CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00781365HyperlinkUpdated Apr 13, 2017Results posted

Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Case Management to Control Hypertension

An interventional study of Telemonitors and pharmacy management in Hypertension, sponsored by HealthPartners Institute. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-04-13.

Sponsored by HealthPartners Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
450
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this project we develop and implement an intervention to improve hypertension control in a primary care setting that takes advantage of new technology (home blood pressure telemonitoring) and team models of care (pharmacist case management). The results of the project will have important implications for future efforts to improve care provided to many of the estimated 20 million Americans with uncontrolled hypertension.

Read the detailed description

Blood pressure (BP) is controlled to recommended levels in only 1 in 3 people with hypertension, and there has been little improvement since the late 1980s, despite advances in evidence to support aggressive hypertension control, and availability of many new and effective antihypertensive drugs. It is clear that meaningful and sustained improvement in hypertension control will likely require fundamental changes in the current physician-centered office-visit based model of caring for hypertension. In this project we develop and implement an intervention that takes advantage of new technology and team models of care to improve BP measurement and control, solving the problems that have limited the application of case management approaches to hypertension care improvement. The study will take place in a diverse population of adults with hypertension cared for in a real-world primary care setting. The Telemonitoring Intervention (TI) integrates 2 innovative components: First, home BP measures are done using state-of-the-art modem-enabled automated equipment that internally stores and electronically transmits BP data through a simple touch-tone telephone connection to a secure web site. Second, a pharmacist case manager integrated with the primary care team through a jointly used electronic medical record (EMR) and formulary adjusts antihypertensive therapy using an approved written protocol, under a collaborative practice agreement with physicians. Treatment decisions are based on home BP data and are discussed and communicated to patients in telephone visits with the pharmacist case manager. Two-way communication between the pharmacist case manager and the patient's primary care team is assured by using a shared EMR and by additional secure messaging of the results of every pharmacist encounter to the primary care team. To assess the impact of the TI on hypertension control, patient satisfaction, and costs of care, we will conduct a cluster-randomized trial, assigning 16 primary care clinics and 450 of their nested patients with uncontrolled hypertension to either a Usual Care (UC) control group or TI. Blood pressure outcomes in both groups will be determined at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 54 months in an identical and blinded fashion in a research clinic separate from the clinical setting where patients received their medical care. We hypothesize that guideline BP control will be achieved at 6 months and maintained at 12 months in more than 60% of patients from TI clinics, compared to \< 40% in patients from UC clinics. We will compare satisfaction with care and costs in the TI and UC groups. The TI has the potential to improve hypertension control for millions of patients, and could be implemented widely in diverse and large patient populations based on performance in this randomized trial. The results of the project will have important implications for future efforts to improve care provided to many of the estimated 20 million Americans with uncontrolled hypertension.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Telemonitoring
  • Pharmacy management
03

In context

Hypertension

6,689 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 965 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 450 is above the median of 90 across 4,995 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

HealthPartners Institute is the lead sponsor of 164 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 16 (94%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 21 years or more
  • Linked using EMR data to a HealthPartners Medical Group primary care clinic
  • Within the 12-month period of time prior to screening have had at least 2 primary care outpatient encounters, in the two most recent of which the blood pressure was above Joint National Committee 7 (JNC7) goal (\<140/90 mmHg or \<130/80 for patients with diabetes or kidney disease).
  • Have a measured blood pressure at a research clinic screening visit above the JNC7 goal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute coronary syndrome or stroke within the past 3 months
  • Class III (marked limitation of physical activity) or IV (symptoms at rest) New York Heart Association heart failure, or known left ventricular ejection fraction (\<30%)
  • Severe renal dysfunction, with epidermal growth factor receptor (eGFR) ,30 ml/min/1.73 m2 using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD) equation
  • Known secondary causes of hypertension such as coarctation of the aorta, pheochromocytoma, adrenal cortical hypertension or renal vascular hypertension
  • Unwillingness to be followed for a period of 18 months
  • Pregnancy or unwillingness to use reliable bith control for females of child-bearing age
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Requires an interpreter to communicate with health care providers
  • Dementia, mental illness or any condition that would limit ability to give informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
450 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control

    Patients in the control group will receive usual care from their primary care physicians at HealthPartners Medical Group clinics.

  • Experimental
    Telemonitors and pharmacy management

    The telemonitoring intervention (TI) patients will receive a home blood pressure telemonitor and will work with a clinical pharmacist case manager to control elevated blood pressure. Patients will use their home telemonitors to read and send their blood pressures to their Pharmacist case manager, who will use phone meetings with the patient to make medication adjustments.

    Other: Telemonitors and pharmacy management

Interventions

  • OtherTelemonitors and pharmacy management

    Patients in the intervention arm will receive home blood pressure monitors, and will have individual hypertension case management from a medication therapy management pharmacist.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Pressure Control

    Percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure at each time point (less than 140/90 mmHg or 130/80 mmHg for patients with kidney disease or diabetes)

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

  2. Mean Systolic Blood Pressure

    Systolic blood pressure at baseline and 4 time points

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 54 months

  3. Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Mean diastolic blood pressure at baseline and 4 time points

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 54 months

07

Results

Posted Jul 14, 2014
Limitations and caveats
1) Response rate: 1 in 7 patients solicited by mail responded;of those screened, 1 in 4 eligible. 2) Participants were well-educated, had high income levels, 3) 1 integrated health care system, 4) study was not blinded.

Participant flow

Recruitment was between March 2009-April 2011. We identified adult patients with elevated BP (systolic BP \>140 or diastolic BP \>90 mm Hg) at the two most recent primary care visits in the past year using electronic medical records. Patients received up to two mailings followed by phone calls. Further screening occurred in research clinic.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTelemonitoring InterventionUsual Care
Started228222
Completed194186
Not completed3436
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject138
Withdrew: Did not attend visit2028
Withdrew: Language barrier10

Outcome measures

PrimaryBlood Pressure Control

Percentage of patients with controlled blood pressure at each time point (less than 140/90 mmHg or 130/80 mmHg for patients with kidney disease or diabetes)

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Blood Pressure Control
percentage of participantsUsual CareTelemonitoring Intervention
Baseline0 (0 to 0)0 (0 to 0)
6 Months45.2 (39.2 to 51.3)71.8 (65.6 to 77.3)
12 Months52.8 (45.4 to 60.2)71.2 (62.0 to 78.9)
18 Months57.1 (51.5 to 62.6)71.8 (65.0 to 77.8)
PrimaryMean Systolic Blood Pressure

Systolic blood pressure at baseline and 4 time points

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 54 months
Reported as:
Mean · mmHg
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure
mmHgUsual CareTelemonitoring Intervention
Baseline147.7 (145.8 to 149.5)148.2 (146.3 to 150.0)
6 Months136.9 (134.6 to 139.2)126.7 (124.4 to 129.0)
12 Months134.8 (132.5 to 137.2)125.7 (123.4 to 128.0)
18 Months133.0 (130.4 to 135.5)126.9 (124.3 to 129.4)
54 Months131.7 (128.8 to 134.6)131.2 (128.3 to 134.1)
PrimaryMean Diastolic Blood Pressure

Mean diastolic blood pressure at baseline and 4 time points

Time frame:
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 54 months
Reported as:
Mean · mm Hg
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure
mm HgUsual CareTelemonitoring Intervention
Baseline85.1 (82.9 to 87.3)84.4 (82.3 to 86.6)
6 Months81.7 (79.5 to 84.0)75.0 (72.9 to 77.2)
12 Months80.8 (78.5 to 83.2)75.1 (72.8 to 77.4)
18 Months78.7 (76.6 to 80.9)75.1 (73.0 to 77.2)
54 Months79.1 (76.8 to 81.4)77.8 (75.5 to 80.1)

Adverse events

Collected over Events were reported at 6, 12, and 18 month clinic visits. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Usual Care—37/222 (16.7%)8/222 (3.6%)
Telemonitoring Intervention—30/228 (13.2%)5/228 (2.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 39
Most frequent serious events
EventUsual CareTelemonitoring Intervention
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders8/2220/228
Spinal decompression/fusionSurgical and medical procedures6/2223/222
Cerebrovascular accident (stroke)Vascular disorders5/2222/228
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/2222/228
Overdose, toxicity, or withdrawalInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/2221/228
Chest pain, non-cardiac, non-specificGeneral disorders4/2223/228
Knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplastySurgical and medical procedures2/2224/228
Chest pain, atypicalCardiac disorders0/2224/228
Transient Ischemic AttackVascular disorders3/2220/228
Hypotension with syncopeVascular disorders0/2223/228
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventUsual CareTelemonitoring Intervention
Hypotension, dizziness, near syncopeCardiac disorders1/2223/228
Hypertensive crisisVascular disorders2/2220/228
Breast cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/2220/228
Erythema nodosumSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/2220/228
HypertensionVascular disorders1/2220/228
Allergic reactionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/2220/228
Allergic vasculitisVascular disorders1/2220/228
Uretral stent changeRenal and urinary disorders0/2221/228
Prostate CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/2221/228

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Usual CareTelemonitoring InterventionTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years152147299
>=65 years7081151
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Usual CareTelemonitoring InterventionTotal
Mean60.2 ± 12.262.0 ± 11.761.1 ± 12.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Usual CareTelemonitoring InterventionTotal
Female98103201
Male124125249
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Usual CareTelemonitoring InterventionTotal
Hispanic or Latino9110
Not Hispanic or Latino213227440
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(participants)Usual CareTelemonitoring InterventionTotal
White177191368
Black or African American292453
Asian347
Other13922
08

Study locations

1 site
  • HealthPartners Institute
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Margolis KL, Kerby TJ, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, Maciosek MV, O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM. Design and rationale for Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Case Management to Control Hypertension (HyperLink): a cluster randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2012 Jul;33(4):794-803. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2012.03.014. Epub 2012 Apr 1. PubMed 22498720 ↗
  • Margolis KL, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, Dehmer SP, Maciosek MV, Nyboer RA, O'Connor PJ, Pawloski PA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Trower NK, Tucker AD, Green BB. A Successful Multifaceted Trial to Improve Hypertension Control in Primary Care: Why Did it Work? J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1665-72. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3355-x. PubMed 25952653 ↗
  • Pawloski PA, Asche SE, Trower NK, Bergdall AR, Dehmer SP, Maciosek MV, Nyboer RA, O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Green BB, Margolis KL. A substudy evaluating treatment intensification on medication adherence among hypertensive patients receiving home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Oct;41(5):493-8. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12414. Epub 2016 Jun 30. PubMed 27363822 ↗
  • Asche SE, O'Connor PJ, Dehmer SP, Green BB, Bergdall AR, Maciosek MV, Nyboer RA, Pawloski PA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Trower NK, Margolis KL. Patient characteristics associated with greater blood pressure control in a randomized trial of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 Nov;10(11):873-880. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2016.09.004. Epub 2016 Sep 25. PubMed 27720142 ↗
  • Margolis KL, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, Dehmer SP, Groen SE, Kadrmas HM, Kerby TJ, Klotzle KJ, Maciosek MV, Michels RD, O'Connor PJ, Pritchard RA, Sekenski JL, Sperl-Hillen JM, Trower NK. Effect of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management on blood pressure control: a cluster randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Jul 3;310(1):46-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6549. PubMed 23821088 ↗
  • Kerby TJ, Asche SE, Maciosek MV, O'Connor PJ, Sperl-Hillen JM, Margolis KL. Adherence to blood pressure telemonitoring in a cluster-randomized clinical trial. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Oct;14(10):668-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2012.00685.x. Epub 2012 Jul 26. PubMed 23031143 ↗
  • Margolis KL, Crain AL, Green BB, O'Connor PJ, Solberg LI, Beran M, Bergdall AR, Pawloski PA, Ziegenfuss JY, JaKa MM, Appana D, Sharma R, Kodet AJ, Trower NK, Rehrauer DJ, McKinney Z, Norton CK, Haugen P, Anderson JP, Crabtree BF, Norman SK, Sperl-Hillen JM. Comparison of explanatory and pragmatic design choices in a cluster-randomized hypertension trial: effects on enrollment, participant characteristics, and adherence. Trials. 2022 Aug 17;23(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06611-3. PubMed 35978336 ↗
  • Margolis KL, Dehmer SP, Sperl-Hillen J, O'Connor PJ, Asche SE, Bergdall AR, Green BB, Nyboer RA, Pawloski PA, Trower NK, Maciosek MV. Cardiovascular Events and Costs With Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management for Uncontrolled Hypertension. Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1097-1103. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15492. Epub 2020 Aug 31. PubMed 32862713 ↗
  • Margolis KL, Asche SE, Dehmer SP, Bergdall AR, Green BB, Sperl-Hillen JM, Nyboer RA, Pawloski PA, Maciosek MV, Trower NK, O'Connor PJ. Long-term Outcomes of the Effects of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure Among Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Follow-up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1617. PubMed 30646139 ↗
  • Annuzzi G, Bozzetto L, Costabile G, Giacco R, Mangione A, Anniballi G, Vitale M, Vetrani C, Cipriano P, Della Corte G, Pasanisi F, Riccardi G, Rivellese AA. Diets naturally rich in polyphenols improve fasting and postprandial dyslipidemia and reduce oxidative stress: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014 Mar;99(3):463-71. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.073445. Epub 2013 Dec 24. PubMed 24368433 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00781365
Lead sponsor
HealthPartners Institute
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 29, 2008
Start date
Mar 2009
Primary completion
Oct 2012
Completion
Oct 2012
Results posted
Jul 14, 2014
Last update
Apr 13, 2017

Study contacts

Karen L Margolis, MD, MPH
principal investigator · HealthPartners Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion