRIS), Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging (MRSI)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Association of Baseline FMISO PET and MRI Features With OS as Assessed Using Cox-regression Model

    Overall Survival (OS) was evaluated every 3 months through end of the study (up to 5 years). A variety of continuous quantitative (functional) imaging features measuring abnormal tumor vasculature (MRI) and hypoxia (FMISO) were evaluated at baseline for their association with Survival time. Features include PET Hypoxia measures: Peak standardized uptake values (SUVpeak); maximum tumor:blood ratio (T/Bmax); and Hypoxia Volume (HV) DCE MRI perfusion measures: Mean/median volume transfer constant for gadolinium between blood plasma and the tissue extravascular extracellular space (ktrans) DSC MRI tumor vasculature: Normalized Relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV); and Cerebral blood flow (CBF) DWI MRI magnitude of diffusion of water through tissue (cell density): Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) using low and high Gaussian distributions

    Time frame: "assessed from baseline up to 5 years, survival status at 1-year reported

Secondary outcomes

  1. Association of Baseline FMISO PET and MRI Features With Time-to-Progression (TTP)

    Disease progression was defined by Macdonald criteria. PFS was evaluated every 3months through the end of study (up to 5yrs), features were measured at baseline. Quantitative imaging features measuring abnormal tumor vasculature (MRI) and hypoxia (FMISO) were evaluated for their association with TTP (cox model) and to discriminate between responders and non-responders at 6 and 9 mos (PFS6 and PFS9) (logistic) Features include PET Hypoxia measures: Peak standardized uptake values (SUVpeak); maximum tumor:blood ratio (T/Bmax); and Hypoxia Volume (HV) DCE MRI perfusion measures: Mean/median volume transfer constant for gadolinium between blood plasma and the tissue extravascular extracellular space (ktrans) DSC MRI tumor vasculature: Normalized Relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV); and Cerebral blood flow (CBF) DWI MRI magnitude of diffusion of water through tissue (cell density): Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) using low and high Gaussian distributions

    Time frame: assessed from baseline up to 5 years, progression status at months 6 and 9 reported

  2. Reproducibility of the Baseline FMISO PET Uptake Parameters as Assessed by Baseline "Test" and "Retest" PET Scans

    Reproducibility, defined as the variation of repeated measurements in an experiment performed under the same conditions, will be measured as the within subject coefficient of variation with upper an lower repeatability coefficients (LRC, URC) computed as percents from log-transformed data, per Velaquez, et al (J Nucl Med. 2009 Oct;50(10):1646-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063347. Epub 2009 Sep 16. PMID: 19759105 ). Where Within Subject Coefficient of Variation (wCV) is a percentage defined as wCV(%)=100\* (exp( SD\[ld\]/√2) - 1) and LRC and URC are calculated as: RC=100 (exp(±1.96 SD\[ld\]) -1). here SD\[ld\] is the standard deviation of the difference of the log-transformed PET measurements. These bounds provide an estimate of the lower and upper bounds of percent change observed between scans for each measurement.

    Time frame: Baseline and retest within 1 to 7 days after (but prior to the start of therapy)

  3. Correlation Between T/Cmax and T/Bmax

    Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to quantify the correlation between T/Bmax, the maximum tissue-to-blood ratio activity value, and T/Cmax, the tissue-to-cerebellum activite value Since T/Cmax does not requiring blood sampling and is image derived, a high correlation would indicate that T/Cmax could be an advantageous surrogate for T/Bmax.

    Time frame: At baseline

  4. Correlation Between MRS Markers and MR Imaging Markers of Vascularity as Well as Between MRS Markers and PET Markers of Tumor Hypoxia

    Correlation between MRS markers and MR imaging markers and PET markers of tumor hypoxia MRS markers include: NAA/Cho, Cho/Cr, Lac/Cr, and Lac/NAA measured within tumor and at the periphery. MR imaging markers of vascularity include: CBV, CBF, and ktrans PET tumor hypoxia marker: SUVmax

    Time frame: baseline

Other outcomes

  1. Overall and Progression Free Survival

    Disease progression was defined by Macdonald criteria. Survival and Progression were evaluated every 3months and at the end of study (up to 5 years) and time to event evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months through study completion (up to 5 years for progression and survivorship)

  2. SUVpeak and T/Bmax as Measures of Tumor Hypoxia

    The FMISO image data were normalized by the average blood activity to produce pixel level tissue-to-blood ratio (T/B) values for all image slices. And the severity of the hypoxia was determined by the pixel with the maximum T/B value (TBmax). FMISO SUVpeak was determined as the average SUV from a 1 cm circular ROI centered over the hottest pixel. Since FMISO selectively binds to hypoxic tissues, SUVpeak within a region provides a measure of tumor hypoxia.

    Time frame: baseline

  3. Hypoxic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Hypoxia

    The hypoxic volume (HV) was determined as the volume of pixels in the tumor on in the FMISO\\PET with a tumor to blood activity ratio ≥ 1.2. HV is a measure of the spatial extent of tumor hypoxia (in milliliters)

    Time frame: baseline

  4. DWI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)

    Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measures water diffusion through tissue (mm\^2/s). Cerebral infarction leads to diffusion restriction resulting in a low ADC signal in the infarcted area. A double Gaussian mixed model was fit to the ADC histogram and the mean of the lower and the mean of the higher ADC curves were evaluated

    Time frame: baseline

  5. Normalized Relative Cerebral Blood Volume (nRCBV) and Normalized Cerebral Blood Flow (nCBF)

    Relative cerebral blood volume (RCBV) maps, computed from the integral of ∆R2\*(t), were corrected for leakage effects and normalized to normal appearing white matter (nRCBV); nRCBV provides a measure of tumor vasculature Cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps were was normalized to the mean of the region of interest (ROI) in normal appearing white matter (nCBF); nCBF provides a measure of vascular permeability and perfusion

    Time frame: baseline

  6. Summary of Mean and Median Ktrans Across Participants.

    ktrans is a measure of vascular permeability and reflects the rate of gadolinium moves from plasma to extravascular extracellular space (predominantly though blood flow and capillary leakage), which can be represented by the mean or median rate. Mean \& Median ktrans within subject were computed using a matrix-based linearization method to fit tissue ∆R1(t) to the extended Tofts model. The mean across subjects is presented below (Mean (Mean-ktrans) and Mean(Median-Ktrans))

    Time frame: baseline

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2019

Participant flow

Fifty patients with newly diagnosed GBM were enrolled from 11 academic centers in the United States.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNewly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
Started50
Fmiso/pet38
Dce mri31
Dse mri37
Dwi mri39
Completed42
Not completed8
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject6
Withdrew: Fmiso production failure2

Outcome measures

PrimaryAssociation of Baseline FMISO PET and MRI Features With OS as Assessed Using Cox-regression Model

Overall Survival (OS) was evaluated every 3 months through end of the study (up to 5 years). A variety of continuous quantitative (functional) imaging features measuring abnormal tumor vasculature (MRI) and hypoxia (FMISO) were evaluated at baseline for their association with Survival time. Features include PET Hypoxia measures: Peak standardized uptake values (SUVpeak); maximum tumor:blood ratio (T/Bmax); and Hypoxia Volume (HV) DCE MRI perfusion measures: Mean/median volume transfer constant for gadolinium between blood plasma and the tissue extravascular extracellular space (ktrans) DSC MRI tumor vasculature: Normalized Relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV); and Cerebral blood flow (CBF) DWI MRI magnitude of diffusion of water through tissue (cell density): Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) using low and high Gaussian distributions

Time frame:
"assessed from baseline up to 5 years, survival status at 1-year reported
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Association of Baseline FMISO PET and MRI Features With OS as Assessed Using Cox-regression Model
ParticipantsEvaluableFMISO-PETDSC MRIDCE MRIDWI-MRI
OS-1 Alive2522242024
OS-1 Death1716131115
Statistical analysis
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Cox · p = 0.048 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.54 · 95% CI 1.0 to 2.36
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Cox · p = 0.50 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.16 · 95% CI .75 to 1.81
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Cox · p = 0.90 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.00 · 0.97% CI 0.97 to 1.03
  • DCE MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.024 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.17 · 95% CI 1.02 to 1.34HR reported per 0.01 increase
  • DCE MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.045 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.32 · 95% CI 1.01 to 1.72HR reported per 0.01 increase
  • DSC MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.31 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.11 · 95% CI 0.90 to 1.37
  • DSC MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.51 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.07 · 95% CI 0.88 to 1.29
  • DWI-MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.9700 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.00 · 95% CI 0.79 to 1.26
  • DWI-MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.9007 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.99 · 95% CI 0.91 to 1.09
SecondaryAssociation of Baseline FMISO PET and MRI Features With Time-to-Progression (TTP)

Disease progression was defined by Macdonald criteria. PFS was evaluated every 3months through the end of study (up to 5yrs), features were measured at baseline. Quantitative imaging features measuring abnormal tumor vasculature (MRI) and hypoxia (FMISO) were evaluated for their association with TTP (cox model) and to discriminate between responders and non-responders at 6 and 9 mos (PFS6 and PFS9) (logistic) Features include PET Hypoxia measures: Peak standardized uptake values (SUVpeak); maximum tumor:blood ratio (T/Bmax); and Hypoxia Volume (HV) DCE MRI perfusion measures: Mean/median volume transfer constant for gadolinium between blood plasma and the tissue extravascular extracellular space (ktrans) DSC MRI tumor vasculature: Normalized Relative cerebral blood volume (nRCBV); and Cerebral blood flow (CBF) DWI MRI magnitude of diffusion of water through tissue (cell density): Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) using low and high Gaussian distributions

Time frame:
assessed from baseline up to 5 years, progression status at months 6 and 9 reported
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Association of Baseline FMISO PET and MRI Features With Time-to-Progression (TTP)
ParticipantsEvaluableFMISO-PETDSC MRIDCE MRIDWI-MRI
6 month Progression Status — Progression Free2926272028
6 month Progression Status — Progressed1312101111
9 Month Progression Status — Progression Free1917181218
9 Month Progression Status — Progressed2321191921
Statistical analysis
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Cox · p = 0.33 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.24 · 95% CI .80 to 1.91
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Cox · p = 0.72 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.93 · 95% CI .61 to 1.4
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Cox · p = 0.355 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.01 · 95% CI .98 to 1.04
  • DCE MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.074 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.10 · 95% CI 0.99 to 1.23
  • DCE MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.021 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.30 · 95% CI 1.04 to 1.63
  • DSC MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.0096 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.28 · 95% CI 1.06 to 1.54
  • DSC MRI · Regression, Cox · p = 0.038 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.18 · 95% CI 1.01 to 1.38
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.3253 · Odds ratio (or): 0.682 · 95% CI 0.318 to 1.463
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.9836 · Odds ratio (or): 0.991 · 95% CI 0.403 to 2.434
  • FMISO-PET · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.1566 · Odds ratio (or): 0.957 · 95% CI 0.900 to 1.017
  • DCE MRI · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.9554 · Odds ratio (or): 0.993 · 95% CI 0.775 to 1.273
  • DCE MRI · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.6941 · Odds ratio (or): 0.919 · 95% CI 0.602 to 1.402
  • DSC MRI · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.1340 · Odds ratio (or): 0.744 · 95% CI 0.506 to 1.095
  • DSC MRI · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.2642 · Odds ratio (or): 0.821 · 95% CI 0.580 to 1.161
  • DWI-MRI · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.5069 · Odds ratio (or): 0.855 · 95% CI 0.539 to 1.357
  • DWI-MRI · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.1921 · Odds ratio (or): 0.884 · 95% CI 0.735 to 1.064
  • FMISO-PET · Area under the curve (auc): 0.61 · 95% CI 0.42 to 0.79
  • FMISO-PET · Area under the curve (auc): 0.59 · 95% CI 0.39 to 0.78
  • FMISO-PET · Area under the curve (auc): 0.64 · 95% CI 0.46 to 0.83
  • DCE MRI · Area under the curve (auc): 0.62 · 95% CI 0.42 to 0.83
  • DCE MRI · Area under the curve (auc): 0.64 · 95% CI 0.44 to 0.84
  • DSC MRI · Area under the curve (auc): 0.72 · 95% CI 0.54 to 0.89
  • DSC MRI · Area under the curve (auc): 0.72 · 95% CI 0.55 to 0.89
SecondaryReproducibility of the Baseline FMISO PET Uptake Parameters as Assessed by Baseline "Test" and "Retest" PET Scans

Reproducibility, defined as the variation of repeated measurements in an experiment performed under the same conditions, will be measured as the within subject coefficient of variation with upper an lower repeatability coefficients (LRC, URC) computed as percents from log-transformed data, per Velaquez, et al (J Nucl Med. 2009 Oct;50(10):1646-54. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.063347. Epub 2009 Sep 16. PMID: 19759105 ). Where Within Subject Coefficient of Variation (wCV) is a percentage defined as wCV(%)=100\* (exp( SD\[ld\]/√2) - 1) and LRC and URC are calculated as: RC=100 (exp(±1.96 SD\[ld\]) -1). here SD\[ld\] is the standard deviation of the difference of the log-transformed PET measurements. These bounds provide an estimate of the lower and upper bounds of percent change observed between scans for each measurement.

Time frame:
Baseline and retest within 1 to 7 days after (but prior to the start of therapy)
Reported as:
Number · Within Subj. Coefficient of Variation %
Reproducibility of the Baseline FMISO PET Uptake Parameters as Assessed by Baseline "Test" and "Retest" PET Scans
Within Subj. Coefficient of Variation %FMISO Reproducibility
SUVmax : Average across all lesions by participant7.03 (-17.18 to 20.74)
SUVmax : Maximum across all lesions by participant9.60 (-22.43 to 28.92)
SUVmax : Target Lesion8.18 (-19.59 to 24.36)
SUVpeak: Average across all lesions by participant7.08 (-17.27 to 20.88)
SUVpeak: Maximum across all lesions by participant9.20 (-21.65 to 27.63)
SUVpeak: Target Lesion8.24 (-19.71 to 24.55)
SecondaryCorrelation Between T/Cmax and T/Bmax

Pearson correlation coefficient will be used to quantify the correlation between T/Bmax, the maximum tissue-to-blood ratio activity value, and T/Cmax, the tissue-to-cerebellum activite value Since T/Cmax does not requiring blood sampling and is image derived, a high correlation would indicate that T/Cmax could be an advantageous surrogate for T/Bmax.

Time frame:
At baseline
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation Between T/Cmax and T/Bmax
correlation coefficientDSC MRI
Correlation Between T/Cmax and T/Bmax0.98
SecondaryCorrelation Between MRS Markers and MR Imaging Markers of Vascularity as Well as Between MRS Markers and PET Markers of Tumor Hypoxia

Correlation between MRS markers and MR imaging markers and PET markers of tumor hypoxia MRS markers include: NAA/Cho, Cho/Cr, Lac/Cr, and Lac/NAA measured within tumor and at the periphery. MR imaging markers of vascularity include: CBV, CBF, and ktrans PET tumor hypoxia marker: SUVmax

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Number · correlation coefficient
Correlation Between MRS Markers and MR Imaging Markers of Vascularity as Well as Between MRS Markers and PET Markers of Tumor Hypoxia
correlation coefficientnrCBVnCBFMedian K-transSUV Max
NAA/Cho Tumor-0.38-0.41-0.08-.33
NAA/Cho Periphery-0.33-0.340.14-0.41
Cho/Cr Tumor0.240.28-0.20.03
Cho/Cr Periphery0.170.20-0.270.11
Lac/Cr Tumor-0.27-0.25-0.06-0.29
Lac/Cr Periphery-0.09-0.110.10-0.15
Lac/NAA Tumor-0.02-0.010.23-0.18
Lac/NAA Periphery-0.01-0.010.33-0.04
Other pre-specifiedOverall and Progression Free Survival

Disease progression was defined by Macdonald criteria. Survival and Progression were evaluated every 3months and at the end of study (up to 5 years) and time to event evaluated.

Time frame:
Baseline, every 3 months through study completion (up to 5 years for progression and survivorship)
Reported as:
Median · days
Overall and Progression Free Survival
daysNewly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
Median OS time408 (316 to 642)
Median PFS258 (190 to 335)
Other pre-specifiedSUVpeak and T/Bmax as Measures of Tumor Hypoxia

The FMISO image data were normalized by the average blood activity to produce pixel level tissue-to-blood ratio (T/B) values for all image slices. And the severity of the hypoxia was determined by the pixel with the maximum T/B value (TBmax). FMISO SUVpeak was determined as the average SUV from a 1 cm circular ROI centered over the hottest pixel. Since FMISO selectively binds to hypoxic tissues, SUVpeak within a region provides a measure of tumor hypoxia.

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
SUVpeak and T/Bmax as Measures of Tumor Hypoxia
ratioFMISO-PET
SUVpeak2.49 ± 0.89
T/Bmax2.13 ± 0.77
Other pre-specifiedHypoxic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Hypoxia

The hypoxic volume (HV) was determined as the volume of pixels in the tumor on in the FMISO\\PET with a tumor to blood activity ratio ≥ 1.2. HV is a measure of the spatial extent of tumor hypoxia (in milliliters)

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · milliliters
Hypoxic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Hypoxia
millilitersFMISO-PET
Hypoxic Volume as a Measure of Tumor Hypoxia14.21 ± 11.61
Other pre-specifiedDWI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)

Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) measures water diffusion through tissue (mm\^2/s). Cerebral infarction leads to diffusion restriction resulting in a low ADC signal in the infarcted area. A double Gaussian mixed model was fit to the ADC histogram and the mean of the lower and the mean of the higher ADC curves were evaluated

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · mm^2/s
DWI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC)
mm^2/sDWI-MRI
Low0.99 ± 0.15
High1.48 ± 0.39
Other pre-specifiedNormalized Relative Cerebral Blood Volume (nRCBV) and Normalized Cerebral Blood Flow (nCBF)

Relative cerebral blood volume (RCBV) maps, computed from the integral of ∆R2\*(t), were corrected for leakage effects and normalized to normal appearing white matter (nRCBV); nRCBV provides a measure of tumor vasculature Cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps were was normalized to the mean of the region of interest (ROI) in normal appearing white matter (nCBF); nCBF provides a measure of vascular permeability and perfusion

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · ratio
Normalized Relative Cerebral Blood Volume (nRCBV) and Normalized Cerebral Blood Flow (nCBF)
ratioDSC MRI
nRCBV3.13 ± 1.86
nCBF3.36 ± 2.02
Other pre-specifiedSummary of Mean and Median Ktrans Across Participants.

ktrans is a measure of vascular permeability and reflects the rate of gadolinium moves from plasma to extravascular extracellular space (predominantly though blood flow and capillary leakage), which can be represented by the mean or median rate. Mean \& Median ktrans within subject were computed using a matrix-based linearization method to fit tissue ∆R1(t) to the extended Tofts model. The mean across subjects is presented below (Mean (Mean-ktrans) and Mean(Median-Ktrans))

Time frame:
baseline
Reported as:
Mean · 1/min
Summary of Mean and Median Ktrans Across Participants.
1/minDCE MRI
Mean kTrans0.04 ± 0.03
Median kTrans0.03 ± 0.07

Adverse events

Collected over until 24hrs after FMISO administration, evaluated up to 72hours post FMISO injection.. Non-serious events are listed at a 3% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Evaluable Cases0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)
Diagnostic PET (Using FMISO)0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)0/38 (0%)
Diagnostic MRI (DCE MRI)0/37 (0%)0/37 (0%)0/37 (0%)
Diagnostic MRI (DSE MRI)0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)
Diagnostic MRI (DWI MRI)0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Patients with newly diagnosed GBM who received both FMISO-PRT imaging two weeks before initiation of chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
Mean57 ± 9.07
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
Female15
Male27
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
Hispanic or Latino5
Not Hispanic or Latino36
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American2
White38
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Median Tumor Volume
Median Tumor Volume(mm^3)Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme Patients
Median14.94 (.84 to 59.5)
08

Study locations

14 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center
    Birmingham, Alabama 35233, United States
  • USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
  • Washington University School of Medicine
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
  • Mount Sinai Hospital
    New York, New York 10029, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
  • American College of Radiology Imaging Network
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Washington Medical Center
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ratai EM, Zhang Z, Fink J, Muzi M, Hanna L, Greco E, Richards T, Kim D, Andronesi OC, Mintz A, Kostakoglu L, Prah M, Ellingson B, Schmainda K, Sorensen G, Barboriak D, Mankoff D, Gerstner ER; ACRIN 6684 trial group. ACRIN 6684: Multicenter, phase II assessment of tumor hypoxia in newly diagnosed glioblastoma using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0198548. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198548. eCollection 2018. PubMed 29902200 ↗
  • Gerstner ER, Zhang Z, Fink JR, Muzi M, Hanna L, Greco E, Prah M, Schmainda KM, Mintz A, Kostakoglu L, Eikman EA, Ellingson BM, Ratai EM, Sorensen AG, Barboriak DP, Mankoff DA; ACRIN 6684 Trial Group. ACRIN 6684: Assessment of Tumor Hypoxia in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Using 18F-FMISO PET and MRI. Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Oct 15;22(20):5079-5086. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2529. Epub 2016 May 16. PubMed 27185374 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Jan 24, 2012

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2009 to primary completion in Jan 2018, 101 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2019, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 186 non-industry phase 2 interventional studies under Glioblastoma, half reached primary completion within 60 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 42 and three quarters within 88. This study's 101 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 237 studies reached it within 56 months; a quarter within 41 and three quarters within 87.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 14, 2009
First posted
May 15, 2009
StartActual
Aug 24, 2009
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2018
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2018
Results first posted
Apr 8, 2019
Last update
Apr 8, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 8, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00902577
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 15, 2009
Start date
Aug 24, 2009
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2018
Completion
Jan 31, 2018
Results posted
Apr 8, 2019
Last update
Apr 8, 2019

Study contacts

Elizabeth Gerstner
principal investigator · American College of Radiology Imaging Network
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fluoromisonidazole

Start the discussion