An interventional study of Energy Restriction and Energy Restriction in Weight Loss, sponsored by Purdue University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-01-17.
Sponsored by Purdue University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study is to identify how adult men respond to a weight loss diet that includes pork and eggs and increasing the number of meals consumed throughout the day. This is a 13-week study (12-weeks of weight loss and 1-week of baseline measurement).
1,223 studies on the registry are indexed under Body Weight; 132 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 64 across 947 interventional studies indexed under Body Weight.
Browse Body Weight studies →Purdue University is the lead sponsor of 168 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
High protein diet.
Other: Energy Restriction
Lower protein diet.
Other: Energy Restriction
Energy restricted diet of 750 kcal less than subjects requirement with a high protein diet.
Energy restricted diet of 750 kcal less than subjects requirement with a lower protein diet.
The primary aim is to examine the effects of increased protein intake on appetite, selected appetite hormones (insulin, leptin, ghrelin), whole body energy expenditure, and body composition (fat mass and fat-free mass) changes.
Time frame: 12 week
The secondary aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of meal frequency on appetite by asking the men to frequently rate their appetite on days that they purposefully eat 3 vs. 6 times/day.
Time frame: 12 week
This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Purdue University