ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07507409Updated Apr 13, 2026

Innovative Sternal Closure Techniques: Evaluating STRATAFIX™ and DERMABOND™ for Reduced Complications in CABG Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Knotless Barbed Sutures and Mesh-based Topical Skin Adhesive in Cardiovascular Disease, Surgical Site Infection and Superficial Sternal Wound Infection, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
401
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a new method of closing the breastbone after heart bypass surgery can improve healing and reduce complications in adults undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does this new closure method reduce infections and wound reopening? Does it improve healing, recovery, and overall patient outcomes?

Researchers will compare patients who receive the new closure method to past patients who received the standard method to see if outcomes are better.

Participants will:

Receive the new closure method during their surgery (as part of standard care) Be followed during their normal recovery up to their 6-week follow-up visit Complete a short quality-of-life questionnaire (about 10 minutes) Have their recovery assessed, including healing, complications, and hospital use

Researchers will also look at quality of life, heart complications, hospital readmissions, antibiotic use, scar appearance, and overall costs to understand the full impact of the new method.

Read the detailed description

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) represents a major burden of morbidity and mortality. Approximately 8.5% of Canadian adults live with CVD and it is the second leading cause of death in Canada. In Canada, over 30,000 cardiac surgical procedures are performed each year, the vast majority via a sternotomy. Sternotomy complications can be life-threatening especially when they beget sternal dehiscence (SD) and deep sternal wound infection (DSWI). It is often unclear whether SD caused SWI or vice versa. Superficial sternotomy complications have a 5-10% occurrence, with DSWIs occurring in 0.2-5% of patients. When sternal complications do occur, patient-reported outcomes are impacted and mortality rates can be as high as 10-30%.

Typically a combination of steel wires and synthetic, absorbable sutures are used to close sternal incisions. Recently, the development of barbed sutures have been shown to reduce knot slippage and complications related to knot tying. Insufficient data on their feasibility and safety in cardiac surgery has limited their use in the field. Furthermore, research has demonstrated the benefits of otherskin closure systems, that combines 2-octyl cyanoacrylate with a self-adhesive polymer mesh tape, but their effects have been minimally investigated on sternal wound closures (SWCs). Moreover, the combinatory effects of barbed sutures and mesh-based antibiotic skin adhesives on SWCs have not been investigated.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) in CABG are often sternal wound infections which are classified as deep sternal wound infection (DSWI) and superficial sternal wound infection (SSWI). DSWIs, also known as mediastinitis, have an incidence of 1-5% and are associated with the highest SWI mortality rates ranging between 10-47%. Mediastinitis is the inflammation of the tissue and organs within the mediastinum (an area in the chest that contains vital organs such as the heart, trachea, and esophagus). In contrast, SSWIs have a slightly higher incidence of 0.5-10%, with a much lower mortality rate of 0.5-5%, and affect the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and pectoralis fascia. Considering DSWI can affect highly protected organs in the mediastinum, it is predicted that DSWI usually occurs due to preoperative contamination, meanwhile, SSWI is a more superficial infection and is hypothesized to begin on the epidermis and move inside, through the tissue layers. Importantly, DSWI and SSWI share similar risk factors such as diabetes, pre- and post-operative complications, and obesity.

The goal of the study is to determine if implementing a combination of barbed sutures (STRATAFIX™) and a mesh-based topical skin adhesive (DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ ) on sternal wound closures will reduce the incidence of sternal complications, such as sternal dehiscence and sternal wound infection, in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. The investigators hypothesize that this combined approach will significantly reduce sternal dehiscence and wound infections, leading to a measurable decrease in patient morbidity and mortality.

The primary objective of this study is to assess whether the use of STRATAFIX™ barbed sutures, featuring antibacterial triclosan coating, and DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ wound closure system which combines 2-octyl cyanoacrylate with a polymer mesh will reduce sternal wound closure complications in CABG patients over a period of 6-weeks. The secondary objectives are to compare the cost-effectiveness for the hospital and quality of life in patients who have received this novel approach for sternal wound closure, versus the customary materials (i.e., non-barbed, no mesh-based antibiotic skin adhesives) used by cardiac surgeons.

The primary outcomes will include the following:

1) The incidence of DSWI, SSWI, SSI, and SD.

  1. Sternal wound sites will be classified based on a blinded grading using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 4-level classification system13.
  2. The cardiac surgeon will perform a visual assessment to determine the presence of SD, recording the outcome as a binary result (yes or no).

    The secondary outcomes will include the following:

    1. Quality of Life Assessment (QALY) will be completed using the EQ-5D questionnaire which measures mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression14. The questionnaire will be distributed for completion at the 6-week post-operative visit.
    2. Should SD occur, its severity will be measured using a gap measurement. 3) All-cause mortality.

    4) Incidence of ST- and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI, respectively).

    2 5) Utilization of hospital resources, specifically, the frequency of hospital readmission, length of stay at the hospital, and number of revisions and/or reoperations for sternal closure due to infection or dehiscence.

    6) Antibiotic dosage and frequency. 7) Aesthetic assessment of the sternal closure site. 8) Cost-effectiveness of the materials used will be analyzed related to the EQ-5D questionnaire responses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Surgical Site Infection
  • Superficial Sternal Wound Infection
  • Mediastinitis

Keywords

  • STRATAFIX
  • DERMABOND
  • Sternal Closure
  • Suture
  • CABG
03

In context

Cardiovascular Diseases

5,368 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 939 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 401 is above the median of 100 across 3,084 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.

Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Patients aged 18 years and older undergoing CABG surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to participate in the trial.
  • Patients who do not read or speak English.
  • Patient with allergy to surgical adhesives or sutures
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
401 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    STRATAFIX™ and DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ Intervention Group

    This experimental arm evaluates a dual-component sternal closure strategy in 401 patients undergoing CABG surgery. The intervention replaces traditional non-barbed sutures with a combination of STRATAFIX™ barbed sutures and DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ mesh-based adhesive.

    Device: Knotless Barbed Sutures · Device: Mesh-based Topical Skin Adhesive

Interventions

  • DeviceKnotless Barbed Sutures

    This intervention replaces traditional non-barbed, knotted sutures with a specialized knotless and adhesive system. The strategy is characterized by the following layer-specific applications: Deep Tissue (Presternal Fascia): Application of STRATAFIX™ Symmetric barbed sutures. Subcutaneous and Subcuticular Layers: Use of STRATAFIX™ Spiral MONOCRYL™ Plus and/or STRATAFIX™ Spiral PDS™ Plus. These sutures feature an antibacterial triclosan coating designed to reduce the risk of surgical site infections.

    Also known as: STRATAFIX™ Symmetric barbed sutures, STRATAFIX™ Spiral MONOCRYL™ Plus, STRATAFIX™ Spiral PDS™ Plus

  • DeviceMesh-based Topical Skin Adhesive

    Skin Surface: Final closure using the DERMABOND™ PRINEO™ system, which combines 2-octyl cyanoacrylate topical adhesive with a self-adhesive polymer mesh tape.

    Also known as: DERMABOND™ PRINEO™

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Sternal Wound Complications (Composite Endpoint)

    The primary outcome is a composite measure of treatment success or failure. A participant is considered a success only if they experience none of the following: Deep Sternal Wound Infection (DSWI), Superficial Sternal Wound Infection (SSWI), general Surgical Site Infection (SSI), or Sternal Dehiscence (SD). A participant is considered a failure if any one of these complications occurs. Sternal wound sites will be classified by blinded personnel using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 4-level classification system. Sternal Dehiscence (SD) will be determined via a visual assessment by a cardiac surgeon and recorded as a binary result (yes or no).

    Time frame: 6 weeks post-operatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Krishnamoorthy B, Shepherd N, Critchley WR, Nair J, Devan N, Nasir A, Barnard JB, Venkateswaran RV, Waterworth PD, Fildes JE, Yonan N. A randomized study comparing traditional monofilament knotted sutures with barbed knotless sutures for donor leg wound closure in coronary artery bypass surgery. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Feb;22(2):161-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv314. Epub 2015 Nov 20. PubMed 26590381 ↗
  • Haenen, F. W. N., Guy, T. S. & Rodrigus, I. Knotless Closure of the Cardiac Venous Cannulation Site Using Barbed Suture: A First Step in Including Barbed Sutures in our Cardiac Surgery Practice. Surg. Case Rep. 2021, 1-4 (2021).
  • EQ-5D-5L. EuroQol https://euroqol.org/information-and-support/euroqol-instruments/eq-5d5l/.
  • Herman TF, Popowicz P, Bordoni B. Wound Classification. 2023 Aug 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554456/ PubMed 32119343 ↗
  • Lemaignen A, Birgand G, Ghodhbane W, Alkhoder S, Lolom I, Belorgey S, Lescure FX, Armand-Lefevre L, Raffoul R, Dilly MP, Nataf P, Lucet JC. Sternal wound infection after cardiac surgery: incidence and risk factors according to clinical presentation. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Jul;21(7):674.e11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Apr 14. PubMed 25882356 ↗
  • Pastene B, Cassir N, Tankel J, Einav S, Fournier PE, Thomas P, Leone M. Mediastinitis in the intensive care unit patient: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Jan;26(1):26-34. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 12. PubMed 31306791 ↗
  • Haenen FW, Van Oostende C, Allegaert M, Round KJ, Rosen JL, Guy ST, Rodrigus I. Prosthesis-prosthesis anastomosis using barbed sutures compared to conventional sutures under high, long-term pressure; in vitro extracorporeal circulation setup. Perfusion. 2024 Apr;39(3):571-577. doi: 10.1177/02676591231153539. Epub 2023 Jan 24. PubMed 36691745 ↗
  • Lin Y, Lai S, Huang J, Du L. The Efficacy and Safety of Knotless Barbed Sutures in the Surgical Field: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 23;6:23425. doi: 10.1038/srep23425. PubMed 27005688 ↗
  • Greenberg JA, Goldman RH. Barbed suture: a review of the technology and clinical uses in obstetrics and gynecology. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2013;6(3-4):107-15. PubMed 24920976 ↗
  • Singh K, Anderson E, Harper JG. Overview and management of sternal wound infection. Semin Plast Surg. 2011 Feb;25(1):25-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1275168. PubMed 22294940 ↗
  • Song Y, Chu W, Sun J, Liu X, Zhu H, Yu H, Shen C. Review on risk factors, classification, and treatment of sternal wound infection. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023 May 19;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s13019-023-02228-y. PubMed 37208736 ↗
  • Reser D, Caliskan E, Tolboom H, Guidotti A, Maisano F. Median sternotomy. Multimed Man Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jul 17;2015:mmv017. doi: 10.1093/mmcts/mmv017. Print 2015. PubMed 26188337 ↗
  • Canada, P. H. A. of. Heart Disease in Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/publichealth/services/publications/diseases-conditions/heart-disease-canada.html (2017).
  • Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, Addolorato G, Ammirati E, Baddour LM, Barengo NC, Beaton AZ, Benjamin EJ, Benziger CP, Bonny A, Brauer M, Brodmann M, Cahill TJ, Carapetis J, Catapano AL, Chugh SS, Cooper LT, Coresh J, Criqui M, DeCleene N, Eagle KA, Emmons-Bell S, Feigin VL, Fernandez-Sola J, Fowkes G, Gakidou E, Grundy SM, He FJ, Howard G, Hu F, Inker L, Karthikeyan G, Kassebaum N, Koroshetz W, Lavie C, Lloyd-Jones D, Lu HS, Mirijello A, Temesgen AM, Mokdad A, Moran AE, Muntner P, Narula J, Neal B, Ntsekhe M, Moraes de Oliveira G, Otto C, Owolabi M, Pratt M, Rajagopalan S, Reitsma M, Ribeiro ALP, Rigotti N, Rodgers A, Sable C, Shakil S, Sliwa-Hahnle K, Stark B, Sundstrom J, Timpel P, Tleyjeh IM, Valgimigli M, Vos T, Whelton PK, Yacoub M, Zuhlke L, Murray C, Fuster V; GBD-NHLBI-JACC Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases Writing Group. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 22;76(25):2982-3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010. PubMed 33309175 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 18 months later.

Of 107 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Cardiovascular Diseases, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 76. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 113 studies reached it within 46 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 64.

Cardiovascular Diseases covers many different conditions, not one, so the studies compared here vary widely. Read these figures as a rough guide.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 27, 2026
First posted
Apr 2, 2026
StartEst.
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 1, 2028
Last update
Apr 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07507409
Collaborators
Johnson & Johnson
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 2, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion