CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00798707Updated Jun 10, 2011Results posted

Study Evaluating Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release (DVS SR) in the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder

A Phase 3 interventional study of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR) and Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR) in Major Depressive Disorder, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 78 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2011-06-10.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
709
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the antidepressant efficacy and safety of two doses of DVS SR (25 and 50 mg/day) in the treatment of adults with Major Depressive Disorder. The study will also assess changes in sexual function and general and functional quality of life outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder

Keywords

  • Major Depressive Disorder
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 709 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult, outpatient with primary diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder (depressive symptoms for at least 30 days prior to screening)
  • Hamilton Psychiatric Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D 17) total score of >= 20
  • Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity (CGI-S) score of >= 4

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical instability - 25% or greater increase/decrease in HAM-D 17 total score from screening to baseline
  • Significant risk of suicide as assessed by clinician judgement, HAM-D 17 and Columbia Suicide-Severity Rating Scale scores Other eligibility criteria also apply
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
709 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release 25 mg

    Drug: Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR)

  • Experimental
    Desvenlafaxine succinate sustained-release 50 mg

    Drug: Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR)

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Drug: placebo

Interventions

  • DrugDesvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR)

    25 mg tablet, once daily dosing for 8 weeks

  • DrugDesvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained-Release (DVS SR)

    50 mg tablet, once daily dosing for 8 weeks

  • Drugplacebo

    Matching placebo tablets (25 or 50 mg). Daily dosing for 10 +/- 4 days during a placebo lead-in period, and then 8 weeks during the double-blind period.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    HAM-D17: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

    Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

  2. Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

  3. Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

  4. Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    HAM-D6: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 6 items characteristically associated with major depression and is a subset of HAM-D17. HAM-D6 score ranges from 0-22. The scale uses HAM-D17 items: 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0-2 and all others are scored 0-4.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

  5. Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    A HAM-D17 responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in HAM-D17 score. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

    Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

  6. Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 score of less than or equal to 7. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

    Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

  7. Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    A MADRS responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in MADRS score. It measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).

    Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

  8. Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    CGI-I responder was defined as a participant with a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the CGI-I. CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

    Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

Other outcomes

  1. Population Pharmacokinetics for Desvenlafaxine Plasma Concentrations

    Relationship of demographic variables (age, gender, food, race, creatinine, aspartate aminotransaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin and concomitant medications) were examined by fitting measured DVS plasma concentrations to a 1 compartment model with first order absorption. Demographic variables were examined for clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F), Steady Area under Curve (AUC) using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Final parameter estimates for demographic factors effecting CL/F, V/F and AUC were determined.

    Time frame: Week 2, 4 and 8 (or ET)

  2. Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    SDS: a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment in 3 domains: Work/School, Social Life, and Family Life/Home Responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each of these domains is impaired by his/her symptoms using a 10 point visual analog scale: (0=not at all impaired, 10=extremely impaired) for a total maximum score of 30.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

  3. Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    WHO-5 evaluates positive psychological well-being. WHO-5 consists of 5 questions and each is rated on a 6-point scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 25 (0= worst possible quality of life; 25=best possible quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    ASEX scale includes 5 questions that evaluate sexual function exclusively during the week prior to completion in the following areas: libido, excitability and ability to reach orgasm. Sexual dysfunction=an ASEX total score of 19 or greater, or a score of 5 or greater on any item, or a score of 4 or greater on any 3 items. Participants who have had no sexual activity during the prior week should be instructed to not complete questions 3 through 5.

    Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

  5. Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

    C-SSRS mapped into C-CASA(1-7) to assess whether participant:completed suicide(1),suicide attempt(2)(response of "Yes" on "Actual Attempt"),preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3)("Yes" on "Preparatory Acts or Behavior"),suicidal ideation (4)("Yes" on "Wish to be dead","Non-Specific Active Suicidal Thoughts","Active Suicidal Ideation with methods without Intent to Act or Some Intent to Act,without Specific Plan or with Specific Plan and Intent),any suicidal behavior or ideation,self-injurious behaviour(7)("Yes" on "Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior").

    Time frame: Week 8 (or ET)

  6. Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score

    DESS: a clinician-administered 43-item assessment that evaluates discontinuation-emergent symptoms resulting from the withdrawal from test article. The DESS total score is the sum of the number of "new symptoms" and "old (but worse) symptoms" (1) and 0 for "old and unchanged symptom," "absent," or "old symptom but improved" for a total possible range of 0 to 43. A higher score indicates more symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 8 to 10 (or ET)

07

Results

Posted Jun 6, 2011

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Started235237237
Treated231232236
Completed209204215
Not completed263322
Withdrew: Adverse event688
Withdrew: Failed to return220
Withdrew: Investigator012
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy221
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up566
Withdrew: Other010
Withdrew: Protocol violation402
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject382
Withdrew: Randomized not treated451

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

HAM-D17: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Units on a scalePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Change From Baseline in HAM-D17 Total Score at the Final On-therapy (FOT)Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-8.52 ± 0.44-8.98 ± 0.44-10.02 ± 0.44
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.452 (A Hochberg step-up procedure was used to control for the multiplicity associated with multiple active dose arms.) · Mean difference (final values): 0.47 · 95% CI -0.75 to 1.69
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.016 (A Hochberg step-up procedure was used to control for the multiplicity associated with multiple active dose arms.) · Mean difference (final values): 1.50 · 95% CI 0.28 to 2.72
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

Time frame:
Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
ParticipantsPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
1=Very much improved485768
2=Much improved616162
3=Minimally improved627061
4=No change523736
5=Minimally worse454
6=Much worse315
7=Very much worse110
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.160 (In this case, multiplicity arising from testing key secondary hypotheses in both doses was controlled by a Hochberg step-up procedure. p-Value obtained for the alternative hypothesis of 'Row mean scores differences'.)
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.028 (In this case, multiplicity arising from testing key secondary hypotheses in both doses was controlled by a Hochberg step-up procedure.p-Value obtained for the alternative hypothesis of 'Row mean scores differences'.)
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

CGI-S: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of participant's current illness state; range: 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). Higher score = more affected.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Units on a scalePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Change From Baseline in Mean CGI-S Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-1.03 ± 0.07-1.22 ± 0.07-1.24 ± 0.07
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.066 · Mean difference (final values): 0.19 · 95% CI -0.01 to 0.39
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.038 · Mean difference (final values): 0.21 · 95% CI 0.01 to 0.41
SecondaryChange From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

MADRS measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Units on a scalePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-9.23 ± 0.61-10.23 ± 0.60-11.29 ± 0.60
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.242 · Mean difference (final values): 1.00 · 95% CI -0.68 to 2.68
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.016 · Mean difference (final values): 2.06 · 95% CI 0.39 to 3.73
SecondaryChange From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

HAM-D6: a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 6 items characteristically associated with major depression and is a subset of HAM-D17. HAM-D6 score ranges from 0-22. The scale uses HAM-D17 items: 1, 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13. Item 13 is scored 0-2 and all others are scored 0-4.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Units on a scalePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)-4.94 ± 0.26-5.03 ± 0.26-5.65 ± 0.25
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.802 · Mean difference (final values): 0.09 · 95% CI -0.62 to 0.80
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.048 · Median difference (final values): 0.72 · 95% CI 0.01 to 1.43
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

A HAM-D17 responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in HAM-D17 score. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

Time frame:
Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
ParticipantsPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Number of Participants With a Response on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)8097109
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.1099 · Odds ratio (or): 1.363 · 95% CI 0.93 to 1.99
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0154 · Odds ratio (or): 1.591 · 95% CI 1.09 to 2.32
SecondaryNumber of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

Remission was defined as a HAM-D17 score of less than or equal to 7. HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Individual items are scored on either a 3 point (0 to 2) or a 5 point scale (0 to 4), with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50.

Time frame:
Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
ParticipantsPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Number of Participants in Remission Based on the HAM-D17 at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)444062
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.5929 · Odds ratio (or): 0.878 · 95% CI 0.54 to 1.41
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0852 · Odds ratio (or): 1.474 · 95% CI 0.95 to 2.29
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

A MADRS responder was defined as a participant with a 50% or greater decrease from baseline in MADRS score. It measures the overall severity of depressive symptoms. The MADRS has a 10-item checklist. Items are rated on a scale of 0-6, for a total score range of 0 (low severity of depressive symptoms) to 60 (high severity of depressive symptoms).

Time frame:
Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
ParticipantsPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Number of Participants With a Response on the MADRS Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)6881102
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.2232 · Odds ratio (or): 1.277 · 95% CI 0.86 to 1.89
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0022 · Odds ratio (or): 1.827 · 95% CI 1.24 to 2.69
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

CGI-I responder was defined as a participant with a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved) on the CGI-I. CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.

Time frame:
Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
ParticipantsPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Number of Participants With a Response on the CGI-I Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)109118130
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.4313 · Odds ratio (or): 1.158 · 95% CI 0.80 to 1.67
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.0888 · Odds ratio (or): 1.372 · 95% CI 0.95 to 1.97
Other pre-specifiedPopulation Pharmacokinetics for Desvenlafaxine Plasma Concentrations

Relationship of demographic variables (age, gender, food, race, creatinine, aspartate aminotransaminase, alanine transaminase, bilirubin and concomitant medications) were examined by fitting measured DVS plasma concentrations to a 1 compartment model with first order absorption. Demographic variables were examined for clearance (CL/F), volume of distribution (V/F), Steady Area under Curve (AUC) using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Final parameter estimates for demographic factors effecting CL/F, V/F and AUC were determined.

Time frame:
Week 2, 4 and 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · nanogram(ng)/mL

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

SDS: a self-administered tool that measures functional impairment in 3 domains: Work/School, Social Life, and Family Life/Home Responsibilities. The participant rates the extent to which each of these domains is impaired by his/her symptoms using a 10 point visual analog scale: (0=not at all impaired, 10=extremely impaired) for a total maximum score of 30.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in SDS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Units on a scalePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Total Score (n=227,224,235)-2.17 ± 0.43-3.26 ± 0.43-3.23 ± 0.42
Work/Studies Component (n=227,225,235)-0.77 ± 0.16-1.07 ± 0.15-1.12 ± 0.15
Social Life Component (n=229,231,235)-0.86 ± 0.16-1.26 ± 0.15-1.21 ± 0.15
Family Life/Home Responsibilities (n=14,2,13)-0.54 ± 0.88-1.83 ± 2.12-0.97 ± 0.89
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.073 · Mean difference (final values): 1.09 · 95% CI -0.10 to 2.29
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.078 · Median difference (final values): 1.06 · 95% CI -0.12 to 2.24
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.176 · Mean difference (final values): 0.30 · 95% CI -0.13 to 0.73
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.109 · Mean difference (final values): 0.35 · 95% CI -0.08 to 0.77
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.064 · Mean difference (final values): 0.41 · 95% CI -0.02 to 0.84
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.104 · Mean difference (final values): 0.35 · 95% CI -0.07 to 0.78
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.538 · Mean difference (final values): 1.29 · 95% CI -2.98 to 5.57
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.689 · Mean difference (final values): 0.43 · 95% CI -1.76 to 2.62
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

WHO-5 evaluates positive psychological well-being. WHO-5 consists of 5 questions and each is rated on a 6-point scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 25 (0= worst possible quality of life; 25=best possible quality of life).

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Units on a scalePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Change From Baseline in WHO-5 Total Score at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)2.62 ± 0.313.43 ± 0.313.25 ± 0.31
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.066 · Mean difference (final values): -0.81 · 95% CI -1.67 to 0.05
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · ANCOVA · p = 0.150 · Mean difference (final values): -0.63 · 95% CI -1.48 to 0.23
Other pre-specifiedPercentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

ASEX scale includes 5 questions that evaluate sexual function exclusively during the week prior to completion in the following areas: libido, excitability and ability to reach orgasm. Sexual dysfunction=an ASEX total score of 19 or greater, or a score of 5 or greater on any item, or a score of 4 or greater on any 3 items. Participants who have had no sexual activity during the prior week should be instructed to not complete questions 3 through 5.

Time frame:
Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of Participants
Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
Percentage of ParticipantsPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Percentage of Participants With Sexual Dysfunction at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)55.052.755.8
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.8758 · Odds ratio (or): 0.951 · 95% CI 0.51 to 1.78
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.6397 · Odds ratio (or): 1.165 · 95% CI 0.61 to 2.21
Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)

C-SSRS mapped into C-CASA(1-7) to assess whether participant:completed suicide(1),suicide attempt(2)(response of "Yes" on "Actual Attempt"),preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior (3)("Yes" on "Preparatory Acts or Behavior"),suicidal ideation (4)("Yes" on "Wish to be dead","Non-Specific Active Suicidal Thoughts","Active Suicidal Ideation with methods without Intent to Act or Some Intent to Act,without Specific Plan or with Specific Plan and Intent),any suicidal behavior or ideation,self-injurious behaviour(7)("Yes" on "Has subject engaged in Non-suicidal Self-Injurious Behavior").

Time frame:
Week 8 (or ET)
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on the C-SSRS at FOT Evaluation (Week 8 or ET)
ParticipantsPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Completed suicide000
Suicide attempt001
Preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior000
Suicidal ideation425047
Any suicidal behavior and/or ideation425047
Self-injurious behavior, no suicidal intent011
Other pre-specifiedDiscontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score

DESS: a clinician-administered 43-item assessment that evaluates discontinuation-emergent symptoms resulting from the withdrawal from test article. The DESS total score is the sum of the number of "new symptoms" and "old (but worse) symptoms" (1) and 0 for "old and unchanged symptom," "absent," or "old symptom but improved" for a total possible range of 0 to 43. A higher score indicates more symptoms.

Time frame:
Week 8 to 10 (or ET)
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Discontinuation-Emergent Signs and Symptoms (DESS) Total Score
Units on a scalePlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
Week 8 (or ET) (n=96,88,100)0.67 ± 1.620.63 ± 1.300.62 ± 1.53
Week 9 (or ET + 1 week) (n=93,84,98)1.08 ± 2.681.38 ± 2.581.50 ± 2.81
Week 10 (or ET + 2 weeks) (n=83,76,89)0.94 ± 2.280.74 ± 1.230.63 ± 1.60
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.847
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.847
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.720
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.720
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 25 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.720
  • Placebo vs DVS SR 50 mg · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.720

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—3/231 (1.3%)158/231 (68.4%)
DVS SR 25 mg—1/232 (0.4%)160/232 (69%)
DVS SR 50 mg—5/236 (2.1%)174/236 (73.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
DepressionPsychiatric disorders1/2310/2322/236
Grand mal convulsionNervous system disorders1/2310/2320/236
PneumothoraxRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/2310/2320/236
Post procedural complicationInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/2311/2320/236
Chest discomfortGeneral disorders0/2310/2321/236
Peritonsillar abscessInfections and infestations0/2310/2321/236
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour metastaticNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2310/2321/236
Hallucination, auditoryPsychiatric disorders0/2310/2321/236
Homicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/2310/2321/236
Suicidal ideationPsychiatric disorders0/2310/2321/236
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 298
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mg
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations37/23126/23230/236
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders15/23123/23236/236
HeadacheNervous system disorders25/23123/23228/236
DizzinessNervous system disorders9/23121/23219/236
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders14/23115/23214/236
Dry mouthGastrointestinal disorders10/23115/23210/236
SomnolenceNervous system disorders12/23112/23215/236
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders4/2316/23213/236
Abnormal dreamsPsychiatric disorders10/2319/23212/236
InsomniaPsychiatric disorders10/23110/23212/236

Baseline characteristics

Age Continuous
Age Continuous(Years)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Mean40.26 ± 12.3240.19 ± 11.8838.59 ± 12.0839.67 ± 12.10
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Female128127131386
Male103105105313
Hamilton Psychiatric Scale for Depression-17 item (HAM-D17) total score
Hamilton Psychiatric Scale for Depression-17 item (HAM-D17) total score(Units on a scale)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Mean23.06 ± 2.5923.08 ± 2.9322.81 ± 2.6122.98 ± 2.71
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score
Clinical Global Impressions Scale-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score(Units on a scale)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Mean4.39 ± 0.594.35 ± 0.574.33 ± 0.564.36 ± 0.58
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score(Units on a scale)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Mean28.19 ± 5.7428.08 ± 5.4628.21 ± 5.3828.16 ± 5.52
HAM-D6 total score
HAM-D6 total score(Units on a scale)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Mean12.58 ± 1.7912.61 ± 1.7712.43 ± 1.7512.54 ± 1.77
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score(Units on a scale)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Mean16.31 ± 7.7817.02 ± 7.3416.39 ± 7.2716.57 ± 7.46
World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index (WHO-5)
World Health Organization 5-Item Well-Being Index (WHO-5)(Units on a scale)PlaceboDVS SR 25 mgDVS SR 50 mgTotal
Mean7.21 ± 4.476.89 ± 3.997.18 ± 4.347.09 ± 4.27

2 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

78 sites
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Arcadia, California 91007, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Beverly Hills, California 90210, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Cerritos, California 90703, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Garden Grove, California 92845, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Los Alamitos, California 90720, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    St. Petersburg, Florida 33702, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Smyrna, Georgia 30080, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Libertyville, Illinois 60048, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dayton, Ohio 45408, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    East Providence, Rhode Island 02914, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Columbia, South Carolina 29201, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Memphis, Tennessee 38117, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Dallas, Texas 75230, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84107, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kirkland, Washington 98033, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Seattle, Washington 98104, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Brown Deer, Wisconsin 53223, United States
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Nagoya, Aichi 4530015, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Toyoake, Aichi 4701192, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Noda, Chiba 2780033, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka 8020006, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kitakyusyu, Fukuoka 8078555, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shirakawa, Fukushima 9610021, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Fujioka, Gunma 3750017, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kumagaya, Gunma 3600032, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hatsukaichi, Hiroshima 7380023, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kure, Hiroshima 7370023, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 0028029, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 0040052, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 0600061, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 600042, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 630061, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 630804, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kobe, Hyogo 6530841, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kanazawa, Ishikawa 9208650, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Minamiashigara, Kanagawa 2500136, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 2200004, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 2210835, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Yokohama, Kanagawa 2250012, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Yatsushiro, Kumamoto 8660043, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Matsumoto, Nagano 3908510, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Sakai, Osaka 5900018, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kanzaka, Saga 8420192, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Misato, Saitama 3410018, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kusatsu, Shiga 5250037, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Bunkyo, Tokyo 1120012, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Chiyoda, Tokyo 1000006, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Chiyoda, Tokyo 1018643, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Itabashi, Tokyo 1730004, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Katsushika, Tokyo 1250041, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kodaira, Tokyo 1858551, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Minato, Tokyo 1070052, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Nakano, Tokyo 1640012, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 1540004, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Setagaya, Tokyo 1540012, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shibuya, Tokyo 1500001, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shibuya, Tokyo 1510053, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shinagawa, Tokyo 1410021, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shinagawa, Tokyo 1410022, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shinagawa, Tokyo 1420021, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Shinjyuku, Tokyo 1600023, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Suginami, Tokyo 1660003, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Taito, Tokyo 1100003, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Toshima, Tokyo 1700002, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Meguro, Toyko 1520012, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Ube, Yamaguchi 7558505, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Fukuoka, 8100001, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Fukuoka, 8100041, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Fukushima, 9600102, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Hiroshima, 7310121, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kumamoto, 8618002, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kumamoto, 8620909, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Kyoto, 6168421, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Osaka, 5420006, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Saitama, 33000062, Japan
  • Pfizer Investigational Site
    Saitama, 3390057, Japan
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Zilcha-Mano S, Wang X, Wajsbrot DB, Boucher M, Fine SA, Rutherford BR. Trajectories of Function and Symptom Change in Desvenlafaxine Clinical Trials: Toward Personalized Treatment for Depression. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Sep-Oct 01;41(5):579-584. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001435. PubMed 34183490 ↗
  • Soares CN, Zhang M, Boucher M. Categorical improvement in functional impairment in depressed patients treated with desvenlafaxine. CNS Spectr. 2019 Jun;24(3):322-332. doi: 10.1017/S1092852917000633. Epub 2017 Nov 15. PubMed 29140227 ↗
  • McIntyre RS, Fayyad R, Mackell JA, Boucher M. Effect of metabolic syndrome and thyroid hormone on efficacy of desvenlafaxine 50 and 100 mg/d in major depressive disorder. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(3):587-99. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1136603. Epub 2016 Jan 13. PubMed 26709542 ↗
  • McIntyre RS, Fayyad RS, Guico-Pabia CJ, Boucher M. A Post Hoc Analysis of the Effect of Weight on Efficacy in Depressed Patients Treated With Desvenlafaxine 50 mg/d and 100 mg/d. Prim Care Companion CNS Disord. 2015 Jun 4;17(3):10.4088/PCC.14m01741. doi: 10.4088/PCC.14m01741. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26644956 ↗
  • Thase ME, Fayyad R, Cheng RF, Guico-Pabia CJ, Sporn J, Boucher M, Tourian KA. Effects of desvenlafaxine on blood pressure in patients treated for major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis. Curr Med Res Opin. 2015 Apr;31(4):809-20. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2015.1020365. Epub 2015 Mar 26. PubMed 25758058 ↗
  • Iwata N, Tourian KA, Hwang E, Mele L, Vialet C. Efficacy and safety of desvenlafaxine 25 and 5050% shaded blockmg/day in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of depressed outpatients. J Psychiatr Pract. 2013 Jan;19(1):5-14. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000426323.59698.64. PubMed 23334675 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2011, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00798707
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
First posted
Nov 26, 2008
Start date
Dec 2008
Primary completion
Apr 2010
Completion
Apr 2010
Results posted
Jun 6, 2011
Last update
Jun 10, 2011

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2011. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion