CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00842387Updated Dec 23, 2009

Evaluation Study of a Management Strategy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)

An observational study in Reflux, Heartburn and Regurgitation, sponsored by AstraZeneca. Completed at 66 sites in 5 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2009-12-23.

Sponsored by AstraZeneca · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,370
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this project is to compare the GERD clinical outcomes in patients where a structured pathway using the GerdQ questionnaire is implemented compared with the clinical outcomes of those treated without this implementation.

This is a European project with 5 participating countries (Austria, Italy, Norway, Spain and Sweden). Due to different characteristics regarding the actual management of this disease in the 5 countries, each country had the flexibility to introduce design differences and changes in the study protocol.

Read the detailed description

In Norway, it is developed as a clinical trial where a new structured pathway in the diagnosis and treatment of GERD is compared to the ordinary clinical pathway consisting of the endoscopic/pH-metry approach in patients referred from primary care to GI specialists.

In Italy, it is a PCP-level, cluster randomized, controlled trial comparing a structured clinical pathway versus usual care in patients with GERD. The implementation consists of training sessions on the clinical pathway with the selected PCPs (Implementation Group).

In Sweden, it is a cluster-randomised interventional study performed within daily clinical practice for the purpose of assessing the effect of the implementation of the structured clinical pathway in patients identified as having GERD. The participating PCCs will be randomised (1:1) to implement the structured clinical pathway or handling the patients according to local clinical routines.

In Austria and Spain, it is a cluster-randomized study to be developed within daily clinical practice for the purpose of assessing the effect of the implementation of the structured clinical pathway on GERD patients . The evaluation study will take place subsequent to a prior implementation of a clinical pathway. The implementation consists of a detailed explanation by training-materials about the clinical pathway in a selected randomized pool of PCCs. The implementation that will be evaluated is outside of the study procedures; it is the physician's decision whether to apply it or not.

02

Conditions studied

  • Reflux
  • Heartburn
  • Regurgitation
  • Esophagitis

Keywords

  • gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • reflux, heartburn
  • regurgitation
  • acid control
  • PPI
  • antiacid
  • primary care
  • esophagitis
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,067 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 188 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,370 is above the median of 180 across 298 observational studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

AstraZeneca is the lead sponsor of 3,429 studies on the registry; 270 are open to participants now.

Of its 357 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 173 (48%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of GERD (heartburn or regurgitation as prevailing symptoms) of any severity
  • Patient able to understand and complete the questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alarm symptoms (Dysphagia/odynophagia, anorexia, anaemia, unintentional weight loss, abdominal mass, upper GI bleeding)
  • If the patient is participating in any clinical trial, he/she cannot take part on this study
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, makes the patient's participation in the study difficult
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
2,370 participants (estimated)

Groups and cohorts

  • 1

    Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD, managed according to a new structured and implemented pathway

  • 2

    Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD, managed according to usual clinical practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Control of symptoms based on results of GerdQ, need of treatment change and % of patients requiring referral to a specialist (Austria and Italy).

    Time frame: up to 8 weeks

  2. Treatment response and symptomatic control (Norway)

    Time frame: up to 8 weeks

  3. Symptom relief and patient satisfaction with treatment (Spain)

    Time frame: up to 8 weeks

  4. Symptom relief measured by RDQ (Sweden)

    Time frame: 5 months +/- 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Use and consumption of healthcare resources (all countries). Physicians adherence to the clinical pathway (Austria, Spain) and intrinsic characteristics of the physicians/PCC that may affect this adherence (Austria)

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks, except for Sweden: 5 months +/- 4 weeks

  2. Percentage of patients referred to specialists (Spain). Health status based on EQ-5D measure (Norway, Sweden). Work productivity based on the WPAI-GERD questionnaire (Norway, Sweden)

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks, except for Sweden: 5 months +/- 4 weeks

  3. Sweden: Persisting symptoms according to GerdQ, Treatment changes, Reason(s) for the patient consultation at visit 1. To explore other GERD related symptoms, To describe patients' experience of treatment/care given during the study.

    Time frame: 5 months +/- 4 weeks

07

Study locations

66 sites
  • Research Site
    Amstetten, Austria
  • Research Site
    Baden, Austria
  • Research Site
    Bludenz, Austria
  • Research Site
    Bregenz, Austria
  • Research Site
    Feldbach, Austria
  • Research Site
    Gmunden, Austria
  • Research Site
    Graz, Austria
  • Research Site
    Gross Gerungs, Austria
  • Research Site
    Innsbruck, Austria
  • Research Site
    Kitzbuhel, Austria
  • Research Site
    Klagenfurt, Austria
  • Research Site
    Krems, Austria
  • Research Site
    Kufstein, Austria
  • Research Site
    Leibnitz, Austria
  • Research Site
    Leoben, Austria
  • Research Site
    Linz, Austria
  • Research Site
    Mattersburg, Austria
  • Research Site
    Mistelbach, Austria
  • Research Site
    Murzzuschlag, Austria
  • Research Site
    Neunkirchen, Austria
  • Research Site
    Neusiedl, Austria
  • Research Site
    Perg, Austria
  • Research Site
    Schwaz, Austria
  • Research Site
    St. Veit, Austria
  • Research Site
    Steyr, Austria
  • Research Site
    Villach, Austria
  • Research Site
    Vocklabruck, Austria
  • Research Site
    Volkermarkt, Austria
  • Research Site
    Wels, Austria
  • Research Site
    Zell, Austria
  • Research Site
    Brescia, Italy
  • Research Site
    Aalesund, Norway
  • Research Site
    Arendal, Norway
  • Research Site
    Bergen, Norway
  • Research Site
    Bodo, Norway
  • Research Site
    Haugesund, Norway
  • Research Site
    Kristiansund, Norway
  • Research Site
    Levanger, Norway
  • Research Site
    Molde, Norway
  • Research Site
    Mosjoen, Norway
  • Research Site
    Orkdal, Norway
  • Research Site
    Oslo, Norway
  • Research Site
    Tynset, Norway
  • Research Site
    Valencia, Spain
  • Research Site
    Arlov, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Dalby, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Falkoping, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Farsta, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Goteborg, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Helsingborg, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Karlshamn, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Kristianstad, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Kungsangen, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Lulea, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Lund, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Malmo, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Munkedal, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Nordstan(Goteborg), Sweden
  • Research Site
    Partille, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Pitea, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Skanor, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Sodertalje, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Solna, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Stockholm, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Trollhattan, Sweden
  • Research Site
    Vannas, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bergquist H, Agreus L, Tillander L, Johnsson F, Sorngard H, Sjostedt S, Hellstrom PM. Structured diagnostic and treatment approach versus the usual primary care approach in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cluster-randomized multicenter study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;47(7):e65-73. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31827d7782. PubMed 23426452 ↗
  • Jonasson C, Moum B, Bang C, Andersen KR, Hatlebakk JG. Randomised clinical trial: a comparison between a GerdQ-based algorithm and an endoscopy-based approach for the diagnosis and initial treatment of GERD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jun;35(11):1290-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.05092.x. Epub 2012 Apr 18. PubMed 22510027 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 23, 2009, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00842387
Lead sponsor
AstraZeneca
First posted
Feb 12, 2009
Start date
Jan 2009
Completion
Dec 2009
Last update
Dec 23, 2009

Study contacts

Mónica Tafalla, MD
study director · Medical DepartmentAstraZeneca Spain

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2009. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion