A Phase 2 interventional study of rhBMP-2/CPM injection and bisphosphonates, calcium, and vitamin D (oral bisphosphonate therapy) and rhBMP-2/CPM injection and bisphosphonates, calcium, and vitamin D (oral bisphosphonate therapy) in Osteoporosis, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 35 sites in 4 countries. Open to female participants aged 65 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-20.
Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The main purpose of this study is to assess whether a locally-administered rhBMP-2/CPM injection can rapidly increase bone mass in subjects at high risk for osteoporotic fractures of the hip. All subjects will receive standard treatment for low bone mass, consisting of bisphosphonates, calcium, and vitamin D (all taken by mouth). Subjects that are randomly selected to receive treatment with rhBMP-2 will receive an injection directly into the hip. The injection is given in a surgery room using a light anesthesia.
1,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoporosis; 212 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 50 is below the median of 95 across 1,133 interventional studies indexed under Osteoporosis.
Browse Osteoporosis studies →Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.
Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
rhBMP-2/CPM , 1.0 mg/mL
Drug: rhBMP-2/CPM injection and bisphosphonates, calcium, and vitamin D (oral bisphosphonate therapy)
rhBMP-2/CPM , 2.0 mg/mL
Drug: rhBMP-2/CPM injection and bisphosphonates, calcium, and vitamin D (oral bisphosphonate therapy)
Oral bisphosphonate therapy (standard of care)
Drug: bisphosphonates, calcium, and vitamin D
Single, unilateral intraosseous injection of 6mL of rhBMP-2/CPM , 1.0 mg/mL.
Single, unilateral intraosseous injection of 6mL of rhBMP-2/CPM , 2.0 mg/mL.
Oral bisphosphonate therapy
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Measured by Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA)
Evaluating local changes (expected increases) in BMD after administration of rhBMP-2/CPM, compared to those observed with systemic osteoporosis therapy alone. Alternatively, if changes in the total area surrounding the proximal femur are observed, bone mineral content (BMC) may instead be applied for the primary measure. BMD is defined as a derived measure of bone density, generated by dividing the bone mineral content value obtained from a bone densitometry technique (for example, DXA) by the total area of the region scanned.
Time frame: Baseline, 12 months post dose
Time Course Distribution of Volumetric BMD for the Hip Under Study (HUS) for Total Hip
Time course distribution of volumetric Bone mineral density (BMD) for hip is assessed by volumetric Quantitative Computed Tomography (vQCT) technique which is a 4-detector spiral (helical) computed tomography (CT) scanner with designated calibration phantom, obtain a CT scan of the proximal femora (bilateral simultaneous acquisition with volumetric rendering) to identify the specified region of interests (ROIs) for volumetric parameter to be quantified, reconstruct images of both hips and send reconstructed data (in electronic format). The vQCT regions of interest are cortical, the subcortical and trabecular. Cortical and the subcortical BMD are distinguished from trabecular effects. Peeled trabecular BMD reflects the subtraction of the extended CPM. Integral BMD reflects the cortical, subcortical, and peeled trabecular regions (minus the extended Calcium phosphate matrix \[CPM\]).
Time frame: At Month 12
Timecourse Distribution of Volumetric Bone Mineral Density (BMD) for the Hip Under Study (HUS). Volume of Interest: Femoral Neck
Evaluating local changes (expected increases) in BMD after administration of rhBMP-2/CPM, compared to those observed with systemic osteoporosis therapy alone. Alternatively, if changes in the total area surrounding the proximal femur are observed, bone mineral content (BMC) may instead be applied for the primary measure.
Time frame: At Month 12
Summary of Volumetric Density of Cortical and Trabecular Bone Calculated by Quantitative Computed Tomography (vQTC)
Here, measurement of density of cortical and trabecular bone in various regions of interest (ROIs) in the femoral neck, proximal shaft, and individual trochanters and was calculated by Quantitative Computed Tomography (vQTC) in ROIs.
Time frame: 24 months
Number Participant Responses to Injectability Questionnaire Injected Population
Investigator documents preparation of the study medication evaluates injectability and product placement relative to desired location (for participants in active treatment groups). Surgeon performing the injection had to complete the questionnaire that evaluates ease of preparing the study medication, ability to administer study medication, and ability for the study medication to remain in the location it was administered.
Time frame: Participants were monitored after treatment administration (dosing period)
Number of Participants With Any Significant Changes in Serum Biomarkers of Bone Turnover From Baseline
Participants with significant change in serum biomarkers of bone formation and resorption from baseline are reported. Significant changes were judged by investigator.
Time frame: Baseline up to 12 months
Percentage Change From Baseline in Areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD) for Contralateral Total Hip
Evaluating local changes (expected increases) in BMD after administration of rhBMP-2/CPM, compared to those observed with systemic osteoporosis therapy alone. The percentage change from baseline in BMD for total hip (assessed by DXA) is presented for the contralateral (untreated) hip below.
Time frame: 36 months
The study was conducted at 10 centers in the United States of America, Belgium, and Poland.
| Milestone | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPM 2.0mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 17 | 16 | 17 |
| Completed | 12 | 11 | 11 |
| Not completed | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 4 | 3 | 3 |
| Withdrew: Unspecified resaons | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Evaluating local changes (expected increases) in BMD after administration of rhBMP-2/CPM, compared to those observed with systemic osteoporosis therapy alone. Alternatively, if changes in the total area surrounding the proximal femur are observed, bone mineral content (BMC) may instead be applied for the primary measure. BMD is defined as a derived measure of bone density, generated by dividing the bone mineral content value obtained from a bone densitometry technique (for example, DXA) by the total area of the region scanned.
| gram per centimeter squared (g/cm^2) | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total hip | -0.0026 ± 0.018 | 0.1299 ± 0.045 | 0.1196 ± 0.063 |
| Intertrochanter | -0.0029 ± 0.020 | 0.1063 ± 0.066 | 0.1192 ± 0.063 |
| Trochanter | -0.0091 ± 0.023 | 0.1197 ± 0.066 | 0.0869 ± 0.073 |
| Femoral neck | 0.0058 ± 0.021 | 0.2408 ± 0.111 | 0.2120 ± 0.117 |
Time course distribution of volumetric Bone mineral density (BMD) for hip is assessed by volumetric Quantitative Computed Tomography (vQCT) technique which is a 4-detector spiral (helical) computed tomography (CT) scanner with designated calibration phantom, obtain a CT scan of the proximal femora (bilateral simultaneous acquisition with volumetric rendering) to identify the specified region of interests (ROIs) for volumetric parameter to be quantified, reconstruct images of both hips and send reconstructed data (in electronic format). The vQCT regions of interest are cortical, the subcortical and trabecular. Cortical and the subcortical BMD are distinguished from trabecular effects. Peeled trabecular BMD reflects the subtraction of the extended CPM. Integral BMD reflects the cortical, subcortical, and peeled trabecular regions (minus the extended Calcium phosphate matrix \[CPM\]).
| milligram per centimeter cubed (mg/cm^3) | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cortical + Sub-Cortical | 136.8 ± 16.91 | 165.6 ± 18.37 | 151.6 ± 26.07 |
| Peeled Trabecular | 45.1 ± 16.02 | 77.8 ± 23.07 | 88.4 ± 37.63 |
| Integral | 181.9 ± 20.60 | 243.4 ± 31.04 | 240.0 ± 45.31 |
Here, measurement of density of cortical and trabecular bone in various regions of interest (ROIs) in the femoral neck, proximal shaft, and individual trochanters and was calculated by Quantitative Computed Tomography (vQTC) in ROIs.
| mg/cm^3 | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cortical Bone | 2.5782 ± 0.16805 | 2.4259 ± 0.24267 | 2.5128 ± 0.17484 |
| Trabecular Bone | 0 ± 0 | 4.7073 ± 2.40500 | 4.2205 ± 1.63904 |
Investigator documents preparation of the study medication evaluates injectability and product placement relative to desired location (for participants in active treatment groups). Surgeon performing the injection had to complete the questionnaire that evaluates ease of preparing the study medication, ability to administer study medication, and ability for the study medication to remain in the location it was administered.
| Participants | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Preparing-satisfactory | 15 | 14 |
| Ease of Preparing-unsatisfactory | 0 | 0 |
| Ease of Injecting-satisfactory | 15 | 11 |
| Ease of Injecting-unsatisfactory | 0 | 3 |
| Ability to inject entire volume- satisfactory | 13 | 12 |
| Ability to inject entire volume- unsatisfactory | 2 | 2 |
| Localization within Proximal Femur-satisfactory | 15 | 11 |
| Localization within Proximal Femur-unsatisfactory | 0 | 2 |
| Missing | 0 | 1 |
Participants with significant change in serum biomarkers of bone formation and resorption from baseline are reported. Significant changes were judged by investigator.
| participants | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Any Significant Changes in Serum Biomarkers of Bone Turnover From Baseline | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Evaluating local changes (expected increases) in BMD after administration of rhBMP-2/CPM, compared to those observed with systemic osteoporosis therapy alone. Alternatively, if changes in the total area surrounding the proximal femur are observed, bone mineral content (BMC) may instead be applied for the primary measure.
| mg/cm^3 | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cortical +Sub Cortical | 144.3 ± 16.81 | 166.3 ± 31.06 | 164.4 ± 29.37 |
| Peeled Trabecular | 61.1 ± 14.39 | 165.0 ± 59.13 | 159.3 ± 38.97 |
| Integral | 205.4 ± 23.02 | 331.3 ± 73.99 | 323.7 ± 58.96 |
Evaluating local changes (expected increases) in BMD after administration of rhBMP-2/CPM, compared to those observed with systemic osteoporosis therapy alone. The percentage change from baseline in BMD for total hip (assessed by DXA) is presented for the contralateral (untreated) hip below.
| Percent change | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage Change From Baseline in Areal Bone Mineral Density (BMD) for Contralateral Total Hip | 0.73 ± 0.057 | 0.71 ± 0.045 | 0.71 ± 0.110 |
Collected over Adverse events were collected from the time of written informed consent through 3 years, month 36 (Visit 10) for SOC participants and through Visit 12 (month 60) for participants who either received 1.0 mg/mL or 2.0 mg/mL of rhBMP-2/CPM.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard of Care Control | — | 3/17 (17.6%) | 13/17 (76.5%) |
| rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | — | 7/15 (46.7%) | 15/15 (100%) |
| rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL | — | 7/14 (50%) | 12/14 (85.7%) |
| Event | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| OsteonecrosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/17 | 0/15 | 2/14 |
| Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders | 0/17 | 0/15 | 1/14 |
| CystitisInfections and infestations | 0/17 | 0/15 | 1/14 |
| OesophagitisGastrointestinal disorders | 0/17 | 0/15 | 1/14 |
| Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging abnormalInvestigations | 0/17 | 0/15 | 1/14 |
| Bone infarctionMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/17 | 0/15 | 1/14 |
| OsteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 0/17 | 1/15 | 1/14 |
| Basal cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | 0/17 | 0/15 | 1/14 |
| HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders | 0/17 | 0/15 | 1/14 |
| Angina PectorisCardiac disorders | 0/17 | 1/15 | 0/14 |
| Event | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 5/17 | 12/15 | 9/14 |
| NauseaGastrointestinal disorders | 1/17 | 6/15 | 5/14 |
| Injection site painGeneral disorders | 0/17 | 0/15 | 5/14 |
| Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 0/17 | 2/15 | 5/14 |
| FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications | 4/17 | 5/15 | 3/14 |
| Joint swellingMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 2/17 | 3/15 | 4/14 |
| Pain in extremityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 3/17 | 2/15 | 4/14 |
| Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 2/17 | 4/15 | 3/14 |
| VomitingGastrointestinal disorders | 0/17 | 3/15 | 3/14 |
| CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 3/17 | 1/15 | 3/14 |
The as-treated population included randomly assigned participants who received at least 1 dose of rhBMP-2/CPM or comparator agent. Participants in the as-treated population are grouped according to the treatment they received (not the treatment to which they were randomly assigned).
| Age, Continuous(Years) | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 73.35 ± 5.454 | 75.93 ± 5.271 | 73.21 ± 5.041 | 74.15 ± 5.304 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Standard of Care Control | rhBMP-2/CPM 1.0 mg/mL | rhBMP-2/CPm 2.0 mg/mL | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 17 | 15 | 14 | 46 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Pfizer