CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00732693Updated Aug 12, 2008

Evaluation of Physiologic and Standard Sex Steroid Replacement Regimens in Women With Premature Ovarian Failure

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ethinylestradiol / Norethisterone and Estradiol / Progesterone in Premature Ovarian Failure, sponsored by University of Edinburgh. Completed at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to female participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2008-08-12.

Sponsored by University of Edinburgh · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
42
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of the study is to determine whether physiological sex steroid replacement improves parameters of skeletal, cardiovascular and reproductive health of women treated with current sex steroid replacement regimens.

Read the detailed description

Premature ovarian failure, defined as the onset of the menopause before the age of 40 years, is a relatively common problem that affects 1% of women. There are a variety of aetiologies underlying premature ovarian failure including Turner syndrome and those with idiopathic onset, however with the increasing success of intensive treatment for childhood cancer, there are increasing numbers of young survivors, with a variety of late effects of treatment, including premature ovarian failure.

Evidence is required for the optimal management of young women with premature ovarian failure, either as a result of childhood cancer treatment or for other reasons. These women are currently offered combined sex steroid replacement in the convenient form of the oral contraceptive pill, or hormone replacement therapy, designed for older women after the menopause. These preparations are not designed to achieve physiological replacement of oestrogen or progesterone, either in dosage or in biochemical structure - many preparations using synthetic derivatives. These younger women who have differing metabolic and psychological requirements are looking to a future of 30 or more years of replacement. The optimal mode of SSR is not known for young women with premature ovarian failure, however there is concern that current regimens may be inadequate for optimal skeletal and cardiovascular health.

Current preliminary data demonstrates that use of physiological sex steroid replacement improves uterine parameters. Evidence is required to determine whether optimising sex steroid replacement can also significantly improve parameters of skeletal and cardiovascular health. Young women with ovarian failure face several decades of hormone replacement, so small improvements in management may make large differences to later morbidity and mortality.

The aim of the study is to determine whether physiological sex steroid replacement improves parameters of skeletal, cardiovascular and reproductive health of women treated with current sex steroid replacement regimens.

02

Conditions studied

  • Premature Ovarian Failure

Keywords

  • Premature ovarian failure
  • Sex hormone replacement
  • HRT
  • Blood pressure
  • Bone mineral density
  • Bone metabolism
  • Uterine function
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 42 is below the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Edinburgh is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Premature Ovarian Failure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intercurrent illness
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
42 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    1

    Treatment with standard sex steroid replacement regimen

    Drug: Ethinylestradiol / Norethisterone

  • Experimental
    2

    Treatment with physiologic sex steroid regimen

    Drug: Estradiol / Progesterone

Interventions

  • DrugEthinylestradiol / Norethisterone

    Oral ethinylestradiol 30mcg and norethisterone 1.5mg daily for weeks 1-3, followed by 7 "pill free" days

    Also known as: Loestrin 30, Galen Ltd, UK

  • DrugEstradiol / Progesterone

    Transdermal estradiol 100mcg daily for week 1, then 150mcg daily for weeks 2-4; and vaginal progesterone pessaries 200mg twice daily for weeks 3-4

    Also known as: Estraderm TTS, Novartis Pharmaceuticals UK Ltd, Cyclogest, Activis UK Ltd

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure

    Time frame: Before each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment

  2. Bone mineral density measurements (DEXA)

    Time frame: Baseline, 14 and 24 months

  3. Uterine ultrasound scan to assess uterine volume, endometrial thickness, and uterine artery blood flow

    Time frame: Before each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Central arterial blood pressure and arterial stiffness measured using peripheral arterial tonometry

    Time frame: Before each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase

  2. Biochemical evidence of activity on the renin-angiotensin system, including plasma renin activity, angiotensin II, aldosterone, creatinine, urea and electrolyte concentrations.

    Time frame: Before each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase

  3. Serum markers of collagen turnover and bone matrix formation

    Time frame: Before each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase

  4. Hormonal assays for gonadotrophins, FSH, LH and sex steroids estrogen and progesterone

    Time frame: Before each washout period, then at 0, 3, 6 and 12 months of each treatment phase

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh
    Edinburgh, EH16 4SA, United Kingdom
  • Royal Hospital for Sick Children
    Edinburgh, EH9 1LF, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bath LE, Critchley HO, Chambers SE, Anderson RA, Kelnar CJ, Wallace WH. Ovarian and uterine characteristics after total body irradiation in childhood and adolescence: response to sex steroid replacement. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Dec;106(12):1265-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08180.x. PubMed 10609720 ↗
  • Critchley HO, Buckley CH, Anderson DC. Experience with a 'physiological' steroid replacement regimen for the establishment of a receptive endometrium in women with premature ovarian failure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990 Sep;97(9):804-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1990.tb02574.x. PubMed 2242365 ↗
  • Critchley HO, Wallace WH, Shalet SM, Mamtora H, Higginson J, Anderson DC. Abdominal irradiation in childhood; the potential for pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 May;99(5):392-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb13755.x. PubMed 1622911 ↗
  • Davies MC, Gulekli B, Jacobs HS. Osteoporosis in Turner's syndrome and other forms of primary amenorrhoea. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995 Dec;43(6):741-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.1995.tb00544.x. PubMed 8736278 ↗
  • Hansen SW, Olsen N. Raynaud's phenomenon in patients treated with cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin for germ cell cancer: measurement of vasoconstrictor response to cold. J Clin Oncol. 1989 Jul;7(7):940-2. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.7.940. PubMed 2472472 ↗
  • Hawkins MM, Smith RA. Pregnancy outcomes in childhood cancer survivors: probable effects of abdominal irradiation. Int J Cancer. 1989 Mar 15;43(3):399-402. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910430309. PubMed 2538400 ↗
  • Hoorweg-Nijman JJ, Kardos G, Roos JC, van Dijk HJ, Netelenbos C, Popp-Snijders C, de Ridder CM, Delemarre-van de Waal HA. Bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover in young adult survivors of childhood lymphoblastic leukaemia. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999 Feb;50(2):237-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00654.x. PubMed 10396368 ↗
  • Howell SJ, Shalet SM. Aetiology-specific effect of premature ovarian failure on bone mass - is residual ovarian function important? Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1999 Nov;51(5):531-4. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00891.x. No abstract available. PubMed 10594512 ↗
  • Kaneko N, Kawagoe S, Hiroi M. Turner's syndrome--review of the literature with reference to a successful pregnancy outcome. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1990;29(2):81-7. doi: 10.1159/000293307. PubMed 2185981 ↗
  • Krolner B, Pors Nielsen S. Bone mineral content of the lumbar spine in normal and osteoporotic women: cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Clin Sci (Lond). 1982 Mar;62(3):329-36. doi: 10.1042/cs0620329. PubMed 6977427 ↗
  • Mendelsohn ME, Karas RH. The protective effects of estrogen on the cardiovascular system. N Engl J Med. 1999 Jun 10;340(23):1801-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906103402306. No abstract available. PubMed 10362825 ↗
  • Register TC, Jayo MJ, Jerome CP. Oral contraceptive treatment inhibits the normal acquisition of bone mineral in skeletally immature young adult female monkeys. Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(4):348-53. doi: 10.1007/BF01623776. PubMed 9373569 ↗
  • Rubin K. Turner syndrome and osteoporosis: mechanisms and prognosis. Pediatrics. 1998 Aug;102(2 Pt 3):481-5. PubMed 9685448 ↗
  • Saenger P. Clinical review 48: The current status of diagnosis and therapeutic intervention in Turner's syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Aug;77(2):297-301. doi: 10.1210/jcem.77.2.8345029. No abstract available. PubMed 8345029 ↗
  • O'Donnell RL, Warner P, Lee RJ, Walker J, Bath LE, Kelnar CJ, Wallace WH, Critchley HO. Physiological sex steroid replacement in premature ovarian failure: randomized crossover trial of effect on uterine volume, endometrial thickness and blood flow, compared with a standard regimen. Hum Reprod. 2012 Apr;27(4):1130-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des004. Epub 2012 Feb 16. PubMed 22343553 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2008, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00732693
Lead sponsor
University of Edinburgh
First posted
Aug 12, 2008
Start date
Feb 2002
Primary completion
Nov 2006
Completion
Nov 2006
Last update
Aug 12, 2008

Study contacts

W Hamish B Wallace, MD
principal investigator · NHS Lothian / University of Edinburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion