An interventional study of Heliox gas in Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, sponsored by Hawaii Pacific Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 1 Minute to 12 Hours. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-08-26.
Sponsored by Hawaii Pacific Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and utility of using heliox gas in combination with nasal CPAP in premature infants. The investigators hypothesize that using heliox gas in combination with nasal CPAP will results in decreased early nasal CPAP failure requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Introduction: In recent years there has been an increased use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in the management of premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The use of early nCPAP eliminates the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, and their associated morbidities. In clinical practice a significant number of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants with RDS fail nCPAP therapy within the first 72 hours of life and require rescue endotracheal intubation. The clinical factors resulting in nCPAP failure are hypoxemia, hypoventilation, muscular fatigue and/or apnea. Helium is a biologically inert gas that is used in medicine as a carrier for oxygen. Heliox (mixture of helium and oxygen) has been used safely in neonates for decades and its use has been consistently been shown to improve oxygenation, enhance ventilation and decrease the work of breathing. Prior studies using heliox in the management of premature infants with RDS have shown clear therapeutic benefits. The use of heliox delivered via a nCPAP device (Hx-nCPAP) has recently been reported in infants with bronchiolitis. Given the prior success of heliox in the management of RDS combined with the recent advent of Hx-nCPAP we intend to investigate the utility of Hx-nCPAP in reducing the incidence of early nCPAP failure in ELBW infants with RDS.
Research design: Prospective, open-label, randomized, pilot study comparing conventional nCPAP to Hx-nCPAP in the management of ELBW infants being treated with nCPAP for RDS.
Methods: All spontaneously breathing infants born at \< 30 wks estimated gestational age (EGA) admitted to the NICU at KMCWC with the diagnosis of RDS and on nCPAP since birth will be eligible for enrollment. Volunteer Infants will be randomly assigned to conventional nCPAP or Hx-nCPAP groups. Hx-nCPAP will be provided to the study group infants for the first 72 hours of life. Primary and secondary outcome measures will be compared between the heliox group and control group to determine if Hx-nCPAP results in a decreased incidence of early nCPAP failure and/or improved clinical outcomes when compared to conventional nCPAP.
1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 13 is below the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.
Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →Hawaii Pacific Health is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Heliox gas added to nasal CPAP for the first 72 hours of life
Other: Heliox gas
Conventional nasal CPAP for the first 72 hours of life
Heliox gas used in conjunction with nasal CPAP
Nasal CPAP failure resulting in endotracheal intubation
Time frame: 72 hours of life
Bronchopulmonary dysplasia
Time frame: 36 weeks corrected gestational age
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: At hospital discharge
Death
Time frame: Prior to hospital discharge
Pulmonary interstitial emphysema
Time frame: 72 hours of life
Pneumothorax
Time frame: 72 hours of life
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Respiratory Distress Syndrome→
Hawaii Pacific Health