ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT00876551EVACoILUpdated May 26, 2010

Endoscopic-vacuum Assisted Closure of Intrathoracic Postsurgical Leaks

An interventional study of Endoscopic vacuum assisted closure in Mediastinitis, Esophageal Neoplasms and Anastomotic Leakage, sponsored by Hannover Medical School. Status unknown at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2010-05-26.

Sponsored by Hannover Medical School · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2009), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the short and long term outcome of endoscopic vacuum assisted closure of intrathoracic postsurgical leaks.

Read the detailed description

Intrathoracic leakage is a serious complication after esophageal surgery. The reported incidence of esophageal anastomotic leaks after gastrectomy and esophagectomy ranges from 5% to almost 30%. Within the last 10 years endoscopic treatment has changed the approach to intrathoracic anastomotic leakages. Application of metal clips, injection of fibrin glue and placement of self expanding metal or plastic stents (SEMS/SEPS) have been reported to successfully achieve closure of postoperative anastomotic leaks in approximately 66-100%. Alternative endoscopically treatment modalities are welcome especially in cases of failure of the above mentioned endoscopic treatment modalities to prevent the necessity of surgical reintervention which is associated with high mortality or mutilating surgical outcome such as proximal diversion with cervical esophagostomy.

Vacuum-assisted closure (V.A.C.) is an established treatment modality for extensive cutaneous infected wounds. The V.A.C. system device is based on a negative pressure applied to the wound via a vacuum sealed sponge tissue. The sponge results in formation of granulation tissue, while the vacuum removes wound secretions and reduces edema and therefore improves blood flow, all together achieving consecutive wound closure. Since its introduction in the late 1990´s the number of indications for the V.A.C. system has steadily increased. Recently the endoluminal application of a vacuum assisted wound closure system for the closure of rectal anastomotic fistulas has been reported. Our group reported the successful closure of intrathoracic anastomotic leaks in two cases by endoscopic placement of a vacuum assisted closure system. Here we plan to study the efficacy, safety and long term outcome of E-V.A.C. to treat major intrathoracic postsurgical leaks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mediastinitis
  • Esophageal Neoplasms
  • Anastomotic Leakage

Keywords

  • Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy
  • Endoscopic/endoluminal V.A.C. therapy
  • Esophagectomy
  • Anastomotic leakage
  • Anastomosis, Surgical
03

In context

Mediastinitis

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Mediastinitis; 3 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 83 across 12 interventional studies indexed under Mediastinitis.

Browse Mediastinitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Hannover Medical School is the lead sponsor of 202 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients at the Medical School Hannover that present with intrathoracic postsurgical leakage that can be intubated with a regular 9.2mm diameter endoscope (Olympus GIF-165, Olympus
  • Age over 18 years old
  • Signed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Small leakage that can be treated with clips
  • Refusal to participate in study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    E-V.A.C.

    Patients that are treated with E-V.A.C.

    Procedure: Endoscopic vacuum assisted closure

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic vacuum assisted closure

    1. Endoscopic debridement of wound using a regular biopsy forceps. 2. Introduction via the nose and oral exteriorization of a silicone duodenal tube (Freka Tube, 15 Ch, Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg v.d. H. Germany) 3. Fixation of a polyurethane foam (sponge, pore size 400-600 µm, KCI, Wiesbaden Germany) to the tip of the duodenal tube with a mersilene suture (0,35mm, Johnson \& Johnson, St-Stevens-Woluwe, Belgium). 4. Trimming of the sponge to the specific wound size. 5. Endoscopic placement of the sponge in the intrathoracic leak with a grasping forceps (Olympus, Germany) 6. Application of continuous suction of 125mmHg using vacuum pump (KCI, Wiesbaden Germany). 7. Sponge exchange twice a week until wound grounds are clean and closed

    Also known as: Endoluminal vacuum assisted closure, E-V.A.C., Endosponnge

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Closure of postsurgical leak

    Time frame: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Short term complications

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  2. Long term complications

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. number of endoscopic interventions

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  4. time to leak closure

    Time frame: 6 weeks

  5. C reactive protein

    Time frame: 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medical School Hannover
    Hannover, 30625, Germany
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Wedemeyer J, Schneider A, Manns MP, Jackobs S. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Apr;67(4):708-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.10.064. PubMed 18374029 ↗
  • Wedemeyer J, Brangewitz M, Kubicka S, Jackobs S, Winkler M, Neipp M, Klempnauer J, Manns MP, Schneider AS. Management of major postsurgical gastroesophageal intrathoracic leaks with an endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure system. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Feb;71(2):382-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.07.011. Epub 2009 Oct 30. PubMed 19879566 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2008, a primary completion of Dec 2012 and a completion of Dec 2012. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 3, 2009
First posted
Apr 6, 2009
Start
Jan 2008
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2012
CompletionEst.
Dec 2012
Last update
May 26, 2010
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2010, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00876551
First posted
Apr 6, 2009
Start date
Jan 2008
Primary completion
Dec 2012 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2012 (estimated)
Last update
May 26, 2010

Study contacts

Jochen Wedemeyer, MD
Contact
wedemeyer.jochen@mh-hannover.de
+49 511 532 ext. 2406
Andrea S Schneider, MD
Contact
andrea.s.schneider@gmx.de
+49 511 532 ext. 3307
Jochen Wedemeyer, MD
principal investigator · Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medical School Hannover

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion