CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00871871Updated Jul 28, 2015Results posted

Multiple Dose Effects of Hydrochlorothiazide and Isosorbide Mononitrate on Glucose Homeostasis (MK-0000-117)(Completed)

A Phase 1 interventional study of Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and Comparator: Placebo to HCTZ in Hypertension, sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. Completed. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-28.

Sponsored by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will measure and compare changes in insulin production and sensitivity using the hyperglycemic clamp technique in obese patients with impaired glucose tolerance and hypertension treated with placebo, isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) or hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ).

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hypertension

6,689 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 965 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 64 is below the median of 90 across 4,995 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC is the lead sponsor of 2,114 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 489 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 362 (74%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants must be post-menopausal
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) of at least 29 kg/m\^2
  • Weight has been stable over the past 3 months
  • Has never been treated for hypertension or is diagnosed with hypertension taking up to 2 anti-hypertensive medications
  • Willing to stop hypertension treatment for 14 days prior to randomization and throughout the study
  • Does not have a history of diabetes
  • In good health with the exception of hypertension
  • No history of abnormal heart rhythms
  • Part I only: willing to comply with high potassium/low sodium diet for the duration of the study
  • Willing to avoid strenuous physical activity during the study
  • Nonsmoker and/or has not used nicotine for at least 3 months and agrees to refrain from use of tobacco-containing products throughout the study
  • Agrees to refrain from consuming alcohol and caffeine during in-patient periods and to limit consumption at all other times during the study
  • Agrees not to consume grapefruit, grapefruit products, and citrus, apple, and pineapple juices 2 weeks prior to administration of the first dose of study drug

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any illness that may make their participation in the study unsafe or confuse the study results
  • Taking spironolactone or eplerenone
  • Cannot refrain from using any prescription or non-prescription drugs during the study
  • On a weight loss program and is not in the maintenance phase
  • Started a weight loss drug within 8 weeks of the first study visit
  • Consumes excessive amounts of alcohol or caffeine
  • Has had major surgery, donated or lost 1 unit of blood within 4 weeks of the first study visit
  • History of multiple and/or severe allergies to drugs or food
  • Is dehydrated
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
64 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part I, Placebo-HCTZ

    Placebo in Period 1 followed by HCTZ in Period 2

    Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) · Drug: Comparator: Placebo to HCTZ

  • Experimental
    Part I, HCTZ-Placebo

    HCTZ in Period 1, followed by placebo in Period 2

    Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) · Drug: Comparator: Placebo to HCTZ

  • Experimental
    Part II, Placebo-ISMN

    Placebo in Period 1, followed by ISMN in Period 2

    Drug: Isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) · Drug: Comparator: Placebo to ISMN

  • Experimental
    Part II, ISMN-Placebo

    ISMN in Period 1, followed by placebo in Period 2

    Drug: Isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) · Drug: Comparator: Placebo to ISMN

Interventions

  • DrugHydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)

    HCTZ 50 mg (two 25 mg capsules) once daily for 4 weeks per treatment period.

    Also known as: HCTZ

  • DrugComparator: Placebo to HCTZ

    Placebo to HCTZ two 0 mg capsules once daily for 4 weeks per treatment period

  • DrugIsosorbide mononitrate (ISMN)

    ISMN 60 mg extended release capsule once daily for 4 weeks per treatment period

  • DrugComparator: Placebo to ISMN

    Placebo to ISMN 0 mg capsule once daily for 4 weeks per treatment period

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

    Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. IGT was defined as a 2 hour plasma glucose \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test at screening.

    Time frame: 90 -120 minutes post-dose

  2. Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)

    Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

    Time frame: 90 -120 minutes post-dose

  3. Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants Who Had Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT)

    Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. NGT participants (FPG \<100 mg/dL \& 2 hour plasma glucose (PG) \<140 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at screening) were neither Impaired Glucose Tolerant (IGT) nor Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG). IGT was defined as a 2 hour plasma glucose \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test at screening. IFG was defined as FPG between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

    Time frame: 90 -120 minutes post-dose

  4. Part II: Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady-state

    Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the quantity of glucose disposed by the body per kg body weight per minute at steady state divided by the approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration. The approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals in which time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes.

    Time frame: 90 -120 minutes post-dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerant (IGT)

    Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the quantity of glucose disposed by the body per kg body weight per minute at steady state divided by the approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration. The approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals in which time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes. IGT was defined as a 2 hour plasma glucose \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test at screening.

    Time frame: 90 -120 minutes post-dose

  2. Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)

    Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the quantity of glucose disposed by the body per kg body weight per minute at steady state divided by the approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration. The approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals in which time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

    Time frame: 90 -120 minutes post-dose

  3. Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Normal Glucose Tolerant (NGT)

    Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the measure of the quantity of glucose disposed per unit of plasma insulin concentration (PIC). Approximate PIC was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals, time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes. NGT participants (FPG \<100 mg/dL \& 2 hour PG \<140 mg/dL during a 75g OGTT at screening) were neither IGT nor IFG at screening. IGT - defined as a 2 hour PG \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g OGTT at screening. IFG - defined as FPG between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

    Time frame: 90 -120 minutes post-dose

07

Results

Posted Sep 22, 2011

Participant flow

Part I
Participant flow — Part I
MilestoneHCTZ First, Then HCTZ PlaceboHCTZ Placebo First, Then HCTZISMN First, Then ISMN PlaceboISMN Placebo First, Then ISMN
Started181800
Completed151500
Not completed3300
Withdrew: Adverse event0200
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3000
Withdrew: Laboratory abnormality0100
Part II
Participant flow — Part II
MilestoneHCTZ First, Then HCTZ PlaceboHCTZ Placebo First, Then HCTZISMN First, Then ISMN PlaceboISMN Placebo First, Then ISMN
Started001315
Completed00911
Not completed0044
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy0010
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject0021
Withdrew: Adverse event0012
Withdrew: Protocol violation0001

Outcome measures

PrimaryPart I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)

Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. IGT was defined as a 2 hour plasma glucose \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test at screening.

Time frame:
90 -120 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ng/minute
Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)
ng/minuteHydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo
Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT)3.44 ± 1.033.55 ± 1.03
Statistical analysis
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.067 (one-sided, alpha = 0.05) · Least squares mean difference: -0.10 · 90% CI -0.22 to 0.01
PrimaryPart I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)

Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

Time frame:
90 -120 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ng/minute
Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)
ng/minuteHydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo
Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)5.60 ± 1.454.50 ± 0.95
Statistical analysis
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo · ANCOVA · p = >0.500 · Least squares mean difference: 1.10 · 90% CI 0.86 to 1.34
SecondaryPart I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerant (IGT)

Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the quantity of glucose disposed by the body per kg body weight per minute at steady state divided by the approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration. The approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals in which time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes. IGT was defined as a 2 hour plasma glucose \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test at screening.

Time frame:
90 -120 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)
Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerant (IGT)
(mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo
Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Glucose Tolerant (IGT)0.061 ± 0.0440.045 ± 0.041
Statistical analysis
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.130 (one-sided, alpha = 0.05) · Least squares mean difference: 0.016 · 90% CI -0.012 to 0.044
PrimaryPart I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants Who Had Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT)

Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. NGT participants (FPG \<100 mg/dL \& 2 hour plasma glucose (PG) \<140 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at screening) were neither Impaired Glucose Tolerant (IGT) nor Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG). IGT was defined as a 2 hour plasma glucose \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g oral glucose tolerance test at screening. IFG was defined as FPG between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

Time frame:
90 -120 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · ng/minute
Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants Who Had Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT)
ng/minuteHydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo
Part I: Change in Insulin Secretion at Steady-state Compared to Placebo in Participants Who Had Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT)5.54 ± 2.155.01 ± 1.63
Statistical analysis
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo · ANCOVA · p = >0.500 · Least squares mean difference: 0.54 · 90% CI 0.40 to 0.67
PrimaryPart II: Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady-state

Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the quantity of glucose disposed by the body per kg body weight per minute at steady state divided by the approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration. The approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals in which time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes.

Time frame:
90 -120 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)
Part II: Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady-state
(mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)Isosorbide Mononitrate (ISMN)Isosorbide Mononitrate (ISMN) Placebo
Part II: Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady-state0.040 ± 0.0270.044 ± 0.041
Statistical analysis
  • Isosorbide Mononitrate (ISMN) vs Isosorbide Mononitrate (ISMN) Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.342 (one-sided, alpha = 0.05) · Least squares mean difference: 0.004 · 90% CI -0.023 to 0.014
SecondaryPart I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)

Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the quantity of glucose disposed by the body per kg body weight per minute at steady state divided by the approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration. The approximate steady state plasma insulin concentration was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals in which time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes. IFG was defined as fasting plasma glucose (FPG) between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

Time frame:
90 -120 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)
Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)
(mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo
Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG)0.038 ± 0.0190.037 ± 0.109
Statistical analysis
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo · ANOVA · p = >0.500 · Least squares mean difference: 0.0016 · 90% CI -0.008 to 0.011
SecondaryPart I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Normal Glucose Tolerant (NGT)

Steady state was defined as 90-120 minutes post-dose. The ratio was the measure of the quantity of glucose disposed per unit of plasma insulin concentration (PIC). Approximate PIC was estimated by the time-weighted average of the insulin concentration measured at 10 minute intervals, time = 90, 100, 110, and 120 minutes. NGT participants (FPG \<100 mg/dL \& 2 hour PG \<140 mg/dL during a 75g OGTT at screening) were neither IGT nor IFG at screening. IGT - defined as a 2 hour PG \>= 140 and \<= 199 mg/dL during a 75g OGTT at screening. IFG - defined as FPG between 100 and 125 mg/dL at screening.

Time frame:
90 -120 minutes post-dose
Reported as:
Least squares mean · (mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)
Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Normal Glucose Tolerant (NGT)
(mg/kg/minute)/(µIU/mL)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ)Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo
Part I: Change in the Ratio of Whole Body Glucose Disposal to Plasma Insulin at Steady State in Participants With Normal Glucose Tolerant (NGT)0.045 ± 0.0280.042 ± 0.024
Statistical analysis
  • Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) Placebo · ANOVA · p = >0.500 · Least squares mean difference: 0.003 · 90% CI -0.003 to 0.010

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
HCTZ—0/36 (0%)29/36 (80.6%)
HCTZ Placebo—0/36 (0%)25/36 (69.4%)
ISMN—0/28 (0%)26/28 (92.9%)
ISMN Placebo—0/28 (0%)17/28 (60.7%)
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 72
Most frequent other events
EventHCTZHCTZ PlaceboISMNISMN Placebo
HeadacheNervous system disorders11/3612/3626/2814/28
Muscle spasmsMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/365/365/281/28
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders3/363/365/280/28
Musculoskeletal painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/361/364/282/28
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations5/363/360/280/28
Blood potassium decreasedInvestigations4/360/360/280/28
DizzinessNervous system disorders4/362/363/281/28
PollakiuriaRenal and urinary disorders4/361/360/280/28
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/360/361/283/28
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/360/360/281/28

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)All Part I ParticipantsAll Part II ParticipantsTotal
Mean57 (35 to 72)54 (37 to 73)55 (35 to 73)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)All Part I ParticipantsAll Part II ParticipantsTotal
Female201333
Male161531
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 28, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00871871
Lead sponsor
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 30, 2009
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Feb 2010
Completion
Mar 2010
Results posted
Sep 22, 2011
Last update
Jul 28, 2015

Study contacts

Medical Monitor
study director · Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion