CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00793624Updated Jun 27, 2014Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of BI 1744 CL in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease I

A Phase 3 interventional study of Olodaterol (BI 1744) and Olodaterol (BI 1744) in Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim. Completed at 93 sites in 20 countries. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-06-27.

Sponsored by Boehringer Ingelheim · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
906
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to assess the long-term efficacy and safety of once daily treatment of BI 1744 CL inhalation solution (5 and 10 mcg) delivered via the Respimat® inhaler, in patients with COPD.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 906 is above the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Boehringer Ingelheim is the lead sponsor of 2,245 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Of its 162 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 116 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. All patients must have a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and must meet the following spirometric criteria:post-bronchodilator FEV1\<80% of predicted normal (ECSC) and a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \<70% at Visit 1
  2. Male or female patients, 40 years of age or older
  3. Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of more than 10 pack years:

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with clinically relevant abnormal baseline haematology, blood chemistry, or urinalysis; all patients with an SGOT >x2 ULN, SGPT >x2 ULN, bilirubin >x2 ULN or creatinine >x2 ULN
  2. Patients with a history of asthma and/or total blood eosinophil count greater than 600/mm3
  3. Patients with thyrotoxicosis, paroxysmal tachycardia (>100 beats per minute)
  4. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction within 1 year of screening visit, unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia, hospitalization for heart failure within the past year, known active tuberculosis, a malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years, life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, cystic fibrosis, clinically evident bronchiectasis, significant alcohol or drug abuse
  5. Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection
  6. Patients being treated with oral beta-adrenergics or oral corticosteroid medication at unstable doses (i.e., less than six weeks on a stable dose) or at doses in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone per day or 20 mg every other day.
  7. Patients who regularly use daytime oxygen therapy for more than one hour per day.
  8. Patients who have completed a pulmonary rehabilitation program in the six weeks prior to the screening visit (Visit 1) or patients who are currently in a pulmonary rehabilitation program
  9. Pregnant or nursing women
  10. Women of childbearing potential not using two effective methods of birth control (one barrier and one non-barrier).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
906 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Olodaterol (BI 1744) Low

    Low dose inhaled orally once daily from the Respimat inhaler

    Drug: Olodaterol (BI 1744)

  • Experimental
    Olodaterol (BI 1744) High

    High dose inhaled orally once daily from the Respimat inhaler

    Drug: Olodaterol (BI 1744)

  • Active comparator
    Formoterol 12mcg

    12mcg inhaled twice daily from the Aerolizer inhaler

    Drug: Formoterol

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Olodaterol (BI 1744) placebo inhaled once daily from the Respimat inhaler and/or Formoterol placebo inhaled twice daily from the Aerolizer inhaler

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugOlodaterol (BI 1744)

    Comparison of low and high doses on efficacy and safety in COPD patients

  • DrugOlodaterol (BI 1744)

    Comparison of low and high doses on efficacy and safety in COPD patients

  • DrugFormoterol

    Active comparator with Olodaterol (BI 1744) on safety and efficacy in COPD patients

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo for comparison with Olodaterol (BI 1744) on safety and efficacy in COPD patients

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo for comparison Formoterolon safety and efficacy in COPD patients

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 24

  2. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 24

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 24.

  3. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  4. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis

    This outcome measure describes the combined analysis of the trials NCT00793624 and NCT00796653. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

Secondary outcomes

  1. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks

    Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  2. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 12 Weeks

    Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  3. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 48 Weeks

    Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  4. Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis

    Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations). This is a combined analysis of the data from NCT00793624 and NCT00796653 showing adjusted values using a MMRM model.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 24

  5. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 2

  6. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 6

  7. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 12

  8. Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 48

  9. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 2

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 2.

  10. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 6

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 6.

  11. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 12

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 12.

  12. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 18

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 18.

  13. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 32

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 32.

  14. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 40

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 40.

  15. Trough FEV1 Response at Week 48

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 48.

  16. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 2 weeks

  17. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 6 weeks

  18. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 12 weeks

  19. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 24 weeks

  20. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 48 weeks

  21. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 2

  22. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 6

  23. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 12

  24. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 24

  25. Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 48

  26. Trough FVC Response at Week 2

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 2.

  27. Trough FVC Response at Week 6

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 6.

  28. Trough FVC Response at Week 12

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 12.

  29. Trough FVC Response at Week 18

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 18.

  30. Trough FVC Response at Week 24

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 24.

  31. Trough FVC Response at Week 32

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 32.

  32. Trough FVC Response at Week 48

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 48.

  33. Trough FVC Response at Week 40

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 40.

  34. Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 2 weeks

  35. Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 6 weeks

  36. Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 12 weeks

  37. Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 24 weeks

  38. Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks

    Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

    Time frame: 1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 48 weeks

  39. Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at Week 24

    Weekly mean pre-dose morning and evening PEFR. Results are from non-MMRM ANCOVA models by week, with Last observation carried forward (LOCF) up to each week. Fixed effects include treatment, tiotropium, strata and baseline.

    Time frame: Week 24

  40. Use of Rescue Medication at Week 24

    Mean number of puffs of rescue medication used per day (daytime/nighttime/total)

    Time frame: Week 24

  41. Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 6 Weeks

    Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: Week 6

  42. Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 12 Weeks

    Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: Week 12

  43. Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 24 Weeks

    Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: Week 24

  44. Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 48 Weeks

    Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

    Time frame: Week 48

  45. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 6 Weeks

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6

  46. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 12 Weeks

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 12

  47. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 18 Weeks

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 18

  48. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 32 Weeks

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 32

  49. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 40 Weeks

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 40

  50. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 48 Weeks

    Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 48

  51. Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation

    Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. Time to event was measured from the beginning of treatment. Cox regression analysis of treatment effect using tiotropium stratum as a stratification factor.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.

  52. Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation Leading to Hospitalization

    Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations required hospitalization. Time to event was measured from the beginning of treatment. Cox regression analysis of treatment effect using tiotropium stratum as a stratification factor.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.

  53. Time to First Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation

    Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations did not lead to hospitalization but included treatment with antibiotics and/or systemic steroids. Time to event was measured from the beginning of treatment. Cox regression analysis of treatment effect using tiotropium stratum as a stratification factor.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.

  54. Number of COPD Exacerbations

    Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of study at week 48 visit

  55. Number of COPD Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization

    Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations required hospitalization.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of study at week 48 visit

  56. Number of Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbations

    Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations did not lead to hospitalization but included treatment with antibiotics and/or systemic steroids.

    Time frame: Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.

  57. Absolute Plasma Concentrations

    Absolute plasma concentrations of Olodaterol. Values presented are across visits and summarised into geometric means.

    Time frame: within 2 hours before first drug administration and 10 minutes post-dose at week 6, 12 and 18

  58. Changes in Safety Parameters Related to Treatment

    Occurence of cardiac disorders and investigations related to treatment.

    Time frame: 48 weeks

07

Results

Posted Jun 5, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePlaceboOlodaterol (Olo) 5 mcg qdOlodaterol (Olo) 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Started225227225227
Completed168191186184
Not completed57363943
Withdrew: Adverse event18161520
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up2240
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject2091114
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy9213
Withdrew: Non compliance with protocol2323
Withdrew: Other reason not described above6463

Outcome measures

PrimaryForced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks-0.009 ± 0.0160.142 ± 0.0150.156 ± 0.0150.168 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.151 · 95% CI 0.110 to 0.193Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.165 · 95% CI 0.124 to 0.206Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.177 · 95% CI 0.136 to 0.218Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
PrimaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 24

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 24.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 24
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 24-0.056 ± 0.0150.021 ± 0.0150.028 ± 0.015-0.002 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0002 · Mean difference (final values): 0.078 · 95% CI 0.037 to 0.118Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.085 · 95% CI 0.044 to 0.125Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0088 · Mean difference (final values): 0.054 · 95% CI 0.014 to 0.095Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
PrimaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks

Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks2.046 ± 0.2552.234 ± 0.2402.068 ± 0.2451.818 ± 0.247
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5843 · Mean difference (final values): 0.188 · 95% CI -0.485 to 0.860Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9494 · Mean difference (final values): 0.022 · 95% CI -0.656 to 0.699Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5099 · Mean difference (final values): -0.288 · 95% CI -0.908 to 0.451Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondarySaint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks

Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks41.068 ± 1.03838.627 ± 0.99537.674 ± 0.99840.116 ± 0.994
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0816 · Mean difference (final values): -2.442 · 95% CI -5.190 to 0.307Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0155 · Mean difference (final values): -3.394 · 95% CI -6.141 to -0.648Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4954 · Mean difference (final values): -0.952 · 95% CI -3.691 to 1.787Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondarySaint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 12 Weeks

Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 12 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 12 Weeks42.105 ± 1.02739.320 ± 0.98636.961 ± 0.98940.351 ± 0.992
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0450 · Mean difference (final values): -2.785 · 95% CI -5.507 to -0.063Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0002 · Mean difference (final values): -5.144 · 95% CI -7.864 to -2.425Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2061 · Mean difference (final values): -1.754 · 95% CI -4.474 to 0.966Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondarySaint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 48 Weeks

Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 48 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 48 Weeks40.415 ± 1.05738.545 ± 1.00036.850 ± 1.01540.431 ± 1.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1878 · Mean difference (final values): -1.871 · 95% CI -4.655 to 0.914Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0126 · Mean difference (final values): -3.565 · 95% CI -6.364 to -0.767Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9913 · Mean difference (final values): 0.016 · 95% CI -2.782 to 2.814Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondarySaint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis

Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) measures the impact of COPD on overall health, daily life, and perceived well-being ranging from 0 (no limitations) to 100 (most limitations). This is a combined analysis of the data from NCT00793624 and NCT00796653 showing adjusted values using a MMRM model.

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis41.639 ± 0.71838.794 ± 0.69338.205 ± 0.69540.391 ± 0.699
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0034 · Mean difference (final values): -2.846 · 95% CI -4.751 to -0.940Mixed effects model with trt,tio stratum,visit,trt-by-visit as fixed effects,baseline, baseline-by-visit as fixed covariates, patient as random effect
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0004 · Mean difference (final values): -3.434 · 95% CI -5.343 to -1.525Mixed effects model with trt,tio stratum,visit,trt-by-visit as fixed effects,baseline, baseline-by-visit as fixed covariates, patient as random effect
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2009 · Mean difference (final values): -1.248 · 95% CI -3.161 to 0.665Mixed effects model with trt,tio stratum,visit,trt-by-visit as fixed effects,baseline, baseline-by-visit as fixed covariates, patient as random effect
SecondaryForced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 2
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks0.015 ± 0.0150.201 ± 0.0150.181 ± 0.0150.221 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.186 · 95% CI 0.146 to 0.226Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.166 · 95% CI 0.126 to 0.206Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.206 · 95% CI 0.166 to 0.246Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks0.001 ± 0.0150.178 ± 0.0150.161 ± 0.0150.194 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.176 · 95% CI 0.136 to 0.217Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.160 · 95% CI 0.119 to 0.200Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.192 · 95% CI 0.152 to 0.233Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks-0.003 ± 0.0150.176 ± 0.0150.167 ± 0.0150.182 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.178 · 95% CI 0.137 to 0.219Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.170 · 95% CI 0.129 to 0.211Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.185 · 95% CI 0.144 to 0.226Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FEV1 AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks-0.023 ± 0.0160.122 ± 0.0150.123 ± 0.0150.149 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.145 · 95% CI 0.103 to 0.186Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.146 · 95% CI 0.105 to 0.188Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.172 · 95% CI 0.130 to 0.214Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 2

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 2.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 2
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 2-0.019 ± 0.0150.068 ± 0.0140.060 ± 0.0140.061 ± 0.014
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.087 · 95% CI 0.048 to 0.126Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.079 · 95% CI 0.040 to 0.118Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.080 · 95% CI 0.040 to 0.119Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 6

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 6.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 6
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 6-0.037 ± 0.0150.049 ± 0.0140.041 ± 0.0140.042 ± 0.014
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.086 · 95% CI 0.047 to 0.125Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.078 · 95% CI 0.038 to 0.117Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.079 · 95% CI 0.039 to 0.119Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 12

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 12.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 12
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 12-0.027 ± 0.0150.056 ± 0.0140.048 ± 0.0140.033 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.083 · 95% CI 0.043 to 0.123Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0002 · Mean difference (final values): 0.075 · 95% CI 0.035 to 0.114Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0037 · Mean difference (final values): 0.059 · 95% CI 0.019 to 0.100Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 18

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 18.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 18
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 18-0.019 ± 0.0150.046 ± 0.0140.026 ± 0.0150.023 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0016 · Mean difference (final values): 0.065 · 95% CI 0.025 to 0.105Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0276 · Mean difference (final values): 0.045 · 95% CI 0.005 to 0.085Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0426 · Mean difference (final values): 0.042 · 95% CI 0.001 to 0.082Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 32

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 32.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 32
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 32-0.023 ± 0.0150.023 ± 0.0150.026 ± 0.0150.021 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0237 · Mean difference (final values): 0.047 · 95% CI 0.006 to 0.087Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0175 · Mean difference (final values): 0.049 · 95% CI 0.009 to 0.090Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0339 · Mean difference (final values): 0.044 · 95% CI 0.003 to 0.085Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 40

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 40.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 40
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 40-0.020 ± 0.0160.020 ± 0.0150.017 ± 0.0150.004 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0537 · Mean difference (final values): 0.040 · 95% CI -0.001 to 0.081Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0808 · Mean difference (final values): 0.037 · 95% CI -0.004 to 0.078Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2579 · Mean difference (final values): 0.024 · 95% CI -0.017 to 0.065Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FEV1 Response at Week 48

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FEV1 was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FEV1 is defined as the FEV1 performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FEV1s if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 48.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 48
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FEV1 Response at Week 48-0.065 ± 0.0150.003 ± 0.015-0.009 ± 0.015-0.006 ± 0.015
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0011 · Mean difference (final values): 0.068 · 95% CI 0.027 to 0.109Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0069 · Mean difference (final values): 0.059 · 95% CI 0.018 to 0.101Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.080 · 95% CI 0.040 to 0.119Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 2 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks0.100 ± 0.0160.277 ± 0.0160.250 ± 0.0160.290 ± 0.016
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.177 · 95% CI 0.135 to 0.220Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.150 · 95% CI 0.108 to 0.193Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.190 · 95% CI 0.148 to 0.233Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks0.081 ± 0.0160.248 ± 0.0160.234 ± 0.0160.264 ± 0.016
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.166 · 95% CI 0.124 to 0.209Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.152 · 95% CI 0.109 to 0.195Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.182 · 95% CI 0.139 to 0.226Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks0.082 ± 0.0160.247 ± 0.0160.241 ± 0.0160.256 ± 0.016
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.165 · 95% CI 0.122 to 0.208Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.159 · 95% CI 0.116 to 0.203Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.174 · 95% CI 0.130 to 0.218Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 24 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks0.068 ± 0.0170.216 ± 0.0160.225 ± 0.0160.236 ± 0.016
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.148 · 95% CI 0.104 to 0.191Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.167 · 95% CI 0.112 to 0.200Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.167 · 95% CI 0.123 to 0.211Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FEV1 was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FEV1 values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FEV1 (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 48 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FEV1 (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks0.053 ± 0.0170.192 ± 0.0160.193 ± 0.0160.215 ± 0.016
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.139 · 95% CI 0.095 to 0.183Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.140 · 95% CI 0.095 to 0.184Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.162 · 95% CI 0.117 to 0.206Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 2
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 2 Weeks0.076 ± 0.0280.299 ± 0.0270.311 ± 0.0270.383 ± 0.027
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.223 · 95% CI 0.149 to 0.297Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.235 · 95% CI 0.161 to 0.309Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.307 · 95% CI 0.233 to 0.381Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 6 Weeks0.016 ± 0.0280.252 ± 0.0270.265 ± 0.0270.326 ± 0.027
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.236 · 95% CI 0.161 to 0.310Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.249 · 95% CI 0.175 to 0.324Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.310 · 95% CI 0.235 to 0.384Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 12 Weeks0.023 ± 0.0280.233 ± 0.0270.278 ± 0.0270.300 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.210 · 95% CI 0.135 to 0.285Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.254 · 95% CI 0.179 to 0.329Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.276 · 95% CI 0.201 to 0.352Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 24 Weeks0.037 ± 0.0290.220 ± 0.0270.252 ± 0.0280.279 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.182 · 95% CI 0.107 to 0.258Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.215 · 95% CI 0.139 to 0.291Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.242 · 95% CI 0.166 to 0.318Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryForced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 h and -10 min measurements performed just prior to administration of the first am dose of randomized treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit interaction as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit interaction as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect. FVC AUC 0-3h was calculated from 0-3 hours post-dose using the trapezoidal rule, divided by the observation time (3h) to report in litres.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose on Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) Area Under Curve 0-3 Hour (h) (AUC 0-3h) Response at 48 Weeks0.016 ± 0.0290.196 ± 0.0280.219 ± 0.0280.260 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.179 · 95% CI 0.103 to 0.256Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.203 · 95% CI 0.126 to 0.280Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.243 · 95% CI 0.166 to 0.320Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 2

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 2.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 2
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 20.042 ± 0.0280.110 ± 0.0270.119 ± 0.0280.126 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0781 · Mean difference (final values): 0.068 · 95% CI -0.008 to 0.143Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0455 · Mean difference (final values): 0.077 · 95% CI 0.002 to 0.153Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0290 · Mean difference (final values): 0.085 · 95% CI 0.009 to 0.160Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 6

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 6.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 6
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 6-0.046 ± 0.0290.065 ± 0.0270.085 ± 0.0280.090 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0043 · Mean difference (final values): 0.110 · 95% CI 0.035 to 0.186Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0007 · Mean difference (final values): 0.131 · 95% CI 0.055 to 0.207Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0005 · Mean difference (final values): 0.136 · 95% CI 0.060 to 0.212Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 12

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 12.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 12
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 12-0.018 ± 0.0290.079 ± 0.0280.087 ± 0.0280.068 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0136 · Mean difference (final values): 0.097 · 95% CI 0.020 to 0.173Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0076 · Mean difference (final values): 0.105 · 95% CI 0.028 to 0.182Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0294 · Mean difference (final values): 0.086 · 95% CI 0.009 to 0.163Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 18

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 18.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 18
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 180.060 ± 0.0290.066 ± 0.0280.078 ± 0.0280.063 ± 0.028
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.8674 · Mean difference (final values): 0.007 · 95% CI -0.071 to 0.084Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6487 · Mean difference (final values): 0.018 · 95% CI -0.060 to 0.096Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9267 · Mean difference (final values): 0.004 · 95% CI -0.074 to 0.081Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 24

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 24.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 24
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 24-0.018 ± 0.0290.038 ± 0.0280.064 ± 0.0280.001 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1603 · Mean difference (final values): 0.056 · 95% CI -0.022 to 0.134Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0399 · Mean difference (final values): 0.082 · 95% CI 0.004 to 0.160Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6328 · Mean difference (final values): 0.019 · 95% CI -0.059 to 0.098Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 32

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 32.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 32
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 320.019 ± 0.0300.080 ± 0.0280.084 ± 0.0280.077 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1270 · Mean difference (final values): 0.061 · 95% CI -0.017 to 0.139Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1076 · Mean difference (final values): 0.064 · 95% CI -0.014 to 0.143Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1492 · Mean difference (final values): 0.058 · 95% CI -0.021 to 0.137Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 48

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 48.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 48
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 48-0.061 ± 0.0300.022 ± 0.028-0.002 ± 0.0290.006 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0385 · Mean difference (final values): 0.083 · 95% CI 0.004 to 0.162Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1420 · Mean difference (final values): 0.059 · 95% CI -0.020 to 0.138Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0965 · Mean difference (final values): 0.067 · 95% CI -0.012 to 0.147Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTrough FVC Response at Week 40

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline trough FVC was defined as the mean of the -1 hour and -10 minute measurements performed just prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Trough FVC is defined as the FVC performed at -10 mins prior to study drug inhalation as the end of the dosing interval or the mean of -1h and -10 min FVCs if both available. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 h and 10 min prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) and -1 h (if available) and - 10 mins prior to study drug at week 40.
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Trough FVC Response at Week 40
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Trough FVC Response at Week 400.028 ± 0.0300.087 ± 0.0280.086 ± 0.0280.052 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1394 · Mean difference (final values): 0.059 · 95% CI -0.019 to 0.138Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1532 · Mean difference (final values): 0.058 · 95% CI -0.022 to 0.137Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5511 · Mean difference (final values): 0.024 · 95% CI -0.055 to 0.104Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FVC (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 2 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 2 Weeks0.268 ± 0.0290.454 ± 0.0280.474 ± 0.0280.551 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.186 · 95% CI 0.108 to 0.264Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.206 · 95% CI 0.128 to 0.284Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.283 · 95% CI 0.205 to 0.361Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FVC (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 6 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 6 Weeks0.202 ± 0.0290.411 ± 0.0280.433 ± 0.0290.467 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.209 · 95% CI 0.131 to 0.288Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.231 · 95% CI 0.153 to 0.310Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.265 · 95% CI 0.187 to 0.344Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FVC (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 12 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 12 Weeks0.194 ± 0.0300.382 ± 0.0290.432 ± 0.0290.450 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.188 · 95% CI 0.108 to 0.267Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.238 · 95% CI 0.159 to 0.318Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.256 · 95% CI 0.177 to 0.336Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FVC (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 24 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 24 Weeks0.207 ± 0.0300.379 ± 0.0290.414 ± 0.0290.424 ± 0.029
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.173 · 95% CI 0.092 to 0.253Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.207 · 95% CI 0.127 to 0.288Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.217 · 95% CI 0.137 to 0.298Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak FVC (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks

Response was defined as change from baseline. Baseline peak FVC was defined as the mean of the available pre-dose peak FVC values prior to first dose of randomized treatment. Peak FVC (0-3h) values were obtained within 0 - 3 hours after treatment. Means are adjusted using a mixed effects model with treatment (trt), tio stratum, visit, trt-by-visit as fixed categorical effects, baseline and baseline-by-visit as fixed continuous covariates and patient as random effect.

Time frame:
1 hour (h) and 10 minutes (min) prior to dose on the first day of randomized treatment (baseline) to -10 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h relative to dose after 48 weeks
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Liter
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks
LiterPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Peak FVC (0-3h) Response After 48 Weeks0.193 ± 0.0310.344 ± 0.0290.371 ± 0.0300.416 ± 0.030
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0003 · Mean difference (final values): 0.150 · 95% CI 0.070 to 0.231Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.178 · 95% CI 0.096 to 0.259Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 0.223 · 95% CI 0.141 to 0.304Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPeak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at Week 24

Weekly mean pre-dose morning and evening PEFR. Results are from non-MMRM ANCOVA models by week, with Last observation carried forward (LOCF) up to each week. Fixed effects include treatment, tiotropium, strata and baseline.

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · L/min
Peak Expiratory Flow Rate (PEFR) at Week 24
L/minPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
morning PEFR (N=214, 212, 216, 218)196.429 ± 3.392211.496 ± 3.420211.428 ± 3.379214.070 ± 3.373
evening PEFR (N=215, 211, 215, 221)202.256 ± 3.363219.977 ± 3.408220.727 ± 3.360220.129 ± 3.332
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0012 · Mean difference (final values): 15.067 · 95% CI 5.962 to 24.173non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0012 · Mean difference (final values): 14.999 · 95% CI 5.949 to 24.049non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · ANCOVA · p = 0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 17.642 · 95% CI 8.610 to 26.673non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 17.721 · 95% CI 8.680 to 26.762non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 18.471 · 95% CI 9.484 to 27.458non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · ANCOVA · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): 17.873 · 95% CI 8.947 to 26.799non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
SecondaryUse of Rescue Medication at Week 24

Mean number of puffs of rescue medication used per day (daytime/nighttime/total)

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · Number of puffs
Use of Rescue Medication at Week 24
Number of puffsPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Daytime1.364 ± 0.0970.961 ± 0.0991.037 ± 0.0971.217 ± 0.097
Nighttime2.051 ± 0.1251.449 ± 0.1261.471 ± 0.1251.701 ± 0.124
Total3.390 ± 0.1962.399 ± 0.1982.488 ± 0.1962.917 ± 0.195
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0026 · Mean difference (final values): -0.403 · 95% CI -0.665 to -0.141non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0141 · Mean difference (final values): -0.327 · 95% CI -0.587 to -0.066non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · ANCOVA · p = 0.2677 · Mean difference (final values): -0.147 · 95% CI -0.406 to 0.113non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0005 · Mean difference (final values): -0.602 · 95% CI -0.939 to -0.266non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0007 · Mean difference (final values): -0.580 · 95% CI -0.914 to -0.247non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · ANCOVA · p = 0.0391 · Mean difference (final values): -0.350 · 95% CI -0.683 to -0.018non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0002 · Mean difference (final values): -0.991 · 95% CI -1.518 to -0.464non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · ANCOVA · p = 0.0008 · Mean difference (final values): -0.902 · 95% CI -1.426 to -0.378non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · ANCOVA · p = 0.0758 · Mean difference (final values): -0.473 · 95% CI -0.994 to 0.049non-MMRM ANCOVA models with treatment, tiotropium strata and baseline as fixed effects.
SecondaryPatient's Global Rating (PGR) at 6 Weeks

Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 6 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 6 Weeks3.4 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.13.1 ± 0.13.1 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0003 · Mean difference (final values): -0.4 · 95% CI -0.6 to -0.2Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0073 · Mean difference (final values): -0.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0017 · Mean difference (final values): -0.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPatient's Global Rating (PGR) at 12 Weeks

Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame:
Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 12 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 12 Weeks3.3 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0021 · Mean difference (final values): -0.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = <0.0001 · Mean difference (final values): -0.4 · 95% CI -0.6 to -0.2Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0121 · Mean difference (final values): -0.3 · 95% CI -0.5 to -0.1Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPatient's Global Rating (PGR) at 24 Weeks

Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame:
Week 24
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 24 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 24 Weeks3.1 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0320 · Mean difference (final values): -0.2 · 95% CI -0.4 to -0.0Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0447 · Mean difference (final values): -0.2 · 95% CI -0.4 to -0.0Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1332 · Mean difference (final values): -0.2 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.0Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryPatient's Global Rating (PGR) at 48 Weeks

Patient's Global Rating (PGR) was a patient assessment of their health (respiratory condition) at each visit (compared to the day before they started study drug) and ranged from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse).

Time frame:
Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 48 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Patient's Global Rating (PGR) at 48 Weeks3.1 ± 0.13.0 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.12.9 ± 0.1
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4105 · Mean difference (final values): -0.1 · 95% CI -0.3 to 0.1Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0584 · Mean difference (final values): -0.2 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.0Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1006 · Mean difference (final values): -0.2 · 95% CI -0.4 to 0.0Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 6 Weeks

Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 6
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 6 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 6 Weeks0.995 ± 0.2481.566 ± 0.2361.660 ± 0.2401.753 ± 0.243
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0882 · Mean difference (final values): 0.571 · 95% CI -0.085 to 1.227Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0484 · Mean difference (final values): 0.664 · 95% CI 0.005 to 1.324Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.0252 · Mean difference (final values): 0.758 · 95% CI 0.094 to 1.421Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 12 Weeks

Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 12
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 12 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 12 Weeks1.412 ± 0.2521.792 ± 0.2391.955 ± 0.2421.805 ± 0.245
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2625 · Mean difference (final values): 0.381 · 95% CI -0.285 to 1.047Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.1109 · Mean difference (final values): 0.543 · 95% CI -0.125 to 1.211Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2507 · Mean difference (final values): 0.394 · 95% CI -0.278 to 1.066Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 18 Weeks

Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 18
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 18 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 18 Weeks1.665 ± 0.2541.897 ± 0.2402.099 ± 0.2441.689 ± 0.246
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.4895 · Mean difference (final values): 0.232 · 95% CI -0.439 to 0.902Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2073 · Mean difference (final values): 0.434 · 95% CI -0.240 to 1.107Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9462 · Mean difference (final values): 0.023 · 95% CI -0.653 to 0.700Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 32 Weeks

Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 32
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 32 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 32 Weeks1.732 ± 0.2571.898 ± 0.2411.698 ± 0.2471.966 ± 0.249
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.6309 · Mean difference (final values): 0.166 · 95% CI -0.511 to 0.842Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.9227 · Mean difference (final values): -0.034 · 95% CI -0.717 to 0.649Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5030 · Mean difference (final values): 0.234 · 95% CI -0.451 to 0.919Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 40 Weeks

Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 40
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 40 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 40 Weeks1.952 ± 0.2591.839 ± 0.2411.887 ± 0.2491.575 ± 0.251
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7459 · Mean difference (final values): -0.112 · 95% CI -0.793 to 0.568Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.8534 · Mean difference (final values): -0.065 · 95% CI -0.753 to 0.623Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.5099 · Mean difference (final values): -0.377 · 95% CI -1.068 to 0.314Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 48 Weeks

Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 48
Reported as:
Least squares mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 48 Weeks
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 48 Weeks1.940 ± 0.2592.035 ± 0.2422.324 ± 0.2502.047 ± 0.251
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7850 · Mean difference (final values): 0.095 · 95% CI -0.587 to 0.777Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.2755 · Mean difference (final values): 0.383 · 95% CI -0.306 to 1.073Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Mixed Models Analysis · p = 0.7618 · Mean difference (final values): 0.107 · 95% CI -0.584 to 0.798Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryTime to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation

Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. Time to event was measured from the beginning of treatment. Cox regression analysis of treatment effect using tiotropium stratum as a stratification factor.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation
DaysPlacebo (Tiotropium)Placebo (Non-tiotropium)Olo 5 mcg qd (Tiotropium)Olo 5 mcg qd (Non-tiotropium)Olo 10 mcg qd (Tiotropium)Olo 10 mcg qd(Non-tiotropium)Form 12 mcg (Tiotropium)Form 12 mcg (Non-tiotropium)
Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbation143 (70.0 to 254.0)268 (149.0 to NA)136 (74.0 to 255.0)189 (115.0 to 262.0)134 (61.0 to 200.0)209 (109.0 to 290.0)223 (115.0 to 280.0)310 (207.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Tiotropium) vs Olo 5 mcg qd (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.3424 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.162 · 95% CI 0.843 to 1.603Comparison of Olo 5 mcg qd to placebo across stratum
  • Placebo (Non-tiotropium) vs Olo 10 mcg qd (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.3023 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.186 · 95% CI 0.859 to 1.636Comparison of Olo 10 mcg qd to placebo across stratum
  • Placebo (Tiotropium) vs Form 12 mcg (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.3589 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.854 · 95% CI 0.605 to 1.205Comparison of Form 12 mcg to placebo across stratum
SecondaryTime to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation Leading to Hospitalization

Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations required hospitalization. Time to event was measured from the beginning of treatment. Cox regression analysis of treatment effect using tiotropium stratum as a stratification factor.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation Leading to Hospitalization
DaysPlacebo (Tiotropium)Placebo (Non-tiotropium)Olo 5 mcg qd (Tiotropium)Olo 5 mcg qd (Non-tiotropium)Olo 10 mcg qd (Tiotropium)Olo 10 mcg qd(Non-tiotropium)Form 12 mcg (Tiotropium)Form 12 mcg (Non-tiotropium)
Time to First Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation Leading to HospitalizationNA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)NA (NA to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Non-tiotropium) vs Olo 5 mcg qd (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.1910 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.818 · 95% CI 0.734 to 4.503Comparison of Olo 5 mcg qd to placebo across stratum
  • Placebo (Non-tiotropium) vs Olo 10 mcg qd(Non-tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.2274 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.743 · 95% CI 0.695 to 4.369Comparison of Olo 10 mcg qd to placebo across stratum
  • Placebo (Non-tiotropium) vs Form 12 mcg (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.5538 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.346 · 95% CI 0.512 to 3.538Comparison of Form 12 mcg to placebo across stratum
SecondaryTime to First Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation

Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations did not lead to hospitalization but included treatment with antibiotics and/or systemic steroids. Time to event was measured from the beginning of treatment. Cox regression analysis of treatment effect using tiotropium stratum as a stratification factor.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · Days
Time to First Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation
DaysPlacebo (Tiotropium)Placebo (Non-tiotropium)Olo 5 mcg qd (Tiotropium)Olo 5 mcg qd (Non-tiotropium)Olo 10 mcg qd (Tiotropium)Olo 10 mcg qd(Non-tiotropium)Form 12 mcg (Tiotropium)Form 12 mcg (Non-tiotropium)
Time to First Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbation150 (86.0 to 325.0)296 (215.0 to NA)239 (98.0 to 304.0)244 (154.0 to NA)175 (123.0 to 271.0)302 (213.0 to NA)280 (167.0 to NA)270 (270.0 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo (Tiotropium) vs Olo 5 mcg qd (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.5577 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.101 · 95% CI 0.778 to 1.557Comparison of Olo 5 mcg qd to placebo across stratum
  • Placebo (Tiotropium) vs Olo 10 mcg qd (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.9423 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.017 · 95% CI 0.714 to 1.448Comparison of Olo 10 mcg qd to placebo across stratum
  • Placebo (Tiotropium) vs Form 12 mcg (Tiotropium) · Log Rank · p = 0.1097 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.735 · 95% CI 0.502 to 1.076Comparison of Form 12 mcg to placebo across stratum
SecondaryNumber of COPD Exacerbations

Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of study at week 48 visit
Reported as:
Mean · Number of COPD ex. per patient year
Number of COPD Exacerbations
Number of COPD ex. per patient yearPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Number of COPD Exacerbations0.5684 ± 0.07180.7117 ± 0.07930.6946 ± 0.08010.5098 ± 0.0649
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.1729 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.2521 · 95% CI 0.9060 to 1.7304Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.2297 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.2220 · 95% CI 0.8808 to 1.6954Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.5354 · Incidence rate ratio: 0.8968 · 95% CI 0.6353 to 1.2659Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryNumber of COPD Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization

Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations required hospitalization.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of study at week 48 visit
Reported as:
Mean · Number of COPD ex. per patient year
Number of COPD Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization
Number of COPD ex. per patient yearPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Number of COPD Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization0.0554 ± 0.02490.1043 ± 0.03780.1324 ± 0.04930.0570 ± 0.0227
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.2508 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.8821 · 95% CI 0.6391 to 5.5430Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.1135 · Incidence rate ratio: 2.3877 · 95% CI 0.8122 to 7.0194Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.9611 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.0289 · 95% CI 0.3268 to 3.2395Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryNumber of Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbations

Qualifying events of COPD were specifically pre-defined in the protocol. Other respiratory related events were evaluated by the investigator to see if they met the pre-defined criteria. These exacerbations did not lead to hospitalization but included treatment with antibiotics and/or systemic steroids.

Time frame:
Baseline to end of study at 48 weeks.
Reported as:
Mean · Number of COPD ex. per patient year
Number of Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbations
Number of COPD ex. per patient yearPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Number of Moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (CPOD) Exacerbations0.4765 ± 0.06450.5537 ± 0.06740.5114 ± 0.06540.3721 ± 0.0537
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.4002 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.1621 · 95% CI 0.8187 to 1.6497Olo 5 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.6983 · Incidence rate ratio: 1.0733 · 95% CI 0.7503 to 1.5352Olo 10 mcg qd minus Placebo
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · Negative binomial regression · p = 0.2033 · Incidence rate ratio: 0.7810 · 95% CI 0.5336 to 1.1433Form 12 mcg minus Placebo
SecondaryAbsolute Plasma Concentrations

Absolute plasma concentrations of Olodaterol. Values presented are across visits and summarised into geometric means.

Time frame:
within 2 hours before first drug administration and 10 minutes post-dose at week 6, 12 and 18
Reported as:
Geometric mean · pg/mL
Absolute Plasma Concentrations
pg/mLPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Absolute Plasma Concentrations—4.179 ± 60.3007.246 ± 72.242—
SecondaryChanges in Safety Parameters Related to Treatment

Occurence of cardiac disorders and investigations related to treatment.

Time frame:
48 weeks
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Changes in Safety Parameters Related to Treatment
percentage of participantsPlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Tachycardia0.40.00.00.9
Arrhythmia0.00.40.00.0
Atrial fibrillation0.40.00.00.4
Atrioventricular block0.40.00.00.0
Atrioventricular block first degree0.00.00.00.4
Bundle branch block right0.00.40.00.0
Palpitations0.40.00.00.4
Ventricular extrasystoles0.40.00.00.0
Electrocardiogram QT prolonged0.00.40.00.4
Electrocardiogram T wave inversion0.00.00.00.4
PrimaryMahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis

This outcome measure describes the combined analysis of the trials NCT00793624 and NCT00796653. Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score measures 3 components of dyspnea that evoke dyspnea in daily living: Functional Impairment, Magnitude of Task, and Magnitude of Effort. The TDI measures the change from the baseline assessment ranging from -9 (most deterioration) to +9 (most improvement).

Time frame:
Baseline, Week 24
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis
score on a scalePlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Mahler Transitional Dyspnea Index Focal Score at 24 Weeks for Combined Analysis1.471 ± 0.1551.980 ± 0.1751.996 ± 0.1701.827 ± 0.168
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs Olo 5 mcg qd · pattern mixture model · p = 0.0270 · Mean difference (final values): 0.509 · 95% CI 0.058 to 0.960Based on a pattern mixture model with four patterns based on time of dropout (i.e., day of last observed data) 1) day 43 or day 85, 2) day 127 or day 169, 3) day 225 or day 281, 4) day 337
  • Placebo vs Olo 10 mcg qd · pattern mixture model · p = 0.0203 (See Hogan, et. al. Hogan JW, Roy J, Korkontzelou C Tutorial in biostatistics:handling drop-out in longitudinal studies. Stat Med 23,1455-1497(2004)) · Mean difference (final values): 0.525 · 95% CI 0.082 to 0.967Based on a pattern mixture model with four patterns based on time of dropout (i.e., day of last observed data) 1) day 43 or day 85, 2) day 127 or day 169, 3) day 225 or day 281, 4) day 337
  • Placebo vs Form 12 mcg · pattern mixture model · p = 0.1166 · Mean difference (final values): 0.355 · 95% CI -0.088 to 0.799Based on a pattern mixture model with four patterns based on time of dropout (i.e., day of last observed data) 1) day 43 or day 85, 2) day 127 or day 169, 3) day 225 or day 281, 4) day 337

Adverse events

Collected over 48 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Placebo—31/225 (13.8%)83/225 (36.9%)
Olodaterol (Olo) 5 mcg qd—33/227 (14.5%)100/227 (44.1%)
Olodaterol (Olo) 10 mcg qd—26/225 (11.6%)96/225 (42.7%)
Form 12 mcg—33/227 (14.5%)83/227 (36.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 109
Most frequent serious events
EventPlaceboOlodaterol (Olo) 5 mcg qdOlodaterol (Olo) 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders9/22510/22713/2259/227
PneumoniaInfections and infestations3/2256/2278/2253/227
Atrial fibrillationCardiac disorders0/2251/2273/2251/227
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations3/2251/2270/2250/227
Infective exacerbation of chronic obstructive airways diseaseInfections and infestations2/2250/2271/2251/227
Respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/2250/2270/2250/227
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/2251/2270/2250/227
Acute coronary syndromeCardiac disorders1/2250/2270/2250/227
Acute myocardial infarctionCardiac disorders1/2251/2270/2250/227
Cardiac failureCardiac disorders0/2250/2271/2251/227
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPlaceboOlodaterol (Olo) 5 mcg qdOlodaterol (Olo) 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcg
Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders51/22567/22762/22553/227
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations15/22522/22725/22523/227
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations15/22517/22711/22511/227
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders7/2257/22713/22513/227
DyspnoeaRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/2259/22713/2256/227

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcgTotal
Mean64.0 ± 8.463.7 ± 9.162.6 ± 8.864.8 ± 8.663.8 ± 8.7
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcgTotal
Female45505548198
Male180177170179706
Tiotropium (Tio) Use Stratum
Tiotropium (Tio) Use Stratum(Number of participants)PlaceboOlo 5 mcg qdOlo 10 mcg qdForm 12 mcgTotal
Non-tiotropium169168167169673
Tiotropium56595858231
08

Study locations

93 sites
  • 1222.13.2401 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Capital Federal, Argentina
  • 1222.13.2403 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Capital Federal, Argentina
  • 1222.13.2402 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Mar del Plata, Argentina
  • 1222.13.2404 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Monte Grande, Argentina
  • 1222.13.2502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Juiz de Fora, Brazil
  • 1222.13.2503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 1222.13.2505 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 1222.13.2501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 1222.13.2504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sao Paulo, Brazil
  • 1222.13.1408 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Calgary, Alberta, Canada
  • 1222.13.1407 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chilliwack, British Columbia, Canada
  • 1222.13.1403 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Downsview, Ontario, Canada
  • 1222.13.1412 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
  • 1222.13.1401 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada
  • 1222.13.1410 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
  • 1222.13.1413 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 1222.13.1404 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    La Malbaie, Quebec, Canada
  • 1222.13.1411 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 1222.13.1406 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Point Claire, Quebec, Canada
  • 1222.13.1402 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • 1222.13.3502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Dubrovnik, Croatia
  • 1222.13.3503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Rijeka, Croatia
  • 1222.13.3504 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Split, Croatia
  • 1222.13.3501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Zagreb, Croatia
  • 1222.13.3401 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Beroun, Czech Republic
  • 1222.13.3403 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Cesky Tesin, Czech Republic
  • 1222.13.3402 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Tabor, Czech Republic
  • 1222.13.2003 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Aalborg, Denmark
  • 1222.13.2002 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hvidovre, Denmark
  • 1222.13.2001 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Silkeborg, Denmark
  • 1222.13.2103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Lahti, Finland
  • 1222.13.2101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Tampere, Finland
  • 1222.13.2102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Turku, Finland
  • 1222.13.1502 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Berlin, Germany
  • 1222.13.1503 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Berlin, Germany
  • 1222.13.1506 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Berlin, Germany
  • 1222.13.1511 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Dortmund, Germany
  • 1222.13.1514 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Essen, Germany
  • 1222.13.1509 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Großhansdorf, Germany
  • 1222.13.1508 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hannover, Germany
  • 1222.13.1510 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hannover, Germany
  • 1222.13.1512 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kiel, Germany
  • 1222.13.1501 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Köln, Germany
  • 1222.13.1505 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Reinfeld, Germany
  • 1222.13.1507 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Schwerin, Germany
  • 1222.13.2901 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kowloon, Hong Kong
  • 1222.13.2804 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bangalore, India
  • 1222.13.2803 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chennai, India
  • 1222.13.2806 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Coimbatore-, India
  • 1222.13.2810 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Hyderabad, India
  • 1222.13.2801 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Indore, India
  • 1222.13.2807 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Indore, India
  • 1222.13.2805 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Jaipur, India
  • 1222.13.2802 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Ludhiana, Punjab, India
  • 1222.13.2809 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Mumbai, India
  • 1222.13.2812 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Mumbai, India
  • 1222.13.2811 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Pune, India
  • 1222.13.1704 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Catania, Italy
  • 1222.13.1702 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Genova, Italy
  • 1222.13.1701 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Pisa, Italy
  • 1222.13.1705 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Siena, Italy
  • 1222.13.1703 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Trieste, Italy
  • 1222.13.2701 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Gwangju, Korea, Republic of
  • 1222.13.2702 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Incheon, Korea, Republic of
  • 1222.13.2703 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • 1222.13.2705 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • 1222.13.2706 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • 1222.13.2704 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Suwon, Korea, Republic of
  • 1222.13.3103 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Batu Caves, Malaysia
  • 1222.13.3101 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia
  • 1222.13.3102 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 1222.13.3104 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kuantan, Malaysia
  • 1222.13.2201 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bergen, Norway
  • 1222.13.2202 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Oslo, Norway
  • 1222.13.3203 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Cebu, Philippines
  • 1222.13.3201 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Quezon City, Philippines
  • 1222.13.3202 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Quezon City, Philippines
  • 1222.13.2302 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Durban, South Africa
  • 1222.13.2301 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Pretoria, South Africa
  • 1222.13.1803 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Aranjuez, Spain
  • 1222.13.1806 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Elda, Spain
  • 1222.13.1802 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Els Hostalets de Balenyà, Spain
  • 1222.13.1804 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Pozuelo de Alarcón, Spain
  • 1222.13.1805 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Valladolid, Spain
  • 1222.13.1801 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Vic (Barcelona), Spain
  • 1222.13.1901 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Boden, Sweden
  • 1222.13.1902 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Sundsvall, Sweden
  • 1222.13.3302 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bangkok, Thailand
  • 1222.13.3303 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Bangkok, Thailand
  • 1222.13.3301 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • 1222.13.3602 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Ivano-Frankivsk, Ukraine
  • 1222.13.3601 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • 1222.13.3603 Boehringer Ingelheim Investigational Site
    Kiev, Ukraine
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Singh D, Wedzicha JA, Siddiqui S, de la Hoz A, Xue W, Magnussen H, Miravitlles M, Chalmers JD, Calverley PMA. Blood eosinophils as a biomarker of future COPD exacerbation risk: pooled data from 11 clinical trials. Respir Res. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01482-1. PubMed 32943047 ↗
  • Andreas S, Bothner U, de la Hoz A, Kloer I, Trampisch M, Alter P. A Post Hoc Holter ECG Analysis of Olodaterol and Formoterol in Moderate-to-Very-Severe COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Aug 10;15:1955-1965. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S246353. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32848381 ↗
  • Andreas S, Bothner U, Trampisch M, Haensel M, Buhl R, Alter P. Effect of long-acting beta2-agonists olodaterol and formoterol on heart rate and blood pressure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. Pulm Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Oct;52:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2018.08.002. Epub 2018 Aug 2. PubMed 30077810 ↗
  • Koch A, Pizzichini E, Hamilton A, Hart L, Korducki L, De Salvo MC, Paggiaro P. Lung function efficacy and symptomatic benefit of olodaterol once daily delivered via Respimat(R) versus placebo and formoterol twice daily in patients with GOLD 2-4 COPD: results from two replicate 48-week studies. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2014 Jul 5;9:697-714. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S62502. eCollection 2014. PubMed 25045258 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 27, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00793624
Lead sponsor
Boehringer Ingelheim
First posted
Nov 19, 2008
Start date
Feb 2009
Primary completion
Dec 2010
Results posted
Jun 5, 2014
Last update
Jun 27, 2014

Study contacts

Boehringer Ingelheim
study chair · Boehringer Ingelheim
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion