ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07812844PATTMIDCUpdated Sep 28, 2026

Public Attitudes Towards Traditional Medicine in Dermatological Care Within Blantyre, Malawi: Insights From Subject Matter Experts

An observational study in Skin Conditions and Traditional Medicine, sponsored by University of Edinburgh. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by University of Edinburgh · Observational

Updated Sep 28, 2026Eligibility revisedTitle changedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
13
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to understand how people in Blantyre, Malawi recognise and manage common skin problems, and what role traditional medicine plays in their care. The main question it aims to answer are:

  • How do people recognise and treat common skin conditions
  • What can we learn from traditional knowledge to improve skin education and care Participants will take part in a study lasting 20 minutes. They will be asked about their experiences and where they seek help.
Read the detailed description

This is an 8-week study through which is intended to conduct a review of the use of traditional medicine in dermatologic care through interviews with patients and traditional healers. The findings would allow equitable knowledge exchange about presentations of skin conditions on black skin and treatment approaches that center African knowledge systems.

Within Western medical education, in lectures and medical textbooks, there is a lack of teaching and images depicting the presentation of skin conditions on darker skin. This is a problem because diagnosis is dependent on the pattern recognition skills of the clinician, therefore, a lack of exposure to images of darker skin increases the chance of misdiagnosis. In various countries in sub-Saharan Africa, there are few dermatologists in the region and healthcare workers in the primary sector are not sufficiently trained to manage common skin conditions. The knowledge generated in Western countries informs practices in sub-Saharan Africa with little adaptation to suit the local needs of the population. This also holds true for the medical training in these countries, which upholds medical racism because the curricula are not decolonised. Apart from the direct practice of dermatology, healthcare workers are also responsible for improving the health literacy of their population. The chief investigator spoke to a doctor currently practising in Malawi, who mentioned that black skin is mostly depicted in books focusing on tropical medicine, while other medical books depict white skin. The intention of this study is to conduct interviews exploring this topic and create drawings that depict skin conditions on darker skin.

It is important to understand the approaches that local cultures use to manage common skin conditions, which range from recognition to treatment strategies. This includes the use of traditional medicine - ethnobotanical practices and healers - that are more easily accessible than the local dermatologists, whose access tends to be limited to the private sector. This study will have a particular focus on how laypeople/the public engage with dermatology.

There is a need for the development of programs and resources that incorporate Western biomedical knowledge with local indigenous ways of knowing. This research is important to bring visibility, as a lack of prioritisation of black skin health in Western countries directly translates to the experience of people dealing with skin conditions in African countries.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Conditions and Traditional Medicine

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • dermatology
  • skin conditions
  • traditional medicine
  • ethnomedicine
  • Blantyre
  • Malawi
  • semi-structured interviews
  • decolonising medicine
  • health equity
  • health literacy
03

In context

Skin Diseases

496 studies on the registry are indexed under Skin Diseases; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 13 is below the median of 165 across 101 observational studies indexed under Skin Diseases.

Browse Skin Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Edinburgh is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Sep 28, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adults who are clinicians or subject matter experts on skin conditions in Blantyre, Malawi.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over the age of 18
  • Speaks English
  • Involvement in the provision of care or study of skin conditions in either Western Medicine or Malawian ethnobotany
  • Willing and able to provide informed verbal consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  • Under 18 years of age
  • Individuals unable to give such as people lacking capacity
  • Vulnerable populations such as children, refugees, prisoners, and individuals who are politically powerless
  • Unwilling and unable to provide informed verbal consent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
13 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number and content of themes describing participants' understanding and the role of traditional medicine use in the identification, treatment, and management of skin conditions, using reflexive thematic analysis of the semi-structured interviews

    Time frame: Single interview at enrollment

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mosam A, Todd G. Dermatology Training in Africa: Successes and Challenges. Dermatol Clin. 2021 Jan;39(1):57-71. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2020.08.006. PubMed 33228862 ↗
  • Makaula PU, Chateau AV, Hift RJ, Dlova NC, Mosam A. The impact of basic dermatology education and training on primary healthcare providers in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2021 Jan 15;63(1):e1-e5. doi: 10.4102/safp.v63i1.5200. PubMed 33567838 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This is sensitive information that, if shared, could increase the likelihood of identifying the participants.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 8 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 1, 2026
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 16, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 6, 2027
Last update
Sep 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Eligibility
2 inclusion criteria edited, 1 added, 3 removed; 1 exclusion criterion edited, 2 added, 1 removed
What changed in the criteria
Inclusion criteria
  • EditedSpeaks Chichewa or English
  • RemovedPublic participants: self-reported past or present experience of a skin condition or concern
  • RemovedHealers: involvement in providing care or treatment for skin conditions
  • RemovedResident in Blantyre, Malawi
  • AddedInvolvement in the provision of care or study of skin conditions in either Western Medicine or Malawian ethnobotany
  • EditedWilling and able to provide written informedinformed verbal consent.
Exclusion criteria
  • EditedIndividuals unable to give informed consent such as people lacking capacity
  • RemovedIndividuals who are not a resident of Malawi
  • AddedVulnerable populations such as children, refugees, prisoners, and individuals who are politically powerless
  • AddedUnwilling and unable to provide informed verbal consent.
Sep 28, 2026
Title
Public Attitudes Towards Traditional Medicine in Dermatological Care Within Blantyre, Malawi: Insights From Subject Matter Experts
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 28, 2026
    Eligibility 2 inclusion criteria edited, 1 added, 3 removed; 1 exclusion criterion edited, 2 added, 1 removed
    What changed in the criteria
    Inclusion criteria
    • EditedSpeaks Chichewa or English
    • RemovedPublic participants: self-reported past or present experience of a skin condition or concern
    • RemovedHealers: involvement in providing care or treatment for skin conditions
    • RemovedResident in Blantyre, Malawi
    • AddedInvolvement in the provision of care or study of skin conditions in either Western Medicine or Malawian ethnobotany
    • EditedWilling and able to provide written informedinformed verbal consent.
    Exclusion criteria
    • EditedIndividuals unable to give informed consent such as people lacking capacity
    • RemovedIndividuals who are not a resident of Malawi
    • AddedVulnerable populations such as children, refugees, prisoners, and individuals who are politically powerless
    • AddedUnwilling and unable to provide informed verbal consent.
    Title Public Attitudes Towards Traditional Medicine in Dermatological Care Within Blantyre, Malawi: Insights From Subject Matter Experts
    + 1 other change: description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07812844
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
Start date
Dec 13, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 16, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 6, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion